Plant availability of selenite and selenate as influenced by the competing ions phosphate and sulfate
The relative plant availability of selenate versus selenite depends on the concentrations of competing ions, specifically sulfate and phosphate, respectively. In solution culture, the concentration of phosphate is typically 100- to 1000-fold greater than in soil solution, an artifact that could lead...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 1999-01, Vol.210 (2), p.199-207 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 207 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 210 |
creator | Hopper, J.L. (California Univ., Riverside, CA (USA). Dept. of Environmental Sciences) Parker, D.R |
description | The relative plant availability of selenate versus selenite depends on the concentrations of competing ions, specifically sulfate and phosphate, respectively. In solution culture, the concentration of phosphate is typically 100- to 1000-fold greater than in soil solution, an artifact that could lead to underestimation of the phytoavailability of selenite. A nutrient solution study was conducted to compare the availability of selenite and selenate to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv. Evening Shade) and strawberry clover (Trifolium fragiferrum L. cv. O'Conner) at basal concentrations of SO₄ (0.5 mM) and PO₄ (2 µM) similar to those found in soil solution. Concentrations up to 5 mM SO₄ and 200 µM PO₄ allowed quantitative comparison of the efficacy of the competing ions. In both species, selenite was more phytotoxic than selenate, especially for shoot growth. Selenate was less toxic, and tended to preferentially inhibit root growth. Translocation percentages were much higher with selenate (≥ 84%) than with selenite (≤ 47%). A 10-fold increase in sulfate decreased uptake from selenate by > 90% in both species. In ryegrass, 10-fold increases in phosphate caused 30% to 50% decreases in Se accumulation from selenite, but in clover such decreases only occurred in the roots. Sulfate-selenate antagonisms were thus stronger than phosphateselenite antagonisms. Nonetheless, conventional nutrient solutions with millimolar phosphate will significantly underestimate Se availability from selenite, and moderate levels of sulfate salinity can inhibit selenate uptake sufficiently to reverse the apparent relative availability of the two forms of Se. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/a:1004639906245 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_751151251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42949622</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42949622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-551c16676322c12e61988ce6d1f7596e8b4fc2ef727c46364252ff78b2a69ae23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKtnT0IQr6uZ2U2y8SbiFxT1oOBtmaZJm7LNrput0H_vlvoxl5mXeeYdhmHsFMQlCMyv6BqEKFRujFBYyD02AqnzTIpc7bOREDlmQpuPQ3aU0lJsNagRc681xZ7TF4WapqEO_YY3nidXuxh6xynOdoK2IvEQfb120boZn254v3DcNqvW9SHOeWhi4u2iSe2CfkfXtR_qY3bgqU7u5CeP2fv93dvtYzZ5eXi6vZlktgDoMynBglJa5YgW0CkwZWmdmoHX0ihXTgtv0XmN2g6XqgIleq_LKZIy5DAfs_Odb9s1n2uX-mrZrLs4rKy0BJCAEgbo4geiZKn2HUUbUtV2YUXdpgJjClnqATvbYcvUN91fu0BTGIX43_fUVDTvBovnCYptDI8o8282MnbR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751151251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant availability of selenite and selenate as influenced by the competing ions phosphate and sulfate</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hopper, J.L. (California Univ., Riverside, CA (USA). Dept. of Environmental Sciences) ; Parker, D.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Hopper, J.L. (California Univ., Riverside, CA (USA). Dept. of Environmental Sciences) ; Parker, D.R</creatorcontrib><description>The relative plant availability of selenate versus selenite depends on the concentrations of competing ions, specifically sulfate and phosphate, respectively. In solution culture, the concentration of phosphate is typically 100- to 1000-fold greater than in soil solution, an artifact that could lead to underestimation of the phytoavailability of selenite. A nutrient solution study was conducted to compare the availability of selenite and selenate to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv. Evening Shade) and strawberry clover (Trifolium fragiferrum L. cv. O'Conner) at basal concentrations of SO₄ (0.5 mM) and PO₄ (2 µM) similar to those found in soil solution. Concentrations up to 5 mM SO₄ and 200 µM PO₄ allowed quantitative comparison of the efficacy of the competing ions. In both species, selenite was more phytotoxic than selenate, especially for shoot growth. Selenate was less toxic, and tended to preferentially inhibit root growth. Translocation percentages were much higher with selenate (≥ 84%) than with selenite (≤ 47%). A 10-fold increase in sulfate decreased uptake from selenate by > 90% in both species. In ryegrass, 10-fold increases in phosphate caused 30% to 50% decreases in Se accumulation from selenite, but in clover such decreases only occurred in the roots. Sulfate-selenate antagonisms were thus stronger than phosphateselenite antagonisms. Nonetheless, conventional nutrient solutions with millimolar phosphate will significantly underestimate Se availability from selenite, and moderate levels of sulfate salinity can inhibit selenate uptake sufficiently to reverse the apparent relative availability of the two forms of Se.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/a:1004639906245</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Absorption. Translocation of ions and substances. Permeability ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; ANTAGONISM ; ANTAGONISME ; ANTAGONISMO ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clover ; DISPONIBILIDAD DE NUTRIENTES ; DISPONIBILITE D'ELEMENT NUTRITIF ; Economic plant physiology ; FITOTOXICIDAD ; Food industries ; Food toxicology ; FOSFATOS ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; Ions ; LOLIUM PERENNE ; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY ; Nutrient solutions ; Nutrients ; Nutrition. Photosynthesis. Respiration. Metabolism ; PHOSPHATE ; PHOSPHATES ; PHYTOTOXICITE ; PHYTOTOXICITY ; Plant growth ; Plant roots ; Plants ; Root growth ; SELENIO ; SELENIUM ; Soil solution ; Soil toxicity ; SULFATE ; Sulfates ; SULFATOS ; SULPHATES ; Translocation ; TRIFOLIUM FRAGIFERUM ; Turfgrasses</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 1999-01, Vol.210 (2), p.199-207</ispartof><rights>1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-551c16676322c12e61988ce6d1f7596e8b4fc2ef727c46364252ff78b2a69ae23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42949622$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42949622$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1994587$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hopper, J.L. (California Univ., Riverside, CA (USA). Dept. of Environmental Sciences)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, D.R</creatorcontrib><title>Plant availability of selenite and selenate as influenced by the competing ions phosphate and sulfate</title><title>Plant and soil</title><description>The relative plant availability of selenate versus selenite depends on the concentrations of competing ions, specifically sulfate and phosphate, respectively. In solution culture, the concentration of phosphate is typically 100- to 1000-fold greater than in soil solution, an artifact that could lead to underestimation of the phytoavailability of selenite. A nutrient solution study was conducted to compare the availability of selenite and selenate to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv. Evening Shade) and strawberry clover (Trifolium fragiferrum L. cv. O'Conner) at basal concentrations of SO₄ (0.5 mM) and PO₄ (2 µM) similar to those found in soil solution. Concentrations up to 5 mM SO₄ and 200 µM PO₄ allowed quantitative comparison of the efficacy of the competing ions. In both species, selenite was more phytotoxic than selenate, especially for shoot growth. Selenate was less toxic, and tended to preferentially inhibit root growth. Translocation percentages were much higher with selenate (≥ 84%) than with selenite (≤ 47%). A 10-fold increase in sulfate decreased uptake from selenate by > 90% in both species. In ryegrass, 10-fold increases in phosphate caused 30% to 50% decreases in Se accumulation from selenite, but in clover such decreases only occurred in the roots. Sulfate-selenate antagonisms were thus stronger than phosphateselenite antagonisms. Nonetheless, conventional nutrient solutions with millimolar phosphate will significantly underestimate Se availability from selenite, and moderate levels of sulfate salinity can inhibit selenate uptake sufficiently to reverse the apparent relative availability of the two forms of Se.</description><subject>Absorption. Translocation of ions and substances. Permeability</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>ANTAGONISM</subject><subject>ANTAGONISME</subject><subject>ANTAGONISMO</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clover</subject><subject>DISPONIBILIDAD DE NUTRIENTES</subject><subject>DISPONIBILITE D'ELEMENT NUTRITIF</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>FITOTOXICIDAD</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food toxicology</subject><subject>FOSFATOS</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>LOLIUM PERENNE</subject><subject>NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY</subject><subject>Nutrient solutions</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition. Photosynthesis. Respiration. Metabolism</subject><subject>PHOSPHATE</subject><subject>PHOSPHATES</subject><subject>PHYTOTOXICITE</subject><subject>PHYTOTOXICITY</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Root growth</subject><subject>SELENIO</subject><subject>SELENIUM</subject><subject>Soil solution</subject><subject>Soil toxicity</subject><subject>SULFATE</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>SULFATOS</subject><subject>SULPHATES</subject><subject>Translocation</subject><subject>TRIFOLIUM FRAGIFERUM</subject><subject>Turfgrasses</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKtnT0IQr6uZ2U2y8SbiFxT1oOBtmaZJm7LNrput0H_vlvoxl5mXeeYdhmHsFMQlCMyv6BqEKFRujFBYyD02AqnzTIpc7bOREDlmQpuPQ3aU0lJsNagRc681xZ7TF4WapqEO_YY3nidXuxh6xynOdoK2IvEQfb120boZn254v3DcNqvW9SHOeWhi4u2iSe2CfkfXtR_qY3bgqU7u5CeP2fv93dvtYzZ5eXi6vZlktgDoMynBglJa5YgW0CkwZWmdmoHX0ihXTgtv0XmN2g6XqgIleq_LKZIy5DAfs_Odb9s1n2uX-mrZrLs4rKy0BJCAEgbo4geiZKn2HUUbUtV2YUXdpgJjClnqATvbYcvUN91fu0BTGIX43_fUVDTvBovnCYptDI8o8282MnbR</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Hopper, J.L. (California Univ., Riverside, CA (USA). Dept. of Environmental Sciences)</creator><creator>Parker, D.R</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Plant availability of selenite and selenate as influenced by the competing ions phosphate and sulfate</title><author>Hopper, J.L. (California Univ., Riverside, CA (USA). Dept. of Environmental Sciences) ; Parker, D.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-551c16676322c12e61988ce6d1f7596e8b4fc2ef727c46364252ff78b2a69ae23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Absorption. Translocation of ions and substances. Permeability</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>ANTAGONISM</topic><topic>ANTAGONISME</topic><topic>ANTAGONISMO</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clover</topic><topic>DISPONIBILIDAD DE NUTRIENTES</topic><topic>DISPONIBILITE D'ELEMENT NUTRITIF</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>FITOTOXICIDAD</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food toxicology</topic><topic>FOSFATOS</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>LOLIUM PERENNE</topic><topic>NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY</topic><topic>Nutrient solutions</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition. Photosynthesis. Respiration. Metabolism</topic><topic>PHOSPHATE</topic><topic>PHOSPHATES</topic><topic>PHYTOTOXICITE</topic><topic>PHYTOTOXICITY</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Root growth</topic><topic>SELENIO</topic><topic>SELENIUM</topic><topic>Soil solution</topic><topic>Soil toxicity</topic><topic>SULFATE</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>SULFATOS</topic><topic>SULPHATES</topic><topic>Translocation</topic><topic>TRIFOLIUM FRAGIFERUM</topic><topic>Turfgrasses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hopper, J.L. (California Univ., Riverside, CA (USA). Dept. of Environmental Sciences)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, D.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hopper, J.L. (California Univ., Riverside, CA (USA). Dept. of Environmental Sciences)</au><au>Parker, D.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant availability of selenite and selenate as influenced by the competing ions phosphate and sulfate</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>210</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>199-207</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><coden>PLSOA2</coden><abstract>The relative plant availability of selenate versus selenite depends on the concentrations of competing ions, specifically sulfate and phosphate, respectively. In solution culture, the concentration of phosphate is typically 100- to 1000-fold greater than in soil solution, an artifact that could lead to underestimation of the phytoavailability of selenite. A nutrient solution study was conducted to compare the availability of selenite and selenate to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv. Evening Shade) and strawberry clover (Trifolium fragiferrum L. cv. O'Conner) at basal concentrations of SO₄ (0.5 mM) and PO₄ (2 µM) similar to those found in soil solution. Concentrations up to 5 mM SO₄ and 200 µM PO₄ allowed quantitative comparison of the efficacy of the competing ions. In both species, selenite was more phytotoxic than selenate, especially for shoot growth. Selenate was less toxic, and tended to preferentially inhibit root growth. Translocation percentages were much higher with selenate (≥ 84%) than with selenite (≤ 47%). A 10-fold increase in sulfate decreased uptake from selenate by > 90% in both species. In ryegrass, 10-fold increases in phosphate caused 30% to 50% decreases in Se accumulation from selenite, but in clover such decreases only occurred in the roots. Sulfate-selenate antagonisms were thus stronger than phosphateselenite antagonisms. Nonetheless, conventional nutrient solutions with millimolar phosphate will significantly underestimate Se availability from selenite, and moderate levels of sulfate salinity can inhibit selenate uptake sufficiently to reverse the apparent relative availability of the two forms of Se.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/a:1004639906245</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 1999-01, Vol.210 (2), p.199-207 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_751151251 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Absorption. Translocation of ions and substances. Permeability Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ANTAGONISM ANTAGONISME ANTAGONISMO Biological and medical sciences Clover DISPONIBILIDAD DE NUTRIENTES DISPONIBILITE D'ELEMENT NUTRITIF Economic plant physiology FITOTOXICIDAD Food industries Food toxicology FOSFATOS Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grasses Ions LOLIUM PERENNE NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY Nutrient solutions Nutrients Nutrition. Photosynthesis. Respiration. Metabolism PHOSPHATE PHOSPHATES PHYTOTOXICITE PHYTOTOXICITY Plant growth Plant roots Plants Root growth SELENIO SELENIUM Soil solution Soil toxicity SULFATE Sulfates SULFATOS SULPHATES Translocation TRIFOLIUM FRAGIFERUM Turfgrasses |
title | Plant availability of selenite and selenate as influenced by the competing ions phosphate and sulfate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20availability%20of%20selenite%20and%20selenate%20as%20influenced%20by%20the%20competing%20ions%20phosphate%20and%20sulfate&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Hopper,%20J.L.%20(California%20Univ.,%20Riverside,%20CA%20(USA).%20Dept.%20of%20Environmental%20Sciences)&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=210&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=199-207&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft.coden=PLSOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/a:1004639906245&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42949622%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751151251&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42949622&rfr_iscdi=true |