Betrayal in teaching : Persuasion in Kierkegaard, theory and performance
This paper explores the relationship between Kierkegaard's theory of "indirect communication," his employment of that method in the pseudonymous literature, and his explicit comments on the Teacher in Philosophical Fragments. My interest is principally in a pedagogical method able to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Continental philosophy review 2006-07, Vol.39 (3), p.245-272 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 272 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 245 |
| container_title | Continental philosophy review |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | BORMAN, David A |
| description | This paper explores the relationship between Kierkegaard's theory of "indirect communication," his employment of that method in the pseudonymous literature, and his explicit comments on the Teacher in Philosophical Fragments. My interest is principally in a pedagogical method able to serve as a solution to the problem of will formation, and so my assessment of Kierkegaard's theory and performance is essentially ethical in nature. I argue that there is at least an ambiguity, if not a contradiction, to be found in the above relationship and that as a result, in its current form, Kierkegaardean pedagogical devices do not appear to be able to offer an adequate solution.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11007-006-9029-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_753957607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2145987361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-bb6d6f90b9397086d2806ea9b7d48d72f4f724e136219f9b17d783dee0c9796d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFPwzAMhSMEEmPwA7hVSNwIOEmbNNxgAoaYBAc4R2njbB1bO5Lu0H9PqiFxsmW_9yx_hFwyuGUA6i6ysVAASTVwTYcjMmGFEjTNxXHqRakoL3N-Ss5iXAMwVoCekPkj9sEOdpM1bdajrVdNu8zusw8McW9j07Xj4q3B8I1La4O7yfoVdmHIbOuyHQbfha1tazwnJ95uIl781Sn5en76nM3p4v3ldfawoLUA3tOqkk56DZUWWkEpHS9BotWVcnnpFPe5VzxHJiRn2uuKKadK4RCh1kpLJ6bk6pC7C93PHmNv1t0-tOmkUYXQhZKgkogdRHXoYgzozS40WxsGw8CMoMyBl0m8zMjLDMlz_RdsY203PqSvmvhvLAvgueTiF4hMafM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>753957607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Betrayal in teaching : Persuasion in Kierkegaard, theory and performance</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>BORMAN, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>BORMAN, David A</creatorcontrib><description>This paper explores the relationship between Kierkegaard's theory of "indirect communication," his employment of that method in the pseudonymous literature, and his explicit comments on the Teacher in Philosophical Fragments. My interest is principally in a pedagogical method able to serve as a solution to the problem of will formation, and so my assessment of Kierkegaard's theory and performance is essentially ethical in nature. I argue that there is at least an ambiguity, if not a contradiction, to be found in the above relationship and that as a result, in its current form, Kierkegaardean pedagogical devices do not appear to be able to offer an adequate solution.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-2842</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11007-006-9029-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>19th century ; Historical studies (History of philosophy. History of ideas) ; Kierkegaard, Soren Aabye (1813-1855) ; Philosophy ; Teaching ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Continental philosophy review, 2006-07, Vol.39 (3), p.245-272</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-bb6d6f90b9397086d2806ea9b7d48d72f4f724e136219f9b17d783dee0c9796d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18502462$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BORMAN, David A</creatorcontrib><title>Betrayal in teaching : Persuasion in Kierkegaard, theory and performance</title><title>Continental philosophy review</title><description>This paper explores the relationship between Kierkegaard's theory of "indirect communication," his employment of that method in the pseudonymous literature, and his explicit comments on the Teacher in Philosophical Fragments. My interest is principally in a pedagogical method able to serve as a solution to the problem of will formation, and so my assessment of Kierkegaard's theory and performance is essentially ethical in nature. I argue that there is at least an ambiguity, if not a contradiction, to be found in the above relationship and that as a result, in its current form, Kierkegaardean pedagogical devices do not appear to be able to offer an adequate solution.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Historical studies (History of philosophy. History of ideas)</subject><subject>Kierkegaard, Soren Aabye (1813-1855)</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>1387-2842</issn><issn>1573-1103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFPwzAMhSMEEmPwA7hVSNwIOEmbNNxgAoaYBAc4R2njbB1bO5Lu0H9PqiFxsmW_9yx_hFwyuGUA6i6ysVAASTVwTYcjMmGFEjTNxXHqRakoL3N-Ss5iXAMwVoCekPkj9sEOdpM1bdajrVdNu8zusw8McW9j07Xj4q3B8I1La4O7yfoVdmHIbOuyHQbfha1tazwnJ95uIl781Sn5en76nM3p4v3ldfawoLUA3tOqkk56DZUWWkEpHS9BotWVcnnpFPe5VzxHJiRn2uuKKadK4RCh1kpLJ6bk6pC7C93PHmNv1t0-tOmkUYXQhZKgkogdRHXoYgzozS40WxsGw8CMoMyBl0m8zMjLDMlz_RdsY203PqSvmvhvLAvgueTiF4hMafM</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>BORMAN, David A</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Betrayal in teaching : Persuasion in Kierkegaard, theory and performance</title><author>BORMAN, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-bb6d6f90b9397086d2806ea9b7d48d72f4f724e136219f9b17d783dee0c9796d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Historical studies (History of philosophy. History of ideas)</topic><topic>Kierkegaard, Soren Aabye (1813-1855)</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BORMAN, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Continental philosophy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BORMAN, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Betrayal in teaching : Persuasion in Kierkegaard, theory and performance</atitle><jtitle>Continental philosophy review</jtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>245-272</pages><issn>1387-2842</issn><eissn>1573-1103</eissn><abstract>This paper explores the relationship between Kierkegaard's theory of "indirect communication," his employment of that method in the pseudonymous literature, and his explicit comments on the Teacher in Philosophical Fragments. My interest is principally in a pedagogical method able to serve as a solution to the problem of will formation, and so my assessment of Kierkegaard's theory and performance is essentially ethical in nature. I argue that there is at least an ambiguity, if not a contradiction, to be found in the above relationship and that as a result, in its current form, Kierkegaardean pedagogical devices do not appear to be able to offer an adequate solution.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11007-006-9029-y</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1387-2842 |
| ispartof | Continental philosophy review, 2006-07, Vol.39 (3), p.245-272 |
| issn | 1387-2842 1573-1103 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_753957607 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | 19th century Historical studies (History of philosophy. History of ideas) Kierkegaard, Soren Aabye (1813-1855) Philosophy Teaching Theory |
| title | Betrayal in teaching : Persuasion in Kierkegaard, theory and performance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A55%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Betrayal%20in%20teaching%20:%20Persuasion%20in%20Kierkegaard,%20theory%20and%20performance&rft.jtitle=Continental%20philosophy%20review&rft.au=BORMAN,%20David%20A&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=245-272&rft.issn=1387-2842&rft.eissn=1573-1103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11007-006-9029-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2145987361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=753957607&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |