Resolving The Principal Place of Business Conundrum: Adopting A Single Test For Federal Diversity Jurisdiction
28 Certainty and ease of application are the hallmarks of the nerve center test.29 As the Seventh Circuit explained: Since certainty of jurisdiction is a desideratum too - the parties ought to know definitely what court they belong in, and not face the prospect that their litigation may be set at na...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Review of litigation 2010-10, Vol.30 (1), p.75 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 75 |
| container_title | The Review of litigation |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Chaplin, Michael E |
| description | 28 Certainty and ease of application are the hallmarks of the nerve center test.29 As the Seventh Circuit explained: Since certainty of jurisdiction is a desideratum too - the parties ought to know definitely what court they belong in, and not face the prospect that their litigation may be set at naught because they made a wrong guess about jurisdiction - this circuit has long used a simple nerve center test for principal place of business.30 The corporation's nerve center is ordinarily found where the corporation has its headquarters. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_859438600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307396521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_8594386003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM0KgkAURmdR0O87XNoLE2pau7IkWkW5F9FrXZlmbK4T9PYZ9ACtzuJ85xuIsYz8wAvkMhyJCXMjpYziWI6FviAb9SJ9g-yOcLakS2oLBWdVlAimhp1j0sgMidFOV9Y9NrCtTNt9my1ceyiEDLmD1FhIsULb93t6oWXq3nBylriisiOjZ2JYF4px_uNULNJDlhy91pqn6z_yxjire5XH4Trw45WU_l-jD7_BSJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859438600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resolving The Principal Place of Business Conundrum: Adopting A Single Test For Federal Diversity Jurisdiction</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Chaplin, Michael E</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaplin, Michael E</creatorcontrib><description>28 Certainty and ease of application are the hallmarks of the nerve center test.29 As the Seventh Circuit explained: Since certainty of jurisdiction is a desideratum too - the parties ought to know definitely what court they belong in, and not face the prospect that their litigation may be set at naught because they made a wrong guess about jurisdiction - this circuit has long used a simple nerve center test for principal place of business.30 The corporation's nerve center is ordinarily found where the corporation has its headquarters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-4015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Corporate objectives ; Cost reduction ; Executives ; Federal court decisions ; Home office deduction ; Jurisdiction ; Litigation ; Principal place of business ; Sales ; Shipments</subject><ispartof>The Review of litigation, 2010-10, Vol.30 (1), p.75</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc. Fall 2010</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaplin, Michael E</creatorcontrib><title>Resolving The Principal Place of Business Conundrum: Adopting A Single Test For Federal Diversity Jurisdiction</title><title>The Review of litigation</title><description>28 Certainty and ease of application are the hallmarks of the nerve center test.29 As the Seventh Circuit explained: Since certainty of jurisdiction is a desideratum too - the parties ought to know definitely what court they belong in, and not face the prospect that their litigation may be set at naught because they made a wrong guess about jurisdiction - this circuit has long used a simple nerve center test for principal place of business.30 The corporation's nerve center is ordinarily found where the corporation has its headquarters.</description><subject>Corporate objectives</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Home office deduction</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Principal place of business</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Shipments</subject><issn>0734-4015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM0KgkAURmdR0O87XNoLE2pau7IkWkW5F9FrXZlmbK4T9PYZ9ACtzuJ85xuIsYz8wAvkMhyJCXMjpYziWI6FviAb9SJ9g-yOcLakS2oLBWdVlAimhp1j0sgMidFOV9Y9NrCtTNt9my1ceyiEDLmD1FhIsULb93t6oWXq3nBylriisiOjZ2JYF4px_uNULNJDlhy91pqn6z_yxjire5XH4Trw45WU_l-jD7_BSJI</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Chaplin, Michael E</creator><general>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Resolving The Principal Place of Business Conundrum: Adopting A Single Test For Federal Diversity Jurisdiction</title><author>Chaplin, Michael E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_8594386003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Corporate objectives</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Home office deduction</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Principal place of business</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Shipments</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaplin, Michael E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Review of litigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaplin, Michael E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resolving The Principal Place of Business Conundrum: Adopting A Single Test For Federal Diversity Jurisdiction</atitle><jtitle>The Review of litigation</jtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><pages>75-</pages><issn>0734-4015</issn><abstract>28 Certainty and ease of application are the hallmarks of the nerve center test.29 As the Seventh Circuit explained: Since certainty of jurisdiction is a desideratum too - the parties ought to know definitely what court they belong in, and not face the prospect that their litigation may be set at naught because they made a wrong guess about jurisdiction - this circuit has long used a simple nerve center test for principal place of business.30 The corporation's nerve center is ordinarily found where the corporation has its headquarters.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0734-4015 |
| ispartof | The Review of litigation, 2010-10, Vol.30 (1), p.75 |
| issn | 0734-4015 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_859438600 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Corporate objectives Cost reduction Executives Federal court decisions Home office deduction Jurisdiction Litigation Principal place of business Sales Shipments |
| title | Resolving The Principal Place of Business Conundrum: Adopting A Single Test For Federal Diversity Jurisdiction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A16%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resolving%20The%20Principal%20Place%20of%20Business%20Conundrum:%20Adopting%20A%20Single%20Test%20For%20Federal%20Diversity%20Jurisdiction&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20litigation&rft.au=Chaplin,%20Michael%20E&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.pages=75-&rft.issn=0734-4015&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2307396521%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859438600&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |