The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference
Manufacturers are increasingly producing and promoting sustainable products (i.e., products that have a positive social and/or environmental impact). However, relatively little is known about how product sustainability affects consumers' preferences. The authors propose that sustainability may...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of marketing 2010-09, Vol.74 (5), p.18-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Journal of marketing |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Luchs, Michael G. Naylor, Rebecca Walker Irwin, Julie R. Raghunathan, Rajagopal |
description | Manufacturers are increasingly producing and promoting sustainable products (i.e., products that have a positive social and/or environmental impact). However, relatively little is known about how product sustainability affects consumers' preferences. The authors propose that sustainability may not always be an asset, even if most consumers care about social and environmental issues. The degree to which sustainability enhances preference depends on the type of benefit consumers most value for the product category in question. In this research, the authors demonstrate that consumers associate higher product ethicality with gentleness-related attributes and lower product ethicality with strength-related attributes. As a consequence of these associations, the positive effect of product sustainability on consumer preferences is reduced when strength-related attributes are valued, sometimes even resulting in preferences for less sustainable product alternatives (i.e., the "sustainability liability"). Conversely, when gentleness-related attributes are valued, sustainability enhances preference. In addition, the authors show that the potential negative impact of sustainability on product preferences can be attenuated using explicit cues about product strength. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_749870760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2133168871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-66320cce1e087ea795adfc5be64182fa0e4b7fafa5be82b6ed17d74cf7974d503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUE1LAzEUDKJgrd78AcGzuybZZJP1JlI_oGjBehNCNvvSpra7NckK_fdubd9lHo-ZN8MgdE1JTgWp7lab70UueS5yqk7QiAouM0mVOEUjQhjLGGfVObqIcUWGYUqO0Nd8Cfijj8n41tR-7dMOT_1xu8ezLkGbvFnjN1iY5H8BT5wDmyLuHJ6kpbfmX9O1eBa6prdpQHAQoLVwic6cWUe4OuIYfT5N5o8v2fT9-fXxYZrZoqxSVpYFI9YCBaIkGFkJ0zgraig5VcwZAryWzjgznBSrS2iobCS3TlaSN4IUY3Rz-LsN3U8PMelV14d2sNSSV0oSWe5JtweSDV2MQ0a9DX5jwk5Tovf16X19g0ALTVXxBzNtZSY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749870760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Luchs, Michael G. ; Naylor, Rebecca Walker ; Irwin, Julie R. ; Raghunathan, Rajagopal</creator><creatorcontrib>Luchs, Michael G. ; Naylor, Rebecca Walker ; Irwin, Julie R. ; Raghunathan, Rajagopal</creatorcontrib><description>Manufacturers are increasingly producing and promoting sustainable products (i.e., products that have a positive social and/or environmental impact). However, relatively little is known about how product sustainability affects consumers' preferences. The authors propose that sustainability may not always be an asset, even if most consumers care about social and environmental issues. The degree to which sustainability enhances preference depends on the type of benefit consumers most value for the product category in question. In this research, the authors demonstrate that consumers associate higher product ethicality with gentleness-related attributes and lower product ethicality with strength-related attributes. As a consequence of these associations, the positive effect of product sustainability on consumer preferences is reduced when strength-related attributes are valued, sometimes even resulting in preferences for less sustainable product alternatives (i.e., the "sustainability liability"). Conversely, when gentleness-related attributes are valued, sustainability enhances preference. In addition, the authors show that the potential negative impact of sustainability on product preferences can be attenuated using explicit cues about product strength. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMKTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Consumers ; Ethical consumerism ; Green products ; Preferences ; Product choice ; Studies ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing, 2010-09, Vol.74 (5), p.18-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Marketing Association Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-66320cce1e087ea795adfc5be64182fa0e4b7fafa5be82b6ed17d74cf7974d503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-66320cce1e087ea795adfc5be64182fa0e4b7fafa5be82b6ed17d74cf7974d503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luchs, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, Rebecca Walker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Julie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raghunathan, Rajagopal</creatorcontrib><title>The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference</title><title>Journal of marketing</title><description>Manufacturers are increasingly producing and promoting sustainable products (i.e., products that have a positive social and/or environmental impact). However, relatively little is known about how product sustainability affects consumers' preferences. The authors propose that sustainability may not always be an asset, even if most consumers care about social and environmental issues. The degree to which sustainability enhances preference depends on the type of benefit consumers most value for the product category in question. In this research, the authors demonstrate that consumers associate higher product ethicality with gentleness-related attributes and lower product ethicality with strength-related attributes. As a consequence of these associations, the positive effect of product sustainability on consumer preferences is reduced when strength-related attributes are valued, sometimes even resulting in preferences for less sustainable product alternatives (i.e., the "sustainability liability"). Conversely, when gentleness-related attributes are valued, sustainability enhances preference. In addition, the authors show that the potential negative impact of sustainability on product preferences can be attenuated using explicit cues about product strength. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Ethical consumerism</subject><subject>Green products</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Product choice</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0022-2429</issn><issn>1547-7185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUE1LAzEUDKJgrd78AcGzuybZZJP1JlI_oGjBehNCNvvSpra7NckK_fdubd9lHo-ZN8MgdE1JTgWp7lab70UueS5yqk7QiAouM0mVOEUjQhjLGGfVObqIcUWGYUqO0Nd8Cfijj8n41tR-7dMOT_1xu8ezLkGbvFnjN1iY5H8BT5wDmyLuHJ6kpbfmX9O1eBa6prdpQHAQoLVwic6cWUe4OuIYfT5N5o8v2fT9-fXxYZrZoqxSVpYFI9YCBaIkGFkJ0zgraig5VcwZAryWzjgznBSrS2iobCS3TlaSN4IUY3Rz-LsN3U8PMelV14d2sNSSV0oSWe5JtweSDV2MQ0a9DX5jwk5Tovf16X19g0ALTVXxBzNtZSY</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Luchs, Michael G.</creator><creator>Naylor, Rebecca Walker</creator><creator>Irwin, Julie R.</creator><creator>Raghunathan, Rajagopal</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference</title><author>Luchs, Michael G. ; Naylor, Rebecca Walker ; Irwin, Julie R. ; Raghunathan, Rajagopal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-66320cce1e087ea795adfc5be64182fa0e4b7fafa5be82b6ed17d74cf7974d503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Ethical consumerism</topic><topic>Green products</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Product choice</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luchs, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, Rebecca Walker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Julie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raghunathan, Rajagopal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luchs, Michael G.</au><au>Naylor, Rebecca Walker</au><au>Irwin, Julie R.</au><au>Raghunathan, Rajagopal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>18-31</pages><issn>0022-2429</issn><eissn>1547-7185</eissn><coden>JMKTAK</coden><abstract>Manufacturers are increasingly producing and promoting sustainable products (i.e., products that have a positive social and/or environmental impact). However, relatively little is known about how product sustainability affects consumers' preferences. The authors propose that sustainability may not always be an asset, even if most consumers care about social and environmental issues. The degree to which sustainability enhances preference depends on the type of benefit consumers most value for the product category in question. In this research, the authors demonstrate that consumers associate higher product ethicality with gentleness-related attributes and lower product ethicality with strength-related attributes. As a consequence of these associations, the positive effect of product sustainability on consumer preferences is reduced when strength-related attributes are valued, sometimes even resulting in preferences for less sustainable product alternatives (i.e., the "sustainability liability"). Conversely, when gentleness-related attributes are valued, sustainability enhances preference. In addition, the authors show that the potential negative impact of sustainability on product preferences can be attenuated using explicit cues about product strength. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><doi>10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2429 |
ispartof | Journal of marketing, 2010-09, Vol.74 (5), p.18-31 |
issn | 0022-2429 1547-7185 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_749870760 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Consumers Ethical consumerism Green products Preferences Product choice Studies Sustainability |
title | The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A15%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Sustainability%20Liability:%20Potential%20Negative%20Effects%20of%20Ethicality%20on%20Product%20Preference&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing&rft.au=Luchs,%20Michael%20G.&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=18-31&rft.issn=0022-2429&rft.eissn=1547-7185&rft.coden=JMKTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2133168871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749870760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |