Strategic Human Resource Practices: Introducing Alternatives for Organizational Performance Improvement in the Public Sector

Can public sector organizations increase productivity through competition in spite of inherent limitations, such as budget constraints? This study addresses that question by examining the impact of four factors that contribute to employees expectations regarding competitive work environments on orga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public administration review 2010-01, Vol.70 (1), p.38-49
1. Verfasser: Kim, Jungin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 49
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Public administration review
container_volume 70
creator Kim, Jungin
description Can public sector organizations increase productivity through competition in spite of inherent limitations, such as budget constraints? This study addresses that question by examining the impact of four factors that contribute to employees expectations regarding competitive work environments on organizational performance in terms of overall quality of work and client satisfaction. The four factors measured include rewards for merit such as salary and benefits, opportunities, organizational rules, and the capacity to deal with risks as perceived by employees. Using data on public and nonprofit sector employees, expectations for merit rewards were positively related to employees' perception of organizational performance when the conditions of performance-based organizational rules and risk-taking behaviors were also satisfied. Moreover, employees' perceptions of organizational performance tended to increase when they felt that organizational rules were oriented toward performance plus organizational members and top leaders exhibited greater risk-taking behaviors. However, no correlation was evident between employees expectations of opportunities and perceived organizational performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02109.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_853757613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40469109</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40469109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4299-63c66e61864493635887c97b88e628a08a2d16346b3ad27c4b7bb2d035cbc7d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1P2zAUhi20SXRsP2GStV2n-Cu2s4tJFRpQhKCCIS4tx3G7ZGnCbAcK4sfvZJl6N2m-sXXe9zw-HwhhSuYUznEzp7kgmWQQYIQUcwKvYr47QLO98AbNCOE84zxnh-hdjA0hlFGhZ-j1NgWb_KZ2-HzY2g7f-NgPwXm8Ctal2vn4BS-7FPpqcHW3wYs2-dDZVD_6iNd9wNdhY7v6BSJ9Z1u88gGiQALEcvsQ-ke_9V3CdYfTD6AOZQt_3XqX-vAevV3bNvoPf-8jdHf67fvJeXZ5fbY8WVxmTrCiyCR3UnpJtRSi4JLnWitXqFJrL5m2RFtWUcmFLLmtmHKiVGXJKsJzVzpV5fwIfZq4UM6vwcdkGugRqo1G51zlSlIOps__MjGZK0oUUwJcenK50McY_No8hHprw7OhxIwLMY0Z527GuZtxIebPQswOUr9OqU9165__O8-s7hY34xMAHydAE2F4e4AgQhaTnk16HZPf7XUbfhqpoE1zf3VmwHkhL67uzSn_DdQGqnM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>853757613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic Human Resource Practices: Introducing Alternatives for Organizational Performance Improvement in the Public Sector</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kim, Jungin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jungin</creatorcontrib><description>Can public sector organizations increase productivity through competition in spite of inherent limitations, such as budget constraints? This study addresses that question by examining the impact of four factors that contribute to employees expectations regarding competitive work environments on organizational performance in terms of overall quality of work and client satisfaction. The four factors measured include rewards for merit such as salary and benefits, opportunities, organizational rules, and the capacity to deal with risks as perceived by employees. Using data on public and nonprofit sector employees, expectations for merit rewards were positively related to employees' perception of organizational performance when the conditions of performance-based organizational rules and risk-taking behaviors were also satisfied. Moreover, employees' perceptions of organizational performance tended to increase when they felt that organizational rules were oriented toward performance plus organizational members and top leaders exhibited greater risk-taking behaviors. However, no correlation was evident between employees expectations of opportunities and perceived organizational performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02109.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBARBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Achievement Need ; Alternatives ; Behavior ; Behavior Theories ; Budget constraint ; Business risks ; Client satisfaction ; Competition ; Current Trends in Public Personnel Administration ; Economic competition ; Employee motivation ; Employees ; Expectations ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Human resource management ; Human Resources ; Job performance evaluation ; Job Satisfaction ; Literature Reviews ; Merit Pay ; Nonprofit organizations ; Organizational Effectiveness ; Organizational performance ; Perceptions ; Private Sector ; Productivity ; Public administration ; Public sector ; Quality of work ; Rewards ; Risk behavior ; Rules ; Satisfaction ; Studies ; Work ; Work environment ; Work environments</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2010-01, Vol.70 (1), p.38-49</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Public Administration Jan/Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4299-63c66e61864493635887c97b88e628a08a2d16346b3ad27c4b7bb2d035cbc7d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4299-63c66e61864493635887c97b88e628a08a2d16346b3ad27c4b7bb2d035cbc7d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40469109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40469109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,12843,27864,27922,27923,45572,45573,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jungin</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic Human Resource Practices: Introducing Alternatives for Organizational Performance Improvement in the Public Sector</title><title>Public administration review</title><description>Can public sector organizations increase productivity through competition in spite of inherent limitations, such as budget constraints? This study addresses that question by examining the impact of four factors that contribute to employees expectations regarding competitive work environments on organizational performance in terms of overall quality of work and client satisfaction. The four factors measured include rewards for merit such as salary and benefits, opportunities, organizational rules, and the capacity to deal with risks as perceived by employees. Using data on public and nonprofit sector employees, expectations for merit rewards were positively related to employees' perception of organizational performance when the conditions of performance-based organizational rules and risk-taking behaviors were also satisfied. Moreover, employees' perceptions of organizational performance tended to increase when they felt that organizational rules were oriented toward performance plus organizational members and top leaders exhibited greater risk-taking behaviors. However, no correlation was evident between employees expectations of opportunities and perceived organizational performance.</description><subject>Achievement Need</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Theories</subject><subject>Budget constraint</subject><subject>Business risks</subject><subject>Client satisfaction</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Current Trends in Public Personnel Administration</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Employee motivation</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Human Resources</subject><subject>Job performance evaluation</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Merit Pay</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Organizational Effectiveness</subject><subject>Organizational performance</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Quality of work</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>Risk behavior</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Work environments</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1P2zAUhi20SXRsP2GStV2n-Cu2s4tJFRpQhKCCIS4tx3G7ZGnCbAcK4sfvZJl6N2m-sXXe9zw-HwhhSuYUznEzp7kgmWQQYIQUcwKvYr47QLO98AbNCOE84zxnh-hdjA0hlFGhZ-j1NgWb_KZ2-HzY2g7f-NgPwXm8Ctal2vn4BS-7FPpqcHW3wYs2-dDZVD_6iNd9wNdhY7v6BSJ9Z1u88gGiQALEcvsQ-ke_9V3CdYfTD6AOZQt_3XqX-vAevV3bNvoPf-8jdHf67fvJeXZ5fbY8WVxmTrCiyCR3UnpJtRSi4JLnWitXqFJrL5m2RFtWUcmFLLmtmHKiVGXJKsJzVzpV5fwIfZq4UM6vwcdkGugRqo1G51zlSlIOps__MjGZK0oUUwJcenK50McY_No8hHprw7OhxIwLMY0Z527GuZtxIebPQswOUr9OqU9165__O8-s7hY34xMAHydAE2F4e4AgQhaTnk16HZPf7XUbfhqpoE1zf3VmwHkhL67uzSn_DdQGqnM</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Kim, Jungin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Strategic Human Resource Practices: Introducing Alternatives for Organizational Performance Improvement in the Public Sector</title><author>Kim, Jungin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4299-63c66e61864493635887c97b88e628a08a2d16346b3ad27c4b7bb2d035cbc7d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Achievement Need</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Theories</topic><topic>Budget constraint</topic><topic>Business risks</topic><topic>Client satisfaction</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Current Trends in Public Personnel Administration</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Employee motivation</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Human Resources</topic><topic>Job performance evaluation</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Merit Pay</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Organizational Effectiveness</topic><topic>Organizational performance</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Quality of work</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>Risk behavior</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Work environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jungin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jungin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic Human Resource Practices: Introducing Alternatives for Organizational Performance Improvement in the Public Sector</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>38-49</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><coden>PBARBM</coden><abstract>Can public sector organizations increase productivity through competition in spite of inherent limitations, such as budget constraints? This study addresses that question by examining the impact of four factors that contribute to employees expectations regarding competitive work environments on organizational performance in terms of overall quality of work and client satisfaction. The four factors measured include rewards for merit such as salary and benefits, opportunities, organizational rules, and the capacity to deal with risks as perceived by employees. Using data on public and nonprofit sector employees, expectations for merit rewards were positively related to employees' perception of organizational performance when the conditions of performance-based organizational rules and risk-taking behaviors were also satisfied. Moreover, employees' perceptions of organizational performance tended to increase when they felt that organizational rules were oriented toward performance plus organizational members and top leaders exhibited greater risk-taking behaviors. However, no correlation was evident between employees expectations of opportunities and perceived organizational performance.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02109.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3352
ispartof Public administration review, 2010-01, Vol.70 (1), p.38-49
issn 0033-3352
1540-6210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_853757613
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Achievement Need
Alternatives
Behavior
Behavior Theories
Budget constraint
Business risks
Client satisfaction
Competition
Current Trends in Public Personnel Administration
Economic competition
Employee motivation
Employees
Expectations
Government (Administrative Body)
Human resource management
Human Resources
Job performance evaluation
Job Satisfaction
Literature Reviews
Merit Pay
Nonprofit organizations
Organizational Effectiveness
Organizational performance
Perceptions
Private Sector
Productivity
Public administration
Public sector
Quality of work
Rewards
Risk behavior
Rules
Satisfaction
Studies
Work
Work environment
Work environments
title Strategic Human Resource Practices: Introducing Alternatives for Organizational Performance Improvement in the Public Sector
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20Human%20Resource%20Practices:%20Introducing%20Alternatives%20for%20Organizational%20Performance%20Improvement%20in%20the%20Public%20Sector&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Kim,%20Jungin&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=38-49&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft.coden=PBARBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02109.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40469109%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=853757613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40469109&rfr_iscdi=true