Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies
In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology 2006, Vol.26 (1-2), p.1-17 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Kirschner, Suzanne R. |
description | In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are discussed. Two drawbacks of unified theories are then explored, along with the virtues of multiplicity. First, the assertion of a single perspective on psychological reality unduly limits the possibilities for usefully conceptualizing and engaging with the world; it can also hamper critical reflection on the sociocultural embedded-ness of psychologists' theories and practices. Second, the type of unified theory likely to achieve hegemony will not be congenial to sociocultural theories and methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0091264 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614463692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614463692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-928dae9ba21fc24e8c277a34fb3d74de814e092df920a27836ffdfaff2f6bb803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LwzAch4MoWKfgRwievFSTf9K87CbDqTDQwzyHNC-2o1tr0iL79k7mTr_Lw--BB6FbSh4oYfKxIURTEPwMFUArWjLG6TkqKBGqVFzSS3SV84YQUVUKCjT_yHvX9F3_tcd25_HQTcl2bd7O8br_scnjsQl4OEGtsx3O4-TbkK_RRbRdDjf_O0Ofy-f14rVcvb-8LZ5WpYOKj6UG5W3QtQUaHfCgHEhpGY8185L7oCgPRIOPGogFqZiI0UcbI0RR14qwGbo7_g6p_55CHs2mn9LuoDSCci6Y0HCA7o-QS33OKUQzpHZr095QYv7CmFMY9gvnc1WC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614463692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are discussed. Two drawbacks of unified theories are then explored, along with the virtues of multiplicity. First, the assertion of a single perspective on psychological reality unduly limits the possibilities for usefully conceptualizing and engaging with the world; it can also hamper critical reflection on the sociocultural embedded-ness of psychologists' theories and practices. Second, the type of unified theory likely to achieve hegemony will not be congenial to sociocultural theories and methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-8471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-3341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0091264</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Human ; Psychological Theories ; Psychology ; Sociocultural Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology, 2006, Vol.26 (1-2), p.1-17</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-928dae9ba21fc24e8c277a34fb3d74de814e092df920a27836ffdfaff2f6bb803</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies</title><title>Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology</title><description>In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are discussed. Two drawbacks of unified theories are then explored, along with the virtues of multiplicity. First, the assertion of a single perspective on psychological reality unduly limits the possibilities for usefully conceptualizing and engaging with the world; it can also hamper critical reflection on the sociocultural embedded-ness of psychologists' theories and practices. Second, the type of unified theory likely to achieve hegemony will not be congenial to sociocultural theories and methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Psychological Theories</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Sociocultural Factors</subject><issn>1068-8471</issn><issn>2151-3341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE1LwzAch4MoWKfgRwievFSTf9K87CbDqTDQwzyHNC-2o1tr0iL79k7mTr_Lw--BB6FbSh4oYfKxIURTEPwMFUArWjLG6TkqKBGqVFzSS3SV84YQUVUKCjT_yHvX9F3_tcd25_HQTcl2bd7O8br_scnjsQl4OEGtsx3O4-TbkK_RRbRdDjf_O0Ofy-f14rVcvb-8LZ5WpYOKj6UG5W3QtQUaHfCgHEhpGY8185L7oCgPRIOPGogFqZiI0UcbI0RR14qwGbo7_g6p_55CHs2mn9LuoDSCci6Y0HCA7o-QS33OKUQzpHZr095QYv7CmFMY9gvnc1WC</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies</title><author>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-928dae9ba21fc24e8c277a34fb3d74de814e092df920a27836ffdfaff2f6bb803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Psychological Theories</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Sociocultural Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirschner, Suzanne R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>1068-8471</issn><eissn>2151-3341</eissn><abstract>In this paper, it is argued that efforts to devise a unified theory of psychological knowledge are problematic, and that the cultivation of multiple theoretical lenses contributes to a more useful and self-aware psychology. Various forms of unificationism, and the rationales behind such efforts, are discussed. Two drawbacks of unified theories are then explored, along with the virtues of multiplicity. First, the assertion of a single perspective on psychological reality unduly limits the possibilities for usefully conceptualizing and engaging with the world; it can also hamper critical reflection on the sociocultural embedded-ness of psychologists' theories and practices. Second, the type of unified theory likely to achieve hegemony will not be congenial to sociocultural theories and methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</abstract><doi>10.1037/h0091264</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-8471 |
ispartof | Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology, 2006, Vol.26 (1-2), p.1-17 |
issn | 1068-8471 2151-3341 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614463692 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Human Psychological Theories Psychology Sociocultural Factors |
title | Psychology and pluralism: Toward the psychological studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A55%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychology%20and%20pluralism:%20Toward%20the%20psychological%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20and%20philosophical%20psychology&rft.au=Kirschner,%20Suzanne%20R.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=1068-8471&rft.eissn=2151-3341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0091264&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614463692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614463692&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |