The Reliability of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A Comment on Meyer (1997)
Elsewhere the authors have called attention to fundamental problems with the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach (CS). G. Meyer (1997) attempts to refute the authors' criticisms of CS interrater reliability, but misrepresents what they actually stated, and several of his arguments are based...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological assessment 1997-12, Vol.9 (4), p.490-494 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 494 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 490 |
| container_title | Psychological assessment |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Wood, James M Nezworski, M. Teresa Stejskal, William J |
| description | Elsewhere the authors have called attention to fundamental problems with the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach (CS). G.
Meyer (1997)
attempts to refute the authors' criticisms of CS interrater reliability, but misrepresents what they actually stated, and several of his arguments are based on psychometric errors and misunderstandings. The meta-analysis in Meyer's article is flawed and fails to demonstrate CS interrater reliability. Instead of defending the CS with unsound arguments and shaky numbers, Rorschach proponents need to accept valid criticisms and undertake high-quality, replicated studies of reliability and validity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.490 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614397689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ560327</ericid><sourcerecordid>614397689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-9803f215645f93c702e081961fb46973c9ca2f10b72bb28b91c1a4b691bd5b173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxRdRsFY_gOBhUa9bM0k2u3PwIKX-oyDUCt5CEhO6su2uyVbotzdra4-eJsx783vkJck5kBEQVtwA4SRjOZIRjviIIzlIBoAMM2D8_TC-__Tj5CSET0KAszIfJLfzhU1ntq6Uruqq26SNS7u4GjfL1tuFXYXq26avm9DZZeoa_yvOGh_MQpnFaXLkVB3s2W4Ok7f7yXz8mE1fHp7Gd9NMUSRdhiVhjkIueO6QmYJQS0pAAU5zgQUzaBR1QHRBtaalRjCguBYI-iPXULBhcrnltr75WtvQyc9m7VcxUor4ESxEif-ZKEEuqOA9CbYm45sQvHWy9dVS-Y0EIvsmZd-U7JuSKLmMTcab6x1YBaNq59XKVGF_GOGUMoi2i63N-srs1clzLgijffLVVlatkm3YGOW7ytQ2glTYZ_0ApyOFqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614397689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Reliability of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A Comment on Meyer (1997)</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Wood, James M ; Nezworski, M. Teresa ; Stejskal, William J</creator><creatorcontrib>Wood, James M ; Nezworski, M. Teresa ; Stejskal, William J</creatorcontrib><description>Elsewhere the authors have called attention to fundamental problems with the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach (CS). G.
Meyer (1997)
attempts to refute the authors' criticisms of CS interrater reliability, but misrepresents what they actually stated, and several of his arguments are based on psychometric errors and misunderstandings. The meta-analysis in Meyer's article is flawed and fails to demonstrate CS interrater reliability. Instead of defending the CS with unsound arguments and shaky numbers, Rorschach proponents need to accept valid criticisms and undertake high-quality, replicated studies of reliability and validity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Human ; Interrater Reliability ; Medical sciences ; Meta Analysis ; Psychological tests ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reliability ; Research Replication ; Rorschach Content Analysis ; Rorschach Test ; Techniques and methods ; Test Interpretation ; Test Reliability ; Test Use ; Test Validity</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 1997-12, Vol.9 (4), p.490-494</ispartof><rights>1997 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 1997</rights><rights>1997, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-9803f215645f93c702e081961fb46973c9ca2f10b72bb28b91c1a4b691bd5b173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ560327$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2092231$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wood, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nezworski, M. Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stejskal, William J</creatorcontrib><title>The Reliability of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A Comment on Meyer (1997)</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><description>Elsewhere the authors have called attention to fundamental problems with the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach (CS). G.
Meyer (1997)
attempts to refute the authors' criticisms of CS interrater reliability, but misrepresents what they actually stated, and several of his arguments are based on psychometric errors and misunderstandings. The meta-analysis in Meyer's article is flawed and fails to demonstrate CS interrater reliability. Instead of defending the CS with unsound arguments and shaky numbers, Rorschach proponents need to accept valid criticisms and undertake high-quality, replicated studies of reliability and validity.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Interrater Reliability</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research Replication</subject><subject>Rorschach Content Analysis</subject><subject>Rorschach Test</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Test Interpretation</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Use</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxRdRsFY_gOBhUa9bM0k2u3PwIKX-oyDUCt5CEhO6su2uyVbotzdra4-eJsx783vkJck5kBEQVtwA4SRjOZIRjviIIzlIBoAMM2D8_TC-__Tj5CSET0KAszIfJLfzhU1ntq6Uruqq26SNS7u4GjfL1tuFXYXq26avm9DZZeoa_yvOGh_MQpnFaXLkVB3s2W4Ok7f7yXz8mE1fHp7Gd9NMUSRdhiVhjkIueO6QmYJQS0pAAU5zgQUzaBR1QHRBtaalRjCguBYI-iPXULBhcrnltr75WtvQyc9m7VcxUor4ESxEif-ZKEEuqOA9CbYm45sQvHWy9dVS-Y0EIvsmZd-U7JuSKLmMTcab6x1YBaNq59XKVGF_GOGUMoi2i63N-srs1clzLgijffLVVlatkm3YGOW7ytQ2glTYZ_0ApyOFqw</recordid><startdate>199712</startdate><enddate>199712</enddate><creator>Wood, James M</creator><creator>Nezworski, M. Teresa</creator><creator>Stejskal, William J</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199712</creationdate><title>The Reliability of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach</title><author>Wood, James M ; Nezworski, M. Teresa ; Stejskal, William J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-9803f215645f93c702e081961fb46973c9ca2f10b72bb28b91c1a4b691bd5b173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Interrater Reliability</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research Replication</topic><topic>Rorschach Content Analysis</topic><topic>Rorschach Test</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Test Interpretation</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Use</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wood, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nezworski, M. Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stejskal, William J</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wood, James M</au><au>Nezworski, M. Teresa</au><au>Stejskal, William J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ560327</ericid><atitle>The Reliability of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A Comment on Meyer (1997)</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><date>1997-12</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>490-494</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>Elsewhere the authors have called attention to fundamental problems with the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach (CS). G.
Meyer (1997)
attempts to refute the authors' criticisms of CS interrater reliability, but misrepresents what they actually stated, and several of his arguments are based on psychometric errors and misunderstandings. The meta-analysis in Meyer's article is flawed and fails to demonstrate CS interrater reliability. Instead of defending the CS with unsound arguments and shaky numbers, Rorschach proponents need to accept valid criticisms and undertake high-quality, replicated studies of reliability and validity.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.490</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1040-3590 |
| ispartof | Psychological assessment, 1997-12, Vol.9 (4), p.490-494 |
| issn | 1040-3590 1939-134X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614397689 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Human Interrater Reliability Medical sciences Meta Analysis Psychological tests Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reliability Research Replication Rorschach Content Analysis Rorschach Test Techniques and methods Test Interpretation Test Reliability Test Use Test Validity |
| title | The Reliability of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A Comment on Meyer (1997) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T04%3A42%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Reliability%20of%20the%20Comprehensive%20System%20for%20the%20Rorschach:%20A%20Comment%20on%20Meyer%20(1997)&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Wood,%20James%20M&rft.date=1997-12&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=490-494&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.490&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614397689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614397689&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ560327&rfr_iscdi=true |