Water relations advantages for invasive Rubus armeniacus over two native ruderal congeners
Despite species in the Rubus fruticosus complex (wild blackberry) being among the most invasive plants globally in regions with large annual fluctuations in water availability, little is known about their water relations. We compared water relations of a prominent member of the complex, R. armeniacu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant ecology 2010-09, Vol.210 (1), p.169-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Plant ecology |
container_volume | 210 |
creator | Caplan, Joshua S Yeakley, J. Alan |
description | Despite species in the Rubus fruticosus complex (wild blackberry) being among the most invasive plants globally in regions with large annual fluctuations in water availability, little is known about their water relations. We compared water relations of a prominent member of the complex, R. armeniacus (Himalayan blackberry), with species native to the Pacific Northwest of North America (PNW), R. spectabilis (salmonberry) and R. parviflorus (thimbleberry). In eight stands of each species located near Portland, Oregon, USA, we measured mid-day hydraulic resistance (R plant), and daily time series of stomatal conductance (g s), leaf water potential (Ψlf), and environmental conditions at four time periods spanning the 2007 growing season. Although all species maintained Ψlf above −0.5 MPa in spring, R. armeniacus maintained less negative Ψlf (≥−1.0 MPa) than the natives in summer, a factor attributable to advantages in both its root and shoot systems. R plant of R. armeniacus was ≤0.1 MPa mmol⁻¹ m² s for the duration of the study, and approximately 25-50% of R plant for the native species in summer. R. armeniacus had higher g s compared to the native species throughout the spring and summer, with approximately twice their rates in summer. Our R plant and g s results show that R. armeniacus has access to more water during PNW summers than congeneric natives, allowing it to maintain high water-use, and potentially helping it achieve higher growth and reproductive rates. Water relations may therefore be a critical component of the competitive and invasive success of R. armeniacus and other R. fruticosus species worldwide. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11258-010-9747-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_741586692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A361184043</galeid><jstor_id>40802424</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A361184043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-ab3403d705d63f9587f549987f5a38ecbc52fc7206a626de1fa8a2438601fd743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxRtRcF39AB7ExnuvlX-d9HFZXBUWBHURvISa7mTIMJOsle4Rv73VtOhNcqgi9X6px0vTvBRwJQDs2yqENK4DAd1gte30o-ZCGKs6A0Y-5l4504FU9mnzrNYDsBCUuWi-f8M5UEvhiHMqubY4nTHPuA-1jYXalM9Y0zm0n5fdwlM6hZxw5LacmZt_ljYzyQJapkB4bMeS9yEHqs-bJxGPNbz4Uy-b-9t3X28-dHef3n-8ub7rRg0wd7hTGtRkwUy9ioNxNho9DGtB5cK4G42Mo5XQYy_7KYiIDqVWrgcRJ6vVZfNme_eByo8l1NkfykKZV3qrhXF9P0gWXW2iPR6DTzmWmXDkM4VTYsshJr6_Vr0QToNWDIgNGKnUSiH6B0onpF9egF8j91vknpP0a-R-dSI3prKWU6B_Tv4HvdqgQ50L_d2iwYHUcp2_3uYRi8c9pervv0gQCoSzir9X_QZxAJa1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>741586692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water relations advantages for invasive Rubus armeniacus over two native ruderal congeners</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Caplan, Joshua S ; Yeakley, J. Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Caplan, Joshua S ; Yeakley, J. Alan</creatorcontrib><description>Despite species in the Rubus fruticosus complex (wild blackberry) being among the most invasive plants globally in regions with large annual fluctuations in water availability, little is known about their water relations. We compared water relations of a prominent member of the complex, R. armeniacus (Himalayan blackberry), with species native to the Pacific Northwest of North America (PNW), R. spectabilis (salmonberry) and R. parviflorus (thimbleberry). In eight stands of each species located near Portland, Oregon, USA, we measured mid-day hydraulic resistance (R plant), and daily time series of stomatal conductance (g s), leaf water potential (Ψlf), and environmental conditions at four time periods spanning the 2007 growing season. Although all species maintained Ψlf above −0.5 MPa in spring, R. armeniacus maintained less negative Ψlf (≥−1.0 MPa) than the natives in summer, a factor attributable to advantages in both its root and shoot systems. R plant of R. armeniacus was ≤0.1 MPa mmol⁻¹ m² s for the duration of the study, and approximately 25-50% of R plant for the native species in summer. R. armeniacus had higher g s compared to the native species throughout the spring and summer, with approximately twice their rates in summer. Our R plant and g s results show that R. armeniacus has access to more water during PNW summers than congeneric natives, allowing it to maintain high water-use, and potentially helping it achieve higher growth and reproductive rates. Water relations may therefore be a critical component of the competitive and invasive success of R. armeniacus and other R. fruticosus species worldwide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-010-9747-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Applied Ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biological invasion ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Botany ; Community & Population Ecology ; Comparative studies ; Ecology ; ecophysiology ; Environmental conditions ; Growing season ; Indigenous species ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Native species ; Natural springs ; Nonnative species ; Plant Ecology ; Plant invasiveness ; Plants ; Rubus armeniacus ; Rubus praecox ; Soil water ; Spring ; Spring water ; Stomatal conductance ; Summer ; Terrestial Ecology ; Transpiration ; Water ; Water availability ; Water potential ; Water relations ; Water use</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2010-09, Vol.210 (1), p.169-179</ispartof><rights>2010 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-ab3403d705d63f9587f549987f5a38ecbc52fc7206a626de1fa8a2438601fd743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-ab3403d705d63f9587f549987f5a38ecbc52fc7206a626de1fa8a2438601fd743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40802424$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40802424$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caplan, Joshua S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeakley, J. Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Water relations advantages for invasive Rubus armeniacus over two native ruderal congeners</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>Despite species in the Rubus fruticosus complex (wild blackberry) being among the most invasive plants globally in regions with large annual fluctuations in water availability, little is known about their water relations. We compared water relations of a prominent member of the complex, R. armeniacus (Himalayan blackberry), with species native to the Pacific Northwest of North America (PNW), R. spectabilis (salmonberry) and R. parviflorus (thimbleberry). In eight stands of each species located near Portland, Oregon, USA, we measured mid-day hydraulic resistance (R plant), and daily time series of stomatal conductance (g s), leaf water potential (Ψlf), and environmental conditions at four time periods spanning the 2007 growing season. Although all species maintained Ψlf above −0.5 MPa in spring, R. armeniacus maintained less negative Ψlf (≥−1.0 MPa) than the natives in summer, a factor attributable to advantages in both its root and shoot systems. R plant of R. armeniacus was ≤0.1 MPa mmol⁻¹ m² s for the duration of the study, and approximately 25-50% of R plant for the native species in summer. R. armeniacus had higher g s compared to the native species throughout the spring and summer, with approximately twice their rates in summer. Our R plant and g s results show that R. armeniacus has access to more water during PNW summers than congeneric natives, allowing it to maintain high water-use, and potentially helping it achieve higher growth and reproductive rates. Water relations may therefore be a critical component of the competitive and invasive success of R. armeniacus and other R. fruticosus species worldwide.</description><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological invasion</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Community & Population Ecology</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecophysiology</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Natural springs</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant invasiveness</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Rubus armeniacus</subject><subject>Rubus praecox</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring water</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water potential</subject><subject>Water relations</subject><subject>Water use</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxRtRcF39AB7ExnuvlX-d9HFZXBUWBHURvISa7mTIMJOsle4Rv73VtOhNcqgi9X6px0vTvBRwJQDs2yqENK4DAd1gte30o-ZCGKs6A0Y-5l4504FU9mnzrNYDsBCUuWi-f8M5UEvhiHMqubY4nTHPuA-1jYXalM9Y0zm0n5fdwlM6hZxw5LacmZt_ljYzyQJapkB4bMeS9yEHqs-bJxGPNbz4Uy-b-9t3X28-dHef3n-8ub7rRg0wd7hTGtRkwUy9ioNxNho9DGtB5cK4G42Mo5XQYy_7KYiIDqVWrgcRJ6vVZfNme_eByo8l1NkfykKZV3qrhXF9P0gWXW2iPR6DTzmWmXDkM4VTYsshJr6_Vr0QToNWDIgNGKnUSiH6B0onpF9egF8j91vknpP0a-R-dSI3prKWU6B_Tv4HvdqgQ50L_d2iwYHUcp2_3uYRi8c9pervv0gQCoSzir9X_QZxAJa1</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Caplan, Joshua S</creator><creator>Yeakley, J. Alan</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Water relations advantages for invasive Rubus armeniacus over two native ruderal congeners</title><author>Caplan, Joshua S ; Yeakley, J. Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-ab3403d705d63f9587f549987f5a38ecbc52fc7206a626de1fa8a2438601fd743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological invasion</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Community & Population Ecology</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecophysiology</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Natural springs</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant invasiveness</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Rubus armeniacus</topic><topic>Rubus praecox</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring water</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water potential</topic><topic>Water relations</topic><topic>Water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caplan, Joshua S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeakley, J. Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caplan, Joshua S</au><au>Yeakley, J. Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water relations advantages for invasive Rubus armeniacus over two native ruderal congeners</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>210</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>169-179</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>Despite species in the Rubus fruticosus complex (wild blackberry) being among the most invasive plants globally in regions with large annual fluctuations in water availability, little is known about their water relations. We compared water relations of a prominent member of the complex, R. armeniacus (Himalayan blackberry), with species native to the Pacific Northwest of North America (PNW), R. spectabilis (salmonberry) and R. parviflorus (thimbleberry). In eight stands of each species located near Portland, Oregon, USA, we measured mid-day hydraulic resistance (R plant), and daily time series of stomatal conductance (g s), leaf water potential (Ψlf), and environmental conditions at four time periods spanning the 2007 growing season. Although all species maintained Ψlf above −0.5 MPa in spring, R. armeniacus maintained less negative Ψlf (≥−1.0 MPa) than the natives in summer, a factor attributable to advantages in both its root and shoot systems. R plant of R. armeniacus was ≤0.1 MPa mmol⁻¹ m² s for the duration of the study, and approximately 25-50% of R plant for the native species in summer. R. armeniacus had higher g s compared to the native species throughout the spring and summer, with approximately twice their rates in summer. Our R plant and g s results show that R. armeniacus has access to more water during PNW summers than congeneric natives, allowing it to maintain high water-use, and potentially helping it achieve higher growth and reproductive rates. Water relations may therefore be a critical component of the competitive and invasive success of R. armeniacus and other R. fruticosus species worldwide.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-010-9747-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1385-0237 |
ispartof | Plant ecology, 2010-09, Vol.210 (1), p.169-179 |
issn | 1385-0237 1573-5052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_741586692 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Applied Ecology Biodiversity Biological invasion Biomedical and Life Sciences Botany Community & Population Ecology Comparative studies Ecology ecophysiology Environmental conditions Growing season Indigenous species Invasive plants Invasive species Leaves Life Sciences Native species Natural springs Nonnative species Plant Ecology Plant invasiveness Plants Rubus armeniacus Rubus praecox Soil water Spring Spring water Stomatal conductance Summer Terrestial Ecology Transpiration Water Water availability Water potential Water relations Water use |
title | Water relations advantages for invasive Rubus armeniacus over two native ruderal congeners |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A00%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20relations%20advantages%20for%20invasive%20Rubus%20armeniacus%20over%20two%20native%20ruderal%20congeners&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=Caplan,%20Joshua%20S&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=210&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=169-179&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-010-9747-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA361184043%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=741586692&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A361184043&rft_jstor_id=40802424&rfr_iscdi=true |