Cecilia Braslavsky and the New Educational Paradigm
This article describes Cecilia Braslavsky's role in the development of theoretical frameworks based on empirical research that, in the stage of restoration of democracy in Latin America, made it possible to advance in the construction of a Latin American socioeducational paradigm. This article...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Prospects (Paris) 2005-12, Vol.35 (4), p.407-413 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 413 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 407 |
| container_title | Prospects (Paris) |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Filmus, Daniel |
| description | This article describes Cecilia Braslavsky's role in the development of theoretical frameworks based on empirical research that, in the stage of restoration of democracy in Latin America, made it possible to advance in the construction of a Latin American socioeducational paradigm. This article discusses some propositions that may systematize the perspectives set out in Braslavsky's research: (1) It is not possible to propose a universal, predetermined social function for education in its relationship with society; (2) The outcome of the educational process responds to the actions of the set of actors involved and not merely to the will of the State; (3) The educational process should be conceived as a phenomenon in which different dimensions interact: one social and one individual; (4) Fulfilling the "homogenizing" role of education requires encouragement from heterogeneous educational processes; and (5) Education is a necessary but not sufficient factor for guaranteeing the objective of combining economic growth with social justice. (Contains 4 notes.) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11125-006-7257-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_751509228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ774829</ericid><sourcerecordid>2141957001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c160t-482c8eafd98188c7803f6b92e026d028b3a0dcbda07bc1d850bf0b50721037293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwAUgsIvaGe-06tpdQtTxUAQtYW47tQEraFDuB9u9JFcRqNmdGo0PIOcIVAsjrhIhMUICcSiYk3R6QEQrJqQYNh2QEwDlFwdUxOUlpCYByAjgifBpcVVc2u4021fY7fe4yu_ZZ-xGyp_CTzXznbFs1a1tnLzZaX72vTslRaesUzv5yTN7ms9fpPV083z1MbxbUYQ4tnSjmVLCl1wqVclIBL_NCswAs98BUwS14V3gLsnDolYCihEKAZAhcMs3H5HLY3cTmqwupNcumi_2TZKRAAZox1UM4QC42KcVQmk2sVjbuDILZqzGDGtOrMXs1Ztt3LoZOiJX752ePUvafNf8FAKZeaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751509228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cecilia Braslavsky and the New Educational Paradigm</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Filmus, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Filmus, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes Cecilia Braslavsky's role in the development of theoretical frameworks based on empirical research that, in the stage of restoration of democracy in Latin America, made it possible to advance in the construction of a Latin American socioeducational paradigm. This article discusses some propositions that may systematize the perspectives set out in Braslavsky's research: (1) It is not possible to propose a universal, predetermined social function for education in its relationship with society; (2) The outcome of the educational process responds to the actions of the set of actors involved and not merely to the will of the State; (3) The educational process should be conceived as a phenomenon in which different dimensions interact: one social and one individual; (4) Fulfilling the "homogenizing" role of education requires encouragement from heterogeneous educational processes; and (5) Education is a necessary but not sufficient factor for guaranteeing the objective of combining economic growth with social justice. (Contains 4 notes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-1538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-9090</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11125-006-7257-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer</publisher><subject>Economic Progress ; Educational Change ; Foreign Countries ; Justice ; Latin America ; Learning Processes ; Role of Education ; Social Justice</subject><ispartof>Prospects (Paris), 2005-12, Vol.35 (4), p.407-413</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ774829$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Filmus, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Cecilia Braslavsky and the New Educational Paradigm</title><title>Prospects (Paris)</title><description>This article describes Cecilia Braslavsky's role in the development of theoretical frameworks based on empirical research that, in the stage of restoration of democracy in Latin America, made it possible to advance in the construction of a Latin American socioeducational paradigm. This article discusses some propositions that may systematize the perspectives set out in Braslavsky's research: (1) It is not possible to propose a universal, predetermined social function for education in its relationship with society; (2) The outcome of the educational process responds to the actions of the set of actors involved and not merely to the will of the State; (3) The educational process should be conceived as a phenomenon in which different dimensions interact: one social and one individual; (4) Fulfilling the "homogenizing" role of education requires encouragement from heterogeneous educational processes; and (5) Education is a necessary but not sufficient factor for guaranteeing the objective of combining economic growth with social justice. (Contains 4 notes.)</description><subject>Economic Progress</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Role of Education</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><issn>0033-1538</issn><issn>1573-9090</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwAUgsIvaGe-06tpdQtTxUAQtYW47tQEraFDuB9u9JFcRqNmdGo0PIOcIVAsjrhIhMUICcSiYk3R6QEQrJqQYNh2QEwDlFwdUxOUlpCYByAjgifBpcVVc2u4021fY7fe4yu_ZZ-xGyp_CTzXznbFs1a1tnLzZaX72vTslRaesUzv5yTN7ms9fpPV083z1MbxbUYQ4tnSjmVLCl1wqVclIBL_NCswAs98BUwS14V3gLsnDolYCihEKAZAhcMs3H5HLY3cTmqwupNcumi_2TZKRAAZox1UM4QC42KcVQmk2sVjbuDILZqzGDGtOrMXs1Ztt3LoZOiJX752ePUvafNf8FAKZeaQ</recordid><startdate>200512</startdate><enddate>200512</enddate><creator>Filmus, Daniel</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200512</creationdate><title>Cecilia Braslavsky and the New Educational Paradigm</title><author>Filmus, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c160t-482c8eafd98188c7803f6b92e026d028b3a0dcbda07bc1d850bf0b50721037293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Economic Progress</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Role of Education</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Filmus, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Prospects (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Filmus, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ774829</ericid><atitle>Cecilia Braslavsky and the New Educational Paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Prospects (Paris)</jtitle><date>2005-12</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>407-413</pages><issn>0033-1538</issn><eissn>1573-9090</eissn><abstract>This article describes Cecilia Braslavsky's role in the development of theoretical frameworks based on empirical research that, in the stage of restoration of democracy in Latin America, made it possible to advance in the construction of a Latin American socioeducational paradigm. This article discusses some propositions that may systematize the perspectives set out in Braslavsky's research: (1) It is not possible to propose a universal, predetermined social function for education in its relationship with society; (2) The outcome of the educational process responds to the actions of the set of actors involved and not merely to the will of the State; (3) The educational process should be conceived as a phenomenon in which different dimensions interact: one social and one individual; (4) Fulfilling the "homogenizing" role of education requires encouragement from heterogeneous educational processes; and (5) Education is a necessary but not sufficient factor for guaranteeing the objective of combining economic growth with social justice. (Contains 4 notes.)</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11125-006-7257-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-1538 |
| ispartof | Prospects (Paris), 2005-12, Vol.35 (4), p.407-413 |
| issn | 0033-1538 1573-9090 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_751509228 |
| source | EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Economic Progress Educational Change Foreign Countries Justice Latin America Learning Processes Role of Education Social Justice |
| title | Cecilia Braslavsky and the New Educational Paradigm |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A01%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cecilia%20Braslavsky%20and%20the%20New%20Educational%20Paradigm&rft.jtitle=Prospects%20(Paris)&rft.au=Filmus,%20Daniel&rft.date=2005-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=407-413&rft.issn=0033-1538&rft.eissn=1573-9090&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11125-006-7257-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2141957001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751509228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ774829&rfr_iscdi=true |