Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements
Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psyc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 2004-12, Vol.35 (6), p.563-570 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 570 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 563 |
container_title | Professional psychology, research and practice |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Wampold, Bruce E Bhati, Kuldhir S |
description | Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psychologists have been ignored. It is shown that the evidence-based movements (a) overemphasize treatments and treatment differences and (b) ignore aspects of psychotherapy that have been shown to be related to outcome, such as variation among psychologists, the relationship, and other common factors. It is important that psychologists understand the development of these movements so that they can be critical consumers of research and can effectively influence the future course of events. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614465261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>789757351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a330t-12fd6db4fc67eb9f26bef7c20bf5d83c650991f92ff947fcfa10052a8acff4fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqXwBzpViDXh7IudeKwqKEiVusBsOY4PUrVJiN2h_x5XRbAxfct7d9JjbMYh54DlI5QosxJElaPMVS4VXrAJ16gzjgIv2eQXuGY3IWwBABHlhM0WMfquabuPeezn8dPPN_s2hLbvwi27IrsL_u5np-z9-elt-ZKtN6vX5WKdWUSIGRfUqKYuyKnS15qEqj2VTkBNsqnQKQlac9KCSBclObIcQApbWUeULJyy-_PdYey_Dj5Es-0PY5deGsWLQkmh-H-QEEWlZAEiQeIMubEPYfRkhrHd2_FoOJhTJ3PKYE4ZTFplUqckPZwlO1gzhKOzY2zdzock93_YN2G8ZcU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614465261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Wampold, Bruce E ; Bhati, Kuldhir S</creator><creatorcontrib>Wampold, Bruce E ; Bhati, Kuldhir S</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psychologists have been ignored. It is shown that the evidence-based movements (a) overemphasize treatments and treatment differences and (b) ignore aspects of psychotherapy that have been shown to be related to outcome, such as variation among psychologists, the relationship, and other common factors. It is important that psychologists understand the development of these movements so that they can be critical consumers of research and can effectively influence the future course of events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Evidence Based Practice ; History ; Human ; Practice ; Professional practice ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Professional psychology, research and practice, 2004-12, Vol.35 (6), p.563-570</ispartof><rights>2004 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2004</rights><rights>2004, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a330t-12fd6db4fc67eb9f26bef7c20bf5d83c650991f92ff947fcfa10052a8acff4fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a330t-12fd6db4fc67eb9f26bef7c20bf5d83c650991f92ff947fcfa10052a8acff4fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wampold, Bruce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhati, Kuldhir S</creatorcontrib><title>Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements</title><title>Professional psychology, research and practice</title><description>Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psychologists have been ignored. It is shown that the evidence-based movements (a) overemphasize treatments and treatment differences and (b) ignore aspects of psychotherapy that have been shown to be related to outcome, such as variation among psychologists, the relationship, and other common factors. It is important that psychologists understand the development of these movements so that they can be critical consumers of research and can effectively influence the future course of events.</description><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0735-7028</issn><issn>1939-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqXwBzpViDXh7IudeKwqKEiVusBsOY4PUrVJiN2h_x5XRbAxfct7d9JjbMYh54DlI5QosxJElaPMVS4VXrAJ16gzjgIv2eQXuGY3IWwBABHlhM0WMfquabuPeezn8dPPN_s2hLbvwi27IrsL_u5np-z9-elt-ZKtN6vX5WKdWUSIGRfUqKYuyKnS15qEqj2VTkBNsqnQKQlac9KCSBclObIcQApbWUeULJyy-_PdYey_Dj5Es-0PY5deGsWLQkmh-H-QEEWlZAEiQeIMubEPYfRkhrHd2_FoOJhTJ3PKYE4ZTFplUqckPZwlO1gzhKOzY2zdzock93_YN2G8ZcU</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Wampold, Bruce E</creator><creator>Bhati, Kuldhir S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Attending to the Omissions</title><author>Wampold, Bruce E ; Bhati, Kuldhir S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a330t-12fd6db4fc67eb9f26bef7c20bf5d83c650991f92ff947fcfa10052a8acff4fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wampold, Bruce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhati, Kuldhir S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wampold, Bruce E</au><au>Bhati, Kuldhir S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements</atitle><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>563-570</pages><issn>0735-7028</issn><eissn>1939-1323</eissn><abstract>Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psychologists have been ignored. It is shown that the evidence-based movements (a) overemphasize treatments and treatment differences and (b) ignore aspects of psychotherapy that have been shown to be related to outcome, such as variation among psychologists, the relationship, and other common factors. It is important that psychologists understand the development of these movements so that they can be critical consumers of research and can effectively influence the future course of events.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-7028 |
ispartof | Professional psychology, research and practice, 2004-12, Vol.35 (6), p.563-570 |
issn | 0735-7028 1939-1323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614465261 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Evidence Based Practice History Human Practice Professional practice Psychologists Psychology Treatment |
title | Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attending%20to%20the%20Omissions:%20A%20Historical%20Examination%20of%20Evidence-Based%20Practice%20Movements&rft.jtitle=Professional%20psychology,%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=Wampold,%20Bruce%20E&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=563-570&rft.issn=0735-7028&rft.eissn=1939-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E789757351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614465261&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |