On the Committee vs. the Scientific Approach to Problems of Professional Training
In this letter to the editor, the author notes that the recent committee report on the "Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology" (Amer. Psychologist, 1947, 2, pp. 539-558) is admirable of its kind. The author appreciates that circumstances may occasion the issuance of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 1948-05, Vol.3 (5), p.176-177 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 177 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 176 |
| container_title | The American psychologist |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Pressey, S. L |
| description | In this letter to the editor, the author notes that the recent committee report on the "Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology" (Amer. Psychologist, 1947, 2, pp. 539-558) is admirable of its kind. The author appreciates that circumstances may occasion the issuance of a report earlier and in different form than the Committee might otherwise desire, but the issues touched on in this letter seem worth raising even if not legitimately in criticism of this report. The point of the letter is to raise the issue; as the Association increasingly takes important steps, and makes use of committees and boards for that purpose, it seems especially important that consideration be given to the mode of their operations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0060340 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614439480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1289875122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a201t-7216b455b6c9bdf36da737836c8015757390a5ce3c48d614794f161cf1de11413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKfgRwj64ktnbtMkzeMY_oPBFCfsLaRp6jLapiadsG9v5xSffDr3XH4cDgehSyATIFTcrgnhhGbkCI1AUpZISVbHaEQIoQnhfHWKzmLcDJblEkboZdHifm3xzDeN63tr8WecfH9ejbNt7ypn8LTrgtdmjXuPn4MvattE7Kv9XdkYnW91jZdBu9a17-fopNJ1tBc_OkZv93fL2WMyXzw8zabzRKcE-kSkwIuMsYIbWZQV5aUWVOSUm5wAE0xQSTQzlposLzlkQmYVcDAVlBYgAzpGV4fcodvH1sZebfw2DE2iGvCMyiwnA3T9HwRpLnPBIE0H6uZAmeBjDLZSXXCNDjsFRO1XVb-r_gXqTqsu7owOvTO1jUo3naKKKRCcfgFzR3NQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614439480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Committee vs. the Scientific Approach to Problems of Professional Training</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Pressey, S. L</creator><creatorcontrib>Pressey, S. L</creatorcontrib><description>In this letter to the editor, the author notes that the recent committee report on the "Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology" (Amer. Psychologist, 1947, 2, pp. 539-558) is admirable of its kind. The author appreciates that circumstances may occasion the issuance of a report earlier and in different form than the Committee might otherwise desire, but the issues touched on in this letter seem worth raising even if not legitimately in criticism of this report. The point of the letter is to raise the issue; as the Association increasingly takes important steps, and makes use of committees and boards for that purpose, it seems especially important that consideration be given to the mode of their operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0060340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington, Va: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Clinical Psychology ; Clinical Psychology Graduate Training ; Human ; Professional Personnel ; Scientific Communication</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 1948-05, Vol.3 (5), p.176-177</ispartof><rights>1948 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1948, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pressey, S. L</creatorcontrib><title>On the Committee vs. the Scientific Approach to Problems of Professional Training</title><title>The American psychologist</title><description>In this letter to the editor, the author notes that the recent committee report on the "Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology" (Amer. Psychologist, 1947, 2, pp. 539-558) is admirable of its kind. The author appreciates that circumstances may occasion the issuance of a report earlier and in different form than the Committee might otherwise desire, but the issues touched on in this letter seem worth raising even if not legitimately in criticism of this report. The point of the letter is to raise the issue; as the Association increasingly takes important steps, and makes use of committees and boards for that purpose, it seems especially important that consideration be given to the mode of their operations.</description><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology Graduate Training</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Professional Personnel</subject><subject>Scientific Communication</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1948</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKfgRwj64ktnbtMkzeMY_oPBFCfsLaRp6jLapiadsG9v5xSffDr3XH4cDgehSyATIFTcrgnhhGbkCI1AUpZISVbHaEQIoQnhfHWKzmLcDJblEkboZdHifm3xzDeN63tr8WecfH9ejbNt7ypn8LTrgtdmjXuPn4MvattE7Kv9XdkYnW91jZdBu9a17-fopNJ1tBc_OkZv93fL2WMyXzw8zabzRKcE-kSkwIuMsYIbWZQV5aUWVOSUm5wAE0xQSTQzlposLzlkQmYVcDAVlBYgAzpGV4fcodvH1sZebfw2DE2iGvCMyiwnA3T9HwRpLnPBIE0H6uZAmeBjDLZSXXCNDjsFRO1XVb-r_gXqTqsu7owOvTO1jUo3naKKKRCcfgFzR3NQ</recordid><startdate>19480501</startdate><enddate>19480501</enddate><creator>Pressey, S. L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19480501</creationdate><title>On the Committee vs. the Scientific Approach to Problems of Professional Training</title><author>Pressey, S. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a201t-7216b455b6c9bdf36da737836c8015757390a5ce3c48d614794f161cf1de11413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1948</creationdate><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology Graduate Training</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Professional Personnel</topic><topic>Scientific Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pressey, S. L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pressey, S. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Committee vs. the Scientific Approach to Problems of Professional Training</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><date>1948-05-01</date><risdate>1948</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>176-177</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><abstract>In this letter to the editor, the author notes that the recent committee report on the "Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology" (Amer. Psychologist, 1947, 2, pp. 539-558) is admirable of its kind. The author appreciates that circumstances may occasion the issuance of a report earlier and in different form than the Committee might otherwise desire, but the issues touched on in this letter seem worth raising even if not legitimately in criticism of this report. The point of the letter is to raise the issue; as the Association increasingly takes important steps, and makes use of committees and boards for that purpose, it seems especially important that consideration be given to the mode of their operations.</abstract><cop>Arlington, Va</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0060340</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-066X |
| ispartof | The American psychologist, 1948-05, Vol.3 (5), p.176-177 |
| issn | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614439480 |
| source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Clinical Psychology Clinical Psychology Graduate Training Human Professional Personnel Scientific Communication |
| title | On the Committee vs. the Scientific Approach to Problems of Professional Training |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Committee%20vs.%20the%20Scientific%20Approach%20to%20Problems%20of%20Professional%20Training&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Pressey,%20S.%20L&rft.date=1948-05-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=176-177&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0060340&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1289875122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614439480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |