Differential power and effects of expected competitive and cooperative intergroup interaction on intragroup and outgroup attitudes

Asked 41 3-man groups to play the role of union representatives, which prepared them for intergroup negotiations with (fictitious) management teams. In a 2 * 2 experimental design, cooperative or competitive orientations were induced in groups that were led to believe that they had either a strong o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality and social psychology 1974-07, Vol.30 (1), p.46-56
Hauptverfasser: Rabbie, Jacob M, Benoist, Frits, Oosterbaan, Henk, Visser, Lieuwe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 56
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 30
creator Rabbie, Jacob M
Benoist, Frits
Oosterbaan, Henk
Visser, Lieuwe
description Asked 41 3-man groups to play the role of union representatives, which prepared them for intergroup negotiations with (fictitious) management teams. In a 2 * 2 experimental design, cooperative or competitive orientations were induced in groups that were led to believe that they had either a strong or a weak bargaining position. As predicted, competitive groups showed greater cohesiveness when they had a strong than when they had a weak bargaining position. Unexpectedly, the cooperative groups felt more positive about their own group when they had a weak bargaining position than when their bargaining position was strong. Similar interactions were obtained for the outgroup ratings. As expected, competitive groups were more hostile and had more negative attitudes toward the other group than cooperative groups. In the competitive as compared with the cooperative condition, there was greater attention to the task than to the socioemotional relationships in the group. The experimental manipulations had little or no effect on the preferences of the Ss to negotiate in public or in private or on their arguments in support of these preferences. (27 ref)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0036620
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614346322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614346322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-160a840c010c4811ac8ea4729b1f290e6fc99f8d776783d8a17d84ae1178d6543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUlLxTAQx4Mo-FzAj1D0IkJ1Jkm3o7iD4EXPIaZTrTybmKQuVz-5eVYFBSEw85_8ZmGGsS2EfQRRHdwDiLLksMRm2IgmR4HFMpsBcJ6LAuUqWwvhAQBkwfmMvR_3XUeehtjreebsC_lMD21GKWpiyGyX0atLLrWZsY-OYh_7Z_pkjLWOvP7U_RDJ33k7usnVJvZ2yNJL0uvpZ5Fkx_glYio1thQ22Eqn54E2v-w6uzk9uT46zy-vzi6ODi9zLRFjjiXoWoIBBCNrRG1q0rLizS12vAEqO9M0Xd1WVVnVoq01Vm0tNSFWdVsWUqyz7amu8_ZppBDVgx39kFqqEqWQpeA8QTv_QcibogEpUCRqd6KMtyF46pTz_aP2bwpBLc6gvs-Q0L0J1U4rF96M9rE3cwpm9Iu1p5hTImWpNMBP97_wL-oDhT6XWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614346322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential power and effects of expected competitive and cooperative intergroup interaction on intragroup and outgroup attitudes</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Rabbie, Jacob M ; Benoist, Frits ; Oosterbaan, Henk ; Visser, Lieuwe</creator><contributor>Lanzetta, John T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rabbie, Jacob M ; Benoist, Frits ; Oosterbaan, Henk ; Visser, Lieuwe ; Lanzetta, John T</creatorcontrib><description>Asked 41 3-man groups to play the role of union representatives, which prepared them for intergroup negotiations with (fictitious) management teams. In a 2 * 2 experimental design, cooperative or competitive orientations were induced in groups that were led to believe that they had either a strong or a weak bargaining position. As predicted, competitive groups showed greater cohesiveness when they had a strong than when they had a weak bargaining position. Unexpectedly, the cooperative groups felt more positive about their own group when they had a weak bargaining position than when their bargaining position was strong. Similar interactions were obtained for the outgroup ratings. As expected, competitive groups were more hostile and had more negative attitudes toward the other group than cooperative groups. In the competitive as compared with the cooperative condition, there was greater attention to the task than to the socioemotional relationships in the group. The experimental manipulations had little or no effect on the preferences of the Ss to negotiate in public or in private or on their arguments in support of these preferences. (27 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0036620</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Competition ; Cooperation ; Group Cohesion ; Group Dynamics ; Human ; Intergroup Dynamics ; Labor Management Relations</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1974-07, Vol.30 (1), p.46-56</ispartof><rights>1974 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1974, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-160a840c010c4811ac8ea4729b1f290e6fc99f8d776783d8a17d84ae1178d6543</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Lanzetta, John T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rabbie, Jacob M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoist, Frits</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosterbaan, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Lieuwe</creatorcontrib><title>Differential power and effects of expected competitive and cooperative intergroup interaction on intragroup and outgroup attitudes</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><description>Asked 41 3-man groups to play the role of union representatives, which prepared them for intergroup negotiations with (fictitious) management teams. In a 2 * 2 experimental design, cooperative or competitive orientations were induced in groups that were led to believe that they had either a strong or a weak bargaining position. As predicted, competitive groups showed greater cohesiveness when they had a strong than when they had a weak bargaining position. Unexpectedly, the cooperative groups felt more positive about their own group when they had a weak bargaining position than when their bargaining position was strong. Similar interactions were obtained for the outgroup ratings. As expected, competitive groups were more hostile and had more negative attitudes toward the other group than cooperative groups. In the competitive as compared with the cooperative condition, there was greater attention to the task than to the socioemotional relationships in the group. The experimental manipulations had little or no effect on the preferences of the Ss to negotiate in public or in private or on their arguments in support of these preferences. (27 ref)</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Group Cohesion</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Intergroup Dynamics</subject><subject>Labor Management Relations</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUlLxTAQx4Mo-FzAj1D0IkJ1Jkm3o7iD4EXPIaZTrTybmKQuVz-5eVYFBSEw85_8ZmGGsS2EfQRRHdwDiLLksMRm2IgmR4HFMpsBcJ6LAuUqWwvhAQBkwfmMvR_3XUeehtjreebsC_lMD21GKWpiyGyX0atLLrWZsY-OYh_7Z_pkjLWOvP7U_RDJ33k7usnVJvZ2yNJL0uvpZ5Fkx_glYio1thQ22Eqn54E2v-w6uzk9uT46zy-vzi6ODi9zLRFjjiXoWoIBBCNrRG1q0rLizS12vAEqO9M0Xd1WVVnVoq01Vm0tNSFWdVsWUqyz7amu8_ZppBDVgx39kFqqEqWQpeA8QTv_QcibogEpUCRqd6KMtyF46pTz_aP2bwpBLc6gvs-Q0L0J1U4rF96M9rE3cwpm9Iu1p5hTImWpNMBP97_wL-oDhT6XWA</recordid><startdate>197407</startdate><enddate>197407</enddate><creator>Rabbie, Jacob M</creator><creator>Benoist, Frits</creator><creator>Oosterbaan, Henk</creator><creator>Visser, Lieuwe</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197407</creationdate><title>Differential power and effects of expected competitive and cooperative intergroup interaction on intragroup and outgroup attitudes</title><author>Rabbie, Jacob M ; Benoist, Frits ; Oosterbaan, Henk ; Visser, Lieuwe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-160a840c010c4811ac8ea4729b1f290e6fc99f8d776783d8a17d84ae1178d6543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Group Cohesion</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Intergroup Dynamics</topic><topic>Labor Management Relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rabbie, Jacob M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoist, Frits</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosterbaan, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Lieuwe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rabbie, Jacob M</au><au>Benoist, Frits</au><au>Oosterbaan, Henk</au><au>Visser, Lieuwe</au><au>Lanzetta, John T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential power and effects of expected competitive and cooperative intergroup interaction on intragroup and outgroup attitudes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><date>1974-07</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>46-56</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><abstract>Asked 41 3-man groups to play the role of union representatives, which prepared them for intergroup negotiations with (fictitious) management teams. In a 2 * 2 experimental design, cooperative or competitive orientations were induced in groups that were led to believe that they had either a strong or a weak bargaining position. As predicted, competitive groups showed greater cohesiveness when they had a strong than when they had a weak bargaining position. Unexpectedly, the cooperative groups felt more positive about their own group when they had a weak bargaining position than when their bargaining position was strong. Similar interactions were obtained for the outgroup ratings. As expected, competitive groups were more hostile and had more negative attitudes toward the other group than cooperative groups. In the competitive as compared with the cooperative condition, there was greater attention to the task than to the socioemotional relationships in the group. The experimental manipulations had little or no effect on the preferences of the Ss to negotiate in public or in private or on their arguments in support of these preferences. (27 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0036620</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 1974-07, Vol.30 (1), p.46-56
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614346322
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Bargaining
Competition
Cooperation
Group Cohesion
Group Dynamics
Human
Intergroup Dynamics
Labor Management Relations
title Differential power and effects of expected competitive and cooperative intergroup interaction on intragroup and outgroup attitudes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A44%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20power%20and%20effects%20of%20expected%20competitive%20and%20cooperative%20intergroup%20interaction%20on%20intragroup%20and%20outgroup%20attitudes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Rabbie,%20Jacob%20M&rft.date=1974-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=46-56&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0036620&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614346322%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614346322&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true