Making sense of psychological contract breach

Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of managerial psychology 2011-01, Vol.26 (1), p.12-27
Hauptverfasser: Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta, Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12
container_title Journal of managerial psychology
container_volume 26
creator Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta
Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M
description Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective.Design methodology approach - In total, 15 interviews employing critical incident technique to examine employee sense making processes were carried out.Findings - The findings highlight the variety of ways employees perceive contract breach and the processual nature of the experience. Emotions and actions were intertwined in the process of attributing responsibility and finding an explanation for the breach.Research limitations implications - Contract breach is not necessarily a discrete event and reciprocity is integral to the sense making process. The findings provide a basis for future research that could explore the role of time, contextual factors and various employer representatives as sense-givers in psychological contract evaluations.Practical implications - Employer representatives can aid employees to make sense of critical events that occur in organizations to minimize the effects of breach.Originality value - The paper provides an under-researched sense making-perspective on psychological contract breach. Through a qualitative inquiry, the complex nature of the employees' experience of and reaction to breach, is highlighted.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/02683941111099592
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_846767209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>861539616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-200d16f1c8c95158011b9ed034ff9d5e0de922524720a17c7ec1c3dcb6b3d3223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9giFhYCPjv-GlHFlwRigdlybKdNSeNgp0P_Pa7KRJHglhvueU53L0LngK8BsLzBhEuqKsiFlWKKHKAJCCZLIYQ8RJPtvMwAP0YnKS0xBsqomqDyxXy0_bxIvk--CE0xpI1dhC7MW2u6woZ-jMaORR29sYtTdNSYLvmz7z5F7_d3b7PH8vn14Wl2-1zaqmJjSTB2wBuw0ioGTGKAWnmHadU0yjGPnVeEMFIJgg0IK7wFS52teU0dJYRO0eVu7xDD59qnUa_aZH3Xmd6HddKSQ76eA_-bZExhTFiVyYsf5DKsY5_f0LLigudbVIZgB9kYUoq-0UNsVyZuNGC9DVrvBZ0dvHP8ykfTuX8pV78re6geXEO_AJ-yiTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>846767209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making sense of psychological contract breach</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta ; Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creator><creatorcontrib>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta ; Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective.Design methodology approach - In total, 15 interviews employing critical incident technique to examine employee sense making processes were carried out.Findings - The findings highlight the variety of ways employees perceive contract breach and the processual nature of the experience. Emotions and actions were intertwined in the process of attributing responsibility and finding an explanation for the breach.Research limitations implications - Contract breach is not necessarily a discrete event and reciprocity is integral to the sense making process. The findings provide a basis for future research that could explore the role of time, contextual factors and various employer representatives as sense-givers in psychological contract evaluations.Practical implications - Employer representatives can aid employees to make sense of critical events that occur in organizations to minimize the effects of breach.Originality value - The paper provides an under-researched sense making-perspective on psychological contract breach. Through a qualitative inquiry, the complex nature of the employees' experience of and reaction to breach, is highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/02683941111099592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavior ; Breach of contract ; Breaches ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive processes ; Contracts ; Critical incident technique ; Damage claims ; Emotions ; Employees ; Identity ; Integrals ; Methodology ; Occupational psychology ; Organization theory ; Organizations ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Psychological contracts ; Psychology ; Qualitative research ; Reciprocity ; Sense making approach ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of managerial psychology, 2011-01, Vol.26 (1), p.12-27</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-200d16f1c8c95158011b9ed034ff9d5e0de922524720a17c7ec1c3dcb6b3d3223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-200d16f1c8c95158011b9ed034ff9d5e0de922524720a17c7ec1c3dcb6b3d3223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683941111099592/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683941111099592/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,12846,27924,27925,30999,31000,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creatorcontrib><title>Making sense of psychological contract breach</title><title>Journal of managerial psychology</title><description>Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective.Design methodology approach - In total, 15 interviews employing critical incident technique to examine employee sense making processes were carried out.Findings - The findings highlight the variety of ways employees perceive contract breach and the processual nature of the experience. Emotions and actions were intertwined in the process of attributing responsibility and finding an explanation for the breach.Research limitations implications - Contract breach is not necessarily a discrete event and reciprocity is integral to the sense making process. The findings provide a basis for future research that could explore the role of time, contextual factors and various employer representatives as sense-givers in psychological contract evaluations.Practical implications - Employer representatives can aid employees to make sense of critical events that occur in organizations to minimize the effects of breach.Originality value - The paper provides an under-researched sense making-perspective on psychological contract breach. Through a qualitative inquiry, the complex nature of the employees' experience of and reaction to breach, is highlighted.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Breach of contract</subject><subject>Breaches</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive processes</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Critical incident technique</subject><subject>Damage claims</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychological contracts</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Sense making approach</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0268-3946</issn><issn>1758-7778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9giFhYCPjv-GlHFlwRigdlybKdNSeNgp0P_Pa7KRJHglhvueU53L0LngK8BsLzBhEuqKsiFlWKKHKAJCCZLIYQ8RJPtvMwAP0YnKS0xBsqomqDyxXy0_bxIvk--CE0xpI1dhC7MW2u6woZ-jMaORR29sYtTdNSYLvmz7z5F7_d3b7PH8vn14Wl2-1zaqmJjSTB2wBuw0ioGTGKAWnmHadU0yjGPnVeEMFIJgg0IK7wFS52teU0dJYRO0eVu7xDD59qnUa_aZH3Xmd6HddKSQ76eA_-bZExhTFiVyYsf5DKsY5_f0LLigudbVIZgB9kYUoq-0UNsVyZuNGC9DVrvBZ0dvHP8ykfTuX8pV78re6geXEO_AJ-yiTg</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta</creator><creator>Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Making sense of psychological contract breach</title><author>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta ; Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-200d16f1c8c95158011b9ed034ff9d5e0de922524720a17c7ec1c3dcb6b3d3223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Breach of contract</topic><topic>Breaches</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive processes</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Critical incident technique</topic><topic>Damage claims</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychological contracts</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Sense making approach</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of managerial psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta</au><au>Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making sense of psychological contract breach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of managerial psychology</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>12-27</pages><issn>0268-3946</issn><eissn>1758-7778</eissn><abstract>Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective.Design methodology approach - In total, 15 interviews employing critical incident technique to examine employee sense making processes were carried out.Findings - The findings highlight the variety of ways employees perceive contract breach and the processual nature of the experience. Emotions and actions were intertwined in the process of attributing responsibility and finding an explanation for the breach.Research limitations implications - Contract breach is not necessarily a discrete event and reciprocity is integral to the sense making process. The findings provide a basis for future research that could explore the role of time, contextual factors and various employer representatives as sense-givers in psychological contract evaluations.Practical implications - Employer representatives can aid employees to make sense of critical events that occur in organizations to minimize the effects of breach.Originality value - The paper provides an under-researched sense making-perspective on psychological contract breach. Through a qualitative inquiry, the complex nature of the employees' experience of and reaction to breach, is highlighted.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/02683941111099592</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3946
ispartof Journal of managerial psychology, 2011-01, Vol.26 (1), p.12-27
issn 0268-3946
1758-7778
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_846767209
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Analysis
Behavior
Breach of contract
Breaches
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive processes
Contracts
Critical incident technique
Damage claims
Emotions
Employees
Identity
Integrals
Methodology
Occupational psychology
Organization theory
Organizations
Perception
Perceptions
Psychological contracts
Psychology
Qualitative research
Reciprocity
Sense making approach
Studies
title Making sense of psychological contract breach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20sense%20of%20psychological%20contract%20breach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20managerial%20psychology&rft.au=Parzefall,%20Marjo-Riitta&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=12-27&rft.issn=0268-3946&rft.eissn=1758-7778&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/02683941111099592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E861539616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=846767209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true