Between Poiesis and Praxis: Women and Art

If we think of artistic creation as a basic dimension of humanity we need to question the absence of female artists in history. We should also look at their gradual emergence in the late 20th century, an emergence that coincides with the feminist movement and a change in the conception of art itself...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diogenes (English ed.) 2010-02, Vol.57 (1), p.83-92
1. Verfasser: Collin, Françoise
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
container_title Diogenes (English ed.)
container_volume 57
creator Collin, Françoise
description If we think of artistic creation as a basic dimension of humanity we need to question the absence of female artists in history. We should also look at their gradual emergence in the late 20th century, an emergence that coincides with the feminist movement and a change in the conception of art itself, revealed chiefly by Duchamp. But does art by women have some specificity? Without giving a definite answer as far as subject matter is concerned, we note that the conditions suited to both history and the history of art may affect their creation but without specifying it ontologically. If, moreover, some women artists define their work as feminist, it is through an act that combines artistic and political transgression. The exhibition currently arranged by the Georges Pompidou Centre, elles@ beaubourg, provides new resources for these complex questions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0392192110374244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_833216055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0392192110374244</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2234869461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-b04596f57f45bf274a6d7cae4ffe48ac04378f0227fc8d4a24b74960af4b6cde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqJgXb17LN48RPOYJK23dfEFC-5B8RjSNJEubrMmXdR_b0oFQXAYGJjvBR9Cp5RcUKrUJeE1o3kp4QoYwB4qKEiFlazFPipGGI_4ITpKaU3ySM4LdH7thg_n-nIVOpe6VJq-LVfRfHbpqnwJm4yMn3kcjtGBN2_JnfzcGXq-vXla3OPl493DYr7Elkk64IaAqKUXyoNoPFNgZKusceC9g8pYAlxVnjCmvK1aMAwaBbUkxkMjbev4DJ1NvtsY3ncuDXoddrHPkbrinFFJhMgkMpFsDClF5_U2dhsTvzQleuxD_-0jS_AkSebV_Xr-y_8GoARdMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>833216055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Between Poiesis and Praxis: Women and Art</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Collin, Françoise</creator><creatorcontrib>Collin, Françoise</creatorcontrib><description>If we think of artistic creation as a basic dimension of humanity we need to question the absence of female artists in history. We should also look at their gradual emergence in the late 20th century, an emergence that coincides with the feminist movement and a change in the conception of art itself, revealed chiefly by Duchamp. But does art by women have some specificity? Without giving a definite answer as far as subject matter is concerned, we note that the conditions suited to both history and the history of art may affect their creation but without specifying it ontologically. If, moreover, some women artists define their work as feminist, it is through an act that combines artistic and political transgression. The exhibition currently arranged by the Georges Pompidou Centre, elles@ beaubourg, provides new resources for these complex questions.</description><edition>English edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0392-1921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0392192110374244</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DIOGA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ontology ; Women ; Womens rights movements</subject><ispartof>Diogenes (English ed.), 2010-02, Vol.57 (1), p.83-92</ispartof><rights>ICPHS 2010</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-b04596f57f45bf274a6d7cae4ffe48ac04378f0227fc8d4a24b74960af4b6cde3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0392192110374244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0392192110374244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collin, Françoise</creatorcontrib><title>Between Poiesis and Praxis: Women and Art</title><title>Diogenes (English ed.)</title><description>If we think of artistic creation as a basic dimension of humanity we need to question the absence of female artists in history. We should also look at their gradual emergence in the late 20th century, an emergence that coincides with the feminist movement and a change in the conception of art itself, revealed chiefly by Duchamp. But does art by women have some specificity? Without giving a definite answer as far as subject matter is concerned, we note that the conditions suited to both history and the history of art may affect their creation but without specifying it ontologically. If, moreover, some women artists define their work as feminist, it is through an act that combines artistic and political transgression. The exhibition currently arranged by the Georges Pompidou Centre, elles@ beaubourg, provides new resources for these complex questions.</description><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens rights movements</subject><issn>0392-1921</issn><issn>1467-7695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqJgXb17LN48RPOYJK23dfEFC-5B8RjSNJEubrMmXdR_b0oFQXAYGJjvBR9Cp5RcUKrUJeE1o3kp4QoYwB4qKEiFlazFPipGGI_4ITpKaU3ySM4LdH7thg_n-nIVOpe6VJq-LVfRfHbpqnwJm4yMn3kcjtGBN2_JnfzcGXq-vXla3OPl493DYr7Elkk64IaAqKUXyoNoPFNgZKusceC9g8pYAlxVnjCmvK1aMAwaBbUkxkMjbev4DJ1NvtsY3ncuDXoddrHPkbrinFFJhMgkMpFsDClF5_U2dhsTvzQleuxD_-0jS_AkSebV_Xr-y_8GoARdMg</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Collin, Françoise</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Between Poiesis and Praxis: Women and Art</title><author>Collin, Françoise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-b04596f57f45bf274a6d7cae4ffe48ac04378f0227fc8d4a24b74960af4b6cde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens rights movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collin, Françoise</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Diogenes (English ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collin, Françoise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Between Poiesis and Praxis: Women and Art</atitle><jtitle>Diogenes (English ed.)</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>83-92</pages><issn>0392-1921</issn><eissn>1467-7695</eissn><coden>DIOGA9</coden><abstract>If we think of artistic creation as a basic dimension of humanity we need to question the absence of female artists in history. We should also look at their gradual emergence in the late 20th century, an emergence that coincides with the feminist movement and a change in the conception of art itself, revealed chiefly by Duchamp. But does art by women have some specificity? Without giving a definite answer as far as subject matter is concerned, we note that the conditions suited to both history and the history of art may affect their creation but without specifying it ontologically. If, moreover, some women artists define their work as feminist, it is through an act that combines artistic and political transgression. The exhibition currently arranged by the Georges Pompidou Centre, elles@ beaubourg, provides new resources for these complex questions.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0392192110374244</doi><tpages>10</tpages><edition>English edition</edition></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0392-1921
ispartof Diogenes (English ed.), 2010-02, Vol.57 (1), p.83-92
issn 0392-1921
1467-7695
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_833216055
source Access via SAGE
subjects Ontology
Women
Womens rights movements
title Between Poiesis and Praxis: Women and Art
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Between%20Poiesis%20and%20Praxis:%20Women%20and%20Art&rft.jtitle=Diogenes%20(English%20ed.)&rft.au=Collin,%20Fran%C3%A7oise&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=83-92&rft.issn=0392-1921&rft.eissn=1467-7695&rft.coden=DIOGA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0392192110374244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2234869461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=833216055&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0392192110374244&rfr_iscdi=true