Can the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ) predict actual prospective memory performance?
The present study investigated the relationship between individual scores in the recently developed Prospective & Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) & measures of actual prospective memory test performance. Standard laboratory time-based & event-based prospective memory tasks were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current Psychology 2006-10, Vol.25 (3), p.182-191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 191 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 182 |
container_title | Current Psychology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Kliegel, Matthias JÄger, Theodor |
description | The present study investigated the relationship between individual scores in the recently developed Prospective & Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) & measures of actual prospective memory test performance. Standard laboratory time-based & event-based prospective memory tasks were administered to a sample of 87 adults from Switzerland (age: M = 44.11, SD = 18.94; 47 females). We investigated how actual prospective memory performance is related to the scores of the PRMQ. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between prospective memory performances & self-reports of general metamemory judgments (that is, beliefs about & the use of one's memory abilities). The most important finding was that the different subscales of the PRMQ seem to have a differential sensitivity in the prediction of actual task performance: Prospective memory performance was predicted by the prospective memory subscales of the PRMQ, but not by the retrospective memory subscales. Furthermore, distinct aspects of metamemory were found to relate to actual prospective memory performance & to the scores of the PRMQ, providing cross validation for the PRMQ. In sum, the present study extends initial reports supporting the validity of the PRMQ & provides first evidence for the utility of the PRMQ subscales in differentiating between prospective & retrospective memory task performance. Tables, References. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-006-1002-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_850708459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57203782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d52ba5a9d6f62aca1abd120863cdbd637f9cd1892f5a7059110d8b49c63d4223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wN3gQnQRvXlMklmJFF9Q8UH3IZNkcErnYTIj9N-b2i7U1eVcvnM59yB0SuCKAMjrSCjhHAMInDTFag9NSMEE5pKxfTQBySRWVNBDdBTjEhLDOZugfmbabPjwWR-62Hs71F8-M63Lgh9-bRrfdGGdfY4-DnXXtqYOPrt4fX9-u0xO72o7ZMYOo1n9ObSz9T5UXWhMa_3NMTqozCr6k92cosX93WL2iOcvD0-z2zm2DNiAXU5Lk5vCiUpQYw0xpSMUlGDWlU4wWRXWEVXQKjcS8oIQcKrkhRXMcUrZFJ1vz6Y4P6l1U0frVyvT-m6MOpcUmFQb8OwfuOzG0KZoWuUgQfG8SBDZQjY9F4OvdB_qxoS1JqA3_ett_zr1v9FUK_YNDFF6NQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>850708459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ) predict actual prospective memory performance?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Kliegel, Matthias ; JÄger, Theodor</creator><creatorcontrib>Kliegel, Matthias ; JÄger, Theodor</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The present study investigated the relationship between individual scores in the recently developed Prospective & Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) & measures of actual prospective memory test performance. Standard laboratory time-based & event-based prospective memory tasks were administered to a sample of 87 adults from Switzerland (age: M = 44.11, SD = 18.94; 47 females). We investigated how actual prospective memory performance is related to the scores of the PRMQ. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between prospective memory performances & self-reports of general metamemory judgments (that is, beliefs about & the use of one's memory abilities). The most important finding was that the different subscales of the PRMQ seem to have a differential sensitivity in the prediction of actual task performance: Prospective memory performance was predicted by the prospective memory subscales of the PRMQ, but not by the retrospective memory subscales. Furthermore, distinct aspects of metamemory were found to relate to actual prospective memory performance & to the scores of the PRMQ, providing cross validation for the PRMQ. In sum, the present study extends initial reports supporting the validity of the PRMQ & provides first evidence for the utility of the PRMQ subscales in differentiating between prospective & retrospective memory task performance. Tables, References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-8262</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-006-1002-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CURPEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Laboratories ; Memory ; Memory tests ; Metamemory ; Prospective memory ; Psychometric tests ; Questionnaires ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Current Psychology, 2006-10, Vol.25 (3), p.182-191</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d52ba5a9d6f62aca1abd120863cdbd637f9cd1892f5a7059110d8b49c63d4223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d52ba5a9d6f62aca1abd120863cdbd637f9cd1892f5a7059110d8b49c63d4223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kliegel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JÄger, Theodor</creatorcontrib><title>Can the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ) predict actual prospective memory performance?</title><title>Current Psychology</title><description><![CDATA[The present study investigated the relationship between individual scores in the recently developed Prospective & Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) & measures of actual prospective memory test performance. Standard laboratory time-based & event-based prospective memory tasks were administered to a sample of 87 adults from Switzerland (age: M = 44.11, SD = 18.94; 47 females). We investigated how actual prospective memory performance is related to the scores of the PRMQ. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between prospective memory performances & self-reports of general metamemory judgments (that is, beliefs about & the use of one's memory abilities). The most important finding was that the different subscales of the PRMQ seem to have a differential sensitivity in the prediction of actual task performance: Prospective memory performance was predicted by the prospective memory subscales of the PRMQ, but not by the retrospective memory subscales. Furthermore, distinct aspects of metamemory were found to relate to actual prospective memory performance & to the scores of the PRMQ, providing cross validation for the PRMQ. In sum, the present study extends initial reports supporting the validity of the PRMQ & provides first evidence for the utility of the PRMQ subscales in differentiating between prospective & retrospective memory task performance. Tables, References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory tests</subject><subject>Metamemory</subject><subject>Prospective memory</subject><subject>Psychometric tests</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0737-8262</issn><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wN3gQnQRvXlMklmJFF9Q8UH3IZNkcErnYTIj9N-b2i7U1eVcvnM59yB0SuCKAMjrSCjhHAMInDTFag9NSMEE5pKxfTQBySRWVNBDdBTjEhLDOZugfmbabPjwWR-62Hs71F8-M63Lgh9-bRrfdGGdfY4-DnXXtqYOPrt4fX9-u0xO72o7ZMYOo1n9ObSz9T5UXWhMa_3NMTqozCr6k92cosX93WL2iOcvD0-z2zm2DNiAXU5Lk5vCiUpQYw0xpSMUlGDWlU4wWRXWEVXQKjcS8oIQcKrkhRXMcUrZFJ1vz6Y4P6l1U0frVyvT-m6MOpcUmFQb8OwfuOzG0KZoWuUgQfG8SBDZQjY9F4OvdB_qxoS1JqA3_ett_zr1v9FUK_YNDFF6NQ</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Kliegel, Matthias</creator><creator>JÄger, Theodor</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Can the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ) predict actual prospective memory performance?</title><author>Kliegel, Matthias ; JÄger, Theodor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d52ba5a9d6f62aca1abd120863cdbd637f9cd1892f5a7059110d8b49c63d4223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory tests</topic><topic>Metamemory</topic><topic>Prospective memory</topic><topic>Psychometric tests</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kliegel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JÄger, Theodor</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Current Psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kliegel, Matthias</au><au>JÄger, Theodor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ) predict actual prospective memory performance?</atitle><jtitle>Current Psychology</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>182-191</pages><issn>0737-8262</issn><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><coden>CURPEQ</coden><abstract><![CDATA[The present study investigated the relationship between individual scores in the recently developed Prospective & Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) & measures of actual prospective memory test performance. Standard laboratory time-based & event-based prospective memory tasks were administered to a sample of 87 adults from Switzerland (age: M = 44.11, SD = 18.94; 47 females). We investigated how actual prospective memory performance is related to the scores of the PRMQ. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between prospective memory performances & self-reports of general metamemory judgments (that is, beliefs about & the use of one's memory abilities). The most important finding was that the different subscales of the PRMQ seem to have a differential sensitivity in the prediction of actual task performance: Prospective memory performance was predicted by the prospective memory subscales of the PRMQ, but not by the retrospective memory subscales. Furthermore, distinct aspects of metamemory were found to relate to actual prospective memory performance & to the scores of the PRMQ, providing cross validation for the PRMQ. In sum, the present study extends initial reports supporting the validity of the PRMQ & provides first evidence for the utility of the PRMQ subscales in differentiating between prospective & retrospective memory task performance. Tables, References. Adapted from the source document.]]></abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-006-1002-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0737-8262 |
ispartof | Current Psychology, 2006-10, Vol.25 (3), p.182-191 |
issn | 0737-8262 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_850708459 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Laboratories Memory Memory tests Metamemory Prospective memory Psychometric tests Questionnaires Validity |
title | Can the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ) predict actual prospective memory performance? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A43%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20the%20prospective%20and%20retrospective%20memory%20questionnaire%20(PRMQ)%20predict%20actual%20prospective%20memory%20performance?&rft.jtitle=Current%20Psychology&rft.au=Kliegel,%20Matthias&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=182-191&rft.issn=0737-8262&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft.coden=CURPEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-006-1002-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57203782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=850708459&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |