Supplementary Protection Certificates for Plant Protection Products and Provisional Marketing Authorization: The ECJ's Decision in Lovells v. Bayer
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a decision regarding supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for plant protection products and provisional marketing authorisation. The ECJ clarified that SPCs for patented plant protection products may also be based on provisional marketing authoriz...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of risk regulation 2011, Vol.2 (1), p.115-118 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 118 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 115 |
| container_title | European journal of risk regulation |
| container_volume | 2 |
| creator | Bonadio, Enrico |
| description | The European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a decision regarding supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for plant protection products and provisional marketing authorisation. The ECJ clarified that SPCs for patented plant protection products may also be based on provisional marketing authorizations pursuant to Article 8(1) Directive 91/114 (author's headnote). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1867299X00000702 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_859007442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1867299X00000702</cupid><jstor_id>24323252</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24323252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-3cc9bd9ee21543c5fab6c21cedd226d273ad3edfdf41ac039636e3b2fc9acca63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAYhYMoOHQ_wAsheONVZz7arvFO5zcTB1PwrqTJW83smpmkA_0b_mFbN1QQc5O8Oc85IQehPUoGlNDh0ZRm6ZAJ8Ui6NSRsA_UYFSTKWCw2Ua-To07fRn3vZx0UC5JlpIc-ps1iUcEc6iDdG544G0AFY2s8AhdMaZQM4HFpHZ5Usg6_ifaoGxU8lrXuhqXx7bWs8K10LxBM_YRPmvBsnXmXneEY3z8DPh_dHHp8BuqLxqbGY7uEqvJ4OcCn8g3cLtoqZeWhv9530MPF-f3oKhrfXV6PTsaR4iRlEVdKFFoAMJrEXCWlLFLFqAKtGUs1G3KpOehSlzGVinCR8hR4wUolpFIy5TvoYJW7cPa1AR_ymW1c-wGfZ4loi4xj1kJ0BSlnvXdQ5gtn5m1XOSV5137-p_3Ws7_yzHyw7tvAYs44SzqdrzPlvHBGP8HPy_-nfgLaLpPa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859007442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplementary Protection Certificates for Plant Protection Products and Provisional Marketing Authorization: The ECJ's Decision in Lovells v. Bayer</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Bonadio, Enrico</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonadio, Enrico</creatorcontrib><description>The European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a decision regarding supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for plant protection products and provisional marketing authorisation. The ECJ clarified that SPCs for patented plant protection products may also be based on provisional marketing authorizations pursuant to Article 8(1) Directive 91/114 (author's headnote).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-299X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-8249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1867299X00000702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria ; Business structures ; Case Notes ; Crop protection ; Groundwater ; Herbicides ; Humans ; Industrial regulation ; Marketing ; Plants ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>European journal of risk regulation, 2011, Vol.2 (1), p.115-118</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-3cc9bd9ee21543c5fab6c21cedd226d273ad3edfdf41ac039636e3b2fc9acca63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24323252$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1867299X00000702/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,4024,27923,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonadio, Enrico</creatorcontrib><title>Supplementary Protection Certificates for Plant Protection Products and Provisional Marketing Authorization: The ECJ's Decision in Lovells v. Bayer</title><title>European journal of risk regulation</title><addtitle>Eur. j. risk regul</addtitle><description>The European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a decision regarding supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for plant protection products and provisional marketing authorisation. The ECJ clarified that SPCs for patented plant protection products may also be based on provisional marketing authorizations pursuant to Article 8(1) Directive 91/114 (author's headnote).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Case Notes</subject><subject>Crop protection</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industrial regulation</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>1867-299X</issn><issn>2190-8249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAYhYMoOHQ_wAsheONVZz7arvFO5zcTB1PwrqTJW83smpmkA_0b_mFbN1QQc5O8Oc85IQehPUoGlNDh0ZRm6ZAJ8Ui6NSRsA_UYFSTKWCw2Ua-To07fRn3vZx0UC5JlpIc-ps1iUcEc6iDdG544G0AFY2s8AhdMaZQM4HFpHZ5Usg6_ifaoGxU8lrXuhqXx7bWs8K10LxBM_YRPmvBsnXmXneEY3z8DPh_dHHp8BuqLxqbGY7uEqvJ4OcCn8g3cLtoqZeWhv9530MPF-f3oKhrfXV6PTsaR4iRlEVdKFFoAMJrEXCWlLFLFqAKtGUs1G3KpOehSlzGVinCR8hR4wUolpFIy5TvoYJW7cPa1AR_ymW1c-wGfZ4loi4xj1kJ0BSlnvXdQ5gtn5m1XOSV5137-p_3Ws7_yzHyw7tvAYs44SzqdrzPlvHBGP8HPy_-nfgLaLpPa</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Bonadio, Enrico</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Supplementary Protection Certificates for Plant Protection Products and Provisional Marketing Authorization: The ECJ's Decision in Lovells v. Bayer</title><author>Bonadio, Enrico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-3cc9bd9ee21543c5fab6c21cedd226d273ad3edfdf41ac039636e3b2fc9acca63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Case Notes</topic><topic>Crop protection</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industrial regulation</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonadio, Enrico</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of risk regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonadio, Enrico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplementary Protection Certificates for Plant Protection Products and Provisional Marketing Authorization: The ECJ's Decision in Lovells v. Bayer</atitle><jtitle>European journal of risk regulation</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. j. risk regul</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>115-118</pages><issn>1867-299X</issn><eissn>2190-8249</eissn><abstract>The European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a decision regarding supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for plant protection products and provisional marketing authorisation. The ECJ clarified that SPCs for patented plant protection products may also be based on provisional marketing authorizations pursuant to Article 8(1) Directive 91/114 (author's headnote).</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1867299X00000702</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1867-299X |
| ispartof | European journal of risk regulation, 2011, Vol.2 (1), p.115-118 |
| issn | 1867-299X 2190-8249 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_859007442 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Animals Bacteria Business structures Case Notes Crop protection Groundwater Herbicides Humans Industrial regulation Marketing Plants Sustainable agriculture |
| title | Supplementary Protection Certificates for Plant Protection Products and Provisional Marketing Authorization: The ECJ's Decision in Lovells v. Bayer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A29%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplementary%20Protection%20Certificates%20for%20Plant%20Protection%20Products%20and%20Provisional%20Marketing%20Authorization:%20The%20ECJ's%20Decision%20in%20Lovells%20v.%20Bayer&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20risk%20regulation&rft.au=Bonadio,%20Enrico&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=115-118&rft.issn=1867-299X&rft.eissn=2190-8249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1867299X00000702&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24323252%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859007442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1867299X00000702&rft_jstor_id=24323252&rfr_iscdi=true |