Survival and growth response of white spruce stock types to site preparation in Alaska
To identify suitable methods for reforestation, we evaluated the interacting effects of past disturbance, stock types, and site preparation treatments on white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedling survival and growth across a range of sites in Alaska. Replicated experiments were established...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 2011-04, Vol.41 (4), p.793-809 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 809 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 793 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | YOUNGBLOOD, Andrew COLE, Elizabeth NEWTON, Michael |
description | To identify suitable methods for reforestation, we evaluated the interacting effects of past disturbance, stock types, and site preparation treatments on white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedling survival and growth across a range of sites in Alaska. Replicated experiments were established in five regions. At each site, two complete installations differed in time since disturbance: “new” units were harvested immediately before spring planting and “old” units were harvested at least 3 years before planting. We compared mechanical scarification before planting, broadcast herbicide application during the fall before planting, and no site preparation with 1-year-old container-grown seedlings from two sources, 2-year-old bare-root transplants from two sources, and 3-year-old bare-root transplants. Seedlings were followed for 11 years on most sites. Based on meta-analyses, seedling survival increased 10% with herbicide application and 15% with mechanical scarification compared with no site preparation. Scarification and herbicide application increased seedling height by about 28% and 35%, respectively, and increased seedling volume by about 86% and 195%, respectively, compared with no site preparation. Soil temperature did not differ among site preparation methods after the first 7 years. Results suggest that white spruce stands may be successfully restored through a combination of vegetation control and use of quality planting stock. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/x11-001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_863827597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A266598864</galeid><sourcerecordid>A266598864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-23f66efac93adde743183d9d3c23c30c33fe6450d4729a59d87e6afbbd0f487d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0t9rFDEQB_BFFDyr-C-EikqFrdnNbnb38ShqC6WCVV_DNJncpd1L0iTbH_-9KXcUr5wPkoeB5JMZGL5F8baih1XFhs93VVVSWj0rZlVN-5JT1j0vZpQ2bdlS3r0sXsV4SSllnNFZ8ft8CjfmBkYCVpFFcLdpSQJG72xE4jS5XZqEJPowyVySk1ck3XuMJDkSH558QA8BknGWGEvmI8QreF280DBGfLOpe8Wvr19-Hh2Xp9-_nRzNT0vZNn0qa6Y5Rw1yYKAUdg2reqYGxWTNJKOSMY28aalqunqAdlB9hxz0xYWiuuk7xfaK_XVfH9z1hDGJSzcFm0eKnrO-7tqhy-jdGi1gRGGsdimAXJkoxbzmvB36njdZlTvUAi0GGJ1FbfL1lt_f4aU31-JvdLgD5aNwZeTOrgdbH7JJeJcWMMUoTs5__Ic927Yf11YGF2NALXwwKwj3oqLiITci50bk3GT5frNSiBJGHcBKEx953dSU1S3N7sPa2SBzYBCCXD6qTTPhlc7w07_h0-l_AEvo2UA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863827597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival and growth response of white spruce stock types to site preparation in Alaska</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>YOUNGBLOOD, Andrew ; COLE, Elizabeth ; NEWTON, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>YOUNGBLOOD, Andrew ; COLE, Elizabeth ; NEWTON, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>To identify suitable methods for reforestation, we evaluated the interacting effects of past disturbance, stock types, and site preparation treatments on white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedling survival and growth across a range of sites in Alaska. Replicated experiments were established in five regions. At each site, two complete installations differed in time since disturbance: “new” units were harvested immediately before spring planting and “old” units were harvested at least 3 years before planting. We compared mechanical scarification before planting, broadcast herbicide application during the fall before planting, and no site preparation with 1-year-old container-grown seedlings from two sources, 2-year-old bare-root transplants from two sources, and 3-year-old bare-root transplants. Seedlings were followed for 11 years on most sites. Based on meta-analyses, seedling survival increased 10% with herbicide application and 15% with mechanical scarification compared with no site preparation. Scarification and herbicide application increased seedling height by about 28% and 35%, respectively, and increased seedling volume by about 86% and 195%, respectively, compared with no site preparation. Soil temperature did not differ among site preparation methods after the first 7 years. Results suggest that white spruce stands may be successfully restored through a combination of vegetation control and use of quality planting stock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x11-001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, ON: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Comparative analysis ; Effects ; Environmental aspects ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Growth ; Growth (Plants) ; Herbicides ; Planting ; Reforestation ; Seedlings ; Soil temperature ; Spruce ; Survival after airplane accidents, shipwrecks, etc ; Temperature ; Trees ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2011-04, Vol.41 (4), p.793-809</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-23f66efac93adde743183d9d3c23c30c33fe6450d4729a59d87e6afbbd0f487d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-23f66efac93adde743183d9d3c23c30c33fe6450d4729a59d87e6afbbd0f487d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24203250$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>YOUNGBLOOD, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLE, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWTON, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Survival and growth response of white spruce stock types to site preparation in Alaska</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><description>To identify suitable methods for reforestation, we evaluated the interacting effects of past disturbance, stock types, and site preparation treatments on white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedling survival and growth across a range of sites in Alaska. Replicated experiments were established in five regions. At each site, two complete installations differed in time since disturbance: “new” units were harvested immediately before spring planting and “old” units were harvested at least 3 years before planting. We compared mechanical scarification before planting, broadcast herbicide application during the fall before planting, and no site preparation with 1-year-old container-grown seedlings from two sources, 2-year-old bare-root transplants from two sources, and 3-year-old bare-root transplants. Seedlings were followed for 11 years on most sites. Based on meta-analyses, seedling survival increased 10% with herbicide application and 15% with mechanical scarification compared with no site preparation. Scarification and herbicide application increased seedling height by about 28% and 35%, respectively, and increased seedling volume by about 86% and 195%, respectively, compared with no site preparation. Soil temperature did not differ among site preparation methods after the first 7 years. Results suggest that white spruce stands may be successfully restored through a combination of vegetation control and use of quality planting stock.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Growth (Plants)</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Spruce</subject><subject>Survival after airplane accidents, shipwrecks, etc</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV0t9rFDEQB_BFFDyr-C-EikqFrdnNbnb38ShqC6WCVV_DNJncpd1L0iTbH_-9KXcUr5wPkoeB5JMZGL5F8baih1XFhs93VVVSWj0rZlVN-5JT1j0vZpQ2bdlS3r0sXsV4SSllnNFZ8ft8CjfmBkYCVpFFcLdpSQJG72xE4jS5XZqEJPowyVySk1ck3XuMJDkSH558QA8BknGWGEvmI8QreF280DBGfLOpe8Wvr19-Hh2Xp9-_nRzNT0vZNn0qa6Y5Rw1yYKAUdg2reqYGxWTNJKOSMY28aalqunqAdlB9hxz0xYWiuuk7xfaK_XVfH9z1hDGJSzcFm0eKnrO-7tqhy-jdGi1gRGGsdimAXJkoxbzmvB36njdZlTvUAi0GGJ1FbfL1lt_f4aU31-JvdLgD5aNwZeTOrgdbH7JJeJcWMMUoTs5__Ic927Yf11YGF2NALXwwKwj3oqLiITci50bk3GT5frNSiBJGHcBKEx953dSU1S3N7sPa2SBzYBCCXD6qTTPhlc7w07_h0-l_AEvo2UA</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>YOUNGBLOOD, Andrew</creator><creator>COLE, Elizabeth</creator><creator>NEWTON, Michael</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Survival and growth response of white spruce stock types to site preparation in Alaska</title><author>YOUNGBLOOD, Andrew ; COLE, Elizabeth ; NEWTON, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-23f66efac93adde743183d9d3c23c30c33fe6450d4729a59d87e6afbbd0f487d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Growth (Plants)</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Spruce</topic><topic>Survival after airplane accidents, shipwrecks, etc</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>YOUNGBLOOD, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLE, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWTON, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>YOUNGBLOOD, Andrew</au><au>COLE, Elizabeth</au><au>NEWTON, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival and growth response of white spruce stock types to site preparation in Alaska</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>793</spage><epage>809</epage><pages>793-809</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>To identify suitable methods for reforestation, we evaluated the interacting effects of past disturbance, stock types, and site preparation treatments on white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedling survival and growth across a range of sites in Alaska. Replicated experiments were established in five regions. At each site, two complete installations differed in time since disturbance: “new” units were harvested immediately before spring planting and “old” units were harvested at least 3 years before planting. We compared mechanical scarification before planting, broadcast herbicide application during the fall before planting, and no site preparation with 1-year-old container-grown seedlings from two sources, 2-year-old bare-root transplants from two sources, and 3-year-old bare-root transplants. Seedlings were followed for 11 years on most sites. Based on meta-analyses, seedling survival increased 10% with herbicide application and 15% with mechanical scarification compared with no site preparation. Scarification and herbicide application increased seedling height by about 28% and 35%, respectively, and increased seedling volume by about 86% and 195%, respectively, compared with no site preparation. Soil temperature did not differ among site preparation methods after the first 7 years. Results suggest that white spruce stands may be successfully restored through a combination of vegetation control and use of quality planting stock.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, ON</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x11-001</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 2011-04, Vol.41 (4), p.793-809 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_863827597 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Comparative analysis Effects Environmental aspects Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Growth Growth (Plants) Herbicides Planting Reforestation Seedlings Soil temperature Spruce Survival after airplane accidents, shipwrecks, etc Temperature Trees Vegetation |
title | Survival and growth response of white spruce stock types to site preparation in Alaska |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A33%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20and%20growth%20response%20of%20white%20spruce%20stock%20types%20to%20site%20preparation%20in%20Alaska&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=YOUNGBLOOD,%20Andrew&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=793&rft.epage=809&rft.pages=793-809&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x11-001&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA266598864%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863827597&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A266598864&rfr_iscdi=true |