Review of: Feminist Visions of Gender Similarities and Differences
Reviews the book, Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences by Meredith M. Kimball (see record 1995-99017-000). One purpose of the author in writing this book is to explore a central schism within feminist psychology, a schism that bifurcates the feminist psychology community. On the o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne 1999-08, Vol.40 (3), p.283-284 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 284 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 283 |
container_title | Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | PYKE, SANDRA W. |
description | Reviews the book, Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences by Meredith M. Kimball (see record 1995-99017-000). One purpose of the author in writing this book is to explore a central schism within feminist psychology, a schism that bifurcates the feminist psychology community. On the one hand, we have the minimalists, those who argue that the differences between the genders are nonexistent or are modest and irrelevant in most contexts. These are the equal-rights feminists, adherents of the similarities school. On the other hand, we find the maximalists who contend that indeed the genders are quite different on many dimensions and that the qualities of women are important, significant and of value. These are the essentialists, disciples of the differences school. In fleshing out the nature of these two perspectives, Professor Kimball observes the extent of the impact of each view in terms of influencing questions asked, methodologies chosen, theories preferred, and political goals articulated. In her typically even-handed treatment of issues, Kimball also presents the deficiencies of each approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0092510 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614505243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614505243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1253-94515b9546cd669225304e878c3894ce93fbc8031928157423488841b2f8876f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLAzEUhYMoWKvgTxjEhSCjN6-ZxJ1WW4WC4Gsb0vQGU6YzYzJV-u-dUl0Irg4cPs695xByTOGCAi8v3wE0kxR2yICqUuUlB7FLBlCCyqXUdJ8cpLQAAEZpOSA3T_gZ8Ctr_FU2xmWoQ-qyt5BCU6fezCZYzzFmz2EZKhtDFzBltp5nt8F7jFg7TIdkz9sq4dGPDsnr-O5ldJ9PHycPo-tpbimTPNdCUjnTUhRuXhSa9R4I7F90XGnhUHM_cwo41UxRWQrGhVJK0BnzSpWF50Nyss1tY_OxwtSZRbOKdX_SFFRIkEzwHjrbQi42KUX0po1haePaUDCbgczvQD16vkVta02b1s7GLrgKk1vFvllnnG2NAMMNU5vg0__pv9g3kS1wZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614505243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of: Feminist Visions of Gender Similarities and Differences</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>PYKE, SANDRA W.</creator><contributor>Cantano, Victor</contributor><creatorcontrib>PYKE, SANDRA W. ; Cantano, Victor</creatorcontrib><description>Reviews the book, Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences by Meredith M. Kimball (see record 1995-99017-000). One purpose of the author in writing this book is to explore a central schism within feminist psychology, a schism that bifurcates the feminist psychology community. On the one hand, we have the minimalists, those who argue that the differences between the genders are nonexistent or are modest and irrelevant in most contexts. These are the equal-rights feminists, adherents of the similarities school. On the other hand, we find the maximalists who contend that indeed the genders are quite different on many dimensions and that the qualities of women are important, significant and of value. These are the essentialists, disciples of the differences school. In fleshing out the nature of these two perspectives, Professor Kimball observes the extent of the impact of each view in terms of influencing questions asked, methodologies chosen, theories preferred, and political goals articulated. In her typically even-handed treatment of issues, Kimball also presents the deficiencies of each approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0708-5591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0092510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canadian Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Female ; Feminism ; Feminist Psychology ; Human ; Human Sex Differences</subject><ispartof>Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 1999-08, Vol.40 (3), p.283-284</ispartof><rights>1999 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,27899,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Cantano, Victor</contributor><creatorcontrib>PYKE, SANDRA W.</creatorcontrib><title>Review of: Feminist Visions of Gender Similarities and Differences</title><title>Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne</title><description>Reviews the book, Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences by Meredith M. Kimball (see record 1995-99017-000). One purpose of the author in writing this book is to explore a central schism within feminist psychology, a schism that bifurcates the feminist psychology community. On the one hand, we have the minimalists, those who argue that the differences between the genders are nonexistent or are modest and irrelevant in most contexts. These are the equal-rights feminists, adherents of the similarities school. On the other hand, we find the maximalists who contend that indeed the genders are quite different on many dimensions and that the qualities of women are important, significant and of value. These are the essentialists, disciples of the differences school. In fleshing out the nature of these two perspectives, Professor Kimball observes the extent of the impact of each view in terms of influencing questions asked, methodologies chosen, theories preferred, and political goals articulated. In her typically even-handed treatment of issues, Kimball also presents the deficiencies of each approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Feminist Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Sex Differences</subject><issn>0708-5591</issn><issn>1878-7304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEtLAzEUhYMoWKvgTxjEhSCjN6-ZxJ1WW4WC4Gsb0vQGU6YzYzJV-u-dUl0Irg4cPs695xByTOGCAi8v3wE0kxR2yICqUuUlB7FLBlCCyqXUdJ8cpLQAAEZpOSA3T_gZ8Ctr_FU2xmWoQ-qyt5BCU6fezCZYzzFmz2EZKhtDFzBltp5nt8F7jFg7TIdkz9sq4dGPDsnr-O5ldJ9PHycPo-tpbimTPNdCUjnTUhRuXhSa9R4I7F90XGnhUHM_cwo41UxRWQrGhVJK0BnzSpWF50Nyss1tY_OxwtSZRbOKdX_SFFRIkEzwHjrbQi42KUX0po1haePaUDCbgczvQD16vkVta02b1s7GLrgKk1vFvllnnG2NAMMNU5vg0__pv9g3kS1wZQ</recordid><startdate>199908</startdate><enddate>199908</enddate><creator>PYKE, SANDRA W.</creator><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199908</creationdate><title>Review of: Feminist Visions of Gender Similarities and Differences</title><author>PYKE, SANDRA W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1253-94515b9546cd669225304e878c3894ce93fbc8031928157423488841b2f8876f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Feminist Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Sex Differences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PYKE, SANDRA W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PYKE, SANDRA W.</au><au>Cantano, Victor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of: Feminist Visions of Gender Similarities and Differences</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne</jtitle><date>1999-08</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>283-284</pages><issn>0708-5591</issn><eissn>1878-7304</eissn><abstract>Reviews the book, Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences by Meredith M. Kimball (see record 1995-99017-000). One purpose of the author in writing this book is to explore a central schism within feminist psychology, a schism that bifurcates the feminist psychology community. On the one hand, we have the minimalists, those who argue that the differences between the genders are nonexistent or are modest and irrelevant in most contexts. These are the equal-rights feminists, adherents of the similarities school. On the other hand, we find the maximalists who contend that indeed the genders are quite different on many dimensions and that the qualities of women are important, significant and of value. These are the essentialists, disciples of the differences school. In fleshing out the nature of these two perspectives, Professor Kimball observes the extent of the impact of each view in terms of influencing questions asked, methodologies chosen, theories preferred, and political goals articulated. In her typically even-handed treatment of issues, Kimball also presents the deficiencies of each approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</abstract><pub>Canadian Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0092510</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0708-5591 |
ispartof | Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 1999-08, Vol.40 (3), p.283-284 |
issn | 0708-5591 1878-7304 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614505243 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Female Feminism Feminist Psychology Human Human Sex Differences |
title | Review of: Feminist Visions of Gender Similarities and Differences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of:%20Feminist%20Visions%20of%20Gender%20Similarities%20and%20Differences&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Psychology/Psychologie%20canadienne&rft.au=PYKE,%20SANDRA%20W.&rft.date=1999-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=283-284&rft.issn=0708-5591&rft.eissn=1878-7304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0092510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614505243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614505243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |