Sharing secrets: Disclosure and discretion in dyads and triads

Explored the impact of group size on sharing secrets to develop a more comprehensive picture of the variables that influenced disclosure patterns. It was hypothesized that Ss would be more willing to disclose intimate information in a dyad than in a triad (V. J. Derlega et al; . The results of Exp I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality and social psychology 1979-07, Vol.37 (7), p.1196-1203
Hauptverfasser: Taylor, Ralph B, de Soto, Clinton B, Lieb, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1203
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1196
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 37
creator Taylor, Ralph B
de Soto, Clinton B
Lieb, Robert
description Explored the impact of group size on sharing secrets to develop a more comprehensive picture of the variables that influenced disclosure patterns. It was hypothesized that Ss would be more willing to disclose intimate information in a dyad than in a triad (V. J. Derlega et al; . The results of Exp I with 21 undergraduates, which used a role-playing methodology, confirmed the hypothesis. The main effect of group size was observed over a range of roles and items of information. In addition to the main effect, group size interaction effects also indicated that the difference between dyad and triad disclosure rates increased with more intimate items of information and with more intimate roles. These interaction effects suggested that the importance of a closed dyadic boundary depends in part on the expected confidentiality of the interchange. In Exp II with 35 undergraduates, the conversations of groups of acquaintances were recorded and rated for intimacy. As predicted, the conversations of dyads were more intimate than those of triads. Suggestions for understanding the intimate quality of dyads are discussed. (42 ref)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614364970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614364970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-5a2c809949bd593d93f3650d02ed8cbae536ae1c50cc8fda755751bfb35646863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Ai9F8dg6-W48CLJ-woIH9RzSJNXI2take9h_b-qKePE088488w68CB1jqDBQeQ5ASEk5ZhWVlawwVmIHzbCiqsQU8100-yX20UFK7wDAOCEzdPn0ZmLoXovkbfRjuiiuQ7KrPq2jL0znCpdlXoS-K0JXuI1x6Xs-xpDbQ7TXmlXyRz91jl5ub54X9-Xy8e5hcbUsDQMyltwQW4NSTDWOK-oUbang4IB4V9vGeE6F8dhysLZunZGcS46btqFcMFELOkcnW98h9p9rn0b93q9jl19qgRkVTEnI0Ol_ECaKK6DZNlN0S9nYpxR9q4cYPkzcaAx6SlNPWekpK52F1FOa-epse2UGo4e0sSaOwa58ymL4w30B_0dylg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614364970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sharing secrets: Disclosure and discretion in dyads and triads</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Taylor, Ralph B ; de Soto, Clinton B ; Lieb, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Ralph B ; de Soto, Clinton B ; Lieb, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Explored the impact of group size on sharing secrets to develop a more comprehensive picture of the variables that influenced disclosure patterns. It was hypothesized that Ss would be more willing to disclose intimate information in a dyad than in a triad (V. J. Derlega et al; . The results of Exp I with 21 undergraduates, which used a role-playing methodology, confirmed the hypothesis. The main effect of group size was observed over a range of roles and items of information. In addition to the main effect, group size interaction effects also indicated that the difference between dyad and triad disclosure rates increased with more intimate items of information and with more intimate roles. These interaction effects suggested that the importance of a closed dyadic boundary depends in part on the expected confidentiality of the interchange. In Exp II with 35 undergraduates, the conversations of groups of acquaintances were recorded and rated for intimacy. As predicted, the conversations of dyads were more intimate than those of triads. Suggestions for understanding the intimate quality of dyads are discussed. (42 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Dyads ; Group Size ; Human ; Interpersonal Communication ; Intimacy ; Self-Disclosure ; Social Groups</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1979-07, Vol.37 (7), p.1196-1203</ispartof><rights>1979 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1979, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-5a2c809949bd593d93f3650d02ed8cbae536ae1c50cc8fda755751bfb35646863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Ralph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Soto, Clinton B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieb, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Sharing secrets: Disclosure and discretion in dyads and triads</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><description>Explored the impact of group size on sharing secrets to develop a more comprehensive picture of the variables that influenced disclosure patterns. It was hypothesized that Ss would be more willing to disclose intimate information in a dyad than in a triad (V. J. Derlega et al; . The results of Exp I with 21 undergraduates, which used a role-playing methodology, confirmed the hypothesis. The main effect of group size was observed over a range of roles and items of information. In addition to the main effect, group size interaction effects also indicated that the difference between dyad and triad disclosure rates increased with more intimate items of information and with more intimate roles. These interaction effects suggested that the importance of a closed dyadic boundary depends in part on the expected confidentiality of the interchange. In Exp II with 35 undergraduates, the conversations of groups of acquaintances were recorded and rated for intimacy. As predicted, the conversations of dyads were more intimate than those of triads. Suggestions for understanding the intimate quality of dyads are discussed. (42 ref)</description><subject>Dyads</subject><subject>Group Size</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Interpersonal Communication</subject><subject>Intimacy</subject><subject>Self-Disclosure</subject><subject>Social Groups</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Ai9F8dg6-W48CLJ-woIH9RzSJNXI2take9h_b-qKePE088488w68CB1jqDBQeQ5ASEk5ZhWVlawwVmIHzbCiqsQU8100-yX20UFK7wDAOCEzdPn0ZmLoXovkbfRjuiiuQ7KrPq2jL0znCpdlXoS-K0JXuI1x6Xs-xpDbQ7TXmlXyRz91jl5ub54X9-Xy8e5hcbUsDQMyltwQW4NSTDWOK-oUbang4IB4V9vGeE6F8dhysLZunZGcS46btqFcMFELOkcnW98h9p9rn0b93q9jl19qgRkVTEnI0Ol_ECaKK6DZNlN0S9nYpxR9q4cYPkzcaAx6SlNPWekpK52F1FOa-epse2UGo4e0sSaOwa58ymL4w30B_0dylg</recordid><startdate>19790701</startdate><enddate>19790701</enddate><creator>Taylor, Ralph B</creator><creator>de Soto, Clinton B</creator><creator>Lieb, Robert</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790701</creationdate><title>Sharing secrets: Disclosure and discretion in dyads and triads</title><author>Taylor, Ralph B ; de Soto, Clinton B ; Lieb, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-5a2c809949bd593d93f3650d02ed8cbae536ae1c50cc8fda755751bfb35646863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Dyads</topic><topic>Group Size</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Interpersonal Communication</topic><topic>Intimacy</topic><topic>Self-Disclosure</topic><topic>Social Groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Ralph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Soto, Clinton B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieb, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Ralph B</au><au>de Soto, Clinton B</au><au>Lieb, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sharing secrets: Disclosure and discretion in dyads and triads</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><date>1979-07-01</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1196</spage><epage>1203</epage><pages>1196-1203</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><abstract>Explored the impact of group size on sharing secrets to develop a more comprehensive picture of the variables that influenced disclosure patterns. It was hypothesized that Ss would be more willing to disclose intimate information in a dyad than in a triad (V. J. Derlega et al; . The results of Exp I with 21 undergraduates, which used a role-playing methodology, confirmed the hypothesis. The main effect of group size was observed over a range of roles and items of information. In addition to the main effect, group size interaction effects also indicated that the difference between dyad and triad disclosure rates increased with more intimate items of information and with more intimate roles. These interaction effects suggested that the importance of a closed dyadic boundary depends in part on the expected confidentiality of the interchange. In Exp II with 35 undergraduates, the conversations of groups of acquaintances were recorded and rated for intimacy. As predicted, the conversations of dyads were more intimate than those of triads. Suggestions for understanding the intimate quality of dyads are discussed. (42 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1196</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 1979-07, Vol.37 (7), p.1196-1203
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614364970
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Dyads
Group Size
Human
Interpersonal Communication
Intimacy
Self-Disclosure
Social Groups
title Sharing secrets: Disclosure and discretion in dyads and triads
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T00%3A22%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sharing%20secrets:%20Disclosure%20and%20discretion%20in%20dyads%20and%20triads&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Taylor,%20Ralph%20B&rft.date=1979-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1196&rft.epage=1203&rft.pages=1196-1203&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614364970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614364970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true