Comparison of 2 Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Assays as Tumor Markers Assays
Clinical information was available for 96 of the samples: 46 from patients with gestational trophoblastic disease, of which 76% were positive (>5 IU/L); 35 with germ-cell tumors (80% positive); 8 with unspecified gonadal tumors (50% positive); and 7 with other cancers (71% positive). hCG concentr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2010-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1502-1503 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1503 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1502 |
| container_title | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | ANDREW DU TOIT, Stephen BOUWHUIS, Johannes MATSON, Margaret MUSAAD, Samarina DAVIDSON, James S |
| description | Clinical information was available for 96 of the samples: 46 from patients with gestational trophoblastic disease, of which 76% were positive (>5 IU/L); 35 with germ-cell tumors (80% positive); 8 with unspecified gonadal tumors (50% positive); and 7 with other cancers (71% positive). hCG concentrations in the samples varied from |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1373/clinchem.2010.149351 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_749647525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2131202231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-c8f0eaae4db4f26270265e152d18a3803a518712d240f1bd8d6d32614cc1e27d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUgQvOzMyUeTXo6imzjxZl6XLElZ59rUZL3Yv7djnV4dzuF53wMPQvdApsAkeza7qjEbV08pOZ54xgRcoDEIRhIlUrhEY0JIlmTA5QjdxLjtVy5Veo1GlAgFRMEYvee-bnWoom-wLzHFi67WDc43PlS-qQye-0Zbvw--rRo8i1EfItYRr7raB_yhw7cLcbjfoqtS76K7G-YEfb2-rPJFsvycv-WzZWKYlPvEqJI4rR23a17SlEpCU-FAUAtKM0WYFqAkUEs5KWFtlU0toylwY8BRadkEPZ562-B_Ohf3xdZ3oelfFpJnKZeCih7iJ8gEH2NwZdGGqtbhUAApjgKLs8DiKLA4CexjD0N3t66d_QudjfXA0wDoaPSuDLoxVfznGCVKgGS_sVp50A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749647525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of 2 Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Assays as Tumor Markers Assays</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>ANDREW DU TOIT, Stephen ; BOUWHUIS, Johannes ; MATSON, Margaret ; MUSAAD, Samarina ; DAVIDSON, James S</creator><creatorcontrib>ANDREW DU TOIT, Stephen ; BOUWHUIS, Johannes ; MATSON, Margaret ; MUSAAD, Samarina ; DAVIDSON, James S</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical information was available for 96 of the samples: 46 from patients with gestational trophoblastic disease, of which 76% were positive (>5 IU/L); 35 with germ-cell tumors (80% positive); 8 with unspecified gonadal tumors (50% positive); and 7 with other cancers (71% positive). hCG concentrations in the samples varied from <1 to 373 000 IU/L, with the majority of results <1000 IU/L. All authors confirmed they have contributed to the intellectual content of this paper and have met the following 3 requirements: (a) significant contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting or revising the article for intellectual content; and (c) final approval of the published article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.149351</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20581081</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLCHAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Association for Clinical Chemistry</publisher><subject>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Chorionic Gonadotropin - blood ; False Negative Reactions ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Immunoassay - methods ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Molecular biophysics ; Regression analysis</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2010-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1502-1503</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Association for Clinical Chemistry Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-c8f0eaae4db4f26270265e152d18a3803a518712d240f1bd8d6d32614cc1e27d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-c8f0eaae4db4f26270265e152d18a3803a518712d240f1bd8d6d32614cc1e27d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23208517$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20581081$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ANDREW DU TOIT, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOUWHUIS, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATSON, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUSAAD, Samarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIDSON, James S</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of 2 Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Assays as Tumor Markers Assays</title><title>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><description>Clinical information was available for 96 of the samples: 46 from patients with gestational trophoblastic disease, of which 76% were positive (>5 IU/L); 35 with germ-cell tumors (80% positive); 8 with unspecified gonadal tumors (50% positive); and 7 with other cancers (71% positive). hCG concentrations in the samples varied from <1 to 373 000 IU/L, with the majority of results <1000 IU/L. All authors confirmed they have contributed to the intellectual content of this paper and have met the following 3 requirements: (a) significant contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting or revising the article for intellectual content; and (c) final approval of the published article.</description><subject>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin - blood</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular biophysics</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><issn>0009-9147</issn><issn>1530-8561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUgQvOzMyUeTXo6imzjxZl6XLElZ59rUZL3Yv7djnV4dzuF53wMPQvdApsAkeza7qjEbV08pOZ54xgRcoDEIRhIlUrhEY0JIlmTA5QjdxLjtVy5Veo1GlAgFRMEYvee-bnWoom-wLzHFi67WDc43PlS-qQye-0Zbvw--rRo8i1EfItYRr7raB_yhw7cLcbjfoqtS76K7G-YEfb2-rPJFsvycv-WzZWKYlPvEqJI4rR23a17SlEpCU-FAUAtKM0WYFqAkUEs5KWFtlU0toylwY8BRadkEPZ562-B_Ohf3xdZ3oelfFpJnKZeCih7iJ8gEH2NwZdGGqtbhUAApjgKLs8DiKLA4CexjD0N3t66d_QudjfXA0wDoaPSuDLoxVfznGCVKgGS_sVp50A</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>ANDREW DU TOIT, Stephen</creator><creator>BOUWHUIS, Johannes</creator><creator>MATSON, Margaret</creator><creator>MUSAAD, Samarina</creator><creator>DAVIDSON, James S</creator><general>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Comparison of 2 Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Assays as Tumor Markers Assays</title><author>ANDREW DU TOIT, Stephen ; BOUWHUIS, Johannes ; MATSON, Margaret ; MUSAAD, Samarina ; DAVIDSON, James S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-c8f0eaae4db4f26270265e152d18a3803a518712d240f1bd8d6d32614cc1e27d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin - blood</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular biophysics</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ANDREW DU TOIT, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOUWHUIS, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATSON, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUSAAD, Samarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIDSON, James S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ANDREW DU TOIT, Stephen</au><au>BOUWHUIS, Johannes</au><au>MATSON, Margaret</au><au>MUSAAD, Samarina</au><au>DAVIDSON, James S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of 2 Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Assays as Tumor Markers Assays</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1502</spage><epage>1503</epage><pages>1502-1503</pages><issn>0009-9147</issn><eissn>1530-8561</eissn><coden>CLCHAU</coden><abstract>Clinical information was available for 96 of the samples: 46 from patients with gestational trophoblastic disease, of which 76% were positive (>5 IU/L); 35 with germ-cell tumors (80% positive); 8 with unspecified gonadal tumors (50% positive); and 7 with other cancers (71% positive). hCG concentrations in the samples varied from <1 to 373 000 IU/L, with the majority of results <1000 IU/L. All authors confirmed they have contributed to the intellectual content of this paper and have met the following 3 requirements: (a) significant contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting or revising the article for intellectual content; and (c) final approval of the published article.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</pub><pmid>20581081</pmid><doi>10.1373/clinchem.2010.149351</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0009-9147 |
| ispartof | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2010-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1502-1503 |
| issn | 0009-9147 1530-8561 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_749647525 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
| subjects | Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers, Tumor - blood Chorionic Gonadotropin - blood False Negative Reactions Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Immunoassay - methods Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical research Medical sciences Molecular biophysics Regression analysis |
| title | Comparison of 2 Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Assays as Tumor Markers Assays |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A19%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%202%20Human%20Chorionic%20Gonadotropin%20Assays%20as%20Tumor%20Markers%20Assays&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=ANDREW%20DU%20TOIT,%20Stephen&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1502&rft.epage=1503&rft.pages=1502-1503&rft.issn=0009-9147&rft.eissn=1530-8561&rft.coden=CLCHAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2010.149351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2131202231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749647525&rft_id=info:pmid/20581081&rfr_iscdi=true |