Comments on The Brain Watchers

Comments on The Brain Watchers by M. L. Gross , which presents a documented account of application of psychological tests, mostly personality, in industry and education at all levels. The present author argues that Gross presents his case with obvious hostility, and that exaggerations, sweeping generalities, and half-truths are found throughout the book and may tempt many serious psychologists (as human beings) to reject him outright. It is suggested that a realistic defense by the psychology profession should include at least two major elements at the beginning. First of all, it is argued that Gross has not revealed anything about test validity which is not common knowledge to any professionally trained psychologist. Second, it should be clearly emphasized that much of the writer's comments pertain to a certain segment of the psychological profession, and that many of his observations have been made on self-appointed testers with no professional status or recognition of any sort. Further, it should be added that we in the profession are much concerned about the unethical and haphazard uses of tests and the unsubstantiated claims of pseudopsychologists, and that we have ethics committees in the American Psychological Association and in most states which are endeavoring to protect the public through certification procedures and public education.