Making sense of psychological contract breach
Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of managerial psychology 2011-01, Vol.26 (1), p.12-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12 |
container_title | Journal of managerial psychology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M |
description | Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective.Design methodology approach - In total, 15 interviews employing critical incident technique to examine employee sense making processes were carried out.Findings - The findings highlight the variety of ways employees perceive contract breach and the processual nature of the experience. Emotions and actions were intertwined in the process of attributing responsibility and finding an explanation for the breach.Research limitations implications - Contract breach is not necessarily a discrete event and reciprocity is integral to the sense making process. The findings provide a basis for future research that could explore the role of time, contextual factors and various employer representatives as sense-givers in psychological contract evaluations.Practical implications - Employer representatives can aid employees to make sense of critical events that occur in organizations to minimize the effects of breach.Originality value - The paper provides an under-researched sense making-perspective on psychological contract breach. Through a qualitative inquiry, the complex nature of the employees' experience of and reaction to breach, is highlighted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/02683941111099592 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_846767209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>861539616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-200d16f1c8c95158011b9ed034ff9d5e0de922524720a17c7ec1c3dcb6b3d3223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9giFhYCPjv-GlHFlwRigdlybKdNSeNgp0P_Pa7KRJHglhvueU53L0LngK8BsLzBhEuqKsiFlWKKHKAJCCZLIYQ8RJPtvMwAP0YnKS0xBsqomqDyxXy0_bxIvk--CE0xpI1dhC7MW2u6woZ-jMaORR29sYtTdNSYLvmz7z5F7_d3b7PH8vn14Wl2-1zaqmJjSTB2wBuw0ioGTGKAWnmHadU0yjGPnVeEMFIJgg0IK7wFS52teU0dJYRO0eVu7xDD59qnUa_aZH3Xmd6HddKSQ76eA_-bZExhTFiVyYsf5DKsY5_f0LLigudbVIZgB9kYUoq-0UNsVyZuNGC9DVrvBZ0dvHP8ykfTuX8pV78re6geXEO_AJ-yiTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>846767209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making sense of psychological contract breach</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta ; Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creator><creatorcontrib>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta ; Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective.Design methodology approach - In total, 15 interviews employing critical incident technique to examine employee sense making processes were carried out.Findings - The findings highlight the variety of ways employees perceive contract breach and the processual nature of the experience. Emotions and actions were intertwined in the process of attributing responsibility and finding an explanation for the breach.Research limitations implications - Contract breach is not necessarily a discrete event and reciprocity is integral to the sense making process. The findings provide a basis for future research that could explore the role of time, contextual factors and various employer representatives as sense-givers in psychological contract evaluations.Practical implications - Employer representatives can aid employees to make sense of critical events that occur in organizations to minimize the effects of breach.Originality value - The paper provides an under-researched sense making-perspective on psychological contract breach. Through a qualitative inquiry, the complex nature of the employees' experience of and reaction to breach, is highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/02683941111099592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavior ; Breach of contract ; Breaches ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive processes ; Contracts ; Critical incident technique ; Damage claims ; Emotions ; Employees ; Identity ; Integrals ; Methodology ; Occupational psychology ; Organization theory ; Organizations ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Psychological contracts ; Psychology ; Qualitative research ; Reciprocity ; Sense making approach ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of managerial psychology, 2011-01, Vol.26 (1), p.12-27</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-200d16f1c8c95158011b9ed034ff9d5e0de922524720a17c7ec1c3dcb6b3d3223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-200d16f1c8c95158011b9ed034ff9d5e0de922524720a17c7ec1c3dcb6b3d3223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683941111099592/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683941111099592/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,12846,27924,27925,30999,31000,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creatorcontrib><title>Making sense of psychological contract breach</title><title>Journal of managerial psychology</title><description>Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective.Design methodology approach - In total, 15 interviews employing critical incident technique to examine employee sense making processes were carried out.Findings - The findings highlight the variety of ways employees perceive contract breach and the processual nature of the experience. Emotions and actions were intertwined in the process of attributing responsibility and finding an explanation for the breach.Research limitations implications - Contract breach is not necessarily a discrete event and reciprocity is integral to the sense making process. The findings provide a basis for future research that could explore the role of time, contextual factors and various employer representatives as sense-givers in psychological contract evaluations.Practical implications - Employer representatives can aid employees to make sense of critical events that occur in organizations to minimize the effects of breach.Originality value - The paper provides an under-researched sense making-perspective on psychological contract breach. Through a qualitative inquiry, the complex nature of the employees' experience of and reaction to breach, is highlighted.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Breach of contract</subject><subject>Breaches</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive processes</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Critical incident technique</subject><subject>Damage claims</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychological contracts</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Sense making approach</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0268-3946</issn><issn>1758-7778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9giFhYCPjv-GlHFlwRigdlybKdNSeNgp0P_Pa7KRJHglhvueU53L0LngK8BsLzBhEuqKsiFlWKKHKAJCCZLIYQ8RJPtvMwAP0YnKS0xBsqomqDyxXy0_bxIvk--CE0xpI1dhC7MW2u6woZ-jMaORR29sYtTdNSYLvmz7z5F7_d3b7PH8vn14Wl2-1zaqmJjSTB2wBuw0ioGTGKAWnmHadU0yjGPnVeEMFIJgg0IK7wFS52teU0dJYRO0eVu7xDD59qnUa_aZH3Xmd6HddKSQ76eA_-bZExhTFiVyYsf5DKsY5_f0LLigudbVIZgB9kYUoq-0UNsVyZuNGC9DVrvBZ0dvHP8ykfTuX8pV78re6geXEO_AJ-yiTg</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta</creator><creator>Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Making sense of psychological contract breach</title><author>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta ; Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-200d16f1c8c95158011b9ed034ff9d5e0de922524720a17c7ec1c3dcb6b3d3223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Breach of contract</topic><topic>Breaches</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive processes</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Critical incident technique</topic><topic>Damage claims</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychological contracts</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Sense making approach</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of managerial psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta</au><au>Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making sense of psychological contract breach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of managerial psychology</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>12-27</pages><issn>0268-3946</issn><eissn>1758-7778</eissn><abstract>Purpose - A small number of psychological contract studies have explored the cognitive processes that influence employees' evaluation and reactions to perceived contract breach. The aim of this paper is to extend this reseaerch with a qualitative study on breach using a sense making perspective.Design methodology approach - In total, 15 interviews employing critical incident technique to examine employee sense making processes were carried out.Findings - The findings highlight the variety of ways employees perceive contract breach and the processual nature of the experience. Emotions and actions were intertwined in the process of attributing responsibility and finding an explanation for the breach.Research limitations implications - Contract breach is not necessarily a discrete event and reciprocity is integral to the sense making process. The findings provide a basis for future research that could explore the role of time, contextual factors and various employer representatives as sense-givers in psychological contract evaluations.Practical implications - Employer representatives can aid employees to make sense of critical events that occur in organizations to minimize the effects of breach.Originality value - The paper provides an under-researched sense making-perspective on psychological contract breach. Through a qualitative inquiry, the complex nature of the employees' experience of and reaction to breach, is highlighted.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/02683941111099592</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3946 |
ispartof | Journal of managerial psychology, 2011-01, Vol.26 (1), p.12-27 |
issn | 0268-3946 1758-7778 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_846767209 |
source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Analysis Behavior Breach of contract Breaches Cognition & reasoning Cognitive processes Contracts Critical incident technique Damage claims Emotions Employees Identity Integrals Methodology Occupational psychology Organization theory Organizations Perception Perceptions Psychological contracts Psychology Qualitative research Reciprocity Sense making approach Studies |
title | Making sense of psychological contract breach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20sense%20of%20psychological%20contract%20breach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20managerial%20psychology&rft.au=Parzefall,%20Marjo-Riitta&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=12-27&rft.issn=0268-3946&rft.eissn=1758-7778&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/02683941111099592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E861539616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=846767209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |