Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements

Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psyc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 2004-12, Vol.35 (6), p.563-570
Hauptverfasser: Wampold, Bruce E, Bhati, Kuldhir S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 570
container_issue 6
container_start_page 563
container_title Professional psychology, research and practice
container_volume 35
creator Wampold, Bruce E
Bhati, Kuldhir S
description Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psychologists have been ignored. It is shown that the evidence-based movements (a) overemphasize treatments and treatment differences and (b) ignore aspects of psychotherapy that have been shown to be related to outcome, such as variation among psychologists, the relationship, and other common factors. It is important that psychologists understand the development of these movements so that they can be critical consumers of research and can effectively influence the future course of events.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614465261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>789757351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a330t-12fd6db4fc67eb9f26bef7c20bf5d83c650991f92ff947fcfa10052a8acff4fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqXwBzpViDXh7IudeKwqKEiVusBsOY4PUrVJiN2h_x5XRbAxfct7d9JjbMYh54DlI5QosxJElaPMVS4VXrAJ16gzjgIv2eQXuGY3IWwBABHlhM0WMfquabuPeezn8dPPN_s2hLbvwi27IrsL_u5np-z9-elt-ZKtN6vX5WKdWUSIGRfUqKYuyKnS15qEqj2VTkBNsqnQKQlac9KCSBclObIcQApbWUeULJyy-_PdYey_Dj5Es-0PY5deGsWLQkmh-H-QEEWlZAEiQeIMubEPYfRkhrHd2_FoOJhTJ3PKYE4ZTFplUqckPZwlO1gzhKOzY2zdzock93_YN2G8ZcU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614465261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Wampold, Bruce E ; Bhati, Kuldhir S</creator><creatorcontrib>Wampold, Bruce E ; Bhati, Kuldhir S</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psychologists have been ignored. It is shown that the evidence-based movements (a) overemphasize treatments and treatment differences and (b) ignore aspects of psychotherapy that have been shown to be related to outcome, such as variation among psychologists, the relationship, and other common factors. It is important that psychologists understand the development of these movements so that they can be critical consumers of research and can effectively influence the future course of events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Evidence Based Practice ; History ; Human ; Practice ; Professional practice ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Professional psychology, research and practice, 2004-12, Vol.35 (6), p.563-570</ispartof><rights>2004 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2004</rights><rights>2004, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a330t-12fd6db4fc67eb9f26bef7c20bf5d83c650991f92ff947fcfa10052a8acff4fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a330t-12fd6db4fc67eb9f26bef7c20bf5d83c650991f92ff947fcfa10052a8acff4fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wampold, Bruce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhati, Kuldhir S</creatorcontrib><title>Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements</title><title>Professional psychology, research and practice</title><description>Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psychologists have been ignored. It is shown that the evidence-based movements (a) overemphasize treatments and treatment differences and (b) ignore aspects of psychotherapy that have been shown to be related to outcome, such as variation among psychologists, the relationship, and other common factors. It is important that psychologists understand the development of these movements so that they can be critical consumers of research and can effectively influence the future course of events.</description><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0735-7028</issn><issn>1939-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqXwBzpViDXh7IudeKwqKEiVusBsOY4PUrVJiN2h_x5XRbAxfct7d9JjbMYh54DlI5QosxJElaPMVS4VXrAJ16gzjgIv2eQXuGY3IWwBABHlhM0WMfquabuPeezn8dPPN_s2hLbvwi27IrsL_u5np-z9-elt-ZKtN6vX5WKdWUSIGRfUqKYuyKnS15qEqj2VTkBNsqnQKQlac9KCSBclObIcQApbWUeULJyy-_PdYey_Dj5Es-0PY5deGsWLQkmh-H-QEEWlZAEiQeIMubEPYfRkhrHd2_FoOJhTJ3PKYE4ZTFplUqckPZwlO1gzhKOzY2zdzock93_YN2G8ZcU</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Wampold, Bruce E</creator><creator>Bhati, Kuldhir S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Attending to the Omissions</title><author>Wampold, Bruce E ; Bhati, Kuldhir S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a330t-12fd6db4fc67eb9f26bef7c20bf5d83c650991f92ff947fcfa10052a8acff4fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wampold, Bruce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhati, Kuldhir S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wampold, Bruce E</au><au>Bhati, Kuldhir S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements</atitle><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>563-570</pages><issn>0735-7028</issn><eissn>1939-1323</eissn><abstract>Evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatment movements are potent forces that affect the practice of psychology today and have the potential to mandate the types of treatments psychologists conduct. The histories of these movements reveal that certain aspects of therapy valued by psychologists have been ignored. It is shown that the evidence-based movements (a) overemphasize treatments and treatment differences and (b) ignore aspects of psychotherapy that have been shown to be related to outcome, such as variation among psychologists, the relationship, and other common factors. It is important that psychologists understand the development of these movements so that they can be critical consumers of research and can effectively influence the future course of events.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-7028
ispartof Professional psychology, research and practice, 2004-12, Vol.35 (6), p.563-570
issn 0735-7028
1939-1323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614465261
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Evidence Based Practice
History
Human
Practice
Professional practice
Psychologists
Psychology
Treatment
title Attending to the Omissions: A Historical Examination of Evidence-Based Practice Movements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attending%20to%20the%20Omissions:%20A%20Historical%20Examination%20of%20Evidence-Based%20Practice%20Movements&rft.jtitle=Professional%20psychology,%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=Wampold,%20Bruce%20E&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=563-570&rft.issn=0735-7028&rft.eissn=1939-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E789757351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614465261&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true