The MERCOSUR Trade and Environment Linkage Debate: The Disputes over Trade in Retreaded Tires
Brazil is currently immersed in the project of building a new common market, known as MERCOSUR, with its neighbours Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. That project is largely based on the assumption that increased regional trade and harmonization of environmental standards will be beneficial for the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of world trade 2010-10, Vol.44 (5), p.1127-1144 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1144 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1127 |
| container_title | Journal of world trade |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Morosini, Fabio |
| description | Brazil is currently immersed in the project of building a new common market, known as MERCOSUR, with its neighbours Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. That project is largely based on the assumption that increased regional trade and harmonization of environmental standards will be beneficial for the environment. However, these assumptions have been challenged after recent Brazilian efforts to regulate the environmental and health risks associated with retreaded tire imports. Despite the protests of environmentalists, MERCOSUR tribunals have now issued two separate decisions finding that the Brazilian measures violate international trade rules. This article examines the MERCOSUR framework on the relationship between trade liberalization and environmental protection and examines how this framework was applied by MERCOSUR tribunals with respect to the two disputes concerning trade in retreaded tires. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.54648/trad2010043 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_757197447</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kluwer_id>TRAD2010043</kluwer_id><sourcerecordid>2159155901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-96268551c38d3bc66ca158550af13a6955e23c9b8aa3538b9236c4ea125cac9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw44pkcSZgx7ETc6va8pCKKoX0iKKNs4X0kRTbacW_J9Ae4LSj3W92pCHkkrNbGakoufMWypBxxiJxRHqccR6omIXHf_QpOXNuwRjTmkU98pZ9IH0Zp8Pp6yylWedHCnVJx_W2sk29xtrTSVUv4R3pCAvweE9_LKPKbVqPjjZbtAdfVdMUvcVOlzSrLLpzcjKHlcOLw-yT2cM4Gz4Fk-nj83AwCYwQzAdahSqRkhuRlKIwShngslswmHMBSkuJoTC6SACEFEmhQ6FMhMBDacBoEH1yvf-7sc1ni87ni6a1dReZxzLmOo6iuINu9pCxjXMW5_nGVmuwXzln-W9_eZYORof-Ovxqjy9X7Q5tvoLdv_s3jOxqEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757197447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The MERCOSUR Trade and Environment Linkage Debate: The Disputes over Trade in Retreaded Tires</title><source>Kluwer Law International</source><creator>Morosini, Fabio</creator><creatorcontrib>Morosini, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>Brazil is currently immersed in the project of building a new common market, known as MERCOSUR, with its neighbours Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. That project is largely based on the assumption that increased regional trade and harmonization of environmental standards will be beneficial for the environment. However, these assumptions have been challenged after recent Brazilian efforts to regulate the environmental and health risks associated with retreaded tire imports. Despite the protests of environmentalists, MERCOSUR tribunals have now issued two separate decisions finding that the Brazilian measures violate international trade rules. This article examines the MERCOSUR framework on the relationship between trade liberalization and environmental protection and examines how this framework was applied by MERCOSUR tribunals with respect to the two disputes concerning trade in retreaded tires.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-6702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1011-6702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-2795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.54648/trad2010043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Common markets ; Cooperation ; Disputes ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; Environmental protection ; Environmentalists ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Imports ; International trade ; Meetings ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Tariffs ; Tires ; Trade liberalization</subject><ispartof>Journal of world trade, 2010-10, Vol.44 (5), p.1127-1144</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Law International</rights><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,20884,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morosini, Fabio</creatorcontrib><title>The MERCOSUR Trade and Environment Linkage Debate: The Disputes over Trade in Retreaded Tires</title><title>Journal of world trade</title><description>Brazil is currently immersed in the project of building a new common market, known as MERCOSUR, with its neighbours Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. That project is largely based on the assumption that increased regional trade and harmonization of environmental standards will be beneficial for the environment. However, these assumptions have been challenged after recent Brazilian efforts to regulate the environmental and health risks associated with retreaded tire imports. Despite the protests of environmentalists, MERCOSUR tribunals have now issued two separate decisions finding that the Brazilian measures violate international trade rules. This article examines the MERCOSUR framework on the relationship between trade liberalization and environmental protection and examines how this framework was applied by MERCOSUR tribunals with respect to the two disputes concerning trade in retreaded tires.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Common markets</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmentalists</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Tires</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><issn>1011-6702</issn><issn>1011-6702</issn><issn>2210-2795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw44pkcSZgx7ETc6va8pCKKoX0iKKNs4X0kRTbacW_J9Ae4LSj3W92pCHkkrNbGakoufMWypBxxiJxRHqccR6omIXHf_QpOXNuwRjTmkU98pZ9IH0Zp8Pp6yylWedHCnVJx_W2sk29xtrTSVUv4R3pCAvweE9_LKPKbVqPjjZbtAdfVdMUvcVOlzSrLLpzcjKHlcOLw-yT2cM4Gz4Fk-nj83AwCYwQzAdahSqRkhuRlKIwShngslswmHMBSkuJoTC6SACEFEmhQ6FMhMBDacBoEH1yvf-7sc1ni87ni6a1dReZxzLmOo6iuINu9pCxjXMW5_nGVmuwXzln-W9_eZYORof-Ovxqjy9X7Q5tvoLdv_s3jOxqEg</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Morosini, Fabio</creator><general>Kluwer Law International</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>The MERCOSUR Trade and Environment Linkage Debate: The Disputes over Trade in Retreaded Tires</title><author>Morosini, Fabio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-96268551c38d3bc66ca158550af13a6955e23c9b8aa3538b9236c4ea125cac9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Common markets</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmentalists</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Tires</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morosini, Fabio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of world trade</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morosini, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The MERCOSUR Trade and Environment Linkage Debate: The Disputes over Trade in Retreaded Tires</atitle><jtitle>Journal of world trade</jtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1127</spage><epage>1144</epage><pages>1127-1144</pages><issn>1011-6702</issn><eissn>1011-6702</eissn><eissn>2210-2795</eissn><abstract>Brazil is currently immersed in the project of building a new common market, known as MERCOSUR, with its neighbours Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. That project is largely based on the assumption that increased regional trade and harmonization of environmental standards will be beneficial for the environment. However, these assumptions have been challenged after recent Brazilian efforts to regulate the environmental and health risks associated with retreaded tire imports. Despite the protests of environmentalists, MERCOSUR tribunals have now issued two separate decisions finding that the Brazilian measures violate international trade rules. This article examines the MERCOSUR framework on the relationship between trade liberalization and environmental protection and examines how this framework was applied by MERCOSUR tribunals with respect to the two disputes concerning trade in retreaded tires.</abstract><cop>Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands</cop><pub>Kluwer Law International</pub><doi>10.54648/trad2010043</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1011-6702 |
| ispartof | Journal of world trade, 2010-10, Vol.44 (5), p.1127-1144 |
| issn | 1011-6702 1011-6702 2210-2795 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_757197447 |
| source | Kluwer Law International |
| subjects | Agreements Common markets Cooperation Disputes Environmental impact Environmental policy Environmental protection Environmentalists Health risk assessment Health risks Imports International trade Meetings Studies Sustainable development Tariffs Tires Trade liberalization |
| title | The MERCOSUR Trade and Environment Linkage Debate: The Disputes over Trade in Retreaded Tires |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T00%3A12%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20MERCOSUR%20Trade%20and%20Environment%20Linkage%20Debate:%20The%20Disputes%20over%20Trade%20in%20Retreaded%20Tires&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20world%20trade&rft.au=Morosini,%20Fabio&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1127&rft.epage=1144&rft.pages=1127-1144&rft.issn=1011-6702&rft.eissn=1011-6702&rft_id=info:doi/10.54648/trad2010043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159155901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757197447&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kluwer_id=TRAD2010043&rfr_iscdi=true |