Putting the Pieces Together: Online Argumentation Vee Diagrams Enhance Thinking during Discussions
We examine the effect of online Argumentation Vee Diagrams (AVDs) on the quality of students' argumentation during asynchronous, online discussions. With AVDs, students develop arguments on both sides of a controversial issue and then develop an integrated, overall final conclusion. In this stu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning 2007-12, Vol.2 (4), p.479-500 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 500 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 479 |
| container_title | International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning |
| container_volume | 2 |
| creator | Nussbaum, E. Michael Winsor, Denise L Aqui, Yvette M Poliquin, Anne M |
| description | We examine the effect of online Argumentation Vee Diagrams (AVDs) on the quality of students' argumentation during asynchronous, online discussions. With AVDs, students develop arguments on both sides of a controversial issue and then develop an integrated, overall final conclusion. In this study, students used AVDs individually before composing discussion notes, and then--at the end of the discussion--jointly created a group AVD using "Wiki" technology. Compared to a control group, the experimental intervention was found to significantly enhance the integration of arguments and counterarguments (specifically, compromises) and fostered opinion change. For AVDs to be effective, however, it was found to be necessary to include specific scaffolds on how to evaluate argument strength and/or to provide practice and feedback in using the AVDs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11412-007-9025-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_757376104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ854107</ericid><sourcerecordid>2160381511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-cf7afab9175478edab2c97a08477fb63c6de1e642c4449628085997ded6fb1a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhCMEEuXxA5A4WNwD3sSPhFvVlpcqtYfC1XKcTerSOsVODvx7EgX1NLPSN7PSRNEd0EegVD4FAAZJ3Ns4pwmP4SyaAOciBgH8_OSpvIyuQthRynhC00lUrLu2ta4m7RbJ2qLBQDZNjf3pn8nK7a1DMvV1d0DX6tY2jnwhkrnVtdeHQBZuq51Bstla9z30lJ0fZG6D6ULo-XATXVR6H_D2X6-jz5fFZvYWL1ev77PpMjZJnraxqaSudJGD5ExmWOoiMbnUNGNSVoVIjSgRULDEMMZykWQ043kuSyxFVYCW6XX0MPYeffPTYWjVrum8618qyWUqBVDWQzBCxjcheKzU0duD9r8KqBqWVOOSarDDkgr6zP2YQW_NiV98ZJwBlekfBvdwVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757376104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Putting the Pieces Together: Online Argumentation Vee Diagrams Enhance Thinking during Discussions</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Nussbaum, E. Michael ; Winsor, Denise L ; Aqui, Yvette M ; Poliquin, Anne M</creator><creatorcontrib>Nussbaum, E. Michael ; Winsor, Denise L ; Aqui, Yvette M ; Poliquin, Anne M</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the effect of online Argumentation Vee Diagrams (AVDs) on the quality of students' argumentation during asynchronous, online discussions. With AVDs, students develop arguments on both sides of a controversial issue and then develop an integrated, overall final conclusion. In this study, students used AVDs individually before composing discussion notes, and then--at the end of the discussion--jointly created a group AVD using "Wiki" technology. Compared to a control group, the experimental intervention was found to significantly enhance the integration of arguments and counterarguments (specifically, compromises) and fostered opinion change. For AVDs to be effective, however, it was found to be necessary to include specific scaffolds on how to evaluate argument strength and/or to provide practice and feedback in using the AVDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-1607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-1615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11412-007-9025-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Asynchronous Communication ; CAI ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Computer Software ; Control Groups ; Controversial Issues (Course Content) ; Cooperative Learning ; Critical Thinking ; Debates ; Discussion Groups ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Publishing ; Experimental Groups ; Feedback (Response) ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Internet ; Persuasive Discourse ; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) ; Students ; Thinking Skills ; Visual Aids</subject><ispartof>International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 2007-12, Vol.2 (4), p.479-500</ispartof><rights>International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.; Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-cf7afab9175478edab2c97a08477fb63c6de1e642c4449628085997ded6fb1a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-cf7afab9175478edab2c97a08477fb63c6de1e642c4449628085997ded6fb1a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ854107$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nussbaum, E. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsor, Denise L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aqui, Yvette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poliquin, Anne M</creatorcontrib><title>Putting the Pieces Together: Online Argumentation Vee Diagrams Enhance Thinking during Discussions</title><title>International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning</title><description>We examine the effect of online Argumentation Vee Diagrams (AVDs) on the quality of students' argumentation during asynchronous, online discussions. With AVDs, students develop arguments on both sides of a controversial issue and then develop an integrated, overall final conclusion. In this study, students used AVDs individually before composing discussion notes, and then--at the end of the discussion--jointly created a group AVD using "Wiki" technology. Compared to a control group, the experimental intervention was found to significantly enhance the integration of arguments and counterarguments (specifically, compromises) and fostered opinion change. For AVDs to be effective, however, it was found to be necessary to include specific scaffolds on how to evaluate argument strength and/or to provide practice and feedback in using the AVDs.</description><subject>Asynchronous Communication</subject><subject>CAI</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Controversial Issues (Course Content)</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Discussion Groups</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Publishing</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Visual Aids</subject><issn>1556-1607</issn><issn>1556-1615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhCMEEuXxA5A4WNwD3sSPhFvVlpcqtYfC1XKcTerSOsVODvx7EgX1NLPSN7PSRNEd0EegVD4FAAZJ3Ns4pwmP4SyaAOciBgH8_OSpvIyuQthRynhC00lUrLu2ta4m7RbJ2qLBQDZNjf3pn8nK7a1DMvV1d0DX6tY2jnwhkrnVtdeHQBZuq51Bstla9z30lJ0fZG6D6ULo-XATXVR6H_D2X6-jz5fFZvYWL1ev77PpMjZJnraxqaSudJGD5ExmWOoiMbnUNGNSVoVIjSgRULDEMMZykWQ043kuSyxFVYCW6XX0MPYeffPTYWjVrum8618qyWUqBVDWQzBCxjcheKzU0duD9r8KqBqWVOOSarDDkgr6zP2YQW_NiV98ZJwBlekfBvdwVQ</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Nussbaum, E. Michael</creator><creator>Winsor, Denise L</creator><creator>Aqui, Yvette M</creator><creator>Poliquin, Anne M</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Putting the Pieces Together: Online Argumentation Vee Diagrams Enhance Thinking during Discussions</title><author>Nussbaum, E. Michael ; Winsor, Denise L ; Aqui, Yvette M ; Poliquin, Anne M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-cf7afab9175478edab2c97a08477fb63c6de1e642c4449628085997ded6fb1a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Asynchronous Communication</topic><topic>CAI</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Controversial Issues (Course Content)</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Discussion Groups</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Publishing</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Visual Aids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nussbaum, E. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsor, Denise L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aqui, Yvette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poliquin, Anne M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nussbaum, E. Michael</au><au>Winsor, Denise L</au><au>Aqui, Yvette M</au><au>Poliquin, Anne M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ854107</ericid><atitle>Putting the Pieces Together: Online Argumentation Vee Diagrams Enhance Thinking during Discussions</atitle><jtitle>International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>479-500</pages><issn>1556-1607</issn><eissn>1556-1615</eissn><abstract>We examine the effect of online Argumentation Vee Diagrams (AVDs) on the quality of students' argumentation during asynchronous, online discussions. With AVDs, students develop arguments on both sides of a controversial issue and then develop an integrated, overall final conclusion. In this study, students used AVDs individually before composing discussion notes, and then--at the end of the discussion--jointly created a group AVD using "Wiki" technology. Compared to a control group, the experimental intervention was found to significantly enhance the integration of arguments and counterarguments (specifically, compromises) and fostered opinion change. For AVDs to be effective, however, it was found to be necessary to include specific scaffolds on how to evaluate argument strength and/or to provide practice and feedback in using the AVDs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11412-007-9025-1</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1556-1607 |
| ispartof | International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 2007-12, Vol.2 (4), p.479-500 |
| issn | 1556-1607 1556-1615 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_757376104 |
| source | Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Asynchronous Communication CAI Computer Assisted Instruction Computer Mediated Communication Computer Software Control Groups Controversial Issues (Course Content) Cooperative Learning Critical Thinking Debates Discussion Groups Educational Technology Electronic Publishing Experimental Groups Feedback (Response) Instructional Effectiveness Internet Persuasive Discourse Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) Students Thinking Skills Visual Aids |
| title | Putting the Pieces Together: Online Argumentation Vee Diagrams Enhance Thinking during Discussions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A33%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Putting%20the%20Pieces%20Together:%20Online%20Argumentation%20Vee%20Diagrams%20Enhance%20Thinking%20during%20Discussions&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20computer-supported%20collaborative%20learning&rft.au=Nussbaum,%20E.%20Michael&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=479-500&rft.issn=1556-1607&rft.eissn=1556-1615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11412-007-9025-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2160381511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757376104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ854107&rfr_iscdi=true |