Impact of pre-harvest burning versus trash conservation on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks on a sugarcane plantation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest region
Owing to the increased demand for ethanol biofuel from sugar cane, the area planted to this crop in Brazil has increased from 4.8 to 9.5 Mha since 2000. At the same time there has been pressure from environmental groups and others to cease the pre-harvest burning of cane, and today over 40% of the c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2010-08, Vol.333 (1-2), p.71-80 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 80 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 71 |
| container_title | Plant and soil |
| container_volume | 333 |
| creator | Machado Pinheiro, Érika Flavia Lima, Eduardo Ceddia, Marcos Bacis Urquiaga, Segundo Alves, Bruno J. R Boddey, Robert M |
| description | Owing to the increased demand for ethanol biofuel from sugar cane, the area planted to this crop in Brazil has increased from 4.8 to 9.5 Mha since 2000. At the same time there has been pressure from environmental groups and others to cease the pre-harvest burning of cane, and today over 40% of the crop is harvested without burning, thus conserving the trash on the soil surface. While most trash decomposes during the year, it is generally assumed that this transition from burning to trash conservation will have benefits for cane productivity and increase soil carbon stocks. To investigate the possible benefits of this change of practice an experiment was carried out in the state of Espírito Santo, south-eastern Brazil, to investigate the long-term effects of the practice of pre-harvested burning compared to trash conservation on soil fertility and soil C and N stocks. The results showed that over a 14-year period, trash conservation marginally decreased soil acidity and significantly increased soil C and N stocks in 0-10 cm depth interval. Although the trash conservation treatment accumulated 13 Mg C ha⁻¹ more than the burned treatment, this difference was not statistically different. However, the stocks of N to 100 cm depth were 900 kg ha⁻¹ higher under the trash conservation treatment and this difference was statistically significant. The ¹³C abundance data suggested that where trash was conserved, more soil C was derived from the sugar cane than from the original native vegetation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-010-0320-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_646758031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A361711833</galeid><jstor_id>24130676</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A361711833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-cd9e7bb2c410786282184bdafbabf06924cd702f880e35b0c56bfbc813087c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV2L1DAULaLguPoDfBCD4GPXm6Zt2sd18WNhwQdd8C3cZpJOxk4y3nQG9Lf4Y72li_smCeTjnHPv5ZyieCnhUgLod1lKCXUJEkpQFZT6UbGRjVZlA6p9XGyAf0vQ_fenxbOc97C8Zbsp_twcjmhnkbw4kit3SGeXZzGcKIY4irOjfMpiJsw7YVPMjs44hxQF75zCJCzSwHeMWxHDTGl0DMzJ_sgLBUU-jUgWoxPHCeO8ikMU886J94S_wxQwiqt5AYMVPtHSn9zIvOfFE49Tdi_uz4vi7uOHb9efy9svn26ur25L26h-Lu22d3oYKltL0F1bdZXs6mGLfsDBQ9tXtd1qqHzXgVPNALZpBz_YTirotK1qdVG8WeseKf08cX-zT2wAtzRt3eqmAyWZdLmSRpycCdEndsXy2rpDYGucD_x_pVqppeyUYoFcBZZSzuS8OVI4IP0yEswSmllDMxyaWUIzmjVv7yfBbHHyhNGG_E9YKdBS9w3zqpWXGYqjo4eJ_1f81Srac0D0ULRmI1rdMv56xT0mgyNx47uvFTAqOw1NX6u_gYO8Hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>646758031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of pre-harvest burning versus trash conservation on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks on a sugarcane plantation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest region</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Machado Pinheiro, Érika Flavia ; Lima, Eduardo ; Ceddia, Marcos Bacis ; Urquiaga, Segundo ; Alves, Bruno J. R ; Boddey, Robert M</creator><creatorcontrib>Machado Pinheiro, Érika Flavia ; Lima, Eduardo ; Ceddia, Marcos Bacis ; Urquiaga, Segundo ; Alves, Bruno J. R ; Boddey, Robert M</creatorcontrib><description>Owing to the increased demand for ethanol biofuel from sugar cane, the area planted to this crop in Brazil has increased from 4.8 to 9.5 Mha since 2000. At the same time there has been pressure from environmental groups and others to cease the pre-harvest burning of cane, and today over 40% of the crop is harvested without burning, thus conserving the trash on the soil surface. While most trash decomposes during the year, it is generally assumed that this transition from burning to trash conservation will have benefits for cane productivity and increase soil carbon stocks. To investigate the possible benefits of this change of practice an experiment was carried out in the state of Espírito Santo, south-eastern Brazil, to investigate the long-term effects of the practice of pre-harvested burning compared to trash conservation on soil fertility and soil C and N stocks. The results showed that over a 14-year period, trash conservation marginally decreased soil acidity and significantly increased soil C and N stocks in 0-10 cm depth interval. Although the trash conservation treatment accumulated 13 Mg C ha⁻¹ more than the burned treatment, this difference was not statistically different. However, the stocks of N to 100 cm depth were 900 kg ha⁻¹ higher under the trash conservation treatment and this difference was statistically significant. The ¹³C abundance data suggested that where trash was conserved, more soil C was derived from the sugar cane than from the original native vegetation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0320-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acidity ; Agricultural soils ; Agrology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biofuels ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; C ; Canes ; Carbon ; Carbon accumulation ; Carbon content ; Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties ; Clay soils ; Conservation ; Ecology ; Environmental associations ; Environmental organizations ; Ethanol ; Forest conservation ; Forest fires ; Forest soils ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; green manures ; Harvesting ; Life Sciences ; Nitrogen ; Organic matter ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plantations ; Pre-harvest burning ; Protection and preservation ; Regular Article ; Soil acidity ; Soil conservation ; Soil depth ; Soil fertility ; soil organic matter ; Soil science ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil surfaces ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Soils ; Sugar ; Sugar cane ; Sugarcane ; Trash conservation ; Waste disposal</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2010-08, Vol.333 (1-2), p.71-80</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-cd9e7bb2c410786282184bdafbabf06924cd702f880e35b0c56bfbc813087c243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-cd9e7bb2c410786282184bdafbabf06924cd702f880e35b0c56bfbc813087c243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24130676$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24130676$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23071795$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machado Pinheiro, Érika Flavia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceddia, Marcos Bacis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquiaga, Segundo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Bruno J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boddey, Robert M</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of pre-harvest burning versus trash conservation on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks on a sugarcane plantation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest region</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Owing to the increased demand for ethanol biofuel from sugar cane, the area planted to this crop in Brazil has increased from 4.8 to 9.5 Mha since 2000. At the same time there has been pressure from environmental groups and others to cease the pre-harvest burning of cane, and today over 40% of the crop is harvested without burning, thus conserving the trash on the soil surface. While most trash decomposes during the year, it is generally assumed that this transition from burning to trash conservation will have benefits for cane productivity and increase soil carbon stocks. To investigate the possible benefits of this change of practice an experiment was carried out in the state of Espírito Santo, south-eastern Brazil, to investigate the long-term effects of the practice of pre-harvested burning compared to trash conservation on soil fertility and soil C and N stocks. The results showed that over a 14-year period, trash conservation marginally decreased soil acidity and significantly increased soil C and N stocks in 0-10 cm depth interval. Although the trash conservation treatment accumulated 13 Mg C ha⁻¹ more than the burned treatment, this difference was not statistically different. However, the stocks of N to 100 cm depth were 900 kg ha⁻¹ higher under the trash conservation treatment and this difference was statistically significant. The ¹³C abundance data suggested that where trash was conserved, more soil C was derived from the sugar cane than from the original native vegetation.</description><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agrology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>C</subject><subject>Canes</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon accumulation</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</subject><subject>Clay soils</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental associations</subject><subject>Environmental organizations</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest fires</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>green manures</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Pre-harvest burning</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Soil acidity</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil depth</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Sugar cane</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>Trash conservation</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV2L1DAULaLguPoDfBCD4GPXm6Zt2sd18WNhwQdd8C3cZpJOxk4y3nQG9Lf4Y72li_smCeTjnHPv5ZyieCnhUgLod1lKCXUJEkpQFZT6UbGRjVZlA6p9XGyAf0vQ_fenxbOc97C8Zbsp_twcjmhnkbw4kit3SGeXZzGcKIY4irOjfMpiJsw7YVPMjs44hxQF75zCJCzSwHeMWxHDTGl0DMzJ_sgLBUU-jUgWoxPHCeO8ikMU886J94S_wxQwiqt5AYMVPtHSn9zIvOfFE49Tdi_uz4vi7uOHb9efy9svn26ur25L26h-Lu22d3oYKltL0F1bdZXs6mGLfsDBQ9tXtd1qqHzXgVPNALZpBz_YTirotK1qdVG8WeseKf08cX-zT2wAtzRt3eqmAyWZdLmSRpycCdEndsXy2rpDYGucD_x_pVqppeyUYoFcBZZSzuS8OVI4IP0yEswSmllDMxyaWUIzmjVv7yfBbHHyhNGG_E9YKdBS9w3zqpWXGYqjo4eJ_1f81Srac0D0ULRmI1rdMv56xT0mgyNx47uvFTAqOw1NX6u_gYO8Hg</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Machado Pinheiro, Érika Flavia</creator><creator>Lima, Eduardo</creator><creator>Ceddia, Marcos Bacis</creator><creator>Urquiaga, Segundo</creator><creator>Alves, Bruno J. R</creator><creator>Boddey, Robert M</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Impact of pre-harvest burning versus trash conservation on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks on a sugarcane plantation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest region</title><author>Machado Pinheiro, Érika Flavia ; Lima, Eduardo ; Ceddia, Marcos Bacis ; Urquiaga, Segundo ; Alves, Bruno J. R ; Boddey, Robert M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-cd9e7bb2c410786282184bdafbabf06924cd702f880e35b0c56bfbc813087c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agrology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>C</topic><topic>Canes</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon accumulation</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</topic><topic>Clay soils</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental associations</topic><topic>Environmental organizations</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest fires</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>green manures</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Pre-harvest burning</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Soil acidity</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil depth</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Sugar cane</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>Trash conservation</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machado Pinheiro, Érika Flavia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceddia, Marcos Bacis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquiaga, Segundo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Bruno J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boddey, Robert M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machado Pinheiro, Érika Flavia</au><au>Lima, Eduardo</au><au>Ceddia, Marcos Bacis</au><au>Urquiaga, Segundo</au><au>Alves, Bruno J. R</au><au>Boddey, Robert M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of pre-harvest burning versus trash conservation on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks on a sugarcane plantation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest region</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>333</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>71-80</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><coden>PLSOA2</coden><abstract>Owing to the increased demand for ethanol biofuel from sugar cane, the area planted to this crop in Brazil has increased from 4.8 to 9.5 Mha since 2000. At the same time there has been pressure from environmental groups and others to cease the pre-harvest burning of cane, and today over 40% of the crop is harvested without burning, thus conserving the trash on the soil surface. While most trash decomposes during the year, it is generally assumed that this transition from burning to trash conservation will have benefits for cane productivity and increase soil carbon stocks. To investigate the possible benefits of this change of practice an experiment was carried out in the state of Espírito Santo, south-eastern Brazil, to investigate the long-term effects of the practice of pre-harvested burning compared to trash conservation on soil fertility and soil C and N stocks. The results showed that over a 14-year period, trash conservation marginally decreased soil acidity and significantly increased soil C and N stocks in 0-10 cm depth interval. Although the trash conservation treatment accumulated 13 Mg C ha⁻¹ more than the burned treatment, this difference was not statistically different. However, the stocks of N to 100 cm depth were 900 kg ha⁻¹ higher under the trash conservation treatment and this difference was statistically significant. The ¹³C abundance data suggested that where trash was conserved, more soil C was derived from the sugar cane than from the original native vegetation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-010-0320-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
| ispartof | Plant and soil, 2010-08, Vol.333 (1-2), p.71-80 |
| issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_646758031 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Acidity Agricultural soils Agrology Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biofuels Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences C Canes Carbon Carbon accumulation Carbon content Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties Clay soils Conservation Ecology Environmental associations Environmental organizations Ethanol Forest conservation Forest fires Forest soils Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production green manures Harvesting Life Sciences Nitrogen Organic matter Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plantations Pre-harvest burning Protection and preservation Regular Article Soil acidity Soil conservation Soil depth Soil fertility soil organic matter Soil science Soil Science & Conservation Soil surfaces Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments Soils Sugar Sugar cane Sugarcane Trash conservation Waste disposal |
| title | Impact of pre-harvest burning versus trash conservation on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks on a sugarcane plantation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest region |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A22%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20pre-harvest%20burning%20versus%20trash%20conservation%20on%20soil%20carbon%20and%20nitrogen%20stocks%20on%20a%20sugarcane%20plantation%20in%20the%20Brazilian%20Atlantic%20forest%20region&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Machado%20Pinheiro,%20%C3%89rika%20Flavia&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=333&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=71-80&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft.coden=PLSOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-010-0320-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA361711833%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=646758031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A361711833&rft_jstor_id=24130676&rfr_iscdi=true |