Instructional design and project management: complementary or divergent?
This paper reports the results of a study to identify the extent to which organizations that develop educational/training products are committed to project management, as measured by their project management implementation maturity, as a methodology that is separate and distinct from the processes o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational technology research and development 2011-02, Vol.59 (1), p.139-158 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 158 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | van Rooij, Shahron Williams |
description | This paper reports the results of a study to identify the extent to which organizations that develop educational/training products are committed to project management, as measured by their project management implementation maturity, as a methodology that is separate and distinct from the processes of instructional design. A Web survey was conducted among 103 public and private sector organizations worldwide that develop educational/training products. Results show no significant difference by project management maturity level in the roles of instructional designer and project manager, although there is some relationship between maturity level and how organizations perceive the skills/competencies of project managers versus those of instructional designers. Further, organizational decision-makers have very specific expectations about the formal education and training of educational/training product development project leaders. The findings should be of value to institutions of higher education in evaluating programs that prepare students for careers in instructional design. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11423-010-9176-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_851504108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713964446</galeid><ericid>EJ913748</ericid><jstor_id>41414928</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713964446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-a957bb017f628675a4f5ec6c48ccbac7a46a4b7cdc805273dfaef31c93d809ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQLaLg-vEDBIXivWum-Wq8iMj6xYIXPYfsNC1dtsmadAX315u1ojczh8xk3nu8vCw7AzIFQuRVBGAlLQiQQoEUxXYvmwDnohCcwH7qCSsLEKU6zI5iXJJ0pKgm2eOTi0PY4NB5Z1Z5bWPXuty4Ol8Hv7Q45L1xprW9dcN1jr5fr757Ez5zH_K6-7ChTfPNSXbQmFW0pz_3cfZ2P3u9eyzmLw9Pd7fzAqmSQ2EUl4sFAdmIshKSG9ZwiwJZhbgwKA0Thi0k1lgRXkpaN8Y2FFDRuiIKDT3OLkfd5O99Y-Ogl34TkveoKw6cMCBVAk1HUGtWVneu8UMwmKq2fYfe2aZL77cSqBKMMZEIMBIw-BiDbfQ6dH36pAaidwHrMWCdAta7gPU2cc5Hjg0d_uJnzwqoZDsP5biOaeVaG_6M_qd5MZKWcfDhV5RBKlVW9AsVb5H_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851504108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Instructional design and project management: complementary or divergent?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>van Rooij, Shahron Williams</creator><creatorcontrib>van Rooij, Shahron Williams</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports the results of a study to identify the extent to which organizations that develop educational/training products are committed to project management, as measured by their project management implementation maturity, as a methodology that is separate and distinct from the processes of instructional design. A Web survey was conducted among 103 public and private sector organizations worldwide that develop educational/training products. Results show no significant difference by project management maturity level in the roles of instructional designer and project manager, although there is some relationship between maturity level and how organizations perceive the skills/competencies of project managers versus those of instructional designers. Further, organizational decision-makers have very specific expectations about the formal education and training of educational/training product development project leaders. The findings should be of value to institutions of higher education in evaluating programs that prepare students for careers in instructional design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-010-9176-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Administrator Characteristics ; Administrator Qualifications ; Administrator Role ; Associations, institutions, etc ; Courseware ; Design analysis ; Design evaluation ; DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE ; Education ; Education Work Relationship ; Educational Technology ; Equipment and supplies ; Graphic design ; Instructional Design ; Leaders ; Learning and Instruction ; Management education ; Management training ; Material Development ; Occupations ; Organizations (Groups) ; Private Sector ; Product development ; Program Administration ; Project design ; Project management ; Public Sector ; Surveys ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Training</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2011-02, Vol.59 (1), p.139-158</ispartof><rights>2011 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Feb 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-a957bb017f628675a4f5ec6c48ccbac7a46a4b7cdc805273dfaef31c93d809ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-a957bb017f628675a4f5ec6c48ccbac7a46a4b7cdc805273dfaef31c93d809ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41414928$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41414928$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ913748$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Rooij, Shahron Williams</creatorcontrib><title>Instructional design and project management: complementary or divergent?</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>This paper reports the results of a study to identify the extent to which organizations that develop educational/training products are committed to project management, as measured by their project management implementation maturity, as a methodology that is separate and distinct from the processes of instructional design. A Web survey was conducted among 103 public and private sector organizations worldwide that develop educational/training products. Results show no significant difference by project management maturity level in the roles of instructional designer and project manager, although there is some relationship between maturity level and how organizations perceive the skills/competencies of project managers versus those of instructional designers. Further, organizational decision-makers have very specific expectations about the formal education and training of educational/training product development project leaders. The findings should be of value to institutions of higher education in evaluating programs that prepare students for careers in instructional design.</description><subject>Administrator Characteristics</subject><subject>Administrator Qualifications</subject><subject>Administrator Role</subject><subject>Associations, institutions, etc</subject><subject>Courseware</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Design evaluation</subject><subject>DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education Work Relationship</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Graphic design</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Leaders</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Management education</subject><subject>Management training</subject><subject>Material Development</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Organizations (Groups)</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Program Administration</subject><subject>Project design</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Public Sector</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQLaLg-vEDBIXivWum-Wq8iMj6xYIXPYfsNC1dtsmadAX315u1ojczh8xk3nu8vCw7AzIFQuRVBGAlLQiQQoEUxXYvmwDnohCcwH7qCSsLEKU6zI5iXJJ0pKgm2eOTi0PY4NB5Z1Z5bWPXuty4Ol8Hv7Q45L1xprW9dcN1jr5fr757Ez5zH_K6-7ChTfPNSXbQmFW0pz_3cfZ2P3u9eyzmLw9Pd7fzAqmSQ2EUl4sFAdmIshKSG9ZwiwJZhbgwKA0Thi0k1lgRXkpaN8Y2FFDRuiIKDT3OLkfd5O99Y-Ogl34TkveoKw6cMCBVAk1HUGtWVneu8UMwmKq2fYfe2aZL77cSqBKMMZEIMBIw-BiDbfQ6dH36pAaidwHrMWCdAta7gPU2cc5Hjg0d_uJnzwqoZDsP5biOaeVaG_6M_qd5MZKWcfDhV5RBKlVW9AsVb5H_</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>van Rooij, Shahron Williams</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Instructional design and project management: complementary or divergent?</title><author>van Rooij, Shahron Williams</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-a957bb017f628675a4f5ec6c48ccbac7a46a4b7cdc805273dfaef31c93d809ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Administrator Characteristics</topic><topic>Administrator Qualifications</topic><topic>Administrator Role</topic><topic>Associations, institutions, etc</topic><topic>Courseware</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Design evaluation</topic><topic>DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education Work Relationship</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Graphic design</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Leaders</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Management education</topic><topic>Management training</topic><topic>Material Development</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Organizations (Groups)</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Program Administration</topic><topic>Project design</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Public Sector</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Rooij, Shahron Williams</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Rooij, Shahron Williams</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ913748</ericid><atitle>Instructional design and project management: complementary or divergent?</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>139-158</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>This paper reports the results of a study to identify the extent to which organizations that develop educational/training products are committed to project management, as measured by their project management implementation maturity, as a methodology that is separate and distinct from the processes of instructional design. A Web survey was conducted among 103 public and private sector organizations worldwide that develop educational/training products. Results show no significant difference by project management maturity level in the roles of instructional designer and project manager, although there is some relationship between maturity level and how organizations perceive the skills/competencies of project managers versus those of instructional designers. Further, organizational decision-makers have very specific expectations about the formal education and training of educational/training product development project leaders. The findings should be of value to institutions of higher education in evaluating programs that prepare students for careers in instructional design.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-010-9176-z</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2011-02, Vol.59 (1), p.139-158 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_851504108 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Administrator Characteristics Administrator Qualifications Administrator Role Associations, institutions, etc Courseware Design analysis Design evaluation DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE Education Education Work Relationship Educational Technology Equipment and supplies Graphic design Instructional Design Leaders Learning and Instruction Management education Management training Material Development Occupations Organizations (Groups) Private Sector Product development Program Administration Project design Project management Public Sector Surveys Teaching Teaching methods Training |
title | Instructional design and project management: complementary or divergent? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T09%3A12%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Instructional%20design%20and%20project%20management:%20complementary%20or%20divergent?&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=van%20Rooij,%20Shahron%20Williams&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=139-158&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-010-9176-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713964446%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851504108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713964446&rft_ericid=EJ913748&rft_jstor_id=41414928&rfr_iscdi=true |