Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry
In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business history 2010-08, Vol.52 (5), p.695-712 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 712 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 695 |
container_title | Business history |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Higgins, David Tweedale, Geoffrey |
description | In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous accounts, this article focuses on the government's reaction to mule spinners' cancer. Using official records in the National Archives, the slow introduction of health and safety measures by the government is explored in detail. Although obstructionism by the employers played a key role, one of the reasons for government inaction was the ambiguity of scientific research on engineering oils. On the other hand, prolonged scientific research suited a government policy that was framed around self regulation - a policy that had proved largely ineffective by the 1950s. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00076791.2010.499430 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_757830129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A238325918</galeid><sourcerecordid>A238325918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-598832b7987055f5770eca5816fa4463692eeb6f7af8475746b0854b8884902b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEokPhDRCK2MAmxfElttlU1QgKaKTZwNpyPM6Mq8QebKdD3p6Tpu2CRVkc27K-_9z0F8XbGl3USKBPCCHecFlfYARfVEpK0LNiVXNKKi6JeF6sZqSambPiVUo3CNWEIvSyOMOIE8o4WhV56_oy-DIfbHnS2cbP5XW4tdEP1ucy2v3Y6-wACF2pS6OjcT7srS_doskn4JzNh8rAY4xTudHe6HRw0ZYm5AzSdHTeO78HzW5MOU6vixed7pN9c3-fF7--fvm5_lZtttff11ebyjQY54pJIQhuuRQcMdYxzpE1mom66TSlDWkktrZtOq47QTnjtGmRYLQVQlCJcEvOiw9L3mMMv0ebshpcMrbvtbdhTIozIihsEf-fpGLuAksgPz5J1ohA31RyBOj7f9CbMEYPE0NlLgiq7_JVC7TXvVXOm-Cz_ZNN6Hu7twr2sd6qK0xgE0zWAni68CaGlKLt1DG6QccJKqvZGOrBGGo2hlqMAbIfiyzaozWPmqy7dkwHaO1WEc0wHBPEnZJoN_9BHCEayRSvsTrkAZK9ux9sbAe7e8z2YCsALhfA-S7EQZ9C7HdQbOpD7CIYxCVFnuz3L8R43hQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757830129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Business Source Complete (EBSCO)</source><creator>Higgins, David ; Tweedale, Geoffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Higgins, David ; Tweedale, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><description>In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous accounts, this article focuses on the government's reaction to mule spinners' cancer. Using official records in the National Archives, the slow introduction of health and safety measures by the government is explored in detail. Although obstructionism by the employers played a key role, one of the reasons for government inaction was the ambiguity of scientific research on engineering oils. On the other hand, prolonged scientific research suited a government policy that was framed around self regulation - a policy that had proved largely ineffective by the 1950s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-7938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2010.499430</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20734570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Carcinogens ; Carcinoma - ethnology ; Carcinoma - history ; Cotton ; Cotton industry ; Cotton trade ; Employment - economics ; Employment - history ; Employment - psychology ; epithelioma ; Government policy ; Government regulation ; Government Regulation - history ; Historical analysis ; History of medicine ; History, 20th Century ; industrial cancer ; Industrial history ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Occupational Exposure - history ; Occupational health ; Occupational Health - history ; Occupational Health - legislation & jurisprudence ; Occupational safety ; Officials and employees ; Public health ; Regulation ; Safety and security measures ; Safety Management - economics ; Safety Management - history ; Safety Management - legislation & jurisprudence ; Self regulation ; Skin Neoplasms - ethnology ; Skin Neoplasms - history ; Social Control, Informal - history ; Spinning ; Studies ; Textile industry ; Textile Industry - economics ; Textile Industry - education ; Textile Industry - history ; United Kingdom ; United Kingdom - ethnology</subject><ispartof>Business history, 2010-08, Vol.52 (5), p.695-712</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-598832b7987055f5770eca5816fa4463692eeb6f7af8475746b0854b8884902b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-598832b7987055f5770eca5816fa4463692eeb6f7af8475746b0854b8884902b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3994,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20734570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/tafbushst/v_3a52_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a5_3ap_3a695-712.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higgins, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tweedale, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><title>Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry</title><title>Business history</title><addtitle>Bus Hist</addtitle><description>In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous accounts, this article focuses on the government's reaction to mule spinners' cancer. Using official records in the National Archives, the slow introduction of health and safety measures by the government is explored in detail. Although obstructionism by the employers played a key role, one of the reasons for government inaction was the ambiguity of scientific research on engineering oils. On the other hand, prolonged scientific research suited a government policy that was framed around self regulation - a policy that had proved largely ineffective by the 1950s.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Carcinoma - ethnology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - history</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Cotton industry</subject><subject>Cotton trade</subject><subject>Employment - economics</subject><subject>Employment - history</subject><subject>Employment - psychology</subject><subject>epithelioma</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Government Regulation - history</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>industrial cancer</subject><subject>Industrial history</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - history</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Health - history</subject><subject>Occupational Health - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Officials and employees</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Safety Management - economics</subject><subject>Safety Management - history</subject><subject>Safety Management - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Self regulation</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - ethnology</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - history</subject><subject>Social Control, Informal - history</subject><subject>Spinning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Textile industry</subject><subject>Textile Industry - economics</subject><subject>Textile Industry - education</subject><subject>Textile Industry - history</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United Kingdom - ethnology</subject><issn>0007-6791</issn><issn>1743-7938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEokPhDRCK2MAmxfElttlU1QgKaKTZwNpyPM6Mq8QebKdD3p6Tpu2CRVkc27K-_9z0F8XbGl3USKBPCCHecFlfYARfVEpK0LNiVXNKKi6JeF6sZqSambPiVUo3CNWEIvSyOMOIE8o4WhV56_oy-DIfbHnS2cbP5XW4tdEP1ucy2v3Y6-wACF2pS6OjcT7srS_doskn4JzNh8rAY4xTudHe6HRw0ZYm5AzSdHTeO78HzW5MOU6vixed7pN9c3-fF7--fvm5_lZtttff11ebyjQY54pJIQhuuRQcMdYxzpE1mom66TSlDWkktrZtOq47QTnjtGmRYLQVQlCJcEvOiw9L3mMMv0ebshpcMrbvtbdhTIozIihsEf-fpGLuAksgPz5J1ohA31RyBOj7f9CbMEYPE0NlLgiq7_JVC7TXvVXOm-Cz_ZNN6Hu7twr2sd6qK0xgE0zWAni68CaGlKLt1DG6QccJKqvZGOrBGGo2hlqMAbIfiyzaozWPmqy7dkwHaO1WEc0wHBPEnZJoN_9BHCEayRSvsTrkAZK9ux9sbAe7e8z2YCsALhfA-S7EQZ9C7HdQbOpD7CIYxCVFnuz3L8R43hQ</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Higgins, David</creator><creator>Tweedale, Geoffrey</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor and Francis Journals</general><general>Frank Cass & Company Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry</title><author>Higgins, David ; Tweedale, Geoffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-598832b7987055f5770eca5816fa4463692eeb6f7af8475746b0854b8884902b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Carcinoma - ethnology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - history</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Cotton industry</topic><topic>Cotton trade</topic><topic>Employment - economics</topic><topic>Employment - history</topic><topic>Employment - psychology</topic><topic>epithelioma</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Government Regulation - history</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>industrial cancer</topic><topic>Industrial history</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - history</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Health - history</topic><topic>Occupational Health - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Officials and employees</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Safety Management - economics</topic><topic>Safety Management - history</topic><topic>Safety Management - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Self regulation</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - ethnology</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - history</topic><topic>Social Control, Informal - history</topic><topic>Spinning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Textile industry</topic><topic>Textile Industry - economics</topic><topic>Textile Industry - education</topic><topic>Textile Industry - history</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United Kingdom - ethnology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higgins, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tweedale, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Business history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higgins, David</au><au>Tweedale, Geoffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry</atitle><jtitle>Business history</jtitle><addtitle>Bus Hist</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>695</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>695-712</pages><issn>0007-6791</issn><eissn>1743-7938</eissn><abstract>In the Lancashire cotton textile industry, mule spinners were prone to a chronic and sometimes fatal skin cancer (often affecting the groin). The disease had reached epidemic proportions by the 1920s, which necessitated action by the government, employers, and trade unions. In contrast to previous accounts, this article focuses on the government's reaction to mule spinners' cancer. Using official records in the National Archives, the slow introduction of health and safety measures by the government is explored in detail. Although obstructionism by the employers played a key role, one of the reasons for government inaction was the ambiguity of scientific research on engineering oils. On the other hand, prolonged scientific research suited a government policy that was framed around self regulation - a policy that had proved largely ineffective by the 1950s.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>20734570</pmid><doi>10.1080/00076791.2010.499430</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-6791 |
ispartof | Business history, 2010-08, Vol.52 (5), p.695-712 |
issn | 0007-6791 1743-7938 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_757830129 |
source | MEDLINE; RePEc; Business Source Complete (EBSCO) |
subjects | Cancer Carcinogens Carcinoma - ethnology Carcinoma - history Cotton Cotton industry Cotton trade Employment - economics Employment - history Employment - psychology epithelioma Government policy Government regulation Government Regulation - history Historical analysis History of medicine History, 20th Century industrial cancer Industrial history Laws, regulations and rules Occupational Exposure - history Occupational health Occupational Health - history Occupational Health - legislation & jurisprudence Occupational safety Officials and employees Public health Regulation Safety and security measures Safety Management - economics Safety Management - history Safety Management - legislation & jurisprudence Self regulation Skin Neoplasms - ethnology Skin Neoplasms - history Social Control, Informal - history Spinning Studies Textile industry Textile Industry - economics Textile Industry - education Textile Industry - history United Kingdom United Kingdom - ethnology |
title | Oil on the water: Government regulation of a carcinogen in the twentieth-century Lancashire cotton spinning industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A19%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oil%20on%20the%20water:%20Government%20regulation%20of%20a%20carcinogen%20in%20the%20twentieth-century%20Lancashire%20cotton%20spinning%20industry&rft.jtitle=Business%20history&rft.au=Higgins,%20David&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=695&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=695-712&rft.issn=0007-6791&rft.eissn=1743-7938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00076791.2010.499430&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA238325918%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757830129&rft_id=info:pmid/20734570&rft_galeid=A238325918&rfr_iscdi=true |