Evaluation of Conventional and Alternative Monitoring Methods for a Recreational Marine Beach with Nonpoint Source of Fecal Contamination

The objectives of this work were to compare enterococci (ENT) measurements based on the membrane filter, ENT(MF) with alternatives that can provide faster results including alternative enterococci methods (e.g., chromogenic substrate (CS), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)), and resu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2010-11, Vol.44 (21), p.8175-8181
Hauptverfasser: Shibata, Tomoyuki, Solo-Gabriele, Helena M., Sinigalliano, Christopher D., Gidley, Maribeth L., Plano, Lisa R.W., Fleisher, Jay M., Wang, John D., Elmir, Samir M., He, Guoqing, Wright, Mary E., Abdelzaher, Amir M., Ortega, Cristina, Wanless, David, Garza, Anna C., Kish, Jonathan, Scott, Troy, Hollenbeck, Julie, Backer, Lorraine C., Fleming, Lora E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objectives of this work were to compare enterococci (ENT) measurements based on the membrane filter, ENT(MF) with alternatives that can provide faster results including alternative enterococci methods (e.g., chromogenic substrate (CS), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)), and results from regression models based upon environmental parameters that can be measured in real-time. ENT(MF) were also compared to source tracking markers (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacteroidales human and dog markers, and Catellicoccus gull marker) in an effort to interpret the variability of the signal. Results showed that concentrations of enterococci based upon MF (
ISSN:0013-936X
1520-5851
DOI:10.1021/es100884w