RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TOXIC TORTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

The Court then held the state common law negligence and strict liability claims to impose requirements that conflict with federal statutory requirements.8 Accordingly, the Supreme Court held that the MDAs preemption clause bars state common law claims challenging the safety or effectiveness of a med...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Tort trial & insurance practice law journal 2010-01, Vol.45 (2), p.627-652
Hauptverfasser:	Kramer, Beth M., Trattles, Gloria Martinez, Hall, Jessica A., Waggoner, Brandon G., Weber, Brian J., Share, Alison L., Cullman, Adam, Winkelman, Scott L.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Air pollution Climate change Cost recovery Defendants Duty to warn Emission standards Emissions Environmental agencies Environmental law Environmental legislation False advertising FDA approval Federal court decisions Federal district courts Fossil fuels Greenhouse gases Labeling Medical equipment Plaintiffs Soil erosion State court decisions State law Surveys Torts Toxic torts Trials
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!