Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research
The Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS) is an 18-item measure of work motivation theoretically grounded in self-determination theory ( Deci & Ryan, 2000 ). The purpose of the present research was twofold. First, the applicability of the WEIMS in different work environments was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of behavioural science 2009-10, Vol.41 (4), p.213-226 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 226 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | Canadian journal of behavioural science |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Tremblay, Maxime A Blanchard, Céline M Taylor, Sara Pelletier, Luc G Villeneuve, Martin |
description | The Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS) is an 18-item measure of work motivation theoretically grounded in self-determination theory (
Deci & Ryan, 2000
). The purpose of the present research was twofold. First, the applicability of the WEIMS in different work environments was evaluated. Second, its factorial structure and psychometric properties were assessed. Two samples of workers (military:
N
= 465; civilians:
N
= 192) voluntarily completed questionnaires. Using the WEIMS's 3 indexes (work self-determination index, work self-determined and nonself-determined motivation, respectively), results of regression analyses were supportive of its ability to predict positive and negative criteria in the workplace. Results also showed the adequacy of both its construct validity and internal consistency. Its factorial structure was also invariant across samples. Finally, its quasi-simplex pattern and relationships with psychological correlates further supported the self-determination continuum. Overall, these findings provide evidence for the applicability as well as the reliability and validity of the WEIMS in organisational settings. Results are discussed in regard to the applicability of self-determination theory to the workplace.
L'échelle de motivation intrinsèque et extrinsèque au travail (EMIET) est une mesure à 18 items de la motivation au travail ayant pour fondation théorique la théorie d'autodétermination (
Deci & Ryan, 2000
). La présente recherche s'organisaient avait deux objectifs. Premièrement, l'applicabilité de l'EMIET a été testée dans différents milieux de travail. Deuxièmement, sa structure ainsi que ses propriétés psychométriques ont été mesurées. Deux échantillons de travailleurs (militaires :
N
= 465; civils :
N
= 192) volontaires ont rempli les questionnaires. En utilisant les indexes de l'EMIET 3 (respectivement, l'index d'autodétermination au travail, de motivation au travail autodéterminée et non autodéterminée), les résultats des analyses de régression ont appuyé sa capacité prédictive de critères positifs et négatifs au travail. Les résultats ont aussi montré l'adéquation de sa validité de construit et de sa consistance interne. Sa structure factorielle était aussi constante à travers les groupes. Finalement, son patron quasi-simplex et ses relations avec des corrélats psychologiques sont davantage venus appuyer le continuum d'autodétermination. En somme, ces résultats fournissent des appuis pour l'applicabilité, la |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0015167 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614508321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614508321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-33dbd6757aa3a20f86c95e3ae7a29fcc4aa1f2050cc800b9c3e0f82c7dca659e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9Lw0AQBfBFFKxV8CME8eAlOvs_e5TSaqHiQUVvy3SygdSaxN1U7Lc3Unv1NDz4MQ8eY-ccrjlIe4MAXHNjD9iIF9blwhh3yEYAUOQK4O2YnaS0GqLRWo1Y_trG92z63ce6STVl2JTZvNmnh7avv7Cv2yZ7IlyHU3ZU4TqFs787Zi-z6fPkPl883s0nt4scpTV9LmW5LI3VFlGigKow5HSQGCwKVxEpRF4J0EBUACwdyTAgQbYkNNoFOWYXu79dbD83IfV-1W5iM1R6w5WGQgr-HxIClCugcAO62iGKbUoxVL6L9QfGrefgfwfz-8EGermj2KHv0pYw9jWtQ_K0TF5xr_zQKn8A41RoBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220498089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Tremblay, Maxime A ; Blanchard, Céline M ; Taylor, Sara ; Pelletier, Luc G ; Villeneuve, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Maxime A ; Blanchard, Céline M ; Taylor, Sara ; Pelletier, Luc G ; Villeneuve, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>The Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS) is an 18-item measure of work motivation theoretically grounded in self-determination theory (
Deci & Ryan, 2000
). The purpose of the present research was twofold. First, the applicability of the WEIMS in different work environments was evaluated. Second, its factorial structure and psychometric properties were assessed. Two samples of workers (military:
N
= 465; civilians:
N
= 192) voluntarily completed questionnaires. Using the WEIMS's 3 indexes (work self-determination index, work self-determined and nonself-determined motivation, respectively), results of regression analyses were supportive of its ability to predict positive and negative criteria in the workplace. Results also showed the adequacy of both its construct validity and internal consistency. Its factorial structure was also invariant across samples. Finally, its quasi-simplex pattern and relationships with psychological correlates further supported the self-determination continuum. Overall, these findings provide evidence for the applicability as well as the reliability and validity of the WEIMS in organisational settings. Results are discussed in regard to the applicability of self-determination theory to the workplace.
L'échelle de motivation intrinsèque et extrinsèque au travail (EMIET) est une mesure à 18 items de la motivation au travail ayant pour fondation théorique la théorie d'autodétermination (
Deci & Ryan, 2000
). La présente recherche s'organisaient avait deux objectifs. Premièrement, l'applicabilité de l'EMIET a été testée dans différents milieux de travail. Deuxièmement, sa structure ainsi que ses propriétés psychométriques ont été mesurées. Deux échantillons de travailleurs (militaires :
N
= 465; civils :
N
= 192) volontaires ont rempli les questionnaires. En utilisant les indexes de l'EMIET 3 (respectivement, l'index d'autodétermination au travail, de motivation au travail autodéterminée et non autodéterminée), les résultats des analyses de régression ont appuyé sa capacité prédictive de critères positifs et négatifs au travail. Les résultats ont aussi montré l'adéquation de sa validité de construit et de sa consistance interne. Sa structure factorielle était aussi constante à travers les groupes. Finalement, son patron quasi-simplex et ses relations avec des corrélats psychologiques sont davantage venus appuyer le continuum d'autodétermination. En somme, ces résultats fournissent des appuis pour l'applicabilité, la fidélité et la validité de l'EMIET en milieu de travail.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-400X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0015167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Employee Motivation ; Experimentation ; Extrinsic Motivation ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Human ; Industrial and Organizational Psychology ; Intrinsic Motivation ; Male ; Motivation ; Occupational psychology ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Psychometrics ; Self-Determination ; Test Validity ; Working Conditions</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of behavioural science, 2009-10, Vol.41 (4), p.213-226</ispartof><rights>2009 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychological Association Oct 2009</rights><rights>2009, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-33dbd6757aa3a20f86c95e3ae7a29fcc4aa1f2050cc800b9c3e0f82c7dca659e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Maxime A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Céline M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, Luc G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villeneuve, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research</title><title>Canadian journal of behavioural science</title><description>The Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS) is an 18-item measure of work motivation theoretically grounded in self-determination theory (
Deci & Ryan, 2000
). The purpose of the present research was twofold. First, the applicability of the WEIMS in different work environments was evaluated. Second, its factorial structure and psychometric properties were assessed. Two samples of workers (military:
N
= 465; civilians:
N
= 192) voluntarily completed questionnaires. Using the WEIMS's 3 indexes (work self-determination index, work self-determined and nonself-determined motivation, respectively), results of regression analyses were supportive of its ability to predict positive and negative criteria in the workplace. Results also showed the adequacy of both its construct validity and internal consistency. Its factorial structure was also invariant across samples. Finally, its quasi-simplex pattern and relationships with psychological correlates further supported the self-determination continuum. Overall, these findings provide evidence for the applicability as well as the reliability and validity of the WEIMS in organisational settings. Results are discussed in regard to the applicability of self-determination theory to the workplace.
L'échelle de motivation intrinsèque et extrinsèque au travail (EMIET) est une mesure à 18 items de la motivation au travail ayant pour fondation théorique la théorie d'autodétermination (
Deci & Ryan, 2000
). La présente recherche s'organisaient avait deux objectifs. Premièrement, l'applicabilité de l'EMIET a été testée dans différents milieux de travail. Deuxièmement, sa structure ainsi que ses propriétés psychométriques ont été mesurées. Deux échantillons de travailleurs (militaires :
N
= 465; civils :
N
= 192) volontaires ont rempli les questionnaires. En utilisant les indexes de l'EMIET 3 (respectivement, l'index d'autodétermination au travail, de motivation au travail autodéterminée et non autodéterminée), les résultats des analyses de régression ont appuyé sa capacité prédictive de critères positifs et négatifs au travail. Les résultats ont aussi montré l'adéquation de sa validité de construit et de sa consistance interne. Sa structure factorielle était aussi constante à travers les groupes. Finalement, son patron quasi-simplex et ses relations avec des corrélats psychologiques sont davantage venus appuyer le continuum d'autodétermination. En somme, ces résultats fournissent des appuis pour l'applicabilité, la fidélité et la validité de l'EMIET en milieu de travail.</description><subject>Employee Motivation</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Extrinsic Motivation</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</subject><subject>Intrinsic Motivation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Self-Determination</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Working Conditions</subject><issn>0008-400X</issn><issn>1879-2669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9Lw0AQBfBFFKxV8CME8eAlOvs_e5TSaqHiQUVvy3SygdSaxN1U7Lc3Unv1NDz4MQ8eY-ccrjlIe4MAXHNjD9iIF9blwhh3yEYAUOQK4O2YnaS0GqLRWo1Y_trG92z63ce6STVl2JTZvNmnh7avv7Cv2yZ7IlyHU3ZU4TqFs787Zi-z6fPkPl883s0nt4scpTV9LmW5LI3VFlGigKow5HSQGCwKVxEpRF4J0EBUACwdyTAgQbYkNNoFOWYXu79dbD83IfV-1W5iM1R6w5WGQgr-HxIClCugcAO62iGKbUoxVL6L9QfGrefgfwfz-8EGermj2KHv0pYw9jWtQ_K0TF5xr_zQKn8A41RoBA</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Tremblay, Maxime A</creator><creator>Blanchard, Céline M</creator><creator>Taylor, Sara</creator><creator>Pelletier, Luc G</creator><creator>Villeneuve, Martin</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7RZ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale</title><author>Tremblay, Maxime A ; Blanchard, Céline M ; Taylor, Sara ; Pelletier, Luc G ; Villeneuve, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-33dbd6757aa3a20f86c95e3ae7a29fcc4aa1f2050cc800b9c3e0f82c7dca659e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Employee Motivation</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Extrinsic Motivation</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</topic><topic>Intrinsic Motivation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Self-Determination</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Working Conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Maxime A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Céline M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, Luc G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villeneuve, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tremblay, Maxime A</au><au>Blanchard, Céline M</au><au>Taylor, Sara</au><au>Pelletier, Luc G</au><au>Villeneuve, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>213-226</pages><issn>0008-400X</issn><eissn>1879-2669</eissn><abstract>The Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS) is an 18-item measure of work motivation theoretically grounded in self-determination theory (
Deci & Ryan, 2000
). The purpose of the present research was twofold. First, the applicability of the WEIMS in different work environments was evaluated. Second, its factorial structure and psychometric properties were assessed. Two samples of workers (military:
N
= 465; civilians:
N
= 192) voluntarily completed questionnaires. Using the WEIMS's 3 indexes (work self-determination index, work self-determined and nonself-determined motivation, respectively), results of regression analyses were supportive of its ability to predict positive and negative criteria in the workplace. Results also showed the adequacy of both its construct validity and internal consistency. Its factorial structure was also invariant across samples. Finally, its quasi-simplex pattern and relationships with psychological correlates further supported the self-determination continuum. Overall, these findings provide evidence for the applicability as well as the reliability and validity of the WEIMS in organisational settings. Results are discussed in regard to the applicability of self-determination theory to the workplace.
L'échelle de motivation intrinsèque et extrinsèque au travail (EMIET) est une mesure à 18 items de la motivation au travail ayant pour fondation théorique la théorie d'autodétermination (
Deci & Ryan, 2000
). La présente recherche s'organisaient avait deux objectifs. Premièrement, l'applicabilité de l'EMIET a été testée dans différents milieux de travail. Deuxièmement, sa structure ainsi que ses propriétés psychométriques ont été mesurées. Deux échantillons de travailleurs (militaires :
N
= 465; civils :
N
= 192) volontaires ont rempli les questionnaires. En utilisant les indexes de l'EMIET 3 (respectivement, l'index d'autodétermination au travail, de motivation au travail autodéterminée et non autodéterminée), les résultats des analyses de régression ont appuyé sa capacité prédictive de critères positifs et négatifs au travail. Les résultats ont aussi montré l'adéquation de sa validité de construit et de sa consistance interne. Sa structure factorielle était aussi constante à travers les groupes. Finalement, son patron quasi-simplex et ses relations avec des corrélats psychologiques sont davantage venus appuyer le continuum d'autodétermination. En somme, ces résultats fournissent des appuis pour l'applicabilité, la fidélité et la validité de l'EMIET en milieu de travail.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/a0015167</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-400X |
ispartof | Canadian journal of behavioural science, 2009-10, Vol.41 (4), p.213-226 |
issn | 0008-400X 1879-2669 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614508321 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Employee Motivation Experimentation Extrinsic Motivation Factor Structure Female Human Industrial and Organizational Psychology Intrinsic Motivation Male Motivation Occupational psychology Organization theory Organizational behavior Psychometrics Self-Determination Test Validity Working Conditions |
title | Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T12%3A14%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Work%20Extrinsic%20and%20Intrinsic%20Motivation%20Scale:%20Its%20Value%20for%20Organizational%20Psychology%20Research&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20behavioural%20science&rft.au=Tremblay,%20Maxime%20A&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=213-226&rft.issn=0008-400X&rft.eissn=1879-2669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0015167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614508321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220498089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |