GROUP COUNSELING, DEPENDENCE, AND COLLEGE MALE UNDERACHIEVEMENT
INVESTIGATED THE EFFECTS OF 2 DIFFERENT METHODS OF GROUP COUNSELING ON THE MALE COLLEGE UNDERACHIEVER. 8 COUNSELING GROUPS (N = 96) WERE DIVIDED BETWEEN 2 COUNSELORS WHO EACH LED 2 GROUPS IN THE HIGH AUTHORITY LEADER-STRUCTURED (LS) METHOD AND 2 GROUPS IN THE LOW AUTHORITY GROUP-STRUCTURED (GS) METH...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of counseling psychology 1967-09, Vol.14 (5), p.449-453 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 453 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 449 |
| container_title | Journal of counseling psychology |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | GILBREATH, STUART H |
| description | INVESTIGATED THE EFFECTS OF 2 DIFFERENT METHODS OF GROUP COUNSELING ON THE MALE COLLEGE UNDERACHIEVER. 8 COUNSELING GROUPS (N = 96) WERE DIVIDED BETWEEN 2 COUNSELORS WHO EACH LED 2 GROUPS IN THE HIGH AUTHORITY LEADER-STRUCTURED (LS) METHOD AND 2 GROUPS IN THE LOW AUTHORITY GROUP-STRUCTURED (GS) METHOD OF COUNSELING. IT IS CONCLUDED (P < .001) THAT MALE UNDERACHIEVERS WHO HAVE HIGH DEPENDENT NEEDS IMPROVE IN GRADE-POINT AVERAGE IF THEY PARTICIPATE IN THE LS METHOD BUT NOT IN THE GS METHOD. CONVERSELY, MORE INDEPENDENT UNDERACHIEVING MEN IMPROVE IN GRADE-POINT AVERAGE IN THE GS METHOD THAN IN THE LS METHOD. (15 REF.) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0024945 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614354921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614354921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-45617e158943ec4c206346f45bb0fcdcb661e181621642ec7679d6601f55bf7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAUAPAgCs4p-BGKehBcNa9J0_YkpYvdoOvGXL2GNktxY9qatId9eyPTg6CnB-_9eP8QugR8D5gED68YezSi_hEaQEQi1wMWHqOBzXouBhacojNjthgDJWE0QI_pcl4snGRe5M88m-bpyBnzBc_HPE_4yInzsa1lGU-5M4sz7hS2soyTyZS_8BnPV-fopC53Rl18xyEqnvgqmbjZPJ0mceaWhAadS30GgQI_jChRkkoPM0JZTf2qwrVcy4oxUBACs-tST8mABdGaMQy171d1oMgQXR36trr56JXpxLbp9bsdKZg9xaeRBxZd_4eAYAAIMQ2tuj0oqRtjtKpFqzdvpd4LwOLrh-Lnh5beHWjZlqI1e1nqbiN3yshea_XeCdn0AqjwBaWR1Td_69_sE09Ldl0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614354921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GROUP COUNSELING, DEPENDENCE, AND COLLEGE MALE UNDERACHIEVEMENT</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>GILBREATH, STUART H</creator><contributor>Robinson, Francis P</contributor><creatorcontrib>GILBREATH, STUART H ; Robinson, Francis P</creatorcontrib><description>INVESTIGATED THE EFFECTS OF 2 DIFFERENT METHODS OF GROUP COUNSELING ON THE MALE COLLEGE UNDERACHIEVER. 8 COUNSELING GROUPS (N = 96) WERE DIVIDED BETWEEN 2 COUNSELORS WHO EACH LED 2 GROUPS IN THE HIGH AUTHORITY LEADER-STRUCTURED (LS) METHOD AND 2 GROUPS IN THE LOW AUTHORITY GROUP-STRUCTURED (GS) METHOD OF COUNSELING. IT IS CONCLUDED (P < .001) THAT MALE UNDERACHIEVERS WHO HAVE HIGH DEPENDENT NEEDS IMPROVE IN GRADE-POINT AVERAGE IF THEY PARTICIPATE IN THE LS METHOD BUT NOT IN THE GS METHOD. CONVERSELY, MORE INDEPENDENT UNDERACHIEVING MEN IMPROVE IN GRADE-POINT AVERAGE IN THE GS METHOD THAN IN THE LS METHOD. (15 REF.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0024945</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Academic Overachievement ; Academic Underachievement ; Collective Behavior ; College Students ; Counseling ; Dependency (Personality) ; Group Dynamics ; Group Problem Solving ; Human ; Racial and Ethnic Groups ; Social Groups</subject><ispartof>Journal of counseling psychology, 1967-09, Vol.14 (5), p.449-453</ispartof><rights>1967 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1967, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-45617e158943ec4c206346f45bb0fcdcb661e181621642ec7679d6601f55bf7e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Robinson, Francis P</contributor><creatorcontrib>GILBREATH, STUART H</creatorcontrib><title>GROUP COUNSELING, DEPENDENCE, AND COLLEGE MALE UNDERACHIEVEMENT</title><title>Journal of counseling psychology</title><description>INVESTIGATED THE EFFECTS OF 2 DIFFERENT METHODS OF GROUP COUNSELING ON THE MALE COLLEGE UNDERACHIEVER. 8 COUNSELING GROUPS (N = 96) WERE DIVIDED BETWEEN 2 COUNSELORS WHO EACH LED 2 GROUPS IN THE HIGH AUTHORITY LEADER-STRUCTURED (LS) METHOD AND 2 GROUPS IN THE LOW AUTHORITY GROUP-STRUCTURED (GS) METHOD OF COUNSELING. IT IS CONCLUDED (P < .001) THAT MALE UNDERACHIEVERS WHO HAVE HIGH DEPENDENT NEEDS IMPROVE IN GRADE-POINT AVERAGE IF THEY PARTICIPATE IN THE LS METHOD BUT NOT IN THE GS METHOD. CONVERSELY, MORE INDEPENDENT UNDERACHIEVING MEN IMPROVE IN GRADE-POINT AVERAGE IN THE GS METHOD THAN IN THE LS METHOD. (15 REF.)</description><subject>Academic Overachievement</subject><subject>Academic Underachievement</subject><subject>Collective Behavior</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Dependency (Personality)</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Group Problem Solving</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Racial and Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Social Groups</subject><issn>0022-0167</issn><issn>1939-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAUAPAgCs4p-BGKehBcNa9J0_YkpYvdoOvGXL2GNktxY9qatId9eyPTg6CnB-_9eP8QugR8D5gED68YezSi_hEaQEQi1wMWHqOBzXouBhacojNjthgDJWE0QI_pcl4snGRe5M88m-bpyBnzBc_HPE_4yInzsa1lGU-5M4sz7hS2soyTyZS_8BnPV-fopC53Rl18xyEqnvgqmbjZPJ0mceaWhAadS30GgQI_jChRkkoPM0JZTf2qwrVcy4oxUBACs-tST8mABdGaMQy171d1oMgQXR36trr56JXpxLbp9bsdKZg9xaeRBxZd_4eAYAAIMQ2tuj0oqRtjtKpFqzdvpd4LwOLrh-Lnh5beHWjZlqI1e1nqbiN3yshea_XeCdn0AqjwBaWR1Td_69_sE09Ldl0</recordid><startdate>196709</startdate><enddate>196709</enddate><creator>GILBREATH, STUART H</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196709</creationdate><title>GROUP COUNSELING, DEPENDENCE, AND COLLEGE MALE UNDERACHIEVEMENT</title><author>GILBREATH, STUART H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-45617e158943ec4c206346f45bb0fcdcb661e181621642ec7679d6601f55bf7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><topic>Academic Overachievement</topic><topic>Academic Underachievement</topic><topic>Collective Behavior</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Dependency (Personality)</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Group Problem Solving</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Racial and Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Social Groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GILBREATH, STUART H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GILBREATH, STUART H</au><au>Robinson, Francis P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GROUP COUNSELING, DEPENDENCE, AND COLLEGE MALE UNDERACHIEVEMENT</atitle><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle><date>1967-09</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>449-453</pages><issn>0022-0167</issn><eissn>1939-2168</eissn><abstract>INVESTIGATED THE EFFECTS OF 2 DIFFERENT METHODS OF GROUP COUNSELING ON THE MALE COLLEGE UNDERACHIEVER. 8 COUNSELING GROUPS (N = 96) WERE DIVIDED BETWEEN 2 COUNSELORS WHO EACH LED 2 GROUPS IN THE HIGH AUTHORITY LEADER-STRUCTURED (LS) METHOD AND 2 GROUPS IN THE LOW AUTHORITY GROUP-STRUCTURED (GS) METHOD OF COUNSELING. IT IS CONCLUDED (P < .001) THAT MALE UNDERACHIEVERS WHO HAVE HIGH DEPENDENT NEEDS IMPROVE IN GRADE-POINT AVERAGE IF THEY PARTICIPATE IN THE LS METHOD BUT NOT IN THE GS METHOD. CONVERSELY, MORE INDEPENDENT UNDERACHIEVING MEN IMPROVE IN GRADE-POINT AVERAGE IN THE GS METHOD THAN IN THE LS METHOD. (15 REF.)</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0024945</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-0167 |
| ispartof | Journal of counseling psychology, 1967-09, Vol.14 (5), p.449-453 |
| issn | 0022-0167 1939-2168 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614354921 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Academic Overachievement Academic Underachievement Collective Behavior College Students Counseling Dependency (Personality) Group Dynamics Group Problem Solving Human Racial and Ethnic Groups Social Groups |
| title | GROUP COUNSELING, DEPENDENCE, AND COLLEGE MALE UNDERACHIEVEMENT |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A29%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GROUP%20COUNSELING,%20DEPENDENCE,%20AND%20COLLEGE%20MALE%20UNDERACHIEVEMENT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20counseling%20psychology&rft.au=GILBREATH,%20STUART%20H&rft.date=1967-09&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=449-453&rft.issn=0022-0167&rft.eissn=1939-2168&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0024945&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614354921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614354921&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |