Bacteriological purification of the Finnish River Kymi
With its total drainage basin of 37 107 km2 and mean annual discharge of 307 m3 s-1, the River Kymi is one of the largest in Finland. Presently it receives treated domestic wastewaters of about 160 000 inhabitants through eight treatment plants and treated industrial effluents from four paper mills,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 1997-07, Vol.46 (3), p.241-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 241 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Niemi, J.S Heitto, L Niemi, R.M Anttila-Huhtinen, M Malin, V |
description | With its total drainage basin of 37 107 km2 and mean annual discharge of 307 m3 s-1, the River Kymi is one of the largest in Finland. Presently it receives treated domestic wastewaters of about 160 000 inhabitants through eight treatment plants and treated industrial effluents from four paper mills, two cardboard mills and one pulp mill. In the 1960s all the wastewaters were discharged untreated to the river. However, the construction of domestic wastewater treatment plants began in the 1970s and mechanical wastewater treatment became common in industry. By the end of the 1980s practically all the wastewaters discharged to the river were treated in activated sludge processes. The aim of this paper was to investigate the influence of wastewater purification on the bacteriological quality of the river during these three decades. The bacteriological quality of the river was evaluated on the basis of annual medians of fecal streptococci (FS) calculated for 15 sites on the basis of 4804 FS enumerations from the years 1964-1992. The results show that the bacteriological quality improved steadily as the number of treatment plants increased and wastewater treatment became more effective. In the beginning of the 1960s the annual FS medians in the central part of the river were typically 1000-1500 CFU/100 ml, whereas in the 1990s they had decreased to 30-40 CFU/100 ml (CFU = colony forming units). The results indicate that FS input to the river was mainly of domestic origin.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1005747612750 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_751417087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2140971951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f233t-85b3c1d90a624b97ba442d36cc5887d3aed84ebfdbcd0bdff5770ae30b3201b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz0tLAzEUBeAgCtbq2qWDuB29ed7EXS2-sCCoXQ9JJmlT2pmamQr99w60q3sWH-dwCbmmcE-B8YfJIwWQKFBRhhJOyIhK5CUz0pySEVCFpeLKnJOLrlsBgEFhRkQ9Wd-HnNp1u0jerovtLqc4pD61TdHGol-G4iU1TeqWxVf6C7n42G_SJTmLdt2Fq-Mdk_nL88_0rZx9vr5PJ7MyMs77UkvHPa0NWMWEM-isEKzmynupNdbchlqL4GLtfA2ujlEigg0cHGdAneFjcnvo3eb2dxe6vlq1u9wMkxVKKiiCxgHdHZHthhdito1PXbXNaWPzvmIoNBg6sJsDi7at7CIPZP49zHBgWiGThv8DEcRdgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751417087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacteriological purification of the Finnish River Kymi</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Niemi, J.S ; Heitto, L ; Niemi, R.M ; Anttila-Huhtinen, M ; Malin, V</creator><creatorcontrib>Niemi, J.S ; Heitto, L ; Niemi, R.M ; Anttila-Huhtinen, M ; Malin, V</creatorcontrib><description>With its total drainage basin of 37 107 km2 and mean annual discharge of 307 m3 s-1, the River Kymi is one of the largest in Finland. Presently it receives treated domestic wastewaters of about 160 000 inhabitants through eight treatment plants and treated industrial effluents from four paper mills, two cardboard mills and one pulp mill. In the 1960s all the wastewaters were discharged untreated to the river. However, the construction of domestic wastewater treatment plants began in the 1970s and mechanical wastewater treatment became common in industry. By the end of the 1980s practically all the wastewaters discharged to the river were treated in activated sludge processes. The aim of this paper was to investigate the influence of wastewater purification on the bacteriological quality of the river during these three decades. The bacteriological quality of the river was evaluated on the basis of annual medians of fecal streptococci (FS) calculated for 15 sites on the basis of 4804 FS enumerations from the years 1964-1992. The results show that the bacteriological quality improved steadily as the number of treatment plants increased and wastewater treatment became more effective. In the beginning of the 1960s the annual FS medians in the central part of the river were typically 1000-1500 CFU/100 ml, whereas in the 1990s they had decreased to 30-40 CFU/100 ml (CFU = colony forming units). The results indicate that FS input to the river was mainly of domestic origin.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1005747612750</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMASDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrect: Springer</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Applied sciences ; Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biotechnology ; cardboard mill effluent ; domestic waste water ; Domestic wastewater ; Effluent treatment ; Environment and pollution ; Environmental monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; fecal coliforms ; fecal stretococci ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Industrial effluents ; Industrial wastewater ; Natural water pollution ; paper mill effluent ; Pollution ; Pulp & paper mills ; pulp and paper industry ; pulp and paper mill effluents ; Purification ; river water ; Rivers ; Streptococcus ; wastewater ; Wastewater purification ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; water pollution ; water purification ; water quality ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 1997-07, Vol.46 (3), p.241-253</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2748091$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niemi, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitto, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemi, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anttila-Huhtinen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, V</creatorcontrib><title>Bacteriological purification of the Finnish River Kymi</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><description>With its total drainage basin of 37 107 km2 and mean annual discharge of 307 m3 s-1, the River Kymi is one of the largest in Finland. Presently it receives treated domestic wastewaters of about 160 000 inhabitants through eight treatment plants and treated industrial effluents from four paper mills, two cardboard mills and one pulp mill. In the 1960s all the wastewaters were discharged untreated to the river. However, the construction of domestic wastewater treatment plants began in the 1970s and mechanical wastewater treatment became common in industry. By the end of the 1980s practically all the wastewaters discharged to the river were treated in activated sludge processes. The aim of this paper was to investigate the influence of wastewater purification on the bacteriological quality of the river during these three decades. The bacteriological quality of the river was evaluated on the basis of annual medians of fecal streptococci (FS) calculated for 15 sites on the basis of 4804 FS enumerations from the years 1964-1992. The results show that the bacteriological quality improved steadily as the number of treatment plants increased and wastewater treatment became more effective. In the beginning of the 1960s the annual FS medians in the central part of the river were typically 1000-1500 CFU/100 ml, whereas in the 1990s they had decreased to 30-40 CFU/100 ml (CFU = colony forming units). The results indicate that FS input to the river was mainly of domestic origin.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>cardboard mill effluent</subject><subject>domestic waste water</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>Effluent treatment</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>fecal coliforms</subject><subject>fecal stretococci</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Industrial effluents</subject><subject>Industrial wastewater</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>paper mill effluent</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pulp & paper mills</subject><subject>pulp and paper industry</subject><subject>pulp and paper mill effluents</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>river water</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><subject>wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater purification</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>water purification</subject><subject>water quality</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotz0tLAzEUBeAgCtbq2qWDuB29ed7EXS2-sCCoXQ9JJmlT2pmamQr99w60q3sWH-dwCbmmcE-B8YfJIwWQKFBRhhJOyIhK5CUz0pySEVCFpeLKnJOLrlsBgEFhRkQ9Wd-HnNp1u0jerovtLqc4pD61TdHGol-G4iU1TeqWxVf6C7n42G_SJTmLdt2Fq-Mdk_nL88_0rZx9vr5PJ7MyMs77UkvHPa0NWMWEM-isEKzmynupNdbchlqL4GLtfA2ujlEigg0cHGdAneFjcnvo3eb2dxe6vlq1u9wMkxVKKiiCxgHdHZHthhdito1PXbXNaWPzvmIoNBg6sJsDi7at7CIPZP49zHBgWiGThv8DEcRdgA</recordid><startdate>19970701</startdate><enddate>19970701</enddate><creator>Niemi, J.S</creator><creator>Heitto, L</creator><creator>Niemi, R.M</creator><creator>Anttila-Huhtinen, M</creator><creator>Malin, V</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970701</creationdate><title>Bacteriological purification of the Finnish River Kymi</title><author>Niemi, J.S ; Heitto, L ; Niemi, R.M ; Anttila-Huhtinen, M ; Malin, V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f233t-85b3c1d90a624b97ba442d36cc5887d3aed84ebfdbcd0bdff5770ae30b3201b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>cardboard mill effluent</topic><topic>domestic waste water</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>Effluent treatment</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>fecal coliforms</topic><topic>fecal stretococci</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Industrial effluents</topic><topic>Industrial wastewater</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>paper mill effluent</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pulp & paper mills</topic><topic>pulp and paper industry</topic><topic>pulp and paper mill effluents</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>river water</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><topic>wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater purification</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>water purification</topic><topic>water quality</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niemi, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitto, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemi, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anttila-Huhtinen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, V</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niemi, J.S</au><au>Heitto, L</au><au>Niemi, R.M</au><au>Anttila-Huhtinen, M</au><au>Malin, V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacteriological purification of the Finnish River Kymi</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><date>1997-07-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>241-253</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><coden>EMASDH</coden><abstract>With its total drainage basin of 37 107 km2 and mean annual discharge of 307 m3 s-1, the River Kymi is one of the largest in Finland. Presently it receives treated domestic wastewaters of about 160 000 inhabitants through eight treatment plants and treated industrial effluents from four paper mills, two cardboard mills and one pulp mill. In the 1960s all the wastewaters were discharged untreated to the river. However, the construction of domestic wastewater treatment plants began in the 1970s and mechanical wastewater treatment became common in industry. By the end of the 1980s practically all the wastewaters discharged to the river were treated in activated sludge processes. The aim of this paper was to investigate the influence of wastewater purification on the bacteriological quality of the river during these three decades. The bacteriological quality of the river was evaluated on the basis of annual medians of fecal streptococci (FS) calculated for 15 sites on the basis of 4804 FS enumerations from the years 1964-1992. The results show that the bacteriological quality improved steadily as the number of treatment plants increased and wastewater treatment became more effective. In the beginning of the 1960s the annual FS medians in the central part of the river were typically 1000-1500 CFU/100 ml, whereas in the 1990s they had decreased to 30-40 CFU/100 ml (CFU = colony forming units). The results indicate that FS input to the river was mainly of domestic origin.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrect</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1005747612750</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 1997-07, Vol.46 (3), p.241-253 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_751417087 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Activated sludge Applied sciences Bacteria Biological and medical sciences Biological treatment of waters Biotechnology cardboard mill effluent domestic waste water Domestic wastewater Effluent treatment Environment and pollution Environmental monitoring Exact sciences and technology fecal coliforms fecal stretococci Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects Industrial effluents Industrial wastewater Natural water pollution paper mill effluent Pollution Pulp & paper mills pulp and paper industry pulp and paper mill effluents Purification river water Rivers Streptococcus wastewater Wastewater purification Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants water pollution water purification water quality Water treatment Water treatment and pollution |
title | Bacteriological purification of the Finnish River Kymi |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A29%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacteriological%20purification%20of%20the%20Finnish%20River%20Kymi&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Niemi,%20J.S&rft.date=1997-07-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=241-253&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft.coden=EMASDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1005747612750&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E2140971951%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751417087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |