Distinguishing Shakespeare from Fletcher through Function Words
[...] there have been controversies among the advocates of stylometry themselves regarding the best statistical methods to use or the best textual features to measure. [...] I only selected plays that have one authoritative source text, since otherwise I would have to bring together readings from se...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Shakespeare studies (Columbia) 1994-01, Vol.22, p.314-314 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 314 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 314 |
| container_title | Shakespeare studies (Columbia) |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Horton, Thomas B |
| description | [...] there have been controversies among the advocates of stylometry themselves regarding the best statistical methods to use or the best textual features to measure. [...] I only selected plays that have one authoritative source text, since otherwise I would have to bring together readings from several texts to form a composite version (in other words, become an editor).\n Classification results that appear to be strongly affected by a rate for one infrequent marker are thus less trustworthy than a result due to one or more frequent markers such as all, the, of, and in. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_744489431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2113514721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p821-9d7f5df162657dd4fc9714eb496a29b93e3c316a5ae60e00290cd15c5da0dca13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzU1Lw0AUheFZKFir_2HQdeDOd-5KpFoVCi4suCzTmZsmtWbiTPL_DehWXL2bh3PO2AJMLStUiBfsspQjAChr3YLdPXRl7PrD1JV2Dn9r_QeVgXwm3uT0ydcnGkNLmY9tTtOh5eupD2OXev6ecixX7Lzxp0LXv12y7fpxu3quNq9PL6v7TTXUUlQYXWNiI6y0xsWom4BOaNprtF7iHhWpoIT1xpMFApAIIQoTTPQQgxdqyW5-ZoecviYq4-6YptzPjzunta5Rq38QOGVUDTO6_QsJiQ6tQKfVNzzTW30</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297961974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinguishing Shakespeare from Fletcher through Function Words</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Horton, Thomas B</creator><creatorcontrib>Horton, Thomas B</creatorcontrib><description>[...] there have been controversies among the advocates of stylometry themselves regarding the best statistical methods to use or the best textual features to measure. [...] I only selected plays that have one authoritative source text, since otherwise I would have to bring together readings from several texts to form a composite version (in other words, become an editor).\n Classification results that appear to be strongly affected by a rate for one infrequent marker are thus less trustworthy than a result due to one or more frequent markers such as all, the, of, and in.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0582-9399</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, etc: Burt Franklin and Co., etc</publisher><subject>Beaumont, Francis (1584-1616) / Fletcher, John (1579-1625) ; British & Irish literature ; Discriminant analysis ; Drama ; English literature ; Function words ; Linguistics ; Scholars ; Shakespeare, William (1564-1616) ; Statistical analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Shakespeare studies (Columbia), 1994-01, Vol.22, p.314-314</ispartof><rights>Copyright Associated University Presses 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horton, Thomas B</creatorcontrib><title>Distinguishing Shakespeare from Fletcher through Function Words</title><title>Shakespeare studies (Columbia)</title><description>[...] there have been controversies among the advocates of stylometry themselves regarding the best statistical methods to use or the best textual features to measure. [...] I only selected plays that have one authoritative source text, since otherwise I would have to bring together readings from several texts to form a composite version (in other words, become an editor).\n Classification results that appear to be strongly affected by a rate for one infrequent marker are thus less trustworthy than a result due to one or more frequent markers such as all, the, of, and in.</description><subject>Beaumont, Francis (1584-1616) / Fletcher, John (1579-1625)</subject><subject>British & Irish literature</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Drama</subject><subject>English literature</subject><subject>Function words</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Scholars</subject><subject>Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0582-9399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>AKNXY</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~P3</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><sourceid>~PR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFzU1Lw0AUheFZKFir_2HQdeDOd-5KpFoVCi4suCzTmZsmtWbiTPL_DehWXL2bh3PO2AJMLStUiBfsspQjAChr3YLdPXRl7PrD1JV2Dn9r_QeVgXwm3uT0ydcnGkNLmY9tTtOh5eupD2OXev6ecixX7Lzxp0LXv12y7fpxu3quNq9PL6v7TTXUUlQYXWNiI6y0xsWom4BOaNprtF7iHhWpoIT1xpMFApAIIQoTTPQQgxdqyW5-ZoecviYq4-6YptzPjzunta5Rq38QOGVUDTO6_QsJiQ6tQKfVNzzTW30</recordid><startdate>19940101</startdate><enddate>19940101</enddate><creator>Horton, Thomas B</creator><general>Burt Franklin and Co., etc</general><general>Fairleigh Dickinson University Press</general><general>Associated University Presses</general><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>AKNXY</scope><scope>HAGHG</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P2</scope><scope>~P3</scope><scope>~PI</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PP</scope><scope>~PR</scope><scope>4U-</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940101</creationdate><title>Distinguishing Shakespeare from Fletcher through Function Words</title><author>Horton, Thomas B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p821-9d7f5df162657dd4fc9714eb496a29b93e3c316a5ae60e00290cd15c5da0dca13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Beaumont, Francis (1584-1616) / Fletcher, John (1579-1625)</topic><topic>British & Irish literature</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Drama</topic><topic>English literature</topic><topic>Function words</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Scholars</topic><topic>Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horton, Thomas B</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 12</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online English Literature Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 3</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Literary Studies Collection</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><jtitle>Shakespeare studies (Columbia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horton, Thomas B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinguishing Shakespeare from Fletcher through Function Words</atitle><jtitle>Shakespeare studies (Columbia)</jtitle><date>1994-01-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>22</volume><spage>314</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>314-314</pages><issn>0582-9399</issn><abstract>[...] there have been controversies among the advocates of stylometry themselves regarding the best statistical methods to use or the best textual features to measure. [...] I only selected plays that have one authoritative source text, since otherwise I would have to bring together readings from several texts to form a composite version (in other words, become an editor).\n Classification results that appear to be strongly affected by a rate for one infrequent marker are thus less trustworthy than a result due to one or more frequent markers such as all, the, of, and in.</abstract><cop>New York, etc</cop><pub>Burt Franklin and Co., etc</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0582-9399 |
| ispartof | Shakespeare studies (Columbia), 1994-01, Vol.22, p.314-314 |
| issn | 0582-9399 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_744489431 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Beaumont, Francis (1584-1616) / Fletcher, John (1579-1625) British & Irish literature Discriminant analysis Drama English literature Function words Linguistics Scholars Shakespeare, William (1564-1616) Statistical analysis Studies |
| title | Distinguishing Shakespeare from Fletcher through Function Words |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A58%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinguishing%20Shakespeare%20from%20Fletcher%20through%20Function%20Words&rft.jtitle=Shakespeare%20studies%20(Columbia)&rft.au=Horton,%20Thomas%20B&rft.date=1994-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=314-314&rft.issn=0582-9399&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2113514721%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297961974&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |