Exploring teachers' instructional design practices from a systems design perspective
Curricular changes in higher vocational education have rendered teachers' instructional design activities increasingly important. Using a repertory grid technique, this paper sets out to analyse current design activities of ten teacher trainers. Their actual approach is compared with an instruc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Instructional science 2002-07, Vol.30 (4), p.291-305 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 305 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 291 |
container_title | Instructional science |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | HOOGVELD, ALBERT W.M. PAAS, FRED JOCHEMS, WIM M.G. VAN MERRIËNBOER, JEROEN J.G. |
description | Curricular changes in higher vocational education have rendered teachers' instructional design activities increasingly important. Using a repertory grid technique, this paper sets out to analyse current design activities of ten teacher trainers. Their actual approach is compared with an instructional systems design (ISD) approach and related to innovative teacher roles. Teachers' activities show an imbalance in two ID phases, that is problem analysis and evaluation. The results suggest that they attempt to translate curricular goals directly into concrete lessons and they pay relatively little attention to evaluation. In line with this finding, they underrate the two innovative teacher roles of the 'diagnostician' and the 'evaluator'. It is argued that imbalanced or incomplete design approaches and perceived roles may hinder innovation in education. Implications for the support of teachers' design activities are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1016081812908 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_740300641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ654238</ericid><jstor_id>41953589</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41953589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e223t-8e36eb279b36f3955bd64f7dcea4dbf8cd985ce21479e8298b5f6c8a5cc051e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXhQWL56is1_ZXW-l1C8KXuo5bDaTmpImcXcr9t8bqPQ08D7PvAxDyDWDBwZcPM6eGLAcDDOMWzAnZMKUFhmzip-SCQCHTHKtz8lFjBsAYNLAhKwWv0Pbh6Zb04TOf2GI97TpYgo7n5q-cy2tMDbrjg7BjYnHSOvQb6mjcR8TbuORj6sDjsoPXpKz2rURr_7nlHw-L1bz12z58fI2ny0z5FykzKDIseTaliKvhVWqrHJZ68qjk1VZG19ZozxyJrVFw60pVZ1745T3oBiCmJK7Q-8Q-u8dxlRs-l0Yb46FliAAcslG6eYgYWh8MYRm68K-WLznSnJhRnx7wJuY-nDkcvybUMaKP0haZmI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>740300641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring teachers' instructional design practices from a systems design perspective</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>HOOGVELD, ALBERT W.M. ; PAAS, FRED ; JOCHEMS, WIM M.G. ; VAN MERRIËNBOER, JEROEN J.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>HOOGVELD, ALBERT W.M. ; PAAS, FRED ; JOCHEMS, WIM M.G. ; VAN MERRIËNBOER, JEROEN J.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Curricular changes in higher vocational education have rendered teachers' instructional design activities increasingly important. Using a repertory grid technique, this paper sets out to analyse current design activities of ten teacher trainers. Their actual approach is compared with an instructional systems design (ISD) approach and related to innovative teacher roles. Teachers' activities show an imbalance in two ID phases, that is problem analysis and evaluation. The results suggest that they attempt to translate curricular goals directly into concrete lessons and they pay relatively little attention to evaluation. In line with this finding, they underrate the two innovative teacher roles of the 'diagnostician' and the 'evaluator'. It is argued that imbalanced or incomplete design approaches and perceived roles may hinder innovation in education. Implications for the support of teachers' design activities are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1016081812908</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INLSBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Comparative Analysis ; Curricula ; Curriculum Development ; Design analysis ; Design evaluation ; Educational technology ; Evaluation Methods ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Instructional Design ; Instructional Innovation ; Instructional Systems Design ; Learning ; Netherlands ; Preservice Teacher Education ; Repertory Grid Technique ; Studies ; Systems design ; Teacher Educators ; Teachers ; Teaching methods ; Training</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 2002-07, Vol.30 (4), p.291-305</ispartof><rights>2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41953589$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41953589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ654238$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOOGVELD, ALBERT W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAAS, FRED</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOCHEMS, WIM M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN MERRIËNBOER, JEROEN J.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring teachers' instructional design practices from a systems design perspective</title><title>Instructional science</title><description>Curricular changes in higher vocational education have rendered teachers' instructional design activities increasingly important. Using a repertory grid technique, this paper sets out to analyse current design activities of ten teacher trainers. Their actual approach is compared with an instructional systems design (ISD) approach and related to innovative teacher roles. Teachers' activities show an imbalance in two ID phases, that is problem analysis and evaluation. The results suggest that they attempt to translate curricular goals directly into concrete lessons and they pay relatively little attention to evaluation. In line with this finding, they underrate the two innovative teacher roles of the 'diagnostician' and the 'evaluator'. It is argued that imbalanced or incomplete design approaches and perceived roles may hinder innovation in education. Implications for the support of teachers' design activities are discussed.</description><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Design evaluation</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Instructional Innovation</subject><subject>Instructional Systems Design</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Preservice Teacher Education</subject><subject>Repertory Grid Technique</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXhQWL56is1_ZXW-l1C8KXuo5bDaTmpImcXcr9t8bqPQ08D7PvAxDyDWDBwZcPM6eGLAcDDOMWzAnZMKUFhmzip-SCQCHTHKtz8lFjBsAYNLAhKwWv0Pbh6Zb04TOf2GI97TpYgo7n5q-cy2tMDbrjg7BjYnHSOvQb6mjcR8TbuORj6sDjsoPXpKz2rURr_7nlHw-L1bz12z58fI2ny0z5FykzKDIseTaliKvhVWqrHJZ68qjk1VZG19ZozxyJrVFw60pVZ1745T3oBiCmJK7Q-8Q-u8dxlRs-l0Yb46FliAAcslG6eYgYWh8MYRm68K-WLznSnJhRnx7wJuY-nDkcvybUMaKP0haZmI</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>HOOGVELD, ALBERT W.M.</creator><creator>PAAS, FRED</creator><creator>JOCHEMS, WIM M.G.</creator><creator>VAN MERRIËNBOER, JEROEN J.G.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>Exploring teachers' instructional design practices from a systems design perspective</title><author>HOOGVELD, ALBERT W.M. ; PAAS, FRED ; JOCHEMS, WIM M.G. ; VAN MERRIËNBOER, JEROEN J.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e223t-8e36eb279b36f3955bd64f7dcea4dbf8cd985ce21479e8298b5f6c8a5cc051e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Design evaluation</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Instructional Innovation</topic><topic>Instructional Systems Design</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Preservice Teacher Education</topic><topic>Repertory Grid Technique</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOOGVELD, ALBERT W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAAS, FRED</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOCHEMS, WIM M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN MERRIËNBOER, JEROEN J.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOOGVELD, ALBERT W.M.</au><au>PAAS, FRED</au><au>JOCHEMS, WIM M.G.</au><au>VAN MERRIËNBOER, JEROEN J.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ654238</ericid><atitle>Exploring teachers' instructional design practices from a systems design perspective</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>291-305</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><coden>INLSBJ</coden><abstract>Curricular changes in higher vocational education have rendered teachers' instructional design activities increasingly important. Using a repertory grid technique, this paper sets out to analyse current design activities of ten teacher trainers. Their actual approach is compared with an instructional systems design (ISD) approach and related to innovative teacher roles. Teachers' activities show an imbalance in two ID phases, that is problem analysis and evaluation. The results suggest that they attempt to translate curricular goals directly into concrete lessons and they pay relatively little attention to evaluation. In line with this finding, they underrate the two innovative teacher roles of the 'diagnostician' and the 'evaluator'. It is argued that imbalanced or incomplete design approaches and perceived roles may hinder innovation in education. Implications for the support of teachers' design activities are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1016081812908</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-4277 |
ispartof | Instructional science, 2002-07, Vol.30 (4), p.291-305 |
issn | 0020-4277 1573-1952 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_740300641 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Comparative Analysis Curricula Curriculum Development Design analysis Design evaluation Educational technology Evaluation Methods Foreign Countries Higher Education Instructional Design Instructional Innovation Instructional Systems Design Learning Netherlands Preservice Teacher Education Repertory Grid Technique Studies Systems design Teacher Educators Teachers Teaching methods Training |
title | Exploring teachers' instructional design practices from a systems design perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A49%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20teachers'%20instructional%20design%20practices%20from%20a%20systems%20design%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=HOOGVELD,%20ALBERT%20W.M.&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=291-305&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft.coden=INLSBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1016081812908&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41953589%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=740300641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ654238&rft_jstor_id=41953589&rfr_iscdi=true |