A comparison of the Stanford-Binet, Revised Form I, and the California Test of Mental Maturity (S-Form)

A comparison of the Stanford-Binet, Revised Form I, and the California Test of Mental Maturity (S-Form)

In a study of 422 pupils, grades 1-12, no significant differences appeared between the means of the California Test of Mental Maturity and the Binet. The Binet distribution was skewed significantly but the Mental Maturity test results were not. At the upper Binet levels, Binet scores are higher than...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of educational psychology 1954-12, Vol.45 (8), p.499-504
Hauptverfasser: Sheldon, William D., Manolakes, George
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Human
Intelligence Measures
Learning Disabilities
Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 504
container_issue 8
container_start_page 499
container_title Journal of educational psychology
container_volume 45
creator Sheldon, William D.
Manolakes, George
description In a study of 422 pupils, grades 1-12, no significant differences appeared between the means of the California Test of Mental Maturity and the Binet. The Binet distribution was skewed significantly but the Mental Maturity test results were not. At the upper Binet levels, Binet scores are higher than those of the California test. At and below the average range, the California test yields a higher IQ. The California test gives scores higher than the Binet at the 6 and 7-year level, while the Binet is higher at ages 9, 10, and 11. Scores are in greatest agreement at the 8-year old level. The greatest difference in IQ scores between the two tests occurs in the ten-year old groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0057768
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614339020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614339020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c990-e6eb2c6337a5cf213b194e4324f7fc5bfe4bf3af23354d106a7b19236db56f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kN1KAzEUhIMoWKvgIwSvKjR6krObdC9rsVpoEWzvl-xuYlPapCZboW_v1p-rw8A3M4ch5JbDAwdUj2uAXCk5OiM9XmDBBFfynPQAhGAgJV6Sq5Q2AICd6JGPMa3Dbq-jS8HTYGm7NnTZam9DbNiT86Yd0nfz5ZJp6DTEHZ0NqfbNDzfRW9dx3mm6Mqk92RfGt3pLF7o9RNce6WDJTq77a3Jh9TaZm7_bJ8vp82ryyuZvL7PJeM7qogBmpKlELRGVzmsrOFa8yEyGIrPK1nllTVZZ1FYg5lnDQWrVEQJlU-XSjrBP7n5T9zF8HrqXyk04RN8VlpJniAUI6KDBL1THkFI0ttxHt9PxWHIoTxuW_xviN0u3YcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614339020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the Stanford-Binet, Revised Form I, and the California Test of Mental Maturity (S-Form)</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Sheldon, William D. ; Manolakes, George</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, William D. ; Manolakes, George</creatorcontrib><description>In a study of 422 pupils, grades 1-12, no significant differences appeared between the means of the California Test of Mental Maturity and the Binet. The Binet distribution was skewed significantly but the Mental Maturity test results were not. At the upper Binet levels, Binet scores are higher than those of the California test. At and below the average range, the California test yields a higher IQ. The California test gives scores higher than the Binet at the 6 and 7-year level, while the Binet is higher at ages 9, 10, and 11. Scores are in greatest agreement at the 8-year old level. The greatest difference in IQ scores between the two tests occurs in the ten-year old groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0057768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Human ; Intelligence Measures ; Learning Disabilities ; Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 1954-12, Vol.45 (8), p.499-504</ispartof><rights>1954, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c990-e6eb2c6337a5cf213b194e4324f7fc5bfe4bf3af23354d106a7b19236db56f83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manolakes, George</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the Stanford-Binet, Revised Form I, and the California Test of Mental Maturity (S-Form)</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>In a study of 422 pupils, grades 1-12, no significant differences appeared between the means of the California Test of Mental Maturity and the Binet. The Binet distribution was skewed significantly but the Mental Maturity test results were not. At the upper Binet levels, Binet scores are higher than those of the California test. At and below the average range, the California test yields a higher IQ. The California test gives scores higher than the Binet at the 6 and 7-year level, while the Binet is higher at ages 9, 10, and 11. Scores are in greatest agreement at the 8-year old level. The greatest difference in IQ scores between the two tests occurs in the ten-year old groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Intelligence Measures</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1954</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kN1KAzEUhIMoWKvgIwSvKjR6krObdC9rsVpoEWzvl-xuYlPapCZboW_v1p-rw8A3M4ch5JbDAwdUj2uAXCk5OiM9XmDBBFfynPQAhGAgJV6Sq5Q2AICd6JGPMa3Dbq-jS8HTYGm7NnTZam9DbNiT86Yd0nfz5ZJp6DTEHZ0NqfbNDzfRW9dx3mm6Mqk92RfGt3pLF7o9RNce6WDJTq77a3Jh9TaZm7_bJ8vp82ryyuZvL7PJeM7qogBmpKlELRGVzmsrOFa8yEyGIrPK1nllTVZZ1FYg5lnDQWrVEQJlU-XSjrBP7n5T9zF8HrqXyk04RN8VlpJniAUI6KDBL1THkFI0ttxHt9PxWHIoTxuW_xviN0u3YcA</recordid><startdate>195412</startdate><enddate>195412</enddate><creator>Sheldon, William D.</creator><creator>Manolakes, George</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>195412</creationdate><title>A comparison of the Stanford-Binet, Revised Form I, and the California Test of Mental Maturity (S-Form)</title><author>Sheldon, William D. ; Manolakes, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c990-e6eb2c6337a5cf213b194e4324f7fc5bfe4bf3af23354d106a7b19236db56f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1954</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Intelligence Measures</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manolakes, George</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheldon, William D.</au><au>Manolakes, George</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the Stanford-Binet, Revised Form I, and the California Test of Mental Maturity (S-Form)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>1954-12</date><risdate>1954</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>499-504</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><abstract>In a study of 422 pupils, grades 1-12, no significant differences appeared between the means of the California Test of Mental Maturity and the Binet. The Binet distribution was skewed significantly but the Mental Maturity test results were not. At the upper Binet levels, Binet scores are higher than those of the California test. At and below the average range, the California test yields a higher IQ. The California test gives scores higher than the Binet at the 6 and 7-year level, while the Binet is higher at ages 9, 10, and 11. Scores are in greatest agreement at the 8-year old level. The greatest difference in IQ scores between the two tests occurs in the ten-year old groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0057768</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0663
ispartof Journal of educational psychology, 1954-12, Vol.45 (8), p.499-504
issn 0022-0663
1939-2176
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614339020
source APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Human
Intelligence Measures
Learning Disabilities
Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale
title A comparison of the Stanford-Binet, Revised Form I, and the California Test of Mental Maturity (S-Form)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T10%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20Stanford-Binet,%20Revised%20Form%20I,%20and%20the%20California%20Test%20of%20Mental%20Maturity%20(S-Form)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Sheldon,%20William%20D.&rft.date=1954-12&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=499-504&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0057768&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614339020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614339020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true