Plants regenerated from embryo cultures of an apomictic clone of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L. 'Baron') are not apomictic in origin

Plants were regenerated from tissue cultures of embryos dissected from seeds that were harvested from a self-pollinated clonal selection of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) 'Baron', an apomictic cultivar. Plants were regenerated from 35 embryo-derived callus cultures of the 3280 embry...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Euphytica 2006-02, Vol.147 (3), p.383-388
Hauptverfasser: Stephens, L.C, Fei, S.Z, Xiong, Y, Hodges, C.F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 3
container_start_page 383
container_title Euphytica
container_volume 147
creator Stephens, L.C
Fei, S.Z
Xiong, Y
Hodges, C.F
description Plants were regenerated from tissue cultures of embryos dissected from seeds that were harvested from a self-pollinated clonal selection of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) 'Baron', an apomictic cultivar. Plants were regenerated from 35 embryo-derived callus cultures of the 3280 embryos that were plated. Flow-cytometric (FCM) and RAPD-marker analyses were performed to determine if regenerants were or were not apomictic in origin. Fifteen regenerants with a 3c DNA content were classified as arising from 2n + n aberrant embryos, which was a higher frequency than expected, based on a chi-square analysis. Of the remaining 20 regenerants with a 2c DNA content, a chi-square test showed that all could have arisen from n + n sexually-derived embryos, based on the observed segregation of n + n regenerants, which fit the expected 3:1 ratio of dominant:recessive RAPD-marker phenotypes. The apparent lack of regenerants of apomictic origin, and implications for genetic transformation and breeding of Kentucky bluegrass are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10681-005-9034-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_741118144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2105915461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-19816acbe46a1631045f85e9ae483c20c0cc94f7035975a5afdf0c1573df75303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1r3DAQhkVpIdu0PyCnikJJe3A6Y0n-OKahbUIWEkhyFrNaaXHqlbYj--C_0F9dmw20p4HhfZ9hHiHOEC4QoP6aEaoGCwBTtKB0Mb0SKzS1KgxU8FqsAFAXpVLViXib8zMAtLWBlfhz31McsmS_89EzDX4rA6e99PsNT0m6sR9G9lmmIClKOqR954bOSden6JftrY_D6H5NctOPfseUs_x8n0geFljMXZbrC3n-jTjF8y-S2MuYhv9AXZSJu10X34k3gfrs37_MU_H04_vj1XWxvvt5c3W5Lpwqq6HAtsGK3MbrirBSCNqExviWvG6UK8GBc60ONSgzv0iGwjaAW1xsQ20UqFPx8cg9cPo9-jzY5zRynE_aWiNig1rPITyGHKec2Qd74G5PPFkEuxi3R-N2Nm4X43aaO59ewJQd9YEpui7_K9YNlrpZ2B-OuUDJ0o7nzNNDCagAodGmBPUXYRuKng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>741118144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plants regenerated from embryo cultures of an apomictic clone of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L. 'Baron') are not apomictic in origin</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Stephens, L.C ; Fei, S.Z ; Xiong, Y ; Hodges, C.F</creator><creatorcontrib>Stephens, L.C ; Fei, S.Z ; Xiong, Y ; Hodges, C.F</creatorcontrib><description>Plants were regenerated from tissue cultures of embryos dissected from seeds that were harvested from a self-pollinated clonal selection of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) 'Baron', an apomictic cultivar. Plants were regenerated from 35 embryo-derived callus cultures of the 3280 embryos that were plated. Flow-cytometric (FCM) and RAPD-marker analyses were performed to determine if regenerants were or were not apomictic in origin. Fifteen regenerants with a 3c DNA content were classified as arising from 2n + n aberrant embryos, which was a higher frequency than expected, based on a chi-square analysis. Of the remaining 20 regenerants with a 2c DNA content, a chi-square test showed that all could have arisen from n + n sexually-derived embryos, based on the observed segregation of n + n regenerants, which fit the expected 3:1 ratio of dominant:recessive RAPD-marker phenotypes. The apparent lack of regenerants of apomictic origin, and implications for genetic transformation and breeding of Kentucky bluegrass are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10681-005-9034-y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EUPHAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; apomixis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Crop science ; Cultivars ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; embryo (plant) ; embryo culture ; Embryos ; flow cytometry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genetic markers ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; Heterosis. Floral biology applications: apomixy, male sterility, incompatibility, varia ; in vitro regeneration ; Phenotypes ; Plant breeding: fundamental aspects and methodology ; Poa pratensis ; random amplified polymorphic DNA technique ; tissue culture ; turf grasses ; Turfgrasses</subject><ispartof>Euphytica, 2006-02, Vol.147 (3), p.383-388</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-19816acbe46a1631045f85e9ae483c20c0cc94f7035975a5afdf0c1573df75303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-19816acbe46a1631045f85e9ae483c20c0cc94f7035975a5afdf0c1573df75303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17812484$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stephens, L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei, S.Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, C.F</creatorcontrib><title>Plants regenerated from embryo cultures of an apomictic clone of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L. 'Baron') are not apomictic in origin</title><title>Euphytica</title><description>Plants were regenerated from tissue cultures of embryos dissected from seeds that were harvested from a self-pollinated clonal selection of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) 'Baron', an apomictic cultivar. Plants were regenerated from 35 embryo-derived callus cultures of the 3280 embryos that were plated. Flow-cytometric (FCM) and RAPD-marker analyses were performed to determine if regenerants were or were not apomictic in origin. Fifteen regenerants with a 3c DNA content were classified as arising from 2n + n aberrant embryos, which was a higher frequency than expected, based on a chi-square analysis. Of the remaining 20 regenerants with a 2c DNA content, a chi-square test showed that all could have arisen from n + n sexually-derived embryos, based on the observed segregation of n + n regenerants, which fit the expected 3:1 ratio of dominant:recessive RAPD-marker phenotypes. The apparent lack of regenerants of apomictic origin, and implications for genetic transformation and breeding of Kentucky bluegrass are discussed.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>apomixis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Crop science</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>embryo (plant)</subject><subject>embryo culture</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>flow cytometry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genetic markers</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>Heterosis. Floral biology applications: apomixy, male sterility, incompatibility, varia</subject><subject>in vitro regeneration</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Plant breeding: fundamental aspects and methodology</subject><subject>Poa pratensis</subject><subject>random amplified polymorphic DNA technique</subject><subject>tissue culture</subject><subject>turf grasses</subject><subject>Turfgrasses</subject><issn>0014-2336</issn><issn>1573-5060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1r3DAQhkVpIdu0PyCnikJJe3A6Y0n-OKahbUIWEkhyFrNaaXHqlbYj--C_0F9dmw20p4HhfZ9hHiHOEC4QoP6aEaoGCwBTtKB0Mb0SKzS1KgxU8FqsAFAXpVLViXib8zMAtLWBlfhz31McsmS_89EzDX4rA6e99PsNT0m6sR9G9lmmIClKOqR954bOSden6JftrY_D6H5NctOPfseUs_x8n0geFljMXZbrC3n-jTjF8y-S2MuYhv9AXZSJu10X34k3gfrs37_MU_H04_vj1XWxvvt5c3W5Lpwqq6HAtsGK3MbrirBSCNqExviWvG6UK8GBc60ONSgzv0iGwjaAW1xsQ20UqFPx8cg9cPo9-jzY5zRynE_aWiNig1rPITyGHKec2Qd74G5PPFkEuxi3R-N2Nm4X43aaO59ewJQd9YEpui7_K9YNlrpZ2B-OuUDJ0o7nzNNDCagAodGmBPUXYRuKng</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Stephens, L.C</creator><creator>Fei, S.Z</creator><creator>Xiong, Y</creator><creator>Hodges, C.F</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Plants regenerated from embryo cultures of an apomictic clone of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L. 'Baron') are not apomictic in origin</title><author>Stephens, L.C ; Fei, S.Z ; Xiong, Y ; Hodges, C.F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-19816acbe46a1631045f85e9ae483c20c0cc94f7035975a5afdf0c1573df75303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>apomixis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Crop science</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>embryo (plant)</topic><topic>embryo culture</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>flow cytometry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genetic markers</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>Heterosis. Floral biology applications: apomixy, male sterility, incompatibility, varia</topic><topic>in vitro regeneration</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Plant breeding: fundamental aspects and methodology</topic><topic>Poa pratensis</topic><topic>random amplified polymorphic DNA technique</topic><topic>tissue culture</topic><topic>turf grasses</topic><topic>Turfgrasses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stephens, L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei, S.Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, C.F</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Euphytica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stephens, L.C</au><au>Fei, S.Z</au><au>Xiong, Y</au><au>Hodges, C.F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plants regenerated from embryo cultures of an apomictic clone of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L. 'Baron') are not apomictic in origin</atitle><jtitle>Euphytica</jtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>147</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>383-388</pages><issn>0014-2336</issn><eissn>1573-5060</eissn><coden>EUPHAA</coden><abstract>Plants were regenerated from tissue cultures of embryos dissected from seeds that were harvested from a self-pollinated clonal selection of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) 'Baron', an apomictic cultivar. Plants were regenerated from 35 embryo-derived callus cultures of the 3280 embryos that were plated. Flow-cytometric (FCM) and RAPD-marker analyses were performed to determine if regenerants were or were not apomictic in origin. Fifteen regenerants with a 3c DNA content were classified as arising from 2n + n aberrant embryos, which was a higher frequency than expected, based on a chi-square analysis. Of the remaining 20 regenerants with a 2c DNA content, a chi-square test showed that all could have arisen from n + n sexually-derived embryos, based on the observed segregation of n + n regenerants, which fit the expected 3:1 ratio of dominant:recessive RAPD-marker phenotypes. The apparent lack of regenerants of apomictic origin, and implications for genetic transformation and breeding of Kentucky bluegrass are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10681-005-9034-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-2336
ispartof Euphytica, 2006-02, Vol.147 (3), p.383-388
issn 0014-2336
1573-5060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_741118144
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
apomixis
Biological and medical sciences
Crop science
Cultivars
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
embryo (plant)
embryo culture
Embryos
flow cytometry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genetic markers
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
Heterosis. Floral biology applications: apomixy, male sterility, incompatibility, varia
in vitro regeneration
Phenotypes
Plant breeding: fundamental aspects and methodology
Poa pratensis
random amplified polymorphic DNA technique
tissue culture
turf grasses
Turfgrasses
title Plants regenerated from embryo cultures of an apomictic clone of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L. 'Baron') are not apomictic in origin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A08%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plants%20regenerated%20from%20embryo%20cultures%20of%20an%20apomictic%20clone%20of%20Kentucky%20bluegrass%20(Poa%20pratensis%20L.%20'Baron')%20are%20not%20apomictic%20in%20origin&rft.jtitle=Euphytica&rft.au=Stephens,%20L.C&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=383-388&rft.issn=0014-2336&rft.eissn=1573-5060&rft.coden=EUPHAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10681-005-9034-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2105915461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=741118144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true