The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women

Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American economic review 2010-05, Vol.100 (2), p.229-233
Hauptverfasser: Becker, Gary S., Hubbard, William H. J., Murphy, Kevin M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 2
container_start_page 229
container_title The American economic review
container_volume 100
creator Becker, Gary S.
Hubbard, William H. J.
Murphy, Kevin M.
description Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears that the average noncognitive abilities of women are higher than the average for men, as measured by average grades in school and standardized test scores, and that the inequality in noncognitive abilities is lower for women, as measured by the variances in these grades and test scores. Lower inequality of noncognitive abilities among women than men implies that elasticities of supply to college would be greater for women than men, since heterogeneity in costs of college attendance would be lower for women. Further, greater average noncognitive abilities of women than men implies that the supply of women to college would be greater than that of men when their benefits were the same. Together, these gender differences explain how the increased demand for college graduates that occurred in most countries during the past 30 years would have increased the supply of women by more than the supply of men, leading to women's college attendance surpassing that of men.
doi_str_mv 10.1257/aer.100.2.229
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_854916892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27804995</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27804995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-bbb817e34afa59e0daacae35b3b39acb815cfb6e0dfb2717c73f795f9cbd43cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbq0aMQvO-aj90mOWqprVDxsuIx5LPdut3UZBfx35tS8TQzzMMMvADcYlRiUrMH5WKJESpJSYg4AxMsqqpgguNzMEEIkYITTi7BVUo7dJwxm4Cm2Tr4quKnG6APEc5D17mNg8uo7KgGl6DqLRwy-gixs9-tdfAphD1se7hqN1sX4cKORg1t6GHwWe1dfw0uvOqSu_mrU_D-vGjmq2L9tnyZP64LQzEfCq01x8zRSnlVC4esUkY5WmuqqVAmL2vj9SwvvCYMM8OoZ6L2wmhbUWPpFNyf7h5i-BpdGuQujLHPLyWvK4FnXJCMihMyMaQUnZeH2O5V_JEYyWNuMueWeySJzLllf3fyuzSE-I8J46gSoqa_6O1rIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>854916892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Becker, Gary S. ; Hubbard, William H. J. ; Murphy, Kevin M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S. ; Hubbard, William H. J. ; Murphy, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><description>Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears that the average noncognitive abilities of women are higher than the average for men, as measured by average grades in school and standardized test scores, and that the inequality in noncognitive abilities is lower for women, as measured by the variances in these grades and test scores. Lower inequality of noncognitive abilities among women than men implies that elasticities of supply to college would be greater for women than men, since heterogeneity in costs of college attendance would be lower for women. Further, greater average noncognitive abilities of women than men implies that the supply of women to college would be greater than that of men when their benefits were the same. Together, these gender differences explain how the increased demand for college graduates that occurred in most countries during the past 30 years would have increased the supply of women by more than the supply of men, leading to women's college attendance surpassing that of men.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.2.229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>College graduates ; Colleges ; Consumption ; Economics ; Expected utility ; Financial investments ; GDP ; Gender differences ; Gross Domestic Product ; Higher education ; Human capital ; Investments ; Marriage ; Men ; NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN CAPITAL ; Per capita ; Studies ; Supply ; Supply curves ; Tuition ; Wage differential ; Women ; Womens education</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2010-05, Vol.100 (2), p.229-233</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2010 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-bbb817e34afa59e0daacae35b3b39acb815cfb6e0dfb2717c73f795f9cbd43cd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27804995$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27804995$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3735,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, William H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears that the average noncognitive abilities of women are higher than the average for men, as measured by average grades in school and standardized test scores, and that the inequality in noncognitive abilities is lower for women, as measured by the variances in these grades and test scores. Lower inequality of noncognitive abilities among women than men implies that elasticities of supply to college would be greater for women than men, since heterogeneity in costs of college attendance would be lower for women. Further, greater average noncognitive abilities of women than men implies that the supply of women to college would be greater than that of men when their benefits were the same. Together, these gender differences explain how the increased demand for college graduates that occurred in most countries during the past 30 years would have increased the supply of women by more than the supply of men, leading to women's college attendance surpassing that of men.</description><subject>College graduates</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN CAPITAL</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Supply curves</subject><subject>Tuition</subject><subject>Wage differential</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens education</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbq0aMQvO-aj90mOWqprVDxsuIx5LPdut3UZBfx35tS8TQzzMMMvADcYlRiUrMH5WKJESpJSYg4AxMsqqpgguNzMEEIkYITTi7BVUo7dJwxm4Cm2Tr4quKnG6APEc5D17mNg8uo7KgGl6DqLRwy-gixs9-tdfAphD1se7hqN1sX4cKORg1t6GHwWe1dfw0uvOqSu_mrU_D-vGjmq2L9tnyZP64LQzEfCq01x8zRSnlVC4esUkY5WmuqqVAmL2vj9SwvvCYMM8OoZ6L2wmhbUWPpFNyf7h5i-BpdGuQujLHPLyWvK4FnXJCMihMyMaQUnZeH2O5V_JEYyWNuMueWeySJzLllf3fyuzSE-I8J46gSoqa_6O1rIA</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Becker, Gary S.</creator><creator>Hubbard, William H. J.</creator><creator>Murphy, Kevin M.</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women</title><author>Becker, Gary S. ; Hubbard, William H. J. ; Murphy, Kevin M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-bbb817e34afa59e0daacae35b3b39acb815cfb6e0dfb2717c73f795f9cbd43cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>College graduates</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN CAPITAL</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Supply curves</topic><topic>Tuition</topic><topic>Wage differential</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, William H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, Gary S.</au><au>Hubbard, William H. J.</au><au>Murphy, Kevin M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>229-233</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><abstract>Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears that the average noncognitive abilities of women are higher than the average for men, as measured by average grades in school and standardized test scores, and that the inequality in noncognitive abilities is lower for women, as measured by the variances in these grades and test scores. Lower inequality of noncognitive abilities among women than men implies that elasticities of supply to college would be greater for women than men, since heterogeneity in costs of college attendance would be lower for women. Further, greater average noncognitive abilities of women than men implies that the supply of women to college would be greater than that of men when their benefits were the same. Together, these gender differences explain how the increased demand for college graduates that occurred in most countries during the past 30 years would have increased the supply of women by more than the supply of men, leading to women's college attendance surpassing that of men.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/aer.100.2.229</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8282
ispartof The American economic review, 2010-05, Vol.100 (2), p.229-233
issn 0002-8282
1944-7981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_854916892
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Business Source Complete; American Economic Association Web
subjects College graduates
Colleges
Consumption
Economics
Expected utility
Financial investments
GDP
Gender differences
Gross Domestic Product
Higher education
Human capital
Investments
Marriage
Men
NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN CAPITAL
Per capita
Studies
Supply
Supply curves
Tuition
Wage differential
Women
Womens education
title The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A51%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Market%20for%20College%20Graduates%20and%20the%20Worldwide%20Boom%20in%20Higher%20Education%20of%20Women&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Becker,%20Gary%20S.&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=229-233&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/aer.100.2.229&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27804995%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=854916892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27804995&rfr_iscdi=true