Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence

Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by Ruffman et al. (1993) , Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Swiss journal of psychology 2005-09, Vol.64 (3), p.141-152
Hauptverfasser: Koerber, Susanne, Sodian, Beate, Thoermer, Claudia, Nett, Ulrike
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 3
container_start_page 141
container_title Swiss journal of psychology
container_volume 64
creator Koerber, Susanne
Sodian, Beate
Thoermer, Claudia
Nett, Ulrike
description Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by Ruffman et al. (1993) , Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting non-covariation evidence. Experiment 2 showed that 5-year-olds could overcome this difficulty when prompted to expect no causal relationship between two variables. Experiment 2 further showed that preschoolers' evidence evaluation skills were affected by their pre-existing causal beliefs. However, their performance was above chance even when the evidence contradicted a prior belief they held with some conviction. In sum, our results demonstrate a basic understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationship in preschool children, thus contributing to a revision of the picture of the scientifically illiterate preschooler.
doi_str_mv 10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614440697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614440697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-c589484ebb5c648f17e830da00e66a256be37f39f97e220d069164692e6dfafd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouK7-A54WES_SmknSaXqUZf2ABcGPg6eQTRPNsrY1aQ_735uyCgqe5g383gzvEXIKNAfKxBUIBhkFWeQocp6DgD0yAUSWUVlW-0n_AIfkKMY1TVIin5CLJ-Nt03vnzezR6tg2vnmb-Wb22g5JzN_9pg62OSYHTm-iPfmeU_Jys3ie32XLh9v7-fUy04IWfWYKWQkp7GpVGBTSQWklp7Wm1CJqVuDK8tLxylWlZYzWFCtAgRWzWDvtaj4lZ7u7XWg_Bxt7tW6H0KSXCkEIkQxlgtgOMqGNMVinuuA_dNgqoGqsQ41p1ZhWoVA8rZBMlzuT7rTq4tbo0HuzsdEMIQXsVVx3v-nz_-m_2BfAcWy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614440697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Koerber, Susanne ; Sodian, Beate ; Thoermer, Claudia ; Nett, Ulrike</creator><contributor>Wilkening, Friedrich ; Sodian, Beate</contributor><creatorcontrib>Koerber, Susanne ; Sodian, Beate ; Thoermer, Claudia ; Nett, Ulrike ; Wilkening, Friedrich ; Sodian, Beate</creatorcontrib><description>Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by Ruffman et al. (1993) , Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting non-covariation evidence. Experiment 2 showed that 5-year-olds could overcome this difficulty when prompted to expect no causal relationship between two variables. Experiment 2 further showed that preschoolers' evidence evaluation skills were affected by their pre-existing causal beliefs. However, their performance was above chance even when the evidence contradicted a prior belief they held with some conviction. In sum, our results demonstrate a basic understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationship in preschool children, thus contributing to a revision of the picture of the scientifically illiterate preschooler.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1421-0185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-0879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Verlag Hans Huber</publisher><subject>Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive Development ; Early Childhood Development ; Evaluation ; Female ; Human ; Inductive Deductive Reasoning ; Male</subject><ispartof>Swiss journal of psychology, 2005-09, Vol.64 (3), p.141-152</ispartof><rights>2005 Verlag Hans Huber</rights><rights>2005, Verlag Hans Huber</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-c589484ebb5c648f17e830da00e66a256be37f39f97e220d069164692e6dfafd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-c589484ebb5c648f17e830da00e66a256be37f39f97e220d069164692e6dfafd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wilkening, Friedrich</contributor><contributor>Sodian, Beate</contributor><creatorcontrib>Koerber, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodian, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoermer, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nett, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><title>Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence</title><title>Swiss journal of psychology</title><description>Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by Ruffman et al. (1993) , Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting non-covariation evidence. Experiment 2 showed that 5-year-olds could overcome this difficulty when prompted to expect no causal relationship between two variables. Experiment 2 further showed that preschoolers' evidence evaluation skills were affected by their pre-existing causal beliefs. However, their performance was above chance even when the evidence contradicted a prior belief they held with some conviction. In sum, our results demonstrate a basic understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationship in preschool children, thus contributing to a revision of the picture of the scientifically illiterate preschooler.</description><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Early Childhood Development</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Inductive Deductive Reasoning</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>1421-0185</issn><issn>1662-0879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouK7-A54WES_SmknSaXqUZf2ABcGPg6eQTRPNsrY1aQ_735uyCgqe5g383gzvEXIKNAfKxBUIBhkFWeQocp6DgD0yAUSWUVlW-0n_AIfkKMY1TVIin5CLJ-Nt03vnzezR6tg2vnmb-Wb22g5JzN_9pg62OSYHTm-iPfmeU_Jys3ie32XLh9v7-fUy04IWfWYKWQkp7GpVGBTSQWklp7Wm1CJqVuDK8tLxylWlZYzWFCtAgRWzWDvtaj4lZ7u7XWg_Bxt7tW6H0KSXCkEIkQxlgtgOMqGNMVinuuA_dNgqoGqsQ41p1ZhWoVA8rZBMlzuT7rTq4tbo0HuzsdEMIQXsVVx3v-nz_-m_2BfAcWy0</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Koerber, Susanne</creator><creator>Sodian, Beate</creator><creator>Thoermer, Claudia</creator><creator>Nett, Ulrike</creator><general>Verlag Hans Huber</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Scientific Reasoning in Young Children</title><author>Koerber, Susanne ; Sodian, Beate ; Thoermer, Claudia ; Nett, Ulrike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-c589484ebb5c648f17e830da00e66a256be37f39f97e220d069164692e6dfafd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Early Childhood Development</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Inductive Deductive Reasoning</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koerber, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodian, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoermer, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nett, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Swiss journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koerber, Susanne</au><au>Sodian, Beate</au><au>Thoermer, Claudia</au><au>Nett, Ulrike</au><au>Wilkening, Friedrich</au><au>Sodian, Beate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Swiss journal of psychology</jtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>141-152</pages><issn>1421-0185</issn><eissn>1662-0879</eissn><abstract>Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by Ruffman et al. (1993) , Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting non-covariation evidence. Experiment 2 showed that 5-year-olds could overcome this difficulty when prompted to expect no causal relationship between two variables. Experiment 2 further showed that preschoolers' evidence evaluation skills were affected by their pre-existing causal beliefs. However, their performance was above chance even when the evidence contradicted a prior belief they held with some conviction. In sum, our results demonstrate a basic understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationship in preschool children, thus contributing to a revision of the picture of the scientifically illiterate preschooler.</abstract><pub>Verlag Hans Huber</pub><doi>10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1421-0185
ispartof Swiss journal of psychology, 2005-09, Vol.64 (3), p.141-152
issn 1421-0185
1662-0879
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614440697
source APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Cognitive Ability
Cognitive Development
Early Childhood Development
Evaluation
Female
Human
Inductive Deductive Reasoning
Male
title Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T16%3A48%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scientific%20Reasoning%20in%20Young%20Children:%20Preschoolers'%20Ability%20to%20Evaluate%20Covariation%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Swiss%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Koerber,%20Susanne&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=141-152&rft.issn=1421-0185&rft.eissn=1662-0879&rft_id=info:doi/10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614440697%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614440697&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true