Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry

In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business history 2010-08, Vol.52 (5), p.695-712
Hauptverfasser: Higgins, David, Tweedale, Geoffrey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 712
container_issue 5
container_start_page 695
container_title Business history
container_volume 52
creator Higgins, David
Tweedale, Geoffrey
description In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous accounts, this article focuses on the government's reaction to mule spinners' cancer. Using official records in the National Archives, the slow introduction of health and safety measures by the government is explored in detail. Although obstructionism by the employers played a key role, one of the reasons for government inaction was the ambiguity of scientific research on engineering oils. On the other hand, prolonged scientific research suited a government policy that was framed around self regulation - a policy that had proved largely ineffective by the 1950s.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00076791.2010.499430
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_757830129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A238325918</galeid><sourcerecordid>A238325918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-598832b7987055f5770eca5816fa4463692eeb6f7af8475746b0854b8884902b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEokPhDRCK2MAmxfElttlU1QgKaKTZwNpyPM6Mq8QebKdD3p6Tpu2CRVkc27K-_9z0F8XbGl3USKBPCCHecFlfYARfVEpK0LNiVXNKKi6JeF6sZqSambPiVUo3CNWEIvSyOMOIE8o4WhV56_oy-DIfbHnS2cbP5XW4tdEP1ucy2v3Y6-wACF2pS6OjcT7srS_doskn4JzNh8rAY4xTudHe6HRw0ZYm5AzSdHTeO78HzW5MOU6vixed7pN9c3-fF7--fvm5_lZtttff11ebyjQY54pJIQhuuRQcMdYxzpE1mom66TSlDWkktrZtOq47QTnjtGmRYLQVQlCJcEvOiw9L3mMMv0ebshpcMrbvtbdhTIozIihsEf-fpGLuAksgPz5J1ohA31RyBOj7f9CbMEYPE0NlLgiq7_JVC7TXvVXOm-Cz_ZNN6Hu7twr2sd6qK0xgE0zWAni68CaGlKLt1DG6QccJKqvZGOrBGGo2hlqMAbIfiyzaozWPmqy7dkwHaO1WEc0wHBPEnZJoN_9BHCEayRSvsTrkAZK9ux9sbAe7e8z2YCsALhfA-S7EQZ9C7HdQbOpD7CIYxCVFnuz3L8R43hQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757830129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Business Source Complete (EBSCO)</source><creator>Higgins, David ; Tweedale, Geoffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Higgins, David ; Tweedale, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><description>In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous accounts, this article focuses on the government's reaction to mule spinners' cancer. Using official records in the National Archives, the slow introduction of health and safety measures by the government is explored in detail. Although obstructionism by the employers played a key role, one of the reasons for government inaction was the ambiguity of scientific research on engineering oils. On the other hand, prolonged scientific research suited a government policy that was framed around self regulation - a policy that had proved largely ineffective by the 1950s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-7938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2010.499430</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20734570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Carcinogens ; Carcinoma - ethnology ; Carcinoma - history ; Cotton ; Cotton industry ; Cotton trade ; Employment - economics ; Employment - history ; Employment - psychology ; epithelioma ; Government policy ; Government regulation ; Government Regulation - history ; Historical analysis ; History of medicine ; History, 20th Century ; industrial cancer ; Industrial history ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Occupational Exposure - history ; Occupational health ; Occupational Health - history ; Occupational Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Occupational safety ; Officials and employees ; Public health ; Regulation ; Safety and security measures ; Safety Management - economics ; Safety Management - history ; Safety Management - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Self regulation ; Skin Neoplasms - ethnology ; Skin Neoplasms - history ; Social Control, Informal - history ; Spinning ; Studies ; Textile industry ; Textile Industry - economics ; Textile Industry - education ; Textile Industry - history ; United Kingdom ; United Kingdom - ethnology</subject><ispartof>Business history, 2010-08, Vol.52 (5), p.695-712</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-598832b7987055f5770eca5816fa4463692eeb6f7af8475746b0854b8884902b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-598832b7987055f5770eca5816fa4463692eeb6f7af8475746b0854b8884902b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3994,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20734570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/tafbushst/v_3a52_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a5_3ap_3a695-712.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higgins, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tweedale, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><title>Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry</title><title>Business history</title><addtitle>Bus Hist</addtitle><description>In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous accounts, this article focuses on the government's reaction to mule spinners' cancer. Using official records in the National Archives, the slow introduction of health and safety measures by the government is explored in detail. Although obstructionism by the employers played a key role, one of the reasons for government inaction was the ambiguity of scientific research on engineering oils. On the other hand, prolonged scientific research suited a government policy that was framed around self regulation - a policy that had proved largely ineffective by the 1950s.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Carcinoma - ethnology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - history</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Cotton industry</subject><subject>Cotton trade</subject><subject>Employment - economics</subject><subject>Employment - history</subject><subject>Employment - psychology</subject><subject>epithelioma</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Government Regulation - history</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>industrial cancer</subject><subject>Industrial history</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - history</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Health - history</subject><subject>Occupational Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Officials and employees</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Safety Management - economics</subject><subject>Safety Management - history</subject><subject>Safety Management - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Self regulation</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - ethnology</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - history</subject><subject>Social Control, Informal - history</subject><subject>Spinning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Textile industry</subject><subject>Textile Industry - economics</subject><subject>Textile Industry - education</subject><subject>Textile Industry - history</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United Kingdom - ethnology</subject><issn>0007-6791</issn><issn>1743-7938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEokPhDRCK2MAmxfElttlU1QgKaKTZwNpyPM6Mq8QebKdD3p6Tpu2CRVkc27K-_9z0F8XbGl3USKBPCCHecFlfYARfVEpK0LNiVXNKKi6JeF6sZqSambPiVUo3CNWEIvSyOMOIE8o4WhV56_oy-DIfbHnS2cbP5XW4tdEP1ucy2v3Y6-wACF2pS6OjcT7srS_doskn4JzNh8rAY4xTudHe6HRw0ZYm5AzSdHTeO78HzW5MOU6vixed7pN9c3-fF7--fvm5_lZtttff11ebyjQY54pJIQhuuRQcMdYxzpE1mom66TSlDWkktrZtOq47QTnjtGmRYLQVQlCJcEvOiw9L3mMMv0ebshpcMrbvtbdhTIozIihsEf-fpGLuAksgPz5J1ohA31RyBOj7f9CbMEYPE0NlLgiq7_JVC7TXvVXOm-Cz_ZNN6Hu7twr2sd6qK0xgE0zWAni68CaGlKLt1DG6QccJKqvZGOrBGGo2hlqMAbIfiyzaozWPmqy7dkwHaO1WEc0wHBPEnZJoN_9BHCEayRSvsTrkAZK9ux9sbAe7e8z2YCsALhfA-S7EQZ9C7HdQbOpD7CIYxCVFnuz3L8R43hQ</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Higgins, David</creator><creator>Tweedale, Geoffrey</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor and Francis Journals</general><general>Frank Cass &amp; Company Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry</title><author>Higgins, David ; Tweedale, Geoffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-598832b7987055f5770eca5816fa4463692eeb6f7af8475746b0854b8884902b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Carcinoma - ethnology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - history</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Cotton industry</topic><topic>Cotton trade</topic><topic>Employment - economics</topic><topic>Employment - history</topic><topic>Employment - psychology</topic><topic>epithelioma</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Government Regulation - history</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>industrial cancer</topic><topic>Industrial history</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - history</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Health - history</topic><topic>Occupational Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Officials and employees</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Safety Management - economics</topic><topic>Safety Management - history</topic><topic>Safety Management - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Self regulation</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - ethnology</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - history</topic><topic>Social Control, Informal - history</topic><topic>Spinning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Textile industry</topic><topic>Textile Industry - economics</topic><topic>Textile Industry - education</topic><topic>Textile Industry - history</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United Kingdom - ethnology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higgins, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tweedale, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Business history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higgins, David</au><au>Tweedale, Geoffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry</atitle><jtitle>Business history</jtitle><addtitle>Bus Hist</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>695</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>695-712</pages><issn>0007-6791</issn><eissn>1743-7938</eissn><abstract>In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous accounts, this article focuses on the government's reaction to mule spinners' cancer. Using official records in the National Archives, the slow introduction of health and safety measures by the government is explored in detail. Although obstructionism by the employers played a key role, one of the reasons for government inaction was the ambiguity of scientific research on engineering oils. On the other hand, prolonged scientific research suited a government policy that was framed around self regulation - a policy that had proved largely ineffective by the 1950s.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>20734570</pmid><doi>10.1080/00076791.2010.499430</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-6791
ispartof Business history, 2010-08, Vol.52 (5), p.695-712
issn 0007-6791
1743-7938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_757830129
source MEDLINE; RePEc; Business Source Complete (EBSCO)
subjects Cancer
Carcinogens
Carcinoma - ethnology
Carcinoma - history
Cotton
Cotton industry
Cotton trade
Employment - economics
Employment - history
Employment - psychology
epithelioma
Government policy
Government regulation
Government Regulation - history
Historical analysis
History of medicine
History, 20th Century
industrial cancer
Industrial history
Laws, regulations and rules
Occupational Exposure - history
Occupational health
Occupational Health - history
Occupational Health - legislation & jurisprudence
Occupational safety
Officials and employees
Public health
Regulation
Safety and security measures
Safety Management - economics
Safety Management - history
Safety Management - legislation & jurisprudence
Self regulation
Skin Neoplasms - ethnology
Skin Neoplasms - history
Social Control, Informal - history
Spinning
Studies
Textile industry
Textile Industry - economics
Textile Industry - education
Textile Industry - history
United Kingdom
United Kingdom - ethnology
title Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A19%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oil%20on%20the%20water:%20Government%20regulation%20of%20a%20carcinogen%20in%20the%20twentieth-century%20Lancashire%20cotton%20spinning%20industry&rft.jtitle=Business%20history&rft.au=Higgins,%20David&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=695&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=695-712&rft.issn=0007-6791&rft.eissn=1743-7938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00076791.2010.499430&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA238325918%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757830129&rft_id=info:pmid/20734570&rft_galeid=A238325918&rfr_iscdi=true