Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness
This article examines the ways the business community – here operationalised through Business Improvement Associations (BIAs) – thinks about and makes sense of the Law and the legal system, its legal consciousness, in other words. I suggest that the way BIAs think about and make sense of the Law is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of law in context 2010-12, Vol.6 (4), p.323-342 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 342 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | International journal of law in context |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Ranasinghe, Prashan |
description | This article examines the ways the business community – here operationalised through Business Improvement Associations (BIAs) – thinks about and makes sense of the Law and the legal system, its legal consciousness, in other words. I suggest that the way BIAs think about and make sense of the Law is best described as ambivalent, ranging from reverence to disenchantment: on the one hand, the Law is (like) God, but on the other, the Law is also a source of angst, frustration, hopelessness and powerlessness. Drawing on the analytical framework of legal consciousness, I suggest, provides a good platform from which to explore whether the ‘haves’ come out ahead, and what coming out ahead might mean and look like to them. Equally, the ambivalence towards law shows that the ways the ‘haves’ make sense of the Law might not always be that antithetical to the way the ‘have-nots’ make sense of the Law. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1744552310000273 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_761127401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1744552310000273</cupid><sourcerecordid>2175580471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-c9f6ee1534f3ee87ce97610df6b19bb6b0af2306172dfd5409c4f7fe491c08ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7hFnCnETdq03AbiY9IkDsC5ShNnytQ2I2k38e_ptAkOCF9s2e_72DIhl8BugIG8fQMpRJalHNgYqeRHZLJrJVnG4finTvkpOYtxxRgvCl5OiJ61tduoBjuNtPdbFUykjdre0fshug5jpPN2HfwGW-x6OovRa6d657t4TddD3ThNjYs-GAxUdYY2uFQN1eNcOz_EHeGcnFjVRLw45Cn5eHp8f3hJFq_P84fZItFcij7Rpc0RIePCcsRCaixlDszYvIayrvOaKZtyloNMjTWZYKUWVloUJWhWKMOn5GrPHe_9HDD21coPoRtXViMIUikYjCLYi3TwMQa01Tq4VoWvCli1e2X155Wjhx88qq2DM0v8Jf_v-gYaXHdV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>761127401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Ranasinghe, Prashan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ranasinghe, Prashan</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the ways the business community – here operationalised through Business Improvement Associations (BIAs) – thinks about and makes sense of the Law and the legal system, its legal consciousness, in other words. I suggest that the way BIAs think about and make sense of the Law is best described as ambivalent, ranging from reverence to disenchantment: on the one hand, the Law is (like) God, but on the other, the Law is also a source of angst, frustration, hopelessness and powerlessness. Drawing on the analytical framework of legal consciousness, I suggest, provides a good platform from which to explore whether the ‘haves’ come out ahead, and what coming out ahead might mean and look like to them. Equally, the ambivalence towards law shows that the ways the ‘haves’ make sense of the Law might not always be that antithetical to the way the ‘have-nots’ make sense of the Law.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-5523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1744552310000273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Associations ; Beggars ; Bias ; Business community ; Business improvement districts ; Criminology ; Homeless people ; Law ; Litigation ; Pest control ; Society ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of law in context, 2010-12, Vol.6 (4), p.323-342</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-c9f6ee1534f3ee87ce97610df6b19bb6b0af2306172dfd5409c4f7fe491c08ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-c9f6ee1534f3ee87ce97610df6b19bb6b0af2306172dfd5409c4f7fe491c08ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744552310000273/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ranasinghe, Prashan</creatorcontrib><title>Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness</title><title>International journal of law in context</title><description>This article examines the ways the business community – here operationalised through Business Improvement Associations (BIAs) – thinks about and makes sense of the Law and the legal system, its legal consciousness, in other words. I suggest that the way BIAs think about and make sense of the Law is best described as ambivalent, ranging from reverence to disenchantment: on the one hand, the Law is (like) God, but on the other, the Law is also a source of angst, frustration, hopelessness and powerlessness. Drawing on the analytical framework of legal consciousness, I suggest, provides a good platform from which to explore whether the ‘haves’ come out ahead, and what coming out ahead might mean and look like to them. Equally, the ambivalence towards law shows that the ways the ‘haves’ make sense of the Law might not always be that antithetical to the way the ‘have-nots’ make sense of the Law.</description><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Beggars</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Business community</subject><subject>Business improvement districts</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Homeless people</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1744-5523</issn><issn>1744-5531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7hFnCnETdq03AbiY9IkDsC5ShNnytQ2I2k38e_ptAkOCF9s2e_72DIhl8BugIG8fQMpRJalHNgYqeRHZLJrJVnG4finTvkpOYtxxRgvCl5OiJ61tduoBjuNtPdbFUykjdre0fshug5jpPN2HfwGW-x6OovRa6d657t4TddD3ThNjYs-GAxUdYY2uFQN1eNcOz_EHeGcnFjVRLw45Cn5eHp8f3hJFq_P84fZItFcij7Rpc0RIePCcsRCaixlDszYvIayrvOaKZtyloNMjTWZYKUWVloUJWhWKMOn5GrPHe_9HDD21coPoRtXViMIUikYjCLYi3TwMQa01Tq4VoWvCli1e2X155Wjhx88qq2DM0v8Jf_v-gYaXHdV</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Ranasinghe, Prashan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness</title><author>Ranasinghe, Prashan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-c9f6ee1534f3ee87ce97610df6b19bb6b0af2306172dfd5409c4f7fe491c08ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Beggars</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Business community</topic><topic>Business improvement districts</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Homeless people</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ranasinghe, Prashan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of law in context</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ranasinghe, Prashan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness</atitle><jtitle>International journal of law in context</jtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>323-342</pages><issn>1744-5523</issn><eissn>1744-5531</eissn><abstract>This article examines the ways the business community – here operationalised through Business Improvement Associations (BIAs) – thinks about and makes sense of the Law and the legal system, its legal consciousness, in other words. I suggest that the way BIAs think about and make sense of the Law is best described as ambivalent, ranging from reverence to disenchantment: on the one hand, the Law is (like) God, but on the other, the Law is also a source of angst, frustration, hopelessness and powerlessness. Drawing on the analytical framework of legal consciousness, I suggest, provides a good platform from which to explore whether the ‘haves’ come out ahead, and what coming out ahead might mean and look like to them. Equally, the ambivalence towards law shows that the ways the ‘haves’ make sense of the Law might not always be that antithetical to the way the ‘have-nots’ make sense of the Law.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1744552310000273</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-5523 |
ispartof | International journal of law in context, 2010-12, Vol.6 (4), p.323-342 |
issn | 1744-5523 1744-5531 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_761127401 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Associations Beggars Bias Business community Business improvement districts Criminology Homeless people Law Litigation Pest control Society Studies |
title | Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambivalence%20towards%20law:%20Business%20Improvement%20Associations,%20public%20disorder%20and%20legal%20consciousness&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20law%20in%20context&rft.au=Ranasinghe,%20Prashan&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=323-342&rft.issn=1744-5523&rft.eissn=1744-5531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1744552310000273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2175580471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=761127401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1744552310000273&rfr_iscdi=true |