Stakeholder competency assessments as predictors of career success

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to extend the work on 360-degree assessments as a stakeholder perspective and to support the argument that different competency assessments by different rater groups provide valid predictors of the objective and subjective career success of young professionals....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Career development international 2010-01, Vol.15 (5), p.459-478
1. Verfasser: Stumpf, Stephen A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 478
container_issue 5
container_start_page 459
container_title Career development international
container_volume 15
creator Stumpf, Stephen A.
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to extend the work on 360-degree assessments as a stakeholder perspective and to support the argument that different competency assessments by different rater groups provide valid predictors of the objective and subjective career success of young professionals.Design methodology approach - A 360-degree assessment tool, the leadership inventory (LI), was completed by 330 individuals as part of their professional development. Eight competencies germane to the performance of young professionals were assessed by self, supervisors, peers, and direct reports. These rater assessments were used to predict one's satisfaction with his her career, promotions, and salary changes.Findings - Different rater groups assess the competencies differently, and these differences are relevant to career success. The results of object measures of career success held when gender, years of work experience, and two individual difference measures (i.e. proactivity and negative emotions) were controlled. In contrast, the self-assessments of satisfaction with career success were attenuated when control variables were introduced.Practical implications - Professionals can enhance their promotion potential and salary progression by developing and exhibiting the competencies of interest to their supervisors (most performance competencies), peers (gaining buy-in and commitment of others, recognizing and promoting interdependence), and direct reports (providing direction that inspires action, fostering a climate of innovation and learning).Originality value - This article supports a broader use of different rater group competency assessments in understanding and enhancing the career success of professionals. It suggests the need for dialogue and research regarding when different rater assessments in 360-degree assessment tools are an index of instrument validity.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/13620431011075330
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_754531053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>855693618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b76f7e5a6f293ccc2f899085fc1287ecd977ccfc6f077e9b58307817dc313adf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgxYvR3Wz2I0etHxUKilU8LtvJLLZNmribgv33bq0oKD3NDPO88_EScszoOWNUXzAuM5pzRmOlBOd0h_SYEjqVlPLdmMd-GgG5Tw5CmNE1l4keuRp3do5vTVWiT6CpW-xwAavEhoAh1LjoQsyT1mM5ha7xIWlcAtZjxMMSIEKHZM_ZKuDRd-yTl9ub58EwHT3c3Q8uRynkgnXpREmnUFjpsoIDQOZ0UVAtHLBMK4SyUArAgXRUKSwmQnOqNFMlcMZt6XifnG7mtr55X2LoTD0NgFVlF9gsg9FCyIJLpiN58oecNUu_iMcZJXIRXYoO9QnbQOCbEDw60_ppbf3KMGrWnpp_nkZNutFMQ4cfPwLr50YqroTJXzOTj6_zQf40NI-RP9vwWKO3Vfm74u9o0359SLfgWy_6BF7Kkzo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754531053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stakeholder competency assessments as predictors of career success</title><source>Emerald Complete Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Stumpf, Stephen A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stumpf, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to extend the work on 360-degree assessments as a stakeholder perspective and to support the argument that different competency assessments by different rater groups provide valid predictors of the objective and subjective career success of young professionals.Design methodology approach - A 360-degree assessment tool, the leadership inventory (LI), was completed by 330 individuals as part of their professional development. Eight competencies germane to the performance of young professionals were assessed by self, supervisors, peers, and direct reports. These rater assessments were used to predict one's satisfaction with his her career, promotions, and salary changes.Findings - Different rater groups assess the competencies differently, and these differences are relevant to career success. The results of object measures of career success held when gender, years of work experience, and two individual difference measures (i.e. proactivity and negative emotions) were controlled. In contrast, the self-assessments of satisfaction with career success were attenuated when control variables were introduced.Practical implications - Professionals can enhance their promotion potential and salary progression by developing and exhibiting the competencies of interest to their supervisors (most performance competencies), peers (gaining buy-in and commitment of others, recognizing and promoting interdependence), and direct reports (providing direction that inspires action, fostering a climate of innovation and learning).Originality value - This article supports a broader use of different rater group competency assessments in understanding and enhancing the career success of professionals. It suggests the need for dialogue and research regarding when different rater assessments in 360-degree assessment tools are an index of instrument validity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-0436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/13620431011075330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>360degree feedback ; Assessments ; Attenuation ; Bias ; Career development ; Career development planning ; Career satisfaction ; Careers ; Competence ; Emotions ; Feedback ; Human Capital ; Individual Differences ; Job Performance ; Job satisfaction ; Leadership ; Meta Analysis ; Mobility ; Peers ; Professional development ; Professional education ; Professionals ; Progressions ; Promotion ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Response rates ; Salaries ; Self Efficacy ; Self evaluation ; Stakeholders ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Success ; Supervisors ; Work experience ; Younger workers</subject><ispartof>Career development international, 2010-01, Vol.15 (5), p.459-478</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b76f7e5a6f293ccc2f899085fc1287ecd977ccfc6f077e9b58307817dc313adf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b76f7e5a6f293ccc2f899085fc1287ecd977ccfc6f077e9b58307817dc313adf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13620431011075330/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13620431011075330/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11615,21675,27903,27904,52664,52667,53222,53350</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stumpf, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><title>Stakeholder competency assessments as predictors of career success</title><title>Career development international</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to extend the work on 360-degree assessments as a stakeholder perspective and to support the argument that different competency assessments by different rater groups provide valid predictors of the objective and subjective career success of young professionals.Design methodology approach - A 360-degree assessment tool, the leadership inventory (LI), was completed by 330 individuals as part of their professional development. Eight competencies germane to the performance of young professionals were assessed by self, supervisors, peers, and direct reports. These rater assessments were used to predict one's satisfaction with his her career, promotions, and salary changes.Findings - Different rater groups assess the competencies differently, and these differences are relevant to career success. The results of object measures of career success held when gender, years of work experience, and two individual difference measures (i.e. proactivity and negative emotions) were controlled. In contrast, the self-assessments of satisfaction with career success were attenuated when control variables were introduced.Practical implications - Professionals can enhance their promotion potential and salary progression by developing and exhibiting the competencies of interest to their supervisors (most performance competencies), peers (gaining buy-in and commitment of others, recognizing and promoting interdependence), and direct reports (providing direction that inspires action, fostering a climate of innovation and learning).Originality value - This article supports a broader use of different rater group competency assessments in understanding and enhancing the career success of professionals. It suggests the need for dialogue and research regarding when different rater assessments in 360-degree assessment tools are an index of instrument validity.</description><subject>360degree feedback</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Career development</subject><subject>Career development planning</subject><subject>Career satisfaction</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Human Capital</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Job Performance</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professional education</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Progressions</subject><subject>Promotion</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Salaries</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Work experience</subject><subject>Younger workers</subject><issn>1362-0436</issn><issn>1758-6003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgxYvR3Wz2I0etHxUKilU8LtvJLLZNmribgv33bq0oKD3NDPO88_EScszoOWNUXzAuM5pzRmOlBOd0h_SYEjqVlPLdmMd-GgG5Tw5CmNE1l4keuRp3do5vTVWiT6CpW-xwAavEhoAh1LjoQsyT1mM5ha7xIWlcAtZjxMMSIEKHZM_ZKuDRd-yTl9ub58EwHT3c3Q8uRynkgnXpREmnUFjpsoIDQOZ0UVAtHLBMK4SyUArAgXRUKSwmQnOqNFMlcMZt6XifnG7mtr55X2LoTD0NgFVlF9gsg9FCyIJLpiN58oecNUu_iMcZJXIRXYoO9QnbQOCbEDw60_ppbf3KMGrWnpp_nkZNutFMQ4cfPwLr50YqroTJXzOTj6_zQf40NI-RP9vwWKO3Vfm74u9o0359SLfgWy_6BF7Kkzo</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Stumpf, Stephen A.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Stakeholder competency assessments as predictors of career success</title><author>Stumpf, Stephen A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b76f7e5a6f293ccc2f899085fc1287ecd977ccfc6f077e9b58307817dc313adf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>360degree feedback</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Career development</topic><topic>Career development planning</topic><topic>Career satisfaction</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Human Capital</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Job Performance</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professional education</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Progressions</topic><topic>Promotion</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Salaries</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Work experience</topic><topic>Younger workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stumpf, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Career development international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stumpf, Stephen A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stakeholder competency assessments as predictors of career success</atitle><jtitle>Career development international</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>478</epage><pages>459-478</pages><issn>1362-0436</issn><eissn>1758-6003</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to extend the work on 360-degree assessments as a stakeholder perspective and to support the argument that different competency assessments by different rater groups provide valid predictors of the objective and subjective career success of young professionals.Design methodology approach - A 360-degree assessment tool, the leadership inventory (LI), was completed by 330 individuals as part of their professional development. Eight competencies germane to the performance of young professionals were assessed by self, supervisors, peers, and direct reports. These rater assessments were used to predict one's satisfaction with his her career, promotions, and salary changes.Findings - Different rater groups assess the competencies differently, and these differences are relevant to career success. The results of object measures of career success held when gender, years of work experience, and two individual difference measures (i.e. proactivity and negative emotions) were controlled. In contrast, the self-assessments of satisfaction with career success were attenuated when control variables were introduced.Practical implications - Professionals can enhance their promotion potential and salary progression by developing and exhibiting the competencies of interest to their supervisors (most performance competencies), peers (gaining buy-in and commitment of others, recognizing and promoting interdependence), and direct reports (providing direction that inspires action, fostering a climate of innovation and learning).Originality value - This article supports a broader use of different rater group competency assessments in understanding and enhancing the career success of professionals. It suggests the need for dialogue and research regarding when different rater assessments in 360-degree assessment tools are an index of instrument validity.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/13620431011075330</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1362-0436
ispartof Career development international, 2010-01, Vol.15 (5), p.459-478
issn 1362-0436
1758-6003
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_754531053
source Emerald Complete Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects 360degree feedback
Assessments
Attenuation
Bias
Career development
Career development planning
Career satisfaction
Careers
Competence
Emotions
Feedback
Human Capital
Individual Differences
Job Performance
Job satisfaction
Leadership
Meta Analysis
Mobility
Peers
Professional development
Professional education
Professionals
Progressions
Promotion
Ratings & rankings
Response rates
Salaries
Self Efficacy
Self evaluation
Stakeholders
Statistical analysis
Studies
Success
Supervisors
Work experience
Younger workers
title Stakeholder competency assessments as predictors of career success
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stakeholder%20competency%20assessments%20as%20predictors%20of%20career%20success&rft.jtitle=Career%20development%20international&rft.au=Stumpf,%20Stephen%20A.&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=478&rft.pages=459-478&rft.issn=1362-0436&rft.eissn=1758-6003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/13620431011075330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E855693618%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754531053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true