Stent placement provides safe esophageal closure in thoracic NOTES^sup TM^ procedures

Safe esophageal closure remains a challenge in transesophageal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Previously described methods, such as suturing devices, clips, or submucosal tunneling, all have weaknesses. In this survival animal series, we demonstrate safe esophageal closure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2011-03, Vol.25 (3), p.913
Hauptverfasser: Turner, Brian G, Cizginer, Sevdenur, Kim, Min-chan, Mino-kenudson, Mari, Ducharme, Richard W, Surti, Vihar C, Sylla, Patricia, Brugge, William R, Rattner, David W, Gee, Denise W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 913
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 25
creator Turner, Brian G
Cizginer, Sevdenur
Kim, Min-chan
Mino-kenudson, Mari
Ducharme, Richard W
Surti, Vihar C
Sylla, Patricia
Brugge, William R
Rattner, David W
Gee, Denise W
description Safe esophageal closure remains a challenge in transesophageal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Previously described methods, such as suturing devices, clips, or submucosal tunneling, all have weaknesses. In this survival animal series, we demonstrate safe esophageal closure with a prototype retrievable, antimigration stent. Nine Yorkshire swine underwent thoracic NOTES procedures. A double-channel gastroscope equipped with a mucosectomy device was used to create an esophageal mucosal defect. A 5-cm submucosal tunnel was created and the muscular esophageal wall was incised with a needle-knife. Mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy were performed in all swine; lymphadenectomy was performed in seven swine. A prototype small intestinal submucosal (SurgiSIS^sup ®^) covered stent was deployed over the mucosectomy site and tunnel. Three versions of the prototype stent were developed. Prenecropsy endoscopy confirmed stent location and permitted stent retrieval. Explanted esophagi were sent to pathology. Esophageal stenting was successful in all animals. Stent placement took 15.8 ± 4.8 minuted and no stent migration occurred. Prenecropsy endoscopy revealed proximal ingrowth of esophageal mucosa and erosion with Stent A. Mucosal inflammation and erosion was observed proximally with Stent B. No esophageal erosion or pressure damage from proximal radial forces was seen with Stent C. On necropsy, swine 5 had a 0.5-cm periesophageal abscess. Histology revealed a localized inflammatory lesion at the esophageal exit site in swine 1, 3, and 9. The mucosectomy site was partially healed in three swine and poorly healed in six. All swine thrived clinically, except for a brief period of mild lethargy in swine 9 who improved with short-term antibiotic therapy. The submucosal tunnels were completely healed and no esophageal bleeding or stricture formation was observed. All swine survived 13.8 ± 0.4 days and gained weight in the postoperative period. Esophageal stenting provides safe closure for NOTES thoracic procedures but may impede healing of the mucosectomy site.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-010-1297-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_853691481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2275823541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_8536914813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy8FuwjAQBFALgUQofEBvVu-mu44h8bkCcQEOhCvIMksJCnHIJv3-BsQHcJqR5o0QnwhTBEi-GcDMjQIEhdomSvdEhCbWSmtM-yICG4PSiTVDMWK-QsctziKx3zVUNrIqnKfbs9XhLz8RS3ZnksShurhfcoX0ReC2JpmXsrmE2vncy802W-wO3FYyWx8eV0-nzvBYDM6uYJq88kN8LRfZz0p15N4SN8draOuym47pLJ5bNCnGb6F_CtdHAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>853691481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stent placement provides safe esophageal closure in thoracic NOTES^sup TM^ procedures</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Turner, Brian G ; Cizginer, Sevdenur ; Kim, Min-chan ; Mino-kenudson, Mari ; Ducharme, Richard W ; Surti, Vihar C ; Sylla, Patricia ; Brugge, William R ; Rattner, David W ; Gee, Denise W</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Brian G ; Cizginer, Sevdenur ; Kim, Min-chan ; Mino-kenudson, Mari ; Ducharme, Richard W ; Surti, Vihar C ; Sylla, Patricia ; Brugge, William R ; Rattner, David W ; Gee, Denise W</creatorcontrib><description>Safe esophageal closure remains a challenge in transesophageal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Previously described methods, such as suturing devices, clips, or submucosal tunneling, all have weaknesses. In this survival animal series, we demonstrate safe esophageal closure with a prototype retrievable, antimigration stent. Nine Yorkshire swine underwent thoracic NOTES procedures. A double-channel gastroscope equipped with a mucosectomy device was used to create an esophageal mucosal defect. A 5-cm submucosal tunnel was created and the muscular esophageal wall was incised with a needle-knife. Mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy were performed in all swine; lymphadenectomy was performed in seven swine. A prototype small intestinal submucosal (SurgiSIS^sup ®^) covered stent was deployed over the mucosectomy site and tunnel. Three versions of the prototype stent were developed. Prenecropsy endoscopy confirmed stent location and permitted stent retrieval. Explanted esophagi were sent to pathology. Esophageal stenting was successful in all animals. Stent placement took 15.8 ± 4.8 minuted and no stent migration occurred. Prenecropsy endoscopy revealed proximal ingrowth of esophageal mucosa and erosion with Stent A. Mucosal inflammation and erosion was observed proximally with Stent B. No esophageal erosion or pressure damage from proximal radial forces was seen with Stent C. On necropsy, swine 5 had a 0.5-cm periesophageal abscess. Histology revealed a localized inflammatory lesion at the esophageal exit site in swine 1, 3, and 9. The mucosectomy site was partially healed in three swine and poorly healed in six. All swine thrived clinically, except for a brief period of mild lethargy in swine 9 who improved with short-term antibiotic therapy. The submucosal tunnels were completely healed and no esophageal bleeding or stricture formation was observed. All swine survived 13.8 ± 0.4 days and gained weight in the postoperative period. Esophageal stenting provides safe closure for NOTES thoracic procedures but may impede healing of the mucosectomy site.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1297-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biopsy ; Endoscopy ; Esophagus ; Hospitals ; Stents ; Surgery ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2011-03, Vol.25 (3), p.913</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Brian G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cizginer, Sevdenur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min-chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mino-kenudson, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducharme, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surti, Vihar C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sylla, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugge, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rattner, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, Denise W</creatorcontrib><title>Stent placement provides safe esophageal closure in thoracic NOTES^sup TM^ procedures</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><description>Safe esophageal closure remains a challenge in transesophageal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Previously described methods, such as suturing devices, clips, or submucosal tunneling, all have weaknesses. In this survival animal series, we demonstrate safe esophageal closure with a prototype retrievable, antimigration stent. Nine Yorkshire swine underwent thoracic NOTES procedures. A double-channel gastroscope equipped with a mucosectomy device was used to create an esophageal mucosal defect. A 5-cm submucosal tunnel was created and the muscular esophageal wall was incised with a needle-knife. Mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy were performed in all swine; lymphadenectomy was performed in seven swine. A prototype small intestinal submucosal (SurgiSIS^sup ®^) covered stent was deployed over the mucosectomy site and tunnel. Three versions of the prototype stent were developed. Prenecropsy endoscopy confirmed stent location and permitted stent retrieval. Explanted esophagi were sent to pathology. Esophageal stenting was successful in all animals. Stent placement took 15.8 ± 4.8 minuted and no stent migration occurred. Prenecropsy endoscopy revealed proximal ingrowth of esophageal mucosa and erosion with Stent A. Mucosal inflammation and erosion was observed proximally with Stent B. No esophageal erosion or pressure damage from proximal radial forces was seen with Stent C. On necropsy, swine 5 had a 0.5-cm periesophageal abscess. Histology revealed a localized inflammatory lesion at the esophageal exit site in swine 1, 3, and 9. The mucosectomy site was partially healed in three swine and poorly healed in six. All swine thrived clinically, except for a brief period of mild lethargy in swine 9 who improved with short-term antibiotic therapy. The submucosal tunnels were completely healed and no esophageal bleeding or stricture formation was observed. All swine survived 13.8 ± 0.4 days and gained weight in the postoperative period. Esophageal stenting provides safe closure for NOTES thoracic procedures but may impede healing of the mucosectomy site.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy8FuwjAQBFALgUQofEBvVu-mu44h8bkCcQEOhCvIMksJCnHIJv3-BsQHcJqR5o0QnwhTBEi-GcDMjQIEhdomSvdEhCbWSmtM-yICG4PSiTVDMWK-QsctziKx3zVUNrIqnKfbs9XhLz8RS3ZnksShurhfcoX0ReC2JpmXsrmE2vncy802W-wO3FYyWx8eV0-nzvBYDM6uYJq88kN8LRfZz0p15N4SN8draOuym47pLJ5bNCnGb6F_CtdHAQ</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Turner, Brian G</creator><creator>Cizginer, Sevdenur</creator><creator>Kim, Min-chan</creator><creator>Mino-kenudson, Mari</creator><creator>Ducharme, Richard W</creator><creator>Surti, Vihar C</creator><creator>Sylla, Patricia</creator><creator>Brugge, William R</creator><creator>Rattner, David W</creator><creator>Gee, Denise W</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Stent placement provides safe esophageal closure in thoracic NOTES^sup TM^ procedures</title><author>Turner, Brian G ; Cizginer, Sevdenur ; Kim, Min-chan ; Mino-kenudson, Mari ; Ducharme, Richard W ; Surti, Vihar C ; Sylla, Patricia ; Brugge, William R ; Rattner, David W ; Gee, Denise W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_8536914813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Brian G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cizginer, Sevdenur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min-chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mino-kenudson, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducharme, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surti, Vihar C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sylla, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugge, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rattner, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, Denise W</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Brian G</au><au>Cizginer, Sevdenur</au><au>Kim, Min-chan</au><au>Mino-kenudson, Mari</au><au>Ducharme, Richard W</au><au>Surti, Vihar C</au><au>Sylla, Patricia</au><au>Brugge, William R</au><au>Rattner, David W</au><au>Gee, Denise W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stent placement provides safe esophageal closure in thoracic NOTES^sup TM^ procedures</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>913</spage><pages>913-</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Safe esophageal closure remains a challenge in transesophageal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Previously described methods, such as suturing devices, clips, or submucosal tunneling, all have weaknesses. In this survival animal series, we demonstrate safe esophageal closure with a prototype retrievable, antimigration stent. Nine Yorkshire swine underwent thoracic NOTES procedures. A double-channel gastroscope equipped with a mucosectomy device was used to create an esophageal mucosal defect. A 5-cm submucosal tunnel was created and the muscular esophageal wall was incised with a needle-knife. Mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy were performed in all swine; lymphadenectomy was performed in seven swine. A prototype small intestinal submucosal (SurgiSIS^sup ®^) covered stent was deployed over the mucosectomy site and tunnel. Three versions of the prototype stent were developed. Prenecropsy endoscopy confirmed stent location and permitted stent retrieval. Explanted esophagi were sent to pathology. Esophageal stenting was successful in all animals. Stent placement took 15.8 ± 4.8 minuted and no stent migration occurred. Prenecropsy endoscopy revealed proximal ingrowth of esophageal mucosa and erosion with Stent A. Mucosal inflammation and erosion was observed proximally with Stent B. No esophageal erosion or pressure damage from proximal radial forces was seen with Stent C. On necropsy, swine 5 had a 0.5-cm periesophageal abscess. Histology revealed a localized inflammatory lesion at the esophageal exit site in swine 1, 3, and 9. The mucosectomy site was partially healed in three swine and poorly healed in six. All swine thrived clinically, except for a brief period of mild lethargy in swine 9 who improved with short-term antibiotic therapy. The submucosal tunnels were completely healed and no esophageal bleeding or stricture formation was observed. All swine survived 13.8 ± 0.4 days and gained weight in the postoperative period. Esophageal stenting provides safe closure for NOTES thoracic procedures but may impede healing of the mucosectomy site.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00464-010-1297-2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2011-03, Vol.25 (3), p.913
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_853691481
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Animals
Biopsy
Endoscopy
Esophagus
Hospitals
Stents
Surgery
Sutures
title Stent placement provides safe esophageal closure in thoracic NOTES^sup TM^ procedures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A11%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stent%20placement%20provides%20safe%20esophageal%20closure%20in%20thoracic%20NOTES%5Esup%20TM%5E%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Turner,%20Brian%20G&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=913&rft.pages=913-&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-010-1297-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2275823541%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=853691481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true