Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance

Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance

Examined the advantage of disadvantages of 5 different exact analyses of variance for nonorthogonal 2-way designs with respect to orthogonality of the analyses, parametric hypotheses tested, and model comparisons made by the analyses. It is proposed that experimenters, when faced with the necessity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological bulletin 1978-01, Vol.85 (1), p.207-216
Hauptverfasser: Herr, David G, Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Analysis of Variance
Human
Statistical Sample Parameters
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue 1
container_start_page 207
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 85
creator Herr, David G
Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W
description Examined the advantage of disadvantages of 5 different exact analyses of variance for nonorthogonal 2-way designs with respect to orthogonality of the analyses, parametric hypotheses tested, and model comparisons made by the analyses. It is proposed that experimenters, when faced with the necessity of performing a 2-way ANOVA, carefully consider these analyses with regard to the a priori information they have about the data, the questions they expect the analysis to help answer, and the questions each analysis is best equipped to answer. It is also suggested that experimenters choose the analysis that best fits their needs rather than depend on one for all situations. (16 ref)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.207
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614348926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1296875633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-908bc87be9687142594d160be3d92c39533ab1986d0244e190faaad7cfc206443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuiroTWk1vbLGUYLzDoRtfhNE21Q53UpOPQtzdlRFeuDge-_1w-Qs4pZBR4cQPAecoUqKyUGc0YFAdkRhVXKRVSHpLZL3BMTkJYA0Ahcz4j109u4_zw7t7cBrtk2Ll0h2OCsRlDGxLXJF_oW9wYe0qOGuyCPfupc_J6t3xZPKSr5_vHxe0qRSbEkCooK1MWlVV5WVDBpBI1zaGyvFbMcCU5x4qqMq8h8pYqaBCxLkxjGORC8Dm52M_tvfvc2jDotdv6eFDQORVclIrlEbr8D6Js2hy_45Fie8p4F4K3je59-4F-1BT0JE5PXvTkRZdSUx3FxdDVPoQ96j6MBv3Qms4GXW27P-wboTdqcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614348926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Herr, David G ; Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W</creator><creatorcontrib>Herr, David G ; Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W</creatorcontrib><description>Examined the advantage of disadvantages of 5 different exact analyses of variance for nonorthogonal 2-way designs with respect to orthogonality of the analyses, parametric hypotheses tested, and model comparisons made by the analyses. It is proposed that experimenters, when faced with the necessity of performing a 2-way ANOVA, carefully consider these analyses with regard to the a priori information they have about the data, the questions they expect the analysis to help answer, and the questions each analysis is best equipped to answer. It is also suggested that experimenters choose the analysis that best fits their needs rather than depend on one for all situations. (16 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Human ; Statistical Sample Parameters</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1978-01, Vol.85 (1), p.207-216</ispartof><rights>1978 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1978, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-908bc87be9687142594d160be3d92c39533ab1986d0244e190faaad7cfc206443</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herr, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W</creatorcontrib><title>Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>Examined the advantage of disadvantages of 5 different exact analyses of variance for nonorthogonal 2-way designs with respect to orthogonality of the analyses, parametric hypotheses tested, and model comparisons made by the analyses. It is proposed that experimenters, when faced with the necessity of performing a 2-way ANOVA, carefully consider these analyses with regard to the a priori information they have about the data, the questions they expect the analysis to help answer, and the questions each analysis is best equipped to answer. It is also suggested that experimenters choose the analysis that best fits their needs rather than depend on one for all situations. (16 ref)</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Statistical Sample Parameters</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuiroTWk1vbLGUYLzDoRtfhNE21Q53UpOPQtzdlRFeuDge-_1w-Qs4pZBR4cQPAecoUqKyUGc0YFAdkRhVXKRVSHpLZL3BMTkJYA0Ahcz4j109u4_zw7t7cBrtk2Ll0h2OCsRlDGxLXJF_oW9wYe0qOGuyCPfupc_J6t3xZPKSr5_vHxe0qRSbEkCooK1MWlVV5WVDBpBI1zaGyvFbMcCU5x4qqMq8h8pYqaBCxLkxjGORC8Dm52M_tvfvc2jDotdv6eFDQORVclIrlEbr8D6Js2hy_45Fie8p4F4K3je59-4F-1BT0JE5PXvTkRZdSUx3FxdDVPoQ96j6MBv3Qms4GXW27P-wboTdqcA</recordid><startdate>197801</startdate><enddate>197801</enddate><creator>Herr, David G</creator><creator>Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197801</creationdate><title>Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance</title><author>Herr, David G ; Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-908bc87be9687142594d160be3d92c39533ab1986d0244e190faaad7cfc206443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Statistical Sample Parameters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herr, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herr, David G</au><au>Gaebelein, Jacquelyn W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>1978-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>207-216</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>Examined the advantage of disadvantages of 5 different exact analyses of variance for nonorthogonal 2-way designs with respect to orthogonality of the analyses, parametric hypotheses tested, and model comparisons made by the analyses. It is proposed that experimenters, when faced with the necessity of performing a 2-way ANOVA, carefully consider these analyses with regard to the a priori information they have about the data, the questions they expect the analysis to help answer, and the questions each analysis is best equipped to answer. It is also suggested that experimenters choose the analysis that best fits their needs rather than depend on one for all situations. (16 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.207</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 1978-01, Vol.85 (1), p.207-216
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614348926
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Analysis of Variance
Human
Statistical Sample Parameters
title Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A56%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonorthogonal%20two-way%20analysis%20of%20variance&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Herr,%20David%20G&rft.date=1978-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=207-216&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1296875633%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614348926&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true