Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies

In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology 2006, Vol.26 (1-2), p.1-17
1. Verfasser: Kirschner, Suzanne R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology
container_volume 26
creator Kirschner, Suzanne R.
description In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are discussed. Two drawbacks of unified theories are then explored, along with the virtues of multiplicity. First, the assertion of a single perspective on psychological reality unduly limits the possibilities for usefully conceptualizing and engaging with the world; it can also hamper critical reflection on the sociocultural embedded-ness of psychologists' theories and practices. Second, the type of unified theory likely to achieve hegemony will not be congenial to sociocultural theories and methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0091264
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614463692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614463692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-928dae9ba21fc24e8c277a34fb3d74de814e092df920a27836ffdfaff2f6bb803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LwzAch4MoWKfgRwievFSTf9K87CbDqTDQwzyHNC-2o1tr0iL79k7mTr_Lw--BB6FbSh4oYfKxIURTEPwMFUArWjLG6TkqKBGqVFzSS3SV84YQUVUKCjT_yHvX9F3_tcd25_HQTcl2bd7O8br_scnjsQl4OEGtsx3O4-TbkK_RRbRdDjf_O0Ofy-f14rVcvb-8LZ5WpYOKj6UG5W3QtQUaHfCgHEhpGY8185L7oCgPRIOPGogFqZiI0UcbI0RR14qwGbo7_g6p_55CHs2mn9LuoDSCci6Y0HCA7o-QS33OKUQzpHZr095QYv7CmFMY9gvnc1WC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614463692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are discussed. Two drawbacks of unified theories are then explored, along with the virtues of multiplicity. First, the assertion of a single perspective on psychological reality unduly limits the possibilities for usefully conceptualizing and engaging with the world; it can also hamper critical reflection on the sociocultural embedded-ness of psychologists' theories and practices. Second, the type of unified theory likely to achieve hegemony will not be congenial to sociocultural theories and methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-8471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-3341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0091264</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Human ; Psychological Theories ; Psychology ; Sociocultural Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology, 2006, Vol.26 (1-2), p.1-17</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-928dae9ba21fc24e8c277a34fb3d74de814e092df920a27836ffdfaff2f6bb803</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies</title><title>Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology</title><description>In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are discussed. Two drawbacks of unified theories are then explored, along with the virtues of multiplicity. First, the assertion of a single perspective on psychological reality unduly limits the possibilities for usefully conceptualizing and engaging with the world; it can also hamper critical reflection on the sociocultural embedded-ness of psychologists' theories and practices. Second, the type of unified theory likely to achieve hegemony will not be congenial to sociocultural theories and methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Psychological Theories</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Sociocultural Factors</subject><issn>1068-8471</issn><issn>2151-3341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE1LwzAch4MoWKfgRwievFSTf9K87CbDqTDQwzyHNC-2o1tr0iL79k7mTr_Lw--BB6FbSh4oYfKxIURTEPwMFUArWjLG6TkqKBGqVFzSS3SV84YQUVUKCjT_yHvX9F3_tcd25_HQTcl2bd7O8br_scnjsQl4OEGtsx3O4-TbkK_RRbRdDjf_O0Ofy-f14rVcvb-8LZ5WpYOKj6UG5W3QtQUaHfCgHEhpGY8185L7oCgPRIOPGogFqZiI0UcbI0RR14qwGbo7_g6p_55CHs2mn9LuoDSCci6Y0HCA7o-QS33OKUQzpHZr095QYv7CmFMY9gvnc1WC</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies</title><author>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-928dae9ba21fc24e8c277a34fb3d74de814e092df920a27836ffdfaff2f6bb803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Psychological Theories</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Sociocultural Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>1068-8471</issn><eissn>2151-3341</eissn><abstract>In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are discussed. Two drawbacks of unified theories are then explored, along with the virtues of multiplicity. First, the assertion of a single perspective on psychological reality unduly limits the possibilities for usefully conceptualizing and engaging with the world; it can also hamper critical reflection on the sociocultural embedded-ness of psychologists' theories and practices. Second, the type of unified theory likely to achieve hegemony will not be congenial to sociocultural theories and methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</abstract><doi>10.1037/h0091264</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-8471
ispartof Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology, 2006, Vol.26 (1-2), p.1-17
issn 1068-8471
2151-3341
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614463692
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Human
Psychological Theories
Psychology
Sociocultural Factors
title Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A55%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychology%20and%20pluralism:%20Toward%20the%20psychological%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20and%20philosophical%20psychology&rft.au=Kirschner,%20Suzanne%20R.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=1068-8471&rft.eissn=2151-3341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0091264&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614463692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614463692&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true