RETHINKING RELIANCE ON EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE
[...] because of the occurrence of confirmatory feedback over the course of an investigation, the relationship between confidence and accuracy is likely to gel weaker, rather than stronger, before trial. In a recently published study involving 14 witnesses to an actual anneri robbery, the findings a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Judicature 2010-07, Vol.94 (1), p.16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Judicature |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Vidmar, Neil Coleman, James E Newman, Theresa A |
description | [...] because of the occurrence of confirmatory feedback over the course of an investigation, the relationship between confidence and accuracy is likely to gel weaker, rather than stronger, before trial. In a recently published study involving 14 witnesses to an actual anneri robbery, the findings again supported the general scientific conclusion thai witness confidence is noi a reliable predictor ol' accuracy of recall.1 In that study, the witness's recollections were checked against store video cameras that recorded the entire event.\n Thal is. unlike the oilier four elements of lie Biggen lest, the eyewitness's degree of certainty can be recorded only after the suggestive procedure has been used. [...] lile degree of cenai my can be "engendered by the suggestive element itself." |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_749942324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2133405061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p112t-a3a91147e22a8f6f14d4d258c6ce6534adca646b3218ee979cd1d391b1a1d0683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjbsKwjAUQDMo-PyH4mwh9yZNk1Fq1GBJQSviVGKTDiK-Wv9fQaczHDinR4aUIsaJpHRARm17oRSQKjEk850uN8ZujV1HO52bhc10VNhIn_TRlFbv91FW2JVZ6q-YkH7jrm2Y_jkmh5Uus02cF2uTLfL4AYBd7JhTADwNiE42ogHuucdE1qIOImHc-doJLs4MQYagUlV78EzBGRx4KiQbk9mv-3jdn-_QdtXl_n7dvssq5UpxZMjZB-4kOCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749942324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RETHINKING RELIANCE ON EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Vidmar, Neil ; Coleman, James E ; Newman, Theresa A</creator><creatorcontrib>Vidmar, Neil ; Coleman, James E ; Newman, Theresa A</creatorcontrib><description>[...] because of the occurrence of confirmatory feedback over the course of an investigation, the relationship between confidence and accuracy is likely to gel weaker, rather than stronger, before trial. In a recently published study involving 14 witnesses to an actual anneri robbery, the findings again supported the general scientific conclusion thai witness confidence is noi a reliable predictor ol' accuracy of recall.1 In that study, the witness's recollections were checked against store video cameras that recorded the entire event.\n Thal is. unlike the oilier four elements of lie Biggen lest, the eyewitness's degree of certainty can be recorded only after the suggestive procedure has been used. [...] lile degree of cenai my can be "engendered by the suggestive element itself."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5800</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JUDIEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Evidence ; Judges & magistrates ; Rape ; Science ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Judicature, 2010-07, Vol.94 (1), p.16</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Judicature Society Jul/Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vidmar, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Theresa A</creatorcontrib><title>RETHINKING RELIANCE ON EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE</title><title>Judicature</title><description>[...] because of the occurrence of confirmatory feedback over the course of an investigation, the relationship between confidence and accuracy is likely to gel weaker, rather than stronger, before trial. In a recently published study involving 14 witnesses to an actual anneri robbery, the findings again supported the general scientific conclusion thai witness confidence is noi a reliable predictor ol' accuracy of recall.1 In that study, the witness's recollections were checked against store video cameras that recorded the entire event.\n Thal is. unlike the oilier four elements of lie Biggen lest, the eyewitness's degree of certainty can be recorded only after the suggestive procedure has been used. [...] lile degree of cenai my can be "engendered by the suggestive element itself."</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0022-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjbsKwjAUQDMo-PyH4mwh9yZNk1Fq1GBJQSviVGKTDiK-Wv9fQaczHDinR4aUIsaJpHRARm17oRSQKjEk850uN8ZujV1HO52bhc10VNhIn_TRlFbv91FW2JVZ6q-YkH7jrm2Y_jkmh5Uus02cF2uTLfL4AYBd7JhTADwNiE42ogHuucdE1qIOImHc-doJLs4MQYagUlV78EzBGRx4KiQbk9mv-3jdn-_QdtXl_n7dvssq5UpxZMjZB-4kOCY</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Vidmar, Neil</creator><creator>Coleman, James E</creator><creator>Newman, Theresa A</creator><general>Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>RETHINKING RELIANCE ON EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE</title><author>Vidmar, Neil ; Coleman, James E ; Newman, Theresa A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p112t-a3a91147e22a8f6f14d4d258c6ce6534adca646b3218ee979cd1d391b1a1d0683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vidmar, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Theresa A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Judicature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vidmar, Neil</au><au>Coleman, James E</au><au>Newman, Theresa A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RETHINKING RELIANCE ON EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE</atitle><jtitle>Judicature</jtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><pages>16-</pages><issn>0022-5800</issn><coden>JUDIEC</coden><abstract>[...] because of the occurrence of confirmatory feedback over the course of an investigation, the relationship between confidence and accuracy is likely to gel weaker, rather than stronger, before trial. In a recently published study involving 14 witnesses to an actual anneri robbery, the findings again supported the general scientific conclusion thai witness confidence is noi a reliable predictor ol' accuracy of recall.1 In that study, the witness's recollections were checked against store video cameras that recorded the entire event.\n Thal is. unlike the oilier four elements of lie Biggen lest, the eyewitness's degree of certainty can be recorded only after the suggestive procedure has been used. [...] lile degree of cenai my can be "engendered by the suggestive element itself."</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5800 |
ispartof | Judicature, 2010-07, Vol.94 (1), p.16 |
issn | 0022-5800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_749942324 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Accuracy Evidence Judges & magistrates Rape Science Trials |
title | RETHINKING RELIANCE ON EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T09%3A18%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RETHINKING%20RELIANCE%20ON%20EYEWITNESS%20CONFIDENCE&rft.jtitle=Judicature&rft.au=Vidmar,%20Neil&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.pages=16-&rft.issn=0022-5800&rft.coden=JUDIEC&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2133405061%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749942324&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |