Comparison of the efficiency of polygalacturonase and [beta]-glucosidase enzyme preparations in stabilization of cherry plum wine material
Pektofoetidin and Pectinex, enzyme preparations with the highest polygalacturonase and β-glucosidase activities, were covalently immobilized on DEAE cellulose and Aminosilochromes 10 and 30. After treatment of cherry plum wine material with the soluble and immobilized enzyme preparations, the conten...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied biochemistry and microbiology 2006-11, Vol.42 (6), p.609 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 609 |
| container_title | Applied biochemistry and microbiology |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Stepanova, E V Landesman, E O Fedorova, T V Yakovleva, K E Koroleva, O V |
| description | Pektofoetidin and Pectinex, enzyme preparations with the highest polygalacturonase and β-glucosidase activities, were covalently immobilized on DEAE cellulose and Aminosilochromes 10 and 30. After treatment of cherry plum wine material with the soluble and immobilized enzyme preparations, the content of phenolics increased by 26 and 40%, respectively. The increase was accompanied by a decrease in the protein content (by up to 37%), carbohydrate content (by 17% on the average), and antioxidant activity (5-37%). The most efficient treatment involved Pektofoetidin immobilized on Aminosilochrome 10. It increased the clarity of the wine material and its antioxidant activity by 100 and 10%, respectively.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1134/S0003683806060123 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_761357540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2177275931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_7613575403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE1OwzAQhS1EJQL0AOxG7AN2nbrpugKxhx1C1dSdtK4c2_hHKD0CpyZBHAC9xeh93-gxdif4gxCyeXzlnEvVyparMWIhL1glFG9ryRfNJasmXU_-il2ndBrrWrXrin1vfB8wmuQd-A7ykYC6zmhDTg8TCd4OB7Soc4neYSJAt4f3HWX8qA-2aJ_MfsLkzkNPECKNe5iNdwmMg5RxZ6w5_5JpUB8pxgGCLT18GUfQY6Zo0N6yWYc20fzv3rD756e3zUsdov8slPL25Et0o9qulJDL1bLh8l9PP-l3XBM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>761357540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the efficiency of polygalacturonase and [beta]-glucosidase enzyme preparations in stabilization of cherry plum wine material</title><source>Springer Journals</source><creator>Stepanova, E V ; Landesman, E O ; Fedorova, T V ; Yakovleva, K E ; Koroleva, O V</creator><creatorcontrib>Stepanova, E V ; Landesman, E O ; Fedorova, T V ; Yakovleva, K E ; Koroleva, O V</creatorcontrib><description>Pektofoetidin and Pectinex, enzyme preparations with the highest polygalacturonase and β-glucosidase activities, were covalently immobilized on DEAE cellulose and Aminosilochromes 10 and 30. After treatment of cherry plum wine material with the soluble and immobilized enzyme preparations, the content of phenolics increased by 26 and 40%, respectively. The increase was accompanied by a decrease in the protein content (by up to 37%), carbohydrate content (by 17% on the average), and antioxidant activity (5-37%). The most efficient treatment involved Pektofoetidin immobilized on Aminosilochrome 10. It increased the clarity of the wine material and its antioxidant activity by 100 and 10%, respectively.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-3024</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0003683806060123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Antioxidants ; Biochemistry ; Cellulose ; Enzymes ; Phenols ; Proteins ; Wines</subject><ispartof>Applied biochemistry and microbiology, 2006-11, Vol.42 (6), p.609</ispartof><rights>Nauka/Interperiodica 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stepanova, E V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landesman, E O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedorova, T V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakovleva, K E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koroleva, O V</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the efficiency of polygalacturonase and [beta]-glucosidase enzyme preparations in stabilization of cherry plum wine material</title><title>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</title><description>Pektofoetidin and Pectinex, enzyme preparations with the highest polygalacturonase and β-glucosidase activities, were covalently immobilized on DEAE cellulose and Aminosilochromes 10 and 30. After treatment of cherry plum wine material with the soluble and immobilized enzyme preparations, the content of phenolics increased by 26 and 40%, respectively. The increase was accompanied by a decrease in the protein content (by up to 37%), carbohydrate content (by 17% on the average), and antioxidant activity (5-37%). The most efficient treatment involved Pektofoetidin immobilized on Aminosilochrome 10. It increased the clarity of the wine material and its antioxidant activity by 100 and 10%, respectively.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Wines</subject><issn>0003-6838</issn><issn>1608-3024</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjE1OwzAQhS1EJQL0AOxG7AN2nbrpugKxhx1C1dSdtK4c2_hHKD0CpyZBHAC9xeh93-gxdif4gxCyeXzlnEvVyparMWIhL1glFG9ryRfNJasmXU_-il2ndBrrWrXrin1vfB8wmuQd-A7ykYC6zmhDTg8TCd4OB7Soc4neYSJAt4f3HWX8qA-2aJ_MfsLkzkNPECKNe5iNdwmMg5RxZ6w5_5JpUB8pxgGCLT18GUfQY6Zo0N6yWYc20fzv3rD756e3zUsdov8slPL25Et0o9qulJDL1bLh8l9PP-l3XBM</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Stepanova, E V</creator><creator>Landesman, E O</creator><creator>Fedorova, T V</creator><creator>Yakovleva, K E</creator><creator>Koroleva, O V</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Comparison of the efficiency of polygalacturonase and [beta]-glucosidase enzyme preparations in stabilization of cherry plum wine material</title><author>Stepanova, E V ; Landesman, E O ; Fedorova, T V ; Yakovleva, K E ; Koroleva, O V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_7613575403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Wines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stepanova, E V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landesman, E O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedorova, T V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakovleva, K E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koroleva, O V</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stepanova, E V</au><au>Landesman, E O</au><au>Fedorova, T V</au><au>Yakovleva, K E</au><au>Koroleva, O V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the efficiency of polygalacturonase and [beta]-glucosidase enzyme preparations in stabilization of cherry plum wine material</atitle><jtitle>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</jtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>609</spage><pages>609-</pages><issn>0003-6838</issn><eissn>1608-3024</eissn><abstract>Pektofoetidin and Pectinex, enzyme preparations with the highest polygalacturonase and β-glucosidase activities, were covalently immobilized on DEAE cellulose and Aminosilochromes 10 and 30. After treatment of cherry plum wine material with the soluble and immobilized enzyme preparations, the content of phenolics increased by 26 and 40%, respectively. The increase was accompanied by a decrease in the protein content (by up to 37%), carbohydrate content (by 17% on the average), and antioxidant activity (5-37%). The most efficient treatment involved Pektofoetidin immobilized on Aminosilochrome 10. It increased the clarity of the wine material and its antioxidant activity by 100 and 10%, respectively.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1134/S0003683806060123</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-6838 |
| ispartof | Applied biochemistry and microbiology, 2006-11, Vol.42 (6), p.609 |
| issn | 0003-6838 1608-3024 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_761357540 |
| source | Springer Journals |
| subjects | Antioxidants Biochemistry Cellulose Enzymes Phenols Proteins Wines |
| title | Comparison of the efficiency of polygalacturonase and [beta]-glucosidase enzyme preparations in stabilization of cherry plum wine material |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A48%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20efficiency%20of%20polygalacturonase%20and%20%5Bbeta%5D-glucosidase%20enzyme%20preparations%20in%20stabilization%20of%20cherry%20plum%20wine%20material&rft.jtitle=Applied%20biochemistry%20and%20microbiology&rft.au=Stepanova,%20E%20V&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=609&rft.pages=609-&rft.issn=0003-6838&rft.eissn=1608-3024&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0003683806060123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2177275931%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=761357540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |