The Russian enterprise directors' perceptions on the innovation activity of their caompany: A briefing of the empirical results
The main objective of the article is to analyse the current state of the innovation activity among the Russian enterprises. The empirical evidence shows only 13% of the sample indicated that innovation is the first priority for the firm. We propose that the Russian Government designs innovation poli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal for East European management studies 2010-01, Vol.15 (4), p.361-368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 368 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 361 |
container_title | Journal for East European management studies |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Prazdanichnykh, Alexey Prazdnichnykh, Alexey Liuhto, Kari |
description | The main objective of the article is to analyse the current state of the innovation activity among the Russian enterprises. The empirical evidence shows only 13% of the sample indicated that innovation is the first priority for the firm. We propose that the Russian Government designs innovation policies which takes into account the differences between the industries. Secondly, the Russian Government should promote international innovation cooperation by setting up technology trade agents in the most active countries in terms of innovation cooperation, such as Germany, the USA, and Finland. Thirdly, the CEOs of the Russian enterprises consider R&D funding as well as policy steps to increase R&D effectiveness, as those measures of innovation policy which should be of the highest priority for the Russian government. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, den aktuellen Stand der Innovationsaktivitäten von russischen Unternehmen zu analysieren. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass nur für 13% Innovation oberste Priorität hat. Wir schlagen vor, dass die russische Regierung eine Innovationspolitik entwickelt, welche die Unterschiede zwischen den Branchen berücksichtigt. Zweitens sollte die russische Regierung die internationale Zusammenarbeit in Bezug auf Innovation durch die Einrichtung von Technologietransfer mit den aktivsten Ländern wie Deutschland, den USA und Finnland fördern. Drittens erachten die russischen CEOs die Förderung von Forschungs- und Entwicklungsausgaben sowie entsprechende Richtlinien als jene politischen Maßnahmen die höchste Priorität genießen sollten. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5771/0949-6181-2010-4-361 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_818554061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23281755</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23281755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g258t-49e01da9e78d89336628c15eb742d919d200e7efa232c9bfd77da179a5d96f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_QCG4cRXNc5K4K8UXFATpfkhn7tSUNhmTtNCVf90pLa4unPPdczkXoVtGH5XW7IlaaUnFDCOcMkokERU7QyNmKk4oZfYcjf6RS3SV84pSIaWQI_Q7_wb8tc3Zu4AhFEh98hlw6xM0Jab8gHtIDfTFx5BxDLgMCz6EuHMHCbum-J0vexy7g-UTblzc9C7sn_EEL5KHzoflycWw6X3yjVvjBHm7LvkaXXRuneHmNMdo_voyn76T2efbx3QyI0uuTCHSAmWts6BNa6wQVcVNwxQstOStZbbllIKGznHBG7voWq1bx7R1qrVVJ8QY3R9j-xR_tpBLvYrbFIaLtWFGKUkrNkB3R2iVh-b18IiNS_t6iDRMKyX-ADSJbMs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>818554061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Russian enterprise directors' perceptions on the innovation activity of their caompany: A briefing of the empirical results</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Prazdanichnykh, Alexey ; Prazdnichnykh, Alexey ; Liuhto, Kari</creator><creatorcontrib>Prazdanichnykh, Alexey ; Prazdnichnykh, Alexey ; Liuhto, Kari</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of the article is to analyse the current state of the innovation activity among the Russian enterprises. The empirical evidence shows only 13% of the sample indicated that innovation is the first priority for the firm. We propose that the Russian Government designs innovation policies which takes into account the differences between the industries. Secondly, the Russian Government should promote international innovation cooperation by setting up technology trade agents in the most active countries in terms of innovation cooperation, such as Germany, the USA, and Finland. Thirdly, the CEOs of the Russian enterprises consider R&D funding as well as policy steps to increase R&D effectiveness, as those measures of innovation policy which should be of the highest priority for the Russian government. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, den aktuellen Stand der Innovationsaktivitäten von russischen Unternehmen zu analysieren. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass nur für 13% Innovation oberste Priorität hat. Wir schlagen vor, dass die russische Regierung eine Innovationspolitik entwickelt, welche die Unterschiede zwischen den Branchen berücksichtigt. Zweitens sollte die russische Regierung die internationale Zusammenarbeit in Bezug auf Innovation durch die Einrichtung von Technologietransfer mit den aktivsten Ländern wie Deutschland, den USA und Finnland fördern. Drittens erachten die russischen CEOs die Förderung von Forschungs- und Entwicklungsausgaben sowie entsprechende Richtlinien als jene politischen Maßnahmen die höchste Priorität genießen sollten.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-6181</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-0019</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5771/0949-6181-2010-4-361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baden-Baden: Rainer Hampp Verlag</publisher><subject>Automotive industries ; Beverage industries ; Business innovation ; Business structures ; Consumer goods industries ; Cooperation ; Educational innovation ; Expenditures ; Exports ; Information technology ; Innovations ; Polls & surveys ; Public policy ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research Note ; Russian government ; Studies ; Technological innovation ; Technology transfer</subject><ispartof>Journal for East European management studies, 2010-01, Vol.15 (4), p.361-368</ispartof><rights>Copyright Rainer Hampp Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23281755$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23281755$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prazdanichnykh, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prazdnichnykh, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liuhto, Kari</creatorcontrib><title>The Russian enterprise directors' perceptions on the innovation activity of their caompany: A briefing of the empirical results</title><title>Journal for East European management studies</title><description>The main objective of the article is to analyse the current state of the innovation activity among the Russian enterprises. The empirical evidence shows only 13% of the sample indicated that innovation is the first priority for the firm. We propose that the Russian Government designs innovation policies which takes into account the differences between the industries. Secondly, the Russian Government should promote international innovation cooperation by setting up technology trade agents in the most active countries in terms of innovation cooperation, such as Germany, the USA, and Finland. Thirdly, the CEOs of the Russian enterprises consider R&D funding as well as policy steps to increase R&D effectiveness, as those measures of innovation policy which should be of the highest priority for the Russian government. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, den aktuellen Stand der Innovationsaktivitäten von russischen Unternehmen zu analysieren. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass nur für 13% Innovation oberste Priorität hat. Wir schlagen vor, dass die russische Regierung eine Innovationspolitik entwickelt, welche die Unterschiede zwischen den Branchen berücksichtigt. Zweitens sollte die russische Regierung die internationale Zusammenarbeit in Bezug auf Innovation durch die Einrichtung von Technologietransfer mit den aktivsten Ländern wie Deutschland, den USA und Finnland fördern. Drittens erachten die russischen CEOs die Förderung von Forschungs- und Entwicklungsausgaben sowie entsprechende Richtlinien als jene politischen Maßnahmen die höchste Priorität genießen sollten.</description><subject>Automotive industries</subject><subject>Beverage industries</subject><subject>Business innovation</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Consumer goods industries</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Educational innovation</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research Note</subject><subject>Russian government</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><issn>0949-6181</issn><issn>1862-0019</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_QCG4cRXNc5K4K8UXFATpfkhn7tSUNhmTtNCVf90pLa4unPPdczkXoVtGH5XW7IlaaUnFDCOcMkokERU7QyNmKk4oZfYcjf6RS3SV84pSIaWQI_Q7_wb8tc3Zu4AhFEh98hlw6xM0Jab8gHtIDfTFx5BxDLgMCz6EuHMHCbum-J0vexy7g-UTblzc9C7sn_EEL5KHzoflycWw6X3yjVvjBHm7LvkaXXRuneHmNMdo_voyn76T2efbx3QyI0uuTCHSAmWts6BNa6wQVcVNwxQstOStZbbllIKGznHBG7voWq1bx7R1qrVVJ8QY3R9j-xR_tpBLvYrbFIaLtWFGKUkrNkB3R2iVh-b18IiNS_t6iDRMKyX-ADSJbMs</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Prazdanichnykh, Alexey</creator><creator>Prazdnichnykh, Alexey</creator><creator>Liuhto, Kari</creator><general>Rainer Hampp Verlag</general><general>Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH und Co KG</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>The Russian enterprise directors' perceptions on the innovation activity of their caompany: A briefing of the empirical results</title><author>Prazdanichnykh, Alexey ; Prazdnichnykh, Alexey ; Liuhto, Kari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g258t-49e01da9e78d89336628c15eb742d919d200e7efa232c9bfd77da179a5d96f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Automotive industries</topic><topic>Beverage industries</topic><topic>Business innovation</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Consumer goods industries</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Educational innovation</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research Note</topic><topic>Russian government</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prazdanichnykh, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prazdnichnykh, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liuhto, Kari</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal for East European management studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prazdanichnykh, Alexey</au><au>Prazdnichnykh, Alexey</au><au>Liuhto, Kari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Russian enterprise directors' perceptions on the innovation activity of their caompany: A briefing of the empirical results</atitle><jtitle>Journal for East European management studies</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>361-368</pages><issn>0949-6181</issn><eissn>1862-0019</eissn><abstract>The main objective of the article is to analyse the current state of the innovation activity among the Russian enterprises. The empirical evidence shows only 13% of the sample indicated that innovation is the first priority for the firm. We propose that the Russian Government designs innovation policies which takes into account the differences between the industries. Secondly, the Russian Government should promote international innovation cooperation by setting up technology trade agents in the most active countries in terms of innovation cooperation, such as Germany, the USA, and Finland. Thirdly, the CEOs of the Russian enterprises consider R&D funding as well as policy steps to increase R&D effectiveness, as those measures of innovation policy which should be of the highest priority for the Russian government. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, den aktuellen Stand der Innovationsaktivitäten von russischen Unternehmen zu analysieren. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass nur für 13% Innovation oberste Priorität hat. Wir schlagen vor, dass die russische Regierung eine Innovationspolitik entwickelt, welche die Unterschiede zwischen den Branchen berücksichtigt. Zweitens sollte die russische Regierung die internationale Zusammenarbeit in Bezug auf Innovation durch die Einrichtung von Technologietransfer mit den aktivsten Ländern wie Deutschland, den USA und Finnland fördern. Drittens erachten die russischen CEOs die Förderung von Forschungs- und Entwicklungsausgaben sowie entsprechende Richtlinien als jene politischen Maßnahmen die höchste Priorität genießen sollten.</abstract><cop>Baden-Baden</cop><pub>Rainer Hampp Verlag</pub><doi>10.5771/0949-6181-2010-4-361</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0949-6181 |
ispartof | Journal for East European management studies, 2010-01, Vol.15 (4), p.361-368 |
issn | 0949-6181 1862-0019 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_818554061 |
source | Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Automotive industries Beverage industries Business innovation Business structures Consumer goods industries Cooperation Educational innovation Expenditures Exports Information technology Innovations Polls & surveys Public policy R&D Research & development Research Note Russian government Studies Technological innovation Technology transfer |
title | The Russian enterprise directors' perceptions on the innovation activity of their caompany: A briefing of the empirical results |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A04%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Russian%20enterprise%20directors'%20perceptions%20on%20the%20innovation%20activity%20of%20their%20caompany:%20A%20briefing%20of%20the%20empirical%20results&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20East%20European%20management%20studies&rft.au=Prazdanichnykh,%20Alexey&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=361-368&rft.issn=0949-6181&rft.eissn=1862-0019&rft_id=info:doi/10.5771/0949-6181-2010-4-361&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23281755%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=818554061&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23281755&rfr_iscdi=true |