Effect of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors
Examined the influence of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth as perceived by students and teachers on teacher evaluation. Male and female instructors in the same department were matched on the level of course taught. 22 pairs of courses evaluated by 838 college students were obtained. Twen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of educational psychology 1975-06, Vol.67 (3), p.368-374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 368 |
container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Elmore, Patricia B LaPointe, Karen A |
description | Examined the influence of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth as perceived by students and teachers on teacher evaluation. Male and female instructors in the same department were matched on the level of course taught. 22 pairs of courses evaluated by 838 college students were obtained. Twenty Instructional Improvement Questionnaire items that directly evaluate instructor performance were analyzed using a 3-factor analysis of variance and the .0025 level of significance. No interactions between faculty sex, student sex, and teacher warmth were found. When Ss rated their instructor's interest and warmth, teachers who were warmer and primarily interested in students received higher ratings in teaching effectiveness. When teachers rated themselves on warmth and interest, self-ratings interacted with faculty sex. Generally, female teachers received higher effectiveness ratings than did male teachers when they considered themselves low in warmth or interested in course content. Male teachers who rated themselves high in warmth or primarily interested in students received higher ratings than did male teachers who rated themselves low in warmth or primarily interested in course content, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0076608 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614353126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290469994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-f76be8042b024855112549ae2b7c967289348d7df2092abe5d15f25e9087cf7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p-BOKeiFo9SRpk-ZSxvyAgTd6HbL0xHZ07UxSdf_ejqkg6NXh5TycAy8hxxSuKHB5XQFIIaDYISOquEoZlWKXjAAYS0EIvk8OQlgAAB_CiOipc2hj0rkkorEV-iTgx2USYl9iG7fBtOXP9t34ZaySrk1ihQm-maY3sR7icMF2TYMvmNRtiL63sfPhkOw50wQ8-ppj8nw7fZrcp7PHu4fJzSw1XKqYOinmWEDG5sCyIs8pZXmmDLK5tEpIViieFaUsHQPFzBzzkuaO5aigkNZJ5GNysr278t1rjyHqRdf7dnipBc14zikTAzr9D1GmIBNKqWxQ51tlfReCR6dXvl4av9YU9KZj_d3xQC-21KyMXoW1NT7WtsFge--H-jSWvRZSc83FRp_9rX-zTwoqiNk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614353126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Elmore, Patricia B ; LaPointe, Karen A</creator><contributor>Williams, Joanna</contributor><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Patricia B ; LaPointe, Karen A ; Williams, Joanna</creatorcontrib><description>Examined the influence of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth as perceived by students and teachers on teacher evaluation. Male and female instructors in the same department were matched on the level of course taught. 22 pairs of courses evaluated by 838 college students were obtained. Twenty Instructional Improvement Questionnaire items that directly evaluate instructor performance were analyzed using a 3-factor analysis of variance and the .0025 level of significance. No interactions between faculty sex, student sex, and teacher warmth were found. When Ss rated their instructor's interest and warmth, teachers who were warmer and primarily interested in students received higher ratings in teaching effectiveness. When teachers rated themselves on warmth and interest, self-ratings interacted with faculty sex. Generally, female teachers received higher effectiveness ratings than did male teachers when they considered themselves low in warmth or interested in course content. Male teachers who rated themselves high in warmth or primarily interested in students received higher ratings than did male teachers who rated themselves low in warmth or primarily interested in course content, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0076608</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>College Students ; College Teachers ; Evaluation ; Human ; Human Sex Differences ; Teacher Characteristics ; Teacher Personality</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 1975-06, Vol.67 (3), p.368-374</ispartof><rights>1975 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1975, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-f76be8042b024855112549ae2b7c967289348d7df2092abe5d15f25e9087cf7e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Williams, Joanna</contributor><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Patricia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPointe, Karen A</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>Examined the influence of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth as perceived by students and teachers on teacher evaluation. Male and female instructors in the same department were matched on the level of course taught. 22 pairs of courses evaluated by 838 college students were obtained. Twenty Instructional Improvement Questionnaire items that directly evaluate instructor performance were analyzed using a 3-factor analysis of variance and the .0025 level of significance. No interactions between faculty sex, student sex, and teacher warmth were found. When Ss rated their instructor's interest and warmth, teachers who were warmer and primarily interested in students received higher ratings in teaching effectiveness. When teachers rated themselves on warmth and interest, self-ratings interacted with faculty sex. Generally, female teachers received higher effectiveness ratings than did male teachers when they considered themselves low in warmth or interested in course content. Male teachers who rated themselves high in warmth or primarily interested in students received higher ratings than did male teachers who rated themselves low in warmth or primarily interested in course content, respectively.</description><subject>College Students</subject><subject>College Teachers</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Sex Differences</subject><subject>Teacher Characteristics</subject><subject>Teacher Personality</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p-BOKeiFo9SRpk-ZSxvyAgTd6HbL0xHZ07UxSdf_ejqkg6NXh5TycAy8hxxSuKHB5XQFIIaDYISOquEoZlWKXjAAYS0EIvk8OQlgAAB_CiOipc2hj0rkkorEV-iTgx2USYl9iG7fBtOXP9t34ZaySrk1ihQm-maY3sR7icMF2TYMvmNRtiL63sfPhkOw50wQ8-ppj8nw7fZrcp7PHu4fJzSw1XKqYOinmWEDG5sCyIs8pZXmmDLK5tEpIViieFaUsHQPFzBzzkuaO5aigkNZJ5GNysr278t1rjyHqRdf7dnipBc14zikTAzr9D1GmIBNKqWxQ51tlfReCR6dXvl4av9YU9KZj_d3xQC-21KyMXoW1NT7WtsFge--H-jSWvRZSc83FRp_9rX-zTwoqiNk</recordid><startdate>197506</startdate><enddate>197506</enddate><creator>Elmore, Patricia B</creator><creator>LaPointe, Karen A</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197506</creationdate><title>Effect of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors</title><author>Elmore, Patricia B ; LaPointe, Karen A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-f76be8042b024855112549ae2b7c967289348d7df2092abe5d15f25e9087cf7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>College Students</topic><topic>College Teachers</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Sex Differences</topic><topic>Teacher Characteristics</topic><topic>Teacher Personality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Patricia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPointe, Karen A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmore, Patricia B</au><au>LaPointe, Karen A</au><au>Williams, Joanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>1975-06</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>368-374</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><abstract>Examined the influence of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth as perceived by students and teachers on teacher evaluation. Male and female instructors in the same department were matched on the level of course taught. 22 pairs of courses evaluated by 838 college students were obtained. Twenty Instructional Improvement Questionnaire items that directly evaluate instructor performance were analyzed using a 3-factor analysis of variance and the .0025 level of significance. No interactions between faculty sex, student sex, and teacher warmth were found. When Ss rated their instructor's interest and warmth, teachers who were warmer and primarily interested in students received higher ratings in teaching effectiveness. When teachers rated themselves on warmth and interest, self-ratings interacted with faculty sex. Generally, female teachers received higher effectiveness ratings than did male teachers when they considered themselves low in warmth or interested in course content. Male teachers who rated themselves high in warmth or primarily interested in students received higher ratings than did male teachers who rated themselves low in warmth or primarily interested in course content, respectively.</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0076608</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 1975-06, Vol.67 (3), p.368-374 |
issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614353126 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | College Students College Teachers Evaluation Human Human Sex Differences Teacher Characteristics Teacher Personality |
title | Effect of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A12%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20teacher%20sex,%20student%20sex,%20and%20teacher%20warmth%20on%20the%20evaluation%20of%20college%20instructors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Elmore,%20Patricia%20B&rft.date=1975-06&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=368-374&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0076608&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1290469994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614353126&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |