Executive function skills of 6–8year olds: Brain and behavioral evidence and implications for school achievement

Academic and social success in school has been linked to children's self-regulation. This study investigated the assessment of the executive function (EF) component of self-regulation using a low-cost, easily administered measure to determine whether scores obtained from the behavioral task wou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary educational psychology 2010-04, Vol.35 (2), p.116-125
Hauptverfasser: Molfese, Victoria J., Molfese, Peter J., Molfese, Dennis L., Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz, Armstrong, Natalie, Starkey, Gillian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue 2
container_start_page 116
container_title Contemporary educational psychology
container_volume 35
creator Molfese, Victoria J.
Molfese, Peter J.
Molfese, Dennis L.
Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz
Armstrong, Natalie
Starkey, Gillian
description Academic and social success in school has been linked to children's self-regulation. This study investigated the assessment of the executive function (EF) component of self-regulation using a low-cost, easily administered measure to determine whether scores obtained from the behavioral task would agree with those obtained using a laboratory-based neuropsychological measure of EF skills. The sample included 74 children (37 females; M =86.2months) who participated in two assessments of working memory and inhibitory control: Knock-Tap (NEPSY: ), and participated in event-related potential (ERP) testing that included the directional stroop test (). Three main findings emerged. First, children grouped as high vs. low performing on the NEPSY Knock-Tap Task were found to perform differently on the more difficult conditions of the DST (the Incongruent and Mixed Conditions), suggesting that the Knock-Tap Task as a low-cost and easy to administer assessment of EF skills may be one way for teachers to identify students with poor inhibitory control skills. Second, children's performance on the DST was strongly related to their ERP responses, adding to evidence that differences in behavioral performance on the DST as a measure of EF skills reflect corresponding differences in brain processing. Finally, differences in brain processing on the DST task also were found when the children were grouped based on Knock-Tap performance. Simple screening procedures can enable teachers to identify children whose distractibility, inattentiveness, or poor attention spans may interfere with classroom learning. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_852607337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2269928871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2454-68ba4e79f1ddccf2615400b58c4ad71e91f4bbefb2b0bd6804c0950c4209a9643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kN9KwzAYxYMoOKevIMH71i9Nmrbe6fAfDLxR8C6k6ReW2TU1WYu78x18Q5_EzenVgcPhd-BHyDmDlAGTl8vUYNPHjVmkGWxL4CmAOCATBhUkGS_FIZkAlywRhXw9JicxLgEYExWfkHD7gWZYuxGpHTqzdr6j8c21baTeUvn9-VVuUAfq2yZe0ZugXUd119AaF3p0PuiW4uga7Az-9m7Vt87oHSdS6wONZuF9S7VZOBxxhd36lBxZ3UY8-8spebm7fZ49JPOn-8fZ9TwxmchFIstaCywqy5rGGJtJlguAOi-N0E3BsGJW1DXaOquhbmQJwkCVgxEZVLqSgk_JxZ7bB_8-YFyrpR9Ct71UZZ5JKDgvtiO5H5ngYwxoVR_cSoeNYqB2etVS_etVO70KuNrq5T_uu3OG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>852607337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Executive function skills of 6–8year olds: Brain and behavioral evidence and implications for school achievement</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Molfese, Victoria J. ; Molfese, Peter J. ; Molfese, Dennis L. ; Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz ; Armstrong, Natalie ; Starkey, Gillian</creator><creatorcontrib>Molfese, Victoria J. ; Molfese, Peter J. ; Molfese, Dennis L. ; Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz ; Armstrong, Natalie ; Starkey, Gillian</creatorcontrib><description>Academic and social success in school has been linked to children's self-regulation. This study investigated the assessment of the executive function (EF) component of self-regulation using a low-cost, easily administered measure to determine whether scores obtained from the behavioral task would agree with those obtained using a laboratory-based neuropsychological measure of EF skills. The sample included 74 children (37 females; M =86.2months) who participated in two assessments of working memory and inhibitory control: Knock-Tap (NEPSY: ), and participated in event-related potential (ERP) testing that included the directional stroop test (). Three main findings emerged. First, children grouped as high vs. low performing on the NEPSY Knock-Tap Task were found to perform differently on the more difficult conditions of the DST (the Incongruent and Mixed Conditions), suggesting that the Knock-Tap Task as a low-cost and easy to administer assessment of EF skills may be one way for teachers to identify students with poor inhibitory control skills. Second, children's performance on the DST was strongly related to their ERP responses, adding to evidence that differences in behavioral performance on the DST as a measure of EF skills reflect corresponding differences in brain processing. Finally, differences in brain processing on the DST task also were found when the children were grouped based on Knock-Tap performance. Simple screening procedures can enable teachers to identify children whose distractibility, inattentiveness, or poor attention spans may interfere with classroom learning. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-476X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2384</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego: Elsevier BV</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Brain ; Children &amp; youth ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Educational psychology ; Executive Function ; Neurology ; Screening Tests ; Short Term Memory ; Student behavior</subject><ispartof>Contemporary educational psychology, 2010-04, Vol.35 (2), p.116-125</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2454-68ba4e79f1ddccf2615400b58c4ad71e91f4bbefb2b0bd6804c0950c4209a9643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2454-68ba4e79f1ddccf2615400b58c4ad71e91f4bbefb2b0bd6804c0950c4209a9643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Molfese, Victoria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molfese, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molfese, Dennis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starkey, Gillian</creatorcontrib><title>Executive function skills of 6–8year olds: Brain and behavioral evidence and implications for school achievement</title><title>Contemporary educational psychology</title><description>Academic and social success in school has been linked to children's self-regulation. This study investigated the assessment of the executive function (EF) component of self-regulation using a low-cost, easily administered measure to determine whether scores obtained from the behavioral task would agree with those obtained using a laboratory-based neuropsychological measure of EF skills. The sample included 74 children (37 females; M =86.2months) who participated in two assessments of working memory and inhibitory control: Knock-Tap (NEPSY: ), and participated in event-related potential (ERP) testing that included the directional stroop test (). Three main findings emerged. First, children grouped as high vs. low performing on the NEPSY Knock-Tap Task were found to perform differently on the more difficult conditions of the DST (the Incongruent and Mixed Conditions), suggesting that the Knock-Tap Task as a low-cost and easy to administer assessment of EF skills may be one way for teachers to identify students with poor inhibitory control skills. Second, children's performance on the DST was strongly related to their ERP responses, adding to evidence that differences in behavioral performance on the DST as a measure of EF skills reflect corresponding differences in brain processing. Finally, differences in brain processing on the DST task also were found when the children were grouped based on Knock-Tap performance. Simple screening procedures can enable teachers to identify children whose distractibility, inattentiveness, or poor attention spans may interfere with classroom learning. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Executive Function</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Student behavior</subject><issn>0361-476X</issn><issn>1090-2384</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kN9KwzAYxYMoOKevIMH71i9Nmrbe6fAfDLxR8C6k6ReW2TU1WYu78x18Q5_EzenVgcPhd-BHyDmDlAGTl8vUYNPHjVmkGWxL4CmAOCATBhUkGS_FIZkAlywRhXw9JicxLgEYExWfkHD7gWZYuxGpHTqzdr6j8c21baTeUvn9-VVuUAfq2yZe0ZugXUd119AaF3p0PuiW4uga7Az-9m7Vt87oHSdS6wONZuF9S7VZOBxxhd36lBxZ3UY8-8spebm7fZ49JPOn-8fZ9TwxmchFIstaCywqy5rGGJtJlguAOi-N0E3BsGJW1DXaOquhbmQJwkCVgxEZVLqSgk_JxZ7bB_8-YFyrpR9Ct71UZZ5JKDgvtiO5H5ngYwxoVR_cSoeNYqB2etVS_etVO70KuNrq5T_uu3OG</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Molfese, Victoria J.</creator><creator>Molfese, Peter J.</creator><creator>Molfese, Dennis L.</creator><creator>Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz</creator><creator>Armstrong, Natalie</creator><creator>Starkey, Gillian</creator><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Executive function skills of 6–8year olds: Brain and behavioral evidence and implications for school achievement</title><author>Molfese, Victoria J. ; Molfese, Peter J. ; Molfese, Dennis L. ; Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz ; Armstrong, Natalie ; Starkey, Gillian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2454-68ba4e79f1ddccf2615400b58c4ad71e91f4bbefb2b0bd6804c0950c4209a9643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Executive Function</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Student behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Molfese, Victoria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molfese, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molfese, Dennis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starkey, Gillian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Molfese, Victoria J.</au><au>Molfese, Peter J.</au><au>Molfese, Dennis L.</au><au>Rudasill, Kathleen Moritz</au><au>Armstrong, Natalie</au><au>Starkey, Gillian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Executive function skills of 6–8year olds: Brain and behavioral evidence and implications for school achievement</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary educational psychology</jtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>116-125</pages><issn>0361-476X</issn><eissn>1090-2384</eissn><abstract>Academic and social success in school has been linked to children's self-regulation. This study investigated the assessment of the executive function (EF) component of self-regulation using a low-cost, easily administered measure to determine whether scores obtained from the behavioral task would agree with those obtained using a laboratory-based neuropsychological measure of EF skills. The sample included 74 children (37 females; M =86.2months) who participated in two assessments of working memory and inhibitory control: Knock-Tap (NEPSY: ), and participated in event-related potential (ERP) testing that included the directional stroop test (). Three main findings emerged. First, children grouped as high vs. low performing on the NEPSY Knock-Tap Task were found to perform differently on the more difficult conditions of the DST (the Incongruent and Mixed Conditions), suggesting that the Knock-Tap Task as a low-cost and easy to administer assessment of EF skills may be one way for teachers to identify students with poor inhibitory control skills. Second, children's performance on the DST was strongly related to their ERP responses, adding to evidence that differences in behavioral performance on the DST as a measure of EF skills reflect corresponding differences in brain processing. Finally, differences in brain processing on the DST task also were found when the children were grouped based on Knock-Tap performance. Simple screening procedures can enable teachers to identify children whose distractibility, inattentiveness, or poor attention spans may interfere with classroom learning. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>San Diego</cop><pub>Elsevier BV</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-476X
ispartof Contemporary educational psychology, 2010-04, Vol.35 (2), p.116-125
issn 0361-476X
1090-2384
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_852607337
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Academic achievement
Brain
Children & youth
Cognition & reasoning
Educational psychology
Executive Function
Neurology
Screening Tests
Short Term Memory
Student behavior
title Executive function skills of 6–8year olds: Brain and behavioral evidence and implications for school achievement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A31%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Executive%20function%20skills%20of%206%E2%80%938year%20olds:%20Brain%20and%20behavioral%20evidence%20and%20implications%20for%20school%20achievement&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Molfese,%20Victoria%20J.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=116-125&rft.issn=0361-476X&rft.eissn=1090-2384&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2269928871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=852607337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true