Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain: Control as a Nonfactor in Employee Status Determinations Under FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB
Under the NLRA, the decision is especially significant because the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which issued the decision, may be asked to review any NLRB decision.8 More broadly, the D.C. Circuit's decision may affect the application of a host of other employment statutes that also use the c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Labor lawyer 2010-10, Vol.26 (1), p.123 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 123 |
| container_title | The Labor lawyer |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Dilger, Jeffrey E |
| description | Under the NLRA, the decision is especially significant because the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which issued the decision, may be asked to review any NLRB decision.8 More broadly, the D.C. Circuit's decision may affect the application of a host of other employment statutes that also use the common law test to determine employee status. Because of FedEx Ill's importance to labor law, the NLRB sought en banc review of the D.C. Circuit panel's decision, which was denied.9 However, the NLRB appears determined to force the issue. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_853633093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2275323141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_8536330933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhC0EEgX6DivuQW6cWAk3GlL1ABXi51xZzVZ1lewWe1ORV-CpCYgH6Glm9M3MmZqkJi2TzOrsfPSz3CZZoctLdRXjXuu0sLmdqO8XN8CK4UEESTwTCIPsEJ4dwRx3npq_WPVBnKd7qJgkcAsughuHtHUb4QCeoO4OLQ-I8CZO-giPKBg6T-73NsIHNRhggU39BUvucOStP2IY4HgHq6fX-Y262Lo24vRfr9Xton6vlskh8GePUdZ77gONaF3kxhqjS2NOKv0A7PtTCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>853633093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain: Control as a Nonfactor in Employee Status Determinations Under FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Dilger, Jeffrey E</creator><creatorcontrib>Dilger, Jeffrey E</creatorcontrib><description>Under the NLRA, the decision is especially significant because the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which issued the decision, may be asked to review any NLRB decision.8 More broadly, the D.C. Circuit's decision may affect the application of a host of other employment statutes that also use the common law test to determine employee status. Because of FedEx Ill's importance to labor law, the NLRB sought en banc review of the D.C. Circuit panel's decision, which was denied.9 However, the NLRB appears determined to force the issue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-4809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-4604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Collective bargaining ; Common law ; Employees ; Employers ; Employment ; Entrepreneurs ; Independent contractors ; Labor law ; Labor relations ; Labor standards ; Liability ; Wagner Act 1935-US ; Workers ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>The Labor lawyer, 2010-10, Vol.26 (1), p.123</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Fall 2010</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dilger, Jeffrey E</creatorcontrib><title>Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain: Control as a Nonfactor in Employee Status Determinations Under FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB</title><title>The Labor lawyer</title><description>Under the NLRA, the decision is especially significant because the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which issued the decision, may be asked to review any NLRB decision.8 More broadly, the D.C. Circuit's decision may affect the application of a host of other employment statutes that also use the common law test to determine employee status. Because of FedEx Ill's importance to labor law, the NLRB sought en banc review of the D.C. Circuit panel's decision, which was denied.9 However, the NLRB appears determined to force the issue.</description><subject>Collective bargaining</subject><subject>Common law</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Independent contractors</subject><subject>Labor law</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Labor standards</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Wagner Act 1935-US</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>2156-4809</issn><issn>2329-4604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhC0EEgX6DivuQW6cWAk3GlL1ABXi51xZzVZ1lewWe1ORV-CpCYgH6Glm9M3MmZqkJi2TzOrsfPSz3CZZoctLdRXjXuu0sLmdqO8XN8CK4UEESTwTCIPsEJ4dwRx3npq_WPVBnKd7qJgkcAsughuHtHUb4QCeoO4OLQ-I8CZO-giPKBg6T-73NsIHNRhggU39BUvucOStP2IY4HgHq6fX-Y262Lo24vRfr9Xton6vlskh8GePUdZ77gONaF3kxhqjS2NOKv0A7PtTCw</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Dilger, Jeffrey E</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain: Control as a Nonfactor in Employee Status Determinations Under FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB</title><author>Dilger, Jeffrey E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_8536330933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Collective bargaining</topic><topic>Common law</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Independent contractors</topic><topic>Labor law</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Labor standards</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Wagner Act 1935-US</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dilger, Jeffrey E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Labor lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dilger, Jeffrey E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain: Control as a Nonfactor in Employee Status Determinations Under FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB</atitle><jtitle>The Labor lawyer</jtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><pages>123-</pages><issn>2156-4809</issn><eissn>2329-4604</eissn><abstract>Under the NLRA, the decision is especially significant because the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which issued the decision, may be asked to review any NLRB decision.8 More broadly, the D.C. Circuit's decision may affect the application of a host of other employment statutes that also use the common law test to determine employee status. Because of FedEx Ill's importance to labor law, the NLRB sought en banc review of the D.C. Circuit panel's decision, which was denied.9 However, the NLRB appears determined to force the issue.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2156-4809 |
| ispartof | The Labor lawyer, 2010-10, Vol.26 (1), p.123 |
| issn | 2156-4809 2329-4604 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_853633093 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Collective bargaining Common law Employees Employers Employment Entrepreneurs Independent contractors Labor law Labor relations Labor standards Liability Wagner Act 1935-US Workers Working conditions |
| title | Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain: Control as a Nonfactor in Employee Status Determinations Under FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A32%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pay%20No%20Attention%20to%20the%20Man%20Behind%20the%20Curtain:%20Control%20as%20a%20Nonfactor%20in%20Employee%20Status%20Determinations%20Under%20FedEx%20Home%20Delivery%20v.%20NLRB&rft.jtitle=The%20Labor%20lawyer&rft.au=Dilger,%20Jeffrey%20E&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.pages=123-&rft.issn=2156-4809&rft.eissn=2329-4604&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2275323141%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=853633093&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |