Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence
Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by Ruffman et al. (1993) , Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Swiss journal of psychology 2005-09, Vol.64 (3), p.141-152 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 152 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Swiss journal of psychology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Koerber, Susanne Sodian, Beate Thoermer, Claudia Nett, Ulrike |
description | Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by
Ruffman et al. (1993)
, Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting non-covariation evidence. Experiment 2 showed that 5-year-olds could overcome this difficulty when prompted to expect no causal relationship between two variables. Experiment 2 further showed that preschoolers' evidence evaluation skills were affected by their pre-existing causal beliefs. However, their performance was above chance even when the evidence contradicted a prior belief they held with some conviction. In sum, our results demonstrate a basic understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationship in preschool children, thus contributing to a revision of the picture of the scientifically illiterate preschooler. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614440697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614440697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-c589484ebb5c648f17e830da00e66a256be37f39f97e220d069164692e6dfafd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouK7-A54WES_SmknSaXqUZf2ABcGPg6eQTRPNsrY1aQ_735uyCgqe5g383gzvEXIKNAfKxBUIBhkFWeQocp6DgD0yAUSWUVlW-0n_AIfkKMY1TVIin5CLJ-Nt03vnzezR6tg2vnmb-Wb22g5JzN_9pg62OSYHTm-iPfmeU_Jys3ie32XLh9v7-fUy04IWfWYKWQkp7GpVGBTSQWklp7Wm1CJqVuDK8tLxylWlZYzWFCtAgRWzWDvtaj4lZ7u7XWg_Bxt7tW6H0KSXCkEIkQxlgtgOMqGNMVinuuA_dNgqoGqsQ41p1ZhWoVA8rZBMlzuT7rTq4tbo0HuzsdEMIQXsVVx3v-nz_-m_2BfAcWy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614440697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Koerber, Susanne ; Sodian, Beate ; Thoermer, Claudia ; Nett, Ulrike</creator><contributor>Wilkening, Friedrich ; Sodian, Beate</contributor><creatorcontrib>Koerber, Susanne ; Sodian, Beate ; Thoermer, Claudia ; Nett, Ulrike ; Wilkening, Friedrich ; Sodian, Beate</creatorcontrib><description>Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by
Ruffman et al. (1993)
, Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting non-covariation evidence. Experiment 2 showed that 5-year-olds could overcome this difficulty when prompted to expect no causal relationship between two variables. Experiment 2 further showed that preschoolers' evidence evaluation skills were affected by their pre-existing causal beliefs. However, their performance was above chance even when the evidence contradicted a prior belief they held with some conviction. In sum, our results demonstrate a basic understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationship in preschool children, thus contributing to a revision of the picture of the scientifically illiterate preschooler.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1421-0185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-0879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Verlag Hans Huber</publisher><subject>Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive Development ; Early Childhood Development ; Evaluation ; Female ; Human ; Inductive Deductive Reasoning ; Male</subject><ispartof>Swiss journal of psychology, 2005-09, Vol.64 (3), p.141-152</ispartof><rights>2005 Verlag Hans Huber</rights><rights>2005, Verlag Hans Huber</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-c589484ebb5c648f17e830da00e66a256be37f39f97e220d069164692e6dfafd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-c589484ebb5c648f17e830da00e66a256be37f39f97e220d069164692e6dfafd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wilkening, Friedrich</contributor><contributor>Sodian, Beate</contributor><creatorcontrib>Koerber, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodian, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoermer, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nett, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><title>Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence</title><title>Swiss journal of psychology</title><description>Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by
Ruffman et al. (1993)
, Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting non-covariation evidence. Experiment 2 showed that 5-year-olds could overcome this difficulty when prompted to expect no causal relationship between two variables. Experiment 2 further showed that preschoolers' evidence evaluation skills were affected by their pre-existing causal beliefs. However, their performance was above chance even when the evidence contradicted a prior belief they held with some conviction. In sum, our results demonstrate a basic understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationship in preschool children, thus contributing to a revision of the picture of the scientifically illiterate preschooler.</description><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Early Childhood Development</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Inductive Deductive Reasoning</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>1421-0185</issn><issn>1662-0879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouK7-A54WES_SmknSaXqUZf2ABcGPg6eQTRPNsrY1aQ_735uyCgqe5g383gzvEXIKNAfKxBUIBhkFWeQocp6DgD0yAUSWUVlW-0n_AIfkKMY1TVIin5CLJ-Nt03vnzezR6tg2vnmb-Wb22g5JzN_9pg62OSYHTm-iPfmeU_Jys3ie32XLh9v7-fUy04IWfWYKWQkp7GpVGBTSQWklp7Wm1CJqVuDK8tLxylWlZYzWFCtAgRWzWDvtaj4lZ7u7XWg_Bxt7tW6H0KSXCkEIkQxlgtgOMqGNMVinuuA_dNgqoGqsQ41p1ZhWoVA8rZBMlzuT7rTq4tbo0HuzsdEMIQXsVVx3v-nz_-m_2BfAcWy0</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Koerber, Susanne</creator><creator>Sodian, Beate</creator><creator>Thoermer, Claudia</creator><creator>Nett, Ulrike</creator><general>Verlag Hans Huber</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Scientific Reasoning in Young Children</title><author>Koerber, Susanne ; Sodian, Beate ; Thoermer, Claudia ; Nett, Ulrike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-c589484ebb5c648f17e830da00e66a256be37f39f97e220d069164692e6dfafd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Early Childhood Development</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Inductive Deductive Reasoning</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koerber, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodian, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoermer, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nett, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Swiss journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koerber, Susanne</au><au>Sodian, Beate</au><au>Thoermer, Claudia</au><au>Nett, Ulrike</au><au>Wilkening, Friedrich</au><au>Sodian, Beate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Swiss journal of psychology</jtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>141-152</pages><issn>1421-0185</issn><eissn>1662-0879</eissn><abstract>Preschool children's basic scientific reasoning abilities were investigated in two experiments. Consistent with findings by
Ruffman et al. (1993)
, Experiment 1 showed that even 4-year-olds can evaluate patterns of covariation evidence. However, even 6-year-olds had difficulties interpreting non-covariation evidence. Experiment 2 showed that 5-year-olds could overcome this difficulty when prompted to expect no causal relationship between two variables. Experiment 2 further showed that preschoolers' evidence evaluation skills were affected by their pre-existing causal beliefs. However, their performance was above chance even when the evidence contradicted a prior belief they held with some conviction. In sum, our results demonstrate a basic understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relationship in preschool children, thus contributing to a revision of the picture of the scientifically illiterate preschooler.</abstract><pub>Verlag Hans Huber</pub><doi>10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1421-0185 |
ispartof | Swiss journal of psychology, 2005-09, Vol.64 (3), p.141-152 |
issn | 1421-0185 1662-0879 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614440697 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Cognitive Ability Cognitive Development Early Childhood Development Evaluation Female Human Inductive Deductive Reasoning Male |
title | Scientific Reasoning in Young Children: Preschoolers' Ability to Evaluate Covariation Evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T16%3A48%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scientific%20Reasoning%20in%20Young%20Children:%20Preschoolers'%20Ability%20to%20Evaluate%20Covariation%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Swiss%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Koerber,%20Susanne&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=141-152&rft.issn=1421-0185&rft.eissn=1662-0879&rft_id=info:doi/10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614440697%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614440697&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |