Australia's National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality: a retrospective assessment

Perceptions of a salinity ‘crisis’ in Australia around 2000 resulted in the establishment of a major national program that aimed to prevent, stabilize, and reverse trends in salinity. The National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality allocated A$1.4 billion of public funds to 1700 projects ove...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics 2010-10, Vol.54 (4), p.437-456
Hauptverfasser: Pannell, David J., Roberts, Anna M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 456
container_issue 4
container_start_page 437
container_title The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics
container_volume 54
creator Pannell, David J.
Roberts, Anna M.
description Perceptions of a salinity ‘crisis’ in Australia around 2000 resulted in the establishment of a major national program that aimed to prevent, stabilize, and reverse trends in salinity. The National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality allocated A$1.4 billion of public funds to 1700 projects over 7 years. Here, we assess the performance of the program in relation to 12 features that we propose as being essential for programs that aim to address complex environmental problems. The features include use of technical information to guide investment prioritization, use of socio‐economic information, effective integration of information for prioritization, selection of appropriate targets, choice of appropriate policy mechanisms, and provision of incentives and support to environmental managers to pursue environmental outcomes cost effectively. Our assessment reinforces findings from a number of public reviews that found serious weaknesses in the program. Overall, with a few exceptions, projects under the National Action Plan generated few worthwhile salinity mitigation benefits and will have little enduring benefit. This was readily foreseeable given attention to the scientific and economic knowledge of salinity available at the time the program was developed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00504.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_755413274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.201011577</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2149547551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5804-dfb973306690bb3be094805b68f35bf94b6cac5ea2f6b3c055332b49ba28eaeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1TAQhSMEEqXwHyw2XeXid2wkFlFFeajijUBiMRrnOuCr3CTYTtv773F6EQs24I1HM985GvtUFWF0w8p5stswqZvaSGM3nJYupYrKzc2d6uTP4G6phZa1Nerr_epBSjtKKZean1Tf2iXliEPAs0TeYA7TiANpu7Ug7wYcST9F8rEAY8gHguOWfMHsI3m_lF4-PCVIos9xSrMvoitPMCWf0t6P-WF1r8ch-Ue_79Pq88XzT-cv68u3L16dt5d1pwyV9bZ3thGCam2pc8J5aqWhymnTC-V6K53usFMeea-d6KhSQnAnrUNuPHonTquzo-8cp5-LTxn2IXV-KNv7aUlgmBaGS6v_TdKGGyWlLeTjv8jdtMTyNwkapSQTvJEFMkeoK-9P0fcwx7DHeABGYU0HdrCGAGsIsKYDt-nATZE-O0qvw-AP_62D9nX7oVRFf3HUx33IgDP2GX7kPCfYYkYIY4ltnUzxO2ynsBoLwTQEPxT41pMx1TTiFytxrnE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755413274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Australia's National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality: a retrospective assessment</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pannell, David J. ; Roberts, Anna M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pannell, David J. ; Roberts, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><description>Perceptions of a salinity ‘crisis’ in Australia around 2000 resulted in the establishment of a major national program that aimed to prevent, stabilize, and reverse trends in salinity. The National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality allocated A$1.4 billion of public funds to 1700 projects over 7 years. Here, we assess the performance of the program in relation to 12 features that we propose as being essential for programs that aim to address complex environmental problems. The features include use of technical information to guide investment prioritization, use of socio‐economic information, effective integration of information for prioritization, selection of appropriate targets, choice of appropriate policy mechanisms, and provision of incentives and support to environmental managers to pursue environmental outcomes cost effectively. Our assessment reinforces findings from a number of public reviews that found serious weaknesses in the program. Overall, with a few exceptions, projects under the National Action Plan generated few worthwhile salinity mitigation benefits and will have little enduring benefit. This was readily foreseeable given attention to the scientific and economic knowledge of salinity available at the time the program was developed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-985X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00504.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Australia: Environmental policy ; environment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; institutions ; integrated catchment management ; mechanism choice ; natural resource management ; policy ; Policy analysis ; Resource management ; Salinity ; Studies ; Trends ; Water policy ; Water quality ; Water requirements ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Water treatment ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2010-10, Vol.54 (4), p.437-456</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. AJARE © 2010 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc. and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2010 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc. and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5804-dfb973306690bb3be094805b68f35bf94b6cac5ea2f6b3c055332b49ba28eaeb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5804-dfb973306690bb3be094805b68f35bf94b6cac5ea2f6b3c055332b49ba28eaeb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8489.2010.00504.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8489.2010.00504.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pannell, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><title>Australia's National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality: a retrospective assessment</title><title>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>Perceptions of a salinity ‘crisis’ in Australia around 2000 resulted in the establishment of a major national program that aimed to prevent, stabilize, and reverse trends in salinity. The National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality allocated A$1.4 billion of public funds to 1700 projects over 7 years. Here, we assess the performance of the program in relation to 12 features that we propose as being essential for programs that aim to address complex environmental problems. The features include use of technical information to guide investment prioritization, use of socio‐economic information, effective integration of information for prioritization, selection of appropriate targets, choice of appropriate policy mechanisms, and provision of incentives and support to environmental managers to pursue environmental outcomes cost effectively. Our assessment reinforces findings from a number of public reviews that found serious weaknesses in the program. Overall, with a few exceptions, projects under the National Action Plan generated few worthwhile salinity mitigation benefits and will have little enduring benefit. This was readily foreseeable given attention to the scientific and economic knowledge of salinity available at the time the program was developed.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia: Environmental policy</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>institutions</subject><subject>integrated catchment management</subject><subject>mechanism choice</subject><subject>natural resource management</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Water policy</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water requirements</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1364-985X</issn><issn>1467-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtv1TAQhSMEEqXwHyw2XeXid2wkFlFFeajijUBiMRrnOuCr3CTYTtv773F6EQs24I1HM985GvtUFWF0w8p5stswqZvaSGM3nJYupYrKzc2d6uTP4G6phZa1Nerr_epBSjtKKZean1Tf2iXliEPAs0TeYA7TiANpu7Ug7wYcST9F8rEAY8gHguOWfMHsI3m_lF4-PCVIos9xSrMvoitPMCWf0t6P-WF1r8ch-Ue_79Pq88XzT-cv68u3L16dt5d1pwyV9bZ3thGCam2pc8J5aqWhymnTC-V6K53usFMeea-d6KhSQnAnrUNuPHonTquzo-8cp5-LTxn2IXV-KNv7aUlgmBaGS6v_TdKGGyWlLeTjv8jdtMTyNwkapSQTvJEFMkeoK-9P0fcwx7DHeABGYU0HdrCGAGsIsKYDt-nATZE-O0qvw-AP_62D9nX7oVRFf3HUx33IgDP2GX7kPCfYYkYIY4ltnUzxO2ynsBoLwTQEPxT41pMx1TTiFytxrnE</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Pannell, David J.</creator><creator>Roberts, Anna M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Australia's National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality: a retrospective assessment</title><author>Pannell, David J. ; Roberts, Anna M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5804-dfb973306690bb3be094805b68f35bf94b6cac5ea2f6b3c055332b49ba28eaeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia: Environmental policy</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>institutions</topic><topic>integrated catchment management</topic><topic>mechanism choice</topic><topic>natural resource management</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Water policy</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water requirements</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pannell, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pannell, David J.</au><au>Roberts, Anna M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Australia's National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality: a retrospective assessment</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>437-456</pages><issn>1364-985X</issn><eissn>1467-8489</eissn><abstract>Perceptions of a salinity ‘crisis’ in Australia around 2000 resulted in the establishment of a major national program that aimed to prevent, stabilize, and reverse trends in salinity. The National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality allocated A$1.4 billion of public funds to 1700 projects over 7 years. Here, we assess the performance of the program in relation to 12 features that we propose as being essential for programs that aim to address complex environmental problems. The features include use of technical information to guide investment prioritization, use of socio‐economic information, effective integration of information for prioritization, selection of appropriate targets, choice of appropriate policy mechanisms, and provision of incentives and support to environmental managers to pursue environmental outcomes cost effectively. Our assessment reinforces findings from a number of public reviews that found serious weaknesses in the program. Overall, with a few exceptions, projects under the National Action Plan generated few worthwhile salinity mitigation benefits and will have little enduring benefit. This was readily foreseeable given attention to the scientific and economic knowledge of salinity available at the time the program was developed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00504.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-985X
ispartof The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2010-10, Vol.54 (4), p.437-456
issn 1364-985X
1467-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_755413274
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Australia
Australia: Environmental policy
environment
Environmental impact
Environmental policy
institutions
integrated catchment management
mechanism choice
natural resource management
policy
Policy analysis
Resource management
Salinity
Studies
Trends
Water policy
Water quality
Water requirements
Water resources
Water resources management
Water treatment
Watersheds
title Australia's National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality: a retrospective assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A03%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Australia's%20National%20Action%20Plan%20for%20Salinity%20and%20Water%20Quality:%20a%20retrospective%20assessment&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Pannell,%20David%20J.&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=437-456&rft.issn=1364-985X&rft.eissn=1467-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00504.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2149547551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755413274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.201011577&rfr_iscdi=true