The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women
Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American economic review 2010-05, Vol.100 (2), p.229-233 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 233 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | The American economic review |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Becker, Gary S. Hubbard, William H. J. Murphy, Kevin M. |
description | Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears that the average noncognitive abilities of women are higher than the average for men, as measured by average grades in school and standardized test scores, and that the inequality in noncognitive abilities is lower for women, as measured by the variances in these grades and test scores. Lower inequality of noncognitive abilities among women than men implies that elasticities of supply to college would be greater for women than men, since heterogeneity in costs of college attendance would be lower for women. Further, greater average noncognitive abilities of women than men implies that the supply of women to college would be greater than that of men when their benefits were the same. Together, these gender differences explain how the increased demand for college graduates that occurred in most countries during the past 30 years would have increased the supply of women by more than the supply of men, leading to women's college attendance surpassing that of men. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1257/aer.100.2.229 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_854916892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27804995</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27804995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-bbb817e34afa59e0daacae35b3b39acb815cfb6e0dfb2717c73f795f9cbd43cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbq0aMQvO-aj90mOWqprVDxsuIx5LPdut3UZBfx35tS8TQzzMMMvADcYlRiUrMH5WKJESpJSYg4AxMsqqpgguNzMEEIkYITTi7BVUo7dJwxm4Cm2Tr4quKnG6APEc5D17mNg8uo7KgGl6DqLRwy-gixs9-tdfAphD1se7hqN1sX4cKORg1t6GHwWe1dfw0uvOqSu_mrU_D-vGjmq2L9tnyZP64LQzEfCq01x8zRSnlVC4esUkY5WmuqqVAmL2vj9SwvvCYMM8OoZ6L2wmhbUWPpFNyf7h5i-BpdGuQujLHPLyWvK4FnXJCMihMyMaQUnZeH2O5V_JEYyWNuMueWeySJzLllf3fyuzSE-I8J46gSoqa_6O1rIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>854916892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Becker, Gary S. ; Hubbard, William H. J. ; Murphy, Kevin M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S. ; Hubbard, William H. J. ; Murphy, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><description>Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears that the average noncognitive abilities of women are higher than the average for men, as measured by average grades in school and standardized test scores, and that the inequality in noncognitive abilities is lower for women, as measured by the variances in these grades and test scores. Lower inequality of noncognitive abilities among women than men implies that elasticities of supply to college would be greater for women than men, since heterogeneity in costs of college attendance would be lower for women. Further, greater average noncognitive abilities of women than men implies that the supply of women to college would be greater than that of men when their benefits were the same. Together, these gender differences explain how the increased demand for college graduates that occurred in most countries during the past 30 years would have increased the supply of women by more than the supply of men, leading to women's college attendance surpassing that of men.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.2.229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>College graduates ; Colleges ; Consumption ; Economics ; Expected utility ; Financial investments ; GDP ; Gender differences ; Gross Domestic Product ; Higher education ; Human capital ; Investments ; Marriage ; Men ; NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN CAPITAL ; Per capita ; Studies ; Supply ; Supply curves ; Tuition ; Wage differential ; Women ; Womens education</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2010-05, Vol.100 (2), p.229-233</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2010 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-bbb817e34afa59e0daacae35b3b39acb815cfb6e0dfb2717c73f795f9cbd43cd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27804995$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27804995$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3735,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, William H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears that the average noncognitive abilities of women are higher than the average for men, as measured by average grades in school and standardized test scores, and that the inequality in noncognitive abilities is lower for women, as measured by the variances in these grades and test scores. Lower inequality of noncognitive abilities among women than men implies that elasticities of supply to college would be greater for women than men, since heterogeneity in costs of college attendance would be lower for women. Further, greater average noncognitive abilities of women than men implies that the supply of women to college would be greater than that of men when their benefits were the same. Together, these gender differences explain how the increased demand for college graduates that occurred in most countries during the past 30 years would have increased the supply of women by more than the supply of men, leading to women's college attendance surpassing that of men.</description><subject>College graduates</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN CAPITAL</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Supply curves</subject><subject>Tuition</subject><subject>Wage differential</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens education</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbq0aMQvO-aj90mOWqprVDxsuIx5LPdut3UZBfx35tS8TQzzMMMvADcYlRiUrMH5WKJESpJSYg4AxMsqqpgguNzMEEIkYITTi7BVUo7dJwxm4Cm2Tr4quKnG6APEc5D17mNg8uo7KgGl6DqLRwy-gixs9-tdfAphD1se7hqN1sX4cKORg1t6GHwWe1dfw0uvOqSu_mrU_D-vGjmq2L9tnyZP64LQzEfCq01x8zRSnlVC4esUkY5WmuqqVAmL2vj9SwvvCYMM8OoZ6L2wmhbUWPpFNyf7h5i-BpdGuQujLHPLyWvK4FnXJCMihMyMaQUnZeH2O5V_JEYyWNuMueWeySJzLllf3fyuzSE-I8J46gSoqa_6O1rIA</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Becker, Gary S.</creator><creator>Hubbard, William H. J.</creator><creator>Murphy, Kevin M.</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women</title><author>Becker, Gary S. ; Hubbard, William H. J. ; Murphy, Kevin M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-bbb817e34afa59e0daacae35b3b39acb815cfb6e0dfb2717c73f795f9cbd43cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>College graduates</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN CAPITAL</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Supply curves</topic><topic>Tuition</topic><topic>Wage differential</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, William H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, Gary S.</au><au>Hubbard, William H. J.</au><au>Murphy, Kevin M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>229-233</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><abstract>Today, a larger fraction of women than men have completed higher education in 67 of 120 of the countries. In order to illuminate the worldwide boom in higher education, and in particular higher education of women, we present a model of the optimal investment in college by an individual. it appears that the average noncognitive abilities of women are higher than the average for men, as measured by average grades in school and standardized test scores, and that the inequality in noncognitive abilities is lower for women, as measured by the variances in these grades and test scores. Lower inequality of noncognitive abilities among women than men implies that elasticities of supply to college would be greater for women than men, since heterogeneity in costs of college attendance would be lower for women. Further, greater average noncognitive abilities of women than men implies that the supply of women to college would be greater than that of men when their benefits were the same. Together, these gender differences explain how the increased demand for college graduates that occurred in most countries during the past 30 years would have increased the supply of women by more than the supply of men, leading to women's college attendance surpassing that of men.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/aer.100.2.229</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8282 |
ispartof | The American economic review, 2010-05, Vol.100 (2), p.229-233 |
issn | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_854916892 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Business Source Complete; American Economic Association Web |
subjects | College graduates Colleges Consumption Economics Expected utility Financial investments GDP Gender differences Gross Domestic Product Higher education Human capital Investments Marriage Men NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN CAPITAL Per capita Studies Supply Supply curves Tuition Wage differential Women Womens education |
title | The Market for College Graduates and the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A51%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Market%20for%20College%20Graduates%20and%20the%20Worldwide%20Boom%20in%20Higher%20Education%20of%20Women&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Becker,%20Gary%20S.&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=229-233&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/aer.100.2.229&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27804995%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=854916892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27804995&rfr_iscdi=true |