Effects of a Cognitive Adjunct Procedure Within a Microtraining Situation

The present study examined the generalization effects of three methods of counselor training: cognitive-behavioral (CB), behavioral (B), and programmed learning (PL). Each of 45 low-scoring females, prescreened on empathic communication, was randomly assigned to one of these groups. The CB and B gro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of counseling psychology 1981-03, Vol.28 (2), p.168-175
Hauptverfasser: Richardson, Barbara, Stone, Gerald L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 175
container_issue 2
container_start_page 168
container_title Journal of counseling psychology
container_volume 28
creator Richardson, Barbara
Stone, Gerald L
description The present study examined the generalization effects of three methods of counselor training: cognitive-behavioral (CB), behavioral (B), and programmed learning (PL). Each of 45 low-scoring females, prescreened on empathic communication, was randomly assigned to one of these groups. The CB and B groups received training via manuals, videotapes, and individual supervision, whereas the PL group received programmed manuals only. The CB group was exposed to cognitive strategies in addition to the skill acquisition content of the B and PL groups. Each trainee completed an interview before, after, and 4 weeks after training. The effects of training on different communication skills were examined and assessed by interview, written, and self-report measures. Findings indicated that the CB group was more empathic at posttraining and demonstrated better communication skills than the PL group at follow-up. The B group generally fell in the intermediate position between the CB and PL groups. These findings are discussed in terms of different cognitive strategies and the benefits of programmed manuals within microtraining.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0077969
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614441374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1301128842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a224t-f311d1058fe7b52bece8f44170b465864422aa7f06c7c30fe54ea5c1552a27a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKAzEUBdAgCtYq-AmDunAzmpdkJpllKVULFQUVlyGTJm1KnYxJRujfG6kuXb3N4V7eRegc8A1gym_XGHPe1M0BGkFDm5JALQ7RCGNCSgw1P0YnMW4wBkZFM0LzmbVGp1h4W6hi6ledS-7LFJPlZuh0Kp6D12Y5BFO8u7R2XUaPTgefgnKd61bFi0uDSs53p-jIqm00Z793jN7uZq_Th3LxdD-fThalIoSl0lKAJeBKWMPbirRGG2EZA45bVleiZowQpbjFteaaYmsqZlSloaqIIlxxOkYX-9w--M_BxCQ3fghdrpQ1sJxEOcvo8j8EFAMQIRjJ6nqv8kMxBmNlH9yHCjsJWP6sKf_WzPRqT1WvZB93WoXk9NZEqf0giZBE5qHpN0bbcW4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614441374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of a Cognitive Adjunct Procedure Within a Microtraining Situation</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Richardson, Barbara ; Stone, Gerald L</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara ; Stone, Gerald L</creatorcontrib><description>The present study examined the generalization effects of three methods of counselor training: cognitive-behavioral (CB), behavioral (B), and programmed learning (PL). Each of 45 low-scoring females, prescreened on empathic communication, was randomly assigned to one of these groups. The CB and B groups received training via manuals, videotapes, and individual supervision, whereas the PL group received programmed manuals only. The CB group was exposed to cognitive strategies in addition to the skill acquisition content of the B and PL groups. Each trainee completed an interview before, after, and 4 weeks after training. The effects of training on different communication skills were examined and assessed by interview, written, and self-report measures. Findings indicated that the CB group was more empathic at posttraining and demonstrated better communication skills than the PL group at follow-up. The B group generally fell in the intermediate position between the CB and PL groups. These findings are discussed in terms of different cognitive strategies and the benefits of programmed manuals within microtraining.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0077969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Cognitive Techniques ; Counselor Education ; Counselor Trainees ; Female ; Generalization (Learning) ; Microcounseling ; Programmed Instruction</subject><ispartof>Journal of counseling psychology, 1981-03, Vol.28 (2), p.168-175</ispartof><rights>1981 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1981, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a224t-f311d1058fe7b52bece8f44170b465864422aa7f06c7c30fe54ea5c1552a27a73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Gerald L</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of a Cognitive Adjunct Procedure Within a Microtraining Situation</title><title>Journal of counseling psychology</title><description>The present study examined the generalization effects of three methods of counselor training: cognitive-behavioral (CB), behavioral (B), and programmed learning (PL). Each of 45 low-scoring females, prescreened on empathic communication, was randomly assigned to one of these groups. The CB and B groups received training via manuals, videotapes, and individual supervision, whereas the PL group received programmed manuals only. The CB group was exposed to cognitive strategies in addition to the skill acquisition content of the B and PL groups. Each trainee completed an interview before, after, and 4 weeks after training. The effects of training on different communication skills were examined and assessed by interview, written, and self-report measures. Findings indicated that the CB group was more empathic at posttraining and demonstrated better communication skills than the PL group at follow-up. The B group generally fell in the intermediate position between the CB and PL groups. These findings are discussed in terms of different cognitive strategies and the benefits of programmed manuals within microtraining.</description><subject>Cognitive Techniques</subject><subject>Counselor Education</subject><subject>Counselor Trainees</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Generalization (Learning)</subject><subject>Microcounseling</subject><subject>Programmed Instruction</subject><issn>0022-0167</issn><issn>1939-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFKAzEUBdAgCtYq-AmDunAzmpdkJpllKVULFQUVlyGTJm1KnYxJRujfG6kuXb3N4V7eRegc8A1gym_XGHPe1M0BGkFDm5JALQ7RCGNCSgw1P0YnMW4wBkZFM0LzmbVGp1h4W6hi6ledS-7LFJPlZuh0Kp6D12Y5BFO8u7R2XUaPTgefgnKd61bFi0uDSs53p-jIqm00Z793jN7uZq_Th3LxdD-fThalIoSl0lKAJeBKWMPbirRGG2EZA45bVleiZowQpbjFteaaYmsqZlSloaqIIlxxOkYX-9w--M_BxCQ3fghdrpQ1sJxEOcvo8j8EFAMQIRjJ6nqv8kMxBmNlH9yHCjsJWP6sKf_WzPRqT1WvZB93WoXk9NZEqf0giZBE5qHpN0bbcW4</recordid><startdate>198103</startdate><enddate>198103</enddate><creator>Richardson, Barbara</creator><creator>Stone, Gerald L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198103</creationdate><title>Effects of a Cognitive Adjunct Procedure Within a Microtraining Situation</title><author>Richardson, Barbara ; Stone, Gerald L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a224t-f311d1058fe7b52bece8f44170b465864422aa7f06c7c30fe54ea5c1552a27a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Techniques</topic><topic>Counselor Education</topic><topic>Counselor Trainees</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Generalization (Learning)</topic><topic>Microcounseling</topic><topic>Programmed Instruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Gerald L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Barbara</au><au>Stone, Gerald L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of a Cognitive Adjunct Procedure Within a Microtraining Situation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle><date>1981-03</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>168-175</pages><issn>0022-0167</issn><eissn>1939-2168</eissn><abstract>The present study examined the generalization effects of three methods of counselor training: cognitive-behavioral (CB), behavioral (B), and programmed learning (PL). Each of 45 low-scoring females, prescreened on empathic communication, was randomly assigned to one of these groups. The CB and B groups received training via manuals, videotapes, and individual supervision, whereas the PL group received programmed manuals only. The CB group was exposed to cognitive strategies in addition to the skill acquisition content of the B and PL groups. Each trainee completed an interview before, after, and 4 weeks after training. The effects of training on different communication skills were examined and assessed by interview, written, and self-report measures. Findings indicated that the CB group was more empathic at posttraining and demonstrated better communication skills than the PL group at follow-up. The B group generally fell in the intermediate position between the CB and PL groups. These findings are discussed in terms of different cognitive strategies and the benefits of programmed manuals within microtraining.</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0077969</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0167
ispartof Journal of counseling psychology, 1981-03, Vol.28 (2), p.168-175
issn 0022-0167
1939-2168
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614441374
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Cognitive Techniques
Counselor Education
Counselor Trainees
Female
Generalization (Learning)
Microcounseling
Programmed Instruction
title Effects of a Cognitive Adjunct Procedure Within a Microtraining Situation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A38%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20a%20Cognitive%20Adjunct%20Procedure%20Within%20a%20Microtraining%20Situation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20counseling%20psychology&rft.au=Richardson,%20Barbara&rft.date=1981-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=168-175&rft.issn=0022-0167&rft.eissn=1939-2168&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0077969&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1301128842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614441374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true