Computerized Adaptive Assessment With the MMPI-2 in a Clinical Setting
Comparability, validity, and impact of loss of information of a computerized adaptive administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 140 Veterans Affairs hospital patients. The countdown method ( Butcher, Keller, & Bacon, 1985 ) was used...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological assessment 1999-09, Vol.11 (3), p.369-380 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 380 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 369 |
| container_title | Psychological assessment |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Handel, Richard W Ben-Porath, Yossef S Watt, Mimi |
| description | Comparability, validity, and impact of loss of information of a computerized adaptive administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 140 Veterans Affairs hospital patients. The countdown method (
Butcher, Keller, & Bacon, 1985
) was used to adaptively administer Scales
L
(Lie) and
F
(Frequency), the 10 clinical scales, and the 15 content scales. Participants completed the MMPI-2 twice, in 1 of 2 conditions: computerized conventional test-retest, or computerized conventional-computerized adaptive. Mean profiles and test-retest correlations across modalities were comparable. Correlations between MMPI-2 scales and criterion measures supported the validity of the countdown method, although some attenuation of validity was suggested for certain health-related items. Loss of information incurred with this mode of adaptive testing has minimal impact on test validity. Item and time savings were substantial. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.369 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614386337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>45351185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-441f35401557b9db6095cae3da941cf91689ff48053f6b8d7eac27adeb4a381f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhosoOKcv4FUQ76QzaZK2uRzD6WBDQUXvQpomLqNra5IK8-lN3UQU8Son8P3_4XxRdIrgCEGcXSJIYIwpC180wiOcsr1ogBhmMcLkeT_MX8BhdOTcCkJEcE4H0XTSrNvOK2veVQnGpWi9eVNg7Jxybq1qD56MXwK_VGCxuJvFCTA1EGBSmdpIUYF75b2pX46jAy0qp0527zB6nF49TG7i-e31bDKexwIz7GNCkMaUQERpVrCySCGjUihcCkaQ1AylOdOa5JBinRZ5mSkhk0yUqiAC5yE7jM62va1tXjvlPF81na3DSp72F6UYZ_9BCWSEJijtoWQLSds4Z5XmrTVrYTccQd475b0y3ivjCHHMg9MQOt81Cxeu11bU0rjvJCM5-8QutphoBW_dRgrrjayUk521wSkP8T9Kf9M_sQ8gcZAz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614386337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computerized Adaptive Assessment With the MMPI-2 in a Clinical Setting</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Handel, Richard W ; Ben-Porath, Yossef S ; Watt, Mimi</creator><contributor>Haynes, Stephen N</contributor><creatorcontrib>Handel, Richard W ; Ben-Porath, Yossef S ; Watt, Mimi ; Haynes, Stephen N</creatorcontrib><description>Comparability, validity, and impact of loss of information of a computerized adaptive administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 140 Veterans Affairs hospital patients. The countdown method (
Butcher, Keller, & Bacon, 1985
) was used to adaptively administer Scales
L
(Lie) and
F
(Frequency), the 10 clinical scales, and the 15 content scales. Participants completed the MMPI-2 twice, in 1 of 2 conditions: computerized conventional test-retest, or computerized conventional-computerized adaptive. Mean profiles and test-retest correlations across modalities were comparable. Correlations between MMPI-2 scales and criterion measures supported the validity of the countdown method, although some attenuation of validity was suggested for certain health-related items. Loss of information incurred with this mode of adaptive testing has minimal impact on test validity. Item and time savings were substantial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptive Testing ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computer Applications ; Computers ; Drug Addiction ; Human ; Inpatient ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Military Veterans ; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory ; Outpatient ; Personality ; Psychological tests ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Substance Use Treatment ; Techniques and methods ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 1999-09, Vol.11 (3), p.369-380</ispartof><rights>1999 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Sep 1999</rights><rights>1999, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-441f35401557b9db6095cae3da941cf91689ff48053f6b8d7eac27adeb4a381f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1948969$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Haynes, Stephen N</contributor><creatorcontrib>Handel, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Mimi</creatorcontrib><title>Computerized Adaptive Assessment With the MMPI-2 in a Clinical Setting</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><description>Comparability, validity, and impact of loss of information of a computerized adaptive administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 140 Veterans Affairs hospital patients. The countdown method (
Butcher, Keller, & Bacon, 1985
) was used to adaptively administer Scales
L
(Lie) and
F
(Frequency), the 10 clinical scales, and the 15 content scales. Participants completed the MMPI-2 twice, in 1 of 2 conditions: computerized conventional test-retest, or computerized conventional-computerized adaptive. Mean profiles and test-retest correlations across modalities were comparable. Correlations between MMPI-2 scales and criterion measures supported the validity of the countdown method, although some attenuation of validity was suggested for certain health-related items. Loss of information incurred with this mode of adaptive testing has minimal impact on test validity. Item and time savings were substantial.</description><subject>Adaptive Testing</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer Applications</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Drug Addiction</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Inpatient</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Military Veterans</subject><subject>Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Outpatient</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Substance Use Treatment</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhosoOKcv4FUQ76QzaZK2uRzD6WBDQUXvQpomLqNra5IK8-lN3UQU8Son8P3_4XxRdIrgCEGcXSJIYIwpC180wiOcsr1ogBhmMcLkeT_MX8BhdOTcCkJEcE4H0XTSrNvOK2veVQnGpWi9eVNg7Jxybq1qD56MXwK_VGCxuJvFCTA1EGBSmdpIUYF75b2pX46jAy0qp0527zB6nF49TG7i-e31bDKexwIz7GNCkMaUQERpVrCySCGjUihcCkaQ1AylOdOa5JBinRZ5mSkhk0yUqiAC5yE7jM62va1tXjvlPF81na3DSp72F6UYZ_9BCWSEJijtoWQLSds4Z5XmrTVrYTccQd475b0y3ivjCHHMg9MQOt81Cxeu11bU0rjvJCM5-8QutphoBW_dRgrrjayUk521wSkP8T9Kf9M_sQ8gcZAz</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Handel, Richard W</creator><creator>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</creator><creator>Watt, Mimi</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Computerized Adaptive Assessment With the MMPI-2 in a Clinical Setting</title><author>Handel, Richard W ; Ben-Porath, Yossef S ; Watt, Mimi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-441f35401557b9db6095cae3da941cf91689ff48053f6b8d7eac27adeb4a381f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adaptive Testing</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer Applications</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Drug Addiction</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Inpatient</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Military Veterans</topic><topic>Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Outpatient</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Substance Use Treatment</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Handel, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Mimi</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Handel, Richard W</au><au>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</au><au>Watt, Mimi</au><au>Haynes, Stephen N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computerized Adaptive Assessment With the MMPI-2 in a Clinical Setting</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>369-380</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>Comparability, validity, and impact of loss of information of a computerized adaptive administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 140 Veterans Affairs hospital patients. The countdown method (
Butcher, Keller, & Bacon, 1985
) was used to adaptively administer Scales
L
(Lie) and
F
(Frequency), the 10 clinical scales, and the 15 content scales. Participants completed the MMPI-2 twice, in 1 of 2 conditions: computerized conventional test-retest, or computerized conventional-computerized adaptive. Mean profiles and test-retest correlations across modalities were comparable. Correlations between MMPI-2 scales and criterion measures supported the validity of the countdown method, although some attenuation of validity was suggested for certain health-related items. Loss of information incurred with this mode of adaptive testing has minimal impact on test validity. Item and time savings were substantial.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.369</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1040-3590 |
| ispartof | Psychological assessment, 1999-09, Vol.11 (3), p.369-380 |
| issn | 1040-3590 1939-134X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614386337 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Adaptive Testing Biological and medical sciences Computer Applications Computers Drug Addiction Human Inpatient Male Medical sciences Military Veterans Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Outpatient Personality Psychological tests Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Substance Use Treatment Techniques and methods Test Reliability Test Validity Validity |
| title | Computerized Adaptive Assessment With the MMPI-2 in a Clinical Setting |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T12%3A31%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computerized%20Adaptive%20Assessment%20With%20the%20MMPI-2%20in%20a%20Clinical%20Setting&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Handel,%20Richard%20W&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=369-380&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E45351185%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614386337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |